
Planned Parenthood wins partial victory in legal fight with Trump administration over funding cuts
A provision in that bill would end Medicaid payments to abortion providers for one year.
But U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in Boston granted a preliminary injunction Monday that, for now, blocks the government from cutting Medicaid payments to
Planned Parenthood
member organizations that either don't provide abortion care or didn't meet a threshold of at least $800,000 in Medicaid reimbursements in a given year.
It wasn't immediately clear how many Planned Parenthood organizations and clinics would continue to get Medicaid reimbursement under that decision and how many might not.
The lawsuit was filed earlier this month against Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. by Planned Parenthood Federation of America and its member organizations in Massachusetts and Utah.
A Planned Parenthood spokesperson said its lawyers were still examining the order and would release a statement shortly.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
EU Diplomats See Progress Toward US Trade Deal With 15% Tariffs
(Bloomberg) -- The European Union and the US are progressing toward an agreement that would set a 15% tariff for most products, according to diplomats briefed on the negotiations. Trump Awards $1.26 Billion Contract to Build Biggest Immigrant Detention Center in US Why the Federal Reserve's Building Renovation Costs $2.5 Billion Salt Lake City Turns Winter Olympic Bid Into Statewide Bond Boom Milan Corruption Probe Casts Shadow Over Property Boom The High Costs of Trump's 'Big Beautiful' New Car Loan Deduction Member states could be ready to accept a 15% tariff and EU officials are pushing to have that cover sectors including cars, the diplomats said. Steel and aluminum imports above a certain quota would face the 50% duty, one of the diplomats added. The diplomats said that while the EU is optimistic that a deal can be reached, they are also cautious that any final agreement will need sign off from US President Donald Trump and his ultimate decision is difficult to predict. Elon Musk's Empire Is Creaking Under the Strain of Elon Musk Burning Man Is Burning Through Cash A Rebel Army Is Building a Rare-Earth Empire on China's Border What the Tough Job Market for New College Grads Says About the Economy How Starbucks' CEO Plans to Tame the Rush-Hour Free-for-All ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.


Associated Press
25 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Nevada parental notification abortion law in effect; Planned Parenthood lawsuit seeks halt
A 40-year-old Nevada law requiring minors having an abortion to first notify their parents or guardians is now in effect for the first time, after a federal district court judge lifted an administrative block Tuesday afternoon. The one-page order from District Court Judge Anne Traum came after a federal appellate judge earlier this week opted not to temporarily pause implementation of the never-enforced 1985 law while the federal appeal proceeds. In anticipation of the law going into effect, Planned Parenthood Mar Monte filed a new lawsuit in state court Monday seeking to halt its implementation. The California-based abortion rights group and health care provider, and a physician using the pseudonym Dr. Doe, filed a complaint for injunctive relief in Clark County's District Court on Monday. They argue the 1985 law, SB510, relies on a 'hazy, inadequate' process for minors to secure an exception to the law that violates guarantees of procedural due process and lacks guidance or rules to govern it. 'It is fundamentally unclear how any patient seeking a judicial bypass order may practically do so across the state of Nevada at this time,' attorneys wrote in the filing. Shortly after SB510's passage in 1985, the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada issued an injunction, saying the law violated the right to abortion under the U.S. Constitution. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit agreed, making that injunction permanent even while the law stayed on the books. Following the overturn of the Roe v. Wade decision, which had protected the constitutional right to an abortion for about 50 years, district attorneys from Lyon County and Carson City in 2024 argued the 1985 law is now enforceable. They won an initial legal battle in April, but Traum agreed to continue the stay pending an appeal. That appeal is still pending and scheduled for oral arguments in October, but in a July 18 order, the 9th Circuit wrote that Planned Parenthood 'failed to establish serious questions going to the merits on its argument' that would have justified the court issuing a temporary stay. James Bopp Jr., a conservative lawyer representing the district attorneys from Carson City, Storey and Douglas counties, among others, celebrated the news in a phone interview Tuesday evening, saying parents are now guaranteed to be involved in the abortion process. 'Planned Parenthood better be complying, starting an hour ago, with the parental notice law,' Bopp said. 'They're very aware that this was in the offing because all their efforts to keep this law (out of) effect failed.' In the state case, attorneys for Planned Parenthood also argued that the law contains provisions that have been 'impliedly repealed' by a 2019 law repealing informed consent laws for abortions and the sweeping 2022 amendment to the Nevada Constitution ensuring equal rights for all 'regardless of race, color, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, age, disability, ancestry, or national origin.' Attorneys noted that though most adolescents involve a parent in their abortion decision-making, the law has no exemptions for minors who are in foster care or are victims of sexual or physical abuse by their parents or guardians. In the latter case, attorneys wrote that the forced parental involvement can endanger the physical and emotional well-being of minors. As written, SB510 requires physicians to notify parents or guardians before performing abortions on minors. Though minors seeking an abortion could also obtain court authorization to avoid the notification requirement, Planned Parenthood attorneys said it's 'an opaque and daunting process,' especially for minors. 'Subjecting a patient to the judicial bypass process, alone, additionally delays — and even, at times, denies — access to care and can compound the physiological, psychological, emotional, and other consequences associated with forcing an adolescent to continue an unwanted pregnancy,' they wrote. Bopp described the new legal challenge from Planned Parenthood as 'phony objections,' saying that arguments about difficulties in getting an abortion were well litigated under Roe v. Wade, and laws identical to Nevada's notification law were upheld. He added that it's the state judicial system that regulates and authorizes procedures such as the notification law, and that's a decision for that system, not Planned Parenthood. 'We just don't see any other claims having any merit,' Bopp said. A representative for Attorney General Aaron Ford's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. ___ This story was originally published by The Nevada Independent and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.


San Francisco Chronicle
26 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Harvard under investigation over participation in visa program for foreign students and researchers
BOSTON (AP) — In the latest in series of Trump administration inquiries targeting Harvard University, the State Department said Wednesday it is investigating whether the Ivy League school will remain part of a government program that provides American visas for students and researchers from other countries. Harvard has faced mounting sanctions and scrutiny from Washington since rejecting demands from a federal antisemitism task force in April. Harvard has filed a lawsuit challenging $2.6 billion in federal cuts and has accused the Republican administration of waging a retaliation campaign. The statement from Secretary of State Marco Rubio did not say why his department was examining Harvard's eligibility to take part in the Exchange Visitor Program, which allows foreign nationals to study or work in the United States through cultural and education exchange programs. It said all sponsors, such as Harvard, 'are required to fully comply with exchange visitor regulations, transparency in reporting, and a demonstrated commitment to fostering the principles of cultural exchange and mutual understanding upon which the program was founded.' A spokesman for Harvard did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The department said the investigation will seek to ensure that its programs "do not run contrary to our nation's interests.' The administration also has tried several times to prevent the school in Cambridge, Massachusetts, from hosting foreign students, and President Donald Trump has threatened to revoke Harvard's tax-exempt status. Last month, his administration issued a finding that Harvard tolerated antisemitism, a step that could jeopardize all of Harvard's federal funding, including student loans or grants. The penalty is typically referred to as a 'death sentence.' Harvard's president, Alan Garber, has said the university has made changes to combat antisemitism and will not submit to the administration's demands. ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at