
A US newspaper just released its summer reading list. But the books don't exist
A US newspaper released its recommended reading list on Sunday, two weeks ahead of their summer starting.
The problem? Most of the books don't exist.
The Chicago Sun-Times confirmed on Tuesday that several of the titles had been generated by AI and don't actually exist.
Heat Index: Your Guide to the Best of Summer, was created in part by a freelancer who works for a third-party company, according to the Sun-Times.
'To our great disappointment, that list was created through the use of an AI tool and recommended books that do not exist,' chief executive of Sun-Times owner Chicago Public Media Melissa Bell said in a statement.
'We are actively investigating the accuracy of other content in the special section.'
The AI flub comes as industries like journalism fear that the rapidly developing technology could encroach on jobs formerly occupied by humans.
The Sun-Times recently cut 20 per cent of its staff, according to Axios.
While it has come a long way in recent years, AI is not a flawless technology and some iterations have been known to generate fictional or inaccurate information — an issue also called hallucinating.
Some institutions have found uses for the growing technology, including the health care field, education and marketing. However, there is still much pushback from some consumers who are hesitant to trust AI.
And like all forms of journalism, AI still requires fact-checking.
While several of the books listed by the Sun-Times do not exist, the authors attributed with writing them do.
There is no Tidewater Dreams, for example, but Isabel Allende is an acclaimed Chilean American writer. The Chicago author Rebecca Makkai is credited with the fake book Boiling Point. And author Min Jin Lee is listed as having written the nonexistent book NightShade Market.
Toward the bottom of the list, some real books appear, such as André Aciman's Call Me By Your Name.
Bell has also released a statement on the paper's website.
She said the list came from distributor King Features, a company the paper regularly partners with for content.
'King Features worked with a freelancer who used an AI agent to help build out this special section,' she said.
'It was inserted into our paper without review from our editorial team, and we presented the section without any acknowledgement that it was from a third-party organisation.'
At least one other paper, The Philadelphia Inquirer, also used the third-party list including the AI-generated book titles.
In a statement shared by the Sun-Times, a spokesperson for King Features said the company has 'a strict policy with our staff, cartoonists, columnists, and freelance writers against the use of AI to create content'.
'The Heat Index summer supplement was created by a freelance content creator who used AI in its story development without disclosing the use of AI.
'We are terminating our relationship with this individual. We regret this incident and are working with the handful of publishing partners who acquired this supplement.'
The Sun-Times said it had removed the list from its digital publication, and the website had a banner on the homepage leading to Bell's statement as of Wednesday afternoon.
The paper will now identify in print when content comes from a third-party distributor, and is currently reviewing its relationship with third-party contractors to ensure they meet the standards of the newsroom, it said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sydney Morning Herald
3 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Social media ban must look to future teen trends
The federal government plans to introduce its social media ban for under-16s by December. Announced to mixed reviews last year – parent groups were ecstatic, while mental health organisations have warned about the risk of isolating vulnerable teens and tech commentators questioned the data security trade-offs – the ban would eventually require all Australians to complete an age verification process to use Instagram, Facebook, TikTok and other social media apps. The exact parameters of the ban remain to be seen, and will need to pass parliament, but last week, the Herald reported eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant had advised the government to not restrict its new rules to specific social media platforms. Inman Grant is specifically seeking to include video platform YouTube in the ban, after it previously received an exemption due to its 'significant educational purpose'. According to the eSafety Commission's research, four in 10 young teenagers have been exposed to harmful content, such as eating disorder videos, misogynistic or hateful material, or violent fight videos, while watching YouTube. As the Albanese government finalises the details of its attempt to restrict social media on a national scale, the Sun-Herald believes it is extremely prudent to not include a discrete list of platforms the rules cover. Indeed, as Emily Kowal reports in today's Sun-Herald, there are emerging forms of online engagement driven by artificial intelligence, for which regulation should also be considered. Companion chatbots such as Replika and allow users to converse, call and exchange photos and videos with an AI 'friend'. The user can style this friend as their favourite character from a movie, a celebrity, or someone they know in real life. Loading It is not hard to see why child safety experts are concerned. The eSafety Commissioner said she had received reports of children as young as 10 spending hours on chatbots, which AI researchers say learn from their user, evolving to respond in ways to keep them talking for longer. Some bots are designed to be mean, others tend towards pornographic or other forms of conversation inappropriate for children. All collect information about their user, and few have any real mechanism to validate their user's age.

The Age
3 hours ago
- The Age
Social media ban must look to future teen trends
The federal government plans to introduce its social media ban for under-16s by December. Announced to mixed reviews last year – parent groups were ecstatic, while mental health organisations have warned about the risk of isolating vulnerable teens and tech commentators questioned the data security trade-offs – the ban would eventually require all Australians to complete an age verification process to use Instagram, Facebook, TikTok and other social media apps. The exact parameters of the ban remain to be seen, and will need to pass parliament, but last week, the Herald reported eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant had advised the government to not restrict its new rules to specific social media platforms. Inman Grant is specifically seeking to include video platform YouTube in the ban, after it previously received an exemption due to its 'significant educational purpose'. According to the eSafety Commission's research, four in 10 young teenagers have been exposed to harmful content, such as eating disorder videos, misogynistic or hateful material, or violent fight videos, while watching YouTube. As the Albanese government finalises the details of its attempt to restrict social media on a national scale, the Sun-Herald believes it is extremely prudent to not include a discrete list of platforms the rules cover. Indeed, as Emily Kowal reports in today's Sun-Herald, there are emerging forms of online engagement driven by artificial intelligence, for which regulation should also be considered. Companion chatbots such as Replika and allow users to converse, call and exchange photos and videos with an AI 'friend'. The user can style this friend as their favourite character from a movie, a celebrity, or someone they know in real life. Loading It is not hard to see why child safety experts are concerned. The eSafety Commissioner said she had received reports of children as young as 10 spending hours on chatbots, which AI researchers say learn from their user, evolving to respond in ways to keep them talking for longer. Some bots are designed to be mean, others tend towards pornographic or other forms of conversation inappropriate for children. All collect information about their user, and few have any real mechanism to validate their user's age.

ABC News
4 days ago
- ABC News
Your super EOFY tune up
Sun 22 Jun 2025 at 12:00am Sunday 22 Jun 2025 at 12:00am Sun 22 Jun 2025 at 12:00am Space to play or pause, M to mute, left and right arrows to seek, up and down arrows for volume. Play Duration: 24 minutes 5 seconds 24 m