China's manufacturing activity shrinks as exports drag: S&P PMI
The S&P Global China General Manufacturing PMI fell to 49.5 in July from 50.4 in June, undershooting analysts' expectations of 50.4 in a Reuters poll. The 50-mark separates growth from contraction.
The reading, combined with Thursday's official survey, bodes ill for growth momentum at the start of the third quarter, following robust growth in the first half of the year.
Amid a trade truce with Washington, economists say the support of exports front-loading ahead of higher US tariffs to the world's second-biggest economy may fade over the remainder of the year.
According to the S&P Global survey, new export orders contracted for a fourth straight month and at a faster pace than in June.
After rising in June, manufacturing output declined in July. Firms looked to utilise their current stock holdings for the fulfilment of orders, which contributed to a second successive monthly decline in post-production inventories.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Falling production together with a stable backlog prompted factory owners to lower their headcount in July. Firms also said cost concerns had underpinned decisions to shed staff.
However, business sentiment improved at the start of the second half of 2025 but was still below the series average. Manufacturers expected better economic conditions and promotional efforts to spur sales in the year ahead.
As Beijing started to tackle 'price wars' among manufacturers, average input prices increased for the first time in five months.
Firms nevertheless lowered their selling prices again as competition for new business intensified. But export charges increased at the fastest pace in a year due to rising shipping and logistics costs.
Top leaders on Wednesday pledged to support an economy that is facing various risks, by managing what is viewed as disorderly competition in the second half of the year.
Markets expected that Beijing may be about to start a new round of factory capacity cuts in a long-awaited but challenging campaign against deflation.
From July, Caixin no longer sponsors the S&P Global China PMI. REUTERS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
16 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Buffett's Berkshire hit with $4.9 billion Kraft Heinz charge
Mr Buffett's company said that the sustained decline in fair value was part of the reason that the firm marked down its stake. NEW YORK – Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Inc. took a US$3.8 billion (S$4.9 billion) impairment on its Kraft Heinz stake, the latest hit to an investment that's weighed on the billionaire investor's company in recent years. Berkshire marked down its carrying value of the Kraft Heinz stake to US$8.4 billion at the end of June, according to a regulatory filing on Aug 2. Mr Buffett's Kraft Heinz stake has been a rare disappointment for the investor. While he's still in the black on his investment, the stock of the packaged foods giant, which was created in 2015 through the merger of Kraft and Heinz, has fallen 62 per cent since then. During the same period, the S&P 500 has risen 202 per cent. Kraft Heinz is now contemplating a spinoff of part of its business as it grapples with headwinds including inflation weighing on consumers' spending and people seeking healthier alternatives to its products. Last month, the company posted a decline in sales that wasn't as bad as analysts had predicted, in part thanks to higher prices. Mr Buffett's company said that the sustained decline in fair value was part of the reason that the firm marked down its stake. But the company said it also considered the fact that Berkshire gave up seats on the firm's board and Kraft Heinz is eyeing strategic transactions. 'Given these factors, as well as prevailing economic and other uncertainties, we concluded that the unrealised loss, represented by the difference between the carrying value of our investment and its fair value, was other-than-temporary,' Berkshire said in the filing. Mr Buffett's conglomerate owned 27.4 per cent of Kraft Heinz stock at the end of June. Mr Buffett's cash pile ended up dropping 1 per cent in the three months through June, to US$344 billion, the first time in three years that the war chest has shrunk. Those funds had previously kept soaring to all-time highs as Mr Buffett struggled to find opportunities to invest. Buffett ended up taking a more cautious approach to the stock market in the second quarter. He was a net seller of other companies' stocks during the period, offloading about $3 billion of equities. He even steered clear of Berkshire's own shares, forgoing any stock buybacks. He's been on the sidelines for repurchases for roughly a year now, despite the stock falling 12 per cent after Mr Buffett announced in May that he would step down as chief executive officer at the end of the year. Berkshire had a weaker second quarter at its operating businesses. Profit dropped 3.8 per cent to US$11.16 billion, driven by a decline in underwriting earnings at its insurers. Its auto insurer, Geico, posted pretax underwriting earnings that rose 2 per cent to US$1.8 billion in the second quarter. The unit's underwriting expenses surged 40 per cent in the period, as the company spent more to increase its policy count. At its railroad, BNSF, operating earnings rose 19 per cent to about US$1.5 billion, an increase Berkshire attributes to increased productivity and a lower tax rate. The unit, which Berkshire acquired in 2010, has been caught up in dealmaking speculation in recent weeks. Two major competitors, Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern, struck a US$72 billion deal to create the first transcontinental railroad operator. Berkshire's utilities business, which runs Pacificorp, MidAmerican and NV Energy, posted a 7 per cent increase in operating earnings. The company said it is currently evaluating the impact of President Donald Trump's tax bill, as the piece of legislature accelerates the phase-out of clean energy production. BLOOMBERG
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Big Tech earnings strength is bright light in murky stock market
The Nasdaq 100 index remains up more than 30 per cent off its low from early April. NEW YORK – Wall Street had a lot riding on whether this week's big-tech earnings would meet increasingly high expectations. By and large, the companies delivered. The stock market finished the week on a down note with the selloff on Aug 1, which was in part sparked by mixed results from after the market closed on July 31, as well as a weak jobs report and fears about the economic impact of President Donald Trump's sweeping global tariffs. But for the most part, investors looking for strength from technology companies to justify their market leadership found plenty of it in their reports. 'The sector is proving itself to have something like Teflon status, as fundamentals look strong, revenue growth has come in quite significantly higher than expected, and margins remain relatively healthy,' said Kevin Gordon, senior investment strategist at Charles Schwab & Co. 'While things aren't perfect, and valuations are nearing a level that has acted as a ceiling in the past, we still have a high degree of optimism, especially as we go up the market-cap spectrum.' Alphabet started the season off by reporting strong sales, lifted by artificial intelligence. Last week, Apple posted its strongest revenue growth in more than three years, while Meta Platforms spiked to a record as it beat expectations and outlined aggressive spending on AI. Microsoft Corp. reported robust strength in its cloud business on the back of AI demand, enough to temporarily lift it to a US$4 trillion market capitalisation, only the second company ever to do so. The stock has risen for 10 straight weeks, its longest streak since 2023. Amazon was the exception, offering a tepid forecast due to relatively slow growth in its cloud-computing division and heavy investments into AI. From here, investors will turn to chip behemoth Nvidia, which reports at the end of the month. The Nasdaq 100 Index finished the week down 2.2 per cent, with much of the drop coming on Aug 1. However, the Nasdaq 100 remains up more than 30 per cent off its low from early April, while the Mag Seven Index is up more than 40 per cent. Those gains are raising questions among some Wall Street pros about whether the rally in tech has become overly stretched. The Nasdaq 100 is trading at nearly 27 times estimated earnings, well above its 10-year average of 22. Overall, however, none of the companies that have reported are showing dramatically weakening fundamentals, which is particularly important as uncertainty continues to swirl around the impact of trade policy and tariffs. More than 96 per cent of tech firms in the S&P 500 Index have topped expectations for profits, while roughly 93 per cent have for revenue, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. For the index overall, the beat rates stand at 82 per cent for earnings and 68 per cent for revenue. While Wall Street has long been broadly positive on big tech, last week's results reinforced it's continuing potential. The Magnificent Seven are expected to see earnings growth of 24.2 per cent this year, a dramatic increase from the 21.4 per cent pace that was predicted just a month ago, according to Bloomberg Intelligence data. Revenues are anticipated to rise 13.4 per cent, up from the 11.5 per cent pace seen in early July. Of course, that level of growth would represent a deceleration from last year, when the Mag Seven's net income rose 36 per cent and revenue gained 14 per cent. But the group continues to outgrow the broader market, which is expected to see earnings expand by 8.9 per cent in 2025 on revenue growth of 5.5 per cent. 'This slowing is understandable given how quickly these names were growing, and for how long,' said Mr Michael Nell, a senior investment analyst and portfolio manager at UBS Asset Management. 'We're not seeing the kind of dramatic deceleration that would be a cause for concern, just a reflection that these large companies can't grow to the sky forever.' Now investors are waiting on Nvidia, the chipmaker at the heart of the AI boom and the world's biggest company, which is scheduled to release its earnings on Aug 27. Advanced Micro Devices, its much-smaller rival in AI processors, reports on Aug 5. The bottom line for both is that big tech reaffirmed their intention to continue spending on AI, as Meta, Microsoft, Alphabet and Amazon all increased their plans for capital expenditures. That represents a cluster of encouraging data points for Nvidia, which derives more than 40 per cent of its revenue from those four companies, according to supply chain data compiled by Bloomberg. 'Use cases for AI are emerging and some companies are already seeing a payoff, meaning this isn't speculative anymore,' Mr Nell said. 'That doesn't mean big tech can't get ahead of themselves and pull back, but tech is on an inexorable march to be a larger and larger part of the market. That's been the trend my whole career, and I don't know why it would stop now.' BLOOMBERG
AsiaOne
an hour ago
- AsiaOne
How Pakistan shot down India's cutting-edge fighter using Chinese gear, Asia News
ISLAMABAD/NEW DELHI — Just after midnight on May 7, the screen in the Pakistan Air Force's operations room lit up in red with the positions of dozens of active enemy planes across the border in India. Air Chief Mshl. Zaheer Sidhu had been sleeping on a mattress just off that room for days in anticipation of an Indian assault. New Delhi had blamed Islamabad for backing militants who carried out an attack the previous month in Indian Kashmir, which killed 26 civilians. Despite Islamabad denying any involvement, India had vowed a response, which came in the early hours of May 7 with air strikes on Pakistan. Sidhu ordered Pakistan's prized Chinese-made J-10C jets to scramble. A senior Pakistani Air Force (PAF) official, who was present in the operations room, said Sidhu instructed his staff to target Rafales, a French-made fighter that is the jewel of India's fleet and had never been downed in battle. "He wanted Rafales," said the official. The hour-long fight, which took place in darkness, involved some 110 aircraft, experts estimate, making it the world's largest air battle in decades. The J-10s shot down at least one Rafale, Reuters reported in May, citing US officials. Its downing surprised many in the military community and raised questions about the effectiveness of Western military hardware against untested Chinese alternatives. Shares of Dassault, which makes the Rafale, dipped after reports the fighter had been shot down. Indonesia, which has outstanding Rafale orders, has said it is now considering purchasing J-10s — a major boost to China's efforts to sell the aircraft overseas. But Reuters interviews with two Indian officials and three of their Pakistani counterparts found that the performance of the Rafale wasn't the key problem: Central to its downing was an Indian intelligence failure concerning the range of the China-made PL-15 missile fired by the J-10 fighter. China and Pakistan are the only countries to operate both J-10s, known as Vigorous Dragons, and PL-15s. The faulty intelligence gave the Rafale pilots a false sense of confidence they were out of Pakistani firing distance, which they believed was only around 150km, the Indian officials said, referring to the widely cited range of PL-15's export variant. "We ambushed them," the PAF official said, adding that Islamabad conducted an electronic warfare assault on Delhi's systems in an attempt to confuse Indian pilots. Indian officials dispute the effectiveness of those efforts. "The Indians were not expecting to be shot at," said Justin Bronk, air warfare expert at London's Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) think-tank. "And the PL-15 is clearly very capable at long range." The PL-15 that hit the Rafale was fired from around 200km away, according to Pakistani officials, and even farther according to Indian officials. That would make it among the longest-range air-to-air strikes recorded. India's defence and foreign ministries did not return requests for comment about the intelligence mistakes. Delhi hasn't acknowledged a Rafale being shot down, but France's air chief told reporters in June that he had seen evidence of the loss of that fighter and two other aircraft flown by India, including a Russian-made Sukhoi. A top Dassault executive also told French lawmakers that month that India had lost a Rafale in operations, though he didn't have specific details. Pakistan's military referred to past comments by a spokesperson who said that its professional preparedness and resolve was more important than the weaponry it had deployed. China's defence ministry did not respond to Reuters' questions. Dassault and UAC, the manufacturer of the Sukhoi, also did not return requests for comment. 'Situational awareness' Reuters spoke to eight Pakistani and two Indian officials to piece together an account of the aerial battle, which marked the start of four days of fighting between the two nuclear-armed neighbours that caused alarm in Washington. The officials all spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss national security matters. Not only did Islamabad have the element of surprise with its missiles' range, the Pakistani and Indian officials said, but it managed to more efficiently connect its military hardware to surveillance on the ground and in the air, providing it with a clearer picture of the battlefield. Such networks, known as "kill chains", have become a crucial element of modern warfare. Four Pakistani officials said they created a "kill chain", or a multi-domain operation, by linking air, land and space sensors. The network included a Pakistani-developed system, Data Link 17, which connected Chinese military hardware with other equipment, including a Swedish-made surveillance plane, two Pakistani officials said. The system allowed the J-10s flying closer to India to obtain radar feeds from the surveillance plane cruising further away, meaning the Chinese-made fighters could turn their radars off and fly undetected, according to experts. Pakistan's military did not respond to requests for comment on this point. Delhi is trying to set up a similar network, the Indian officials said, adding that their process was more complicated because the country sourced aircraft from a wide range of exporters. Retired UK Air Mshl. Greg Bagwell, now a fellow at RUSI, said the episode didn't conclusively prove the superiority of either Chinese or Western air assets but it showed the importance of having the right information and using it. "The winner in this was the side that had the best situational awareness," said Bagwell. [[nid:720388]] Change in tactics After India in the early hours of May 7 struck targets in Pakistan that it called terrorist infrastructure, Sidhu ordered his squadrons to switch from defence to attack. Five PAF officials said India had deployed some 70 planes, which was more than they had expected and provided Islamabad's PL-15s with a target-rich environment. India has not said how many planes were used. The May 7 battle marked the first big air contest of the modern era in which weaponry is used to strike targets beyond visual range, said Bagwell, noting both India and Pakistan's planes remained well within their airspaces across the duration of the fight. Five Pakistani officials said an electronic assault on Indian sensors and communications systems reduced the situational awareness of the Rafale's pilots. The two Indian officials said the Rafales were not blinded during the skirmishes and that Indian satellites were not jammed. But they acknowledged that Pakistan appeared to have disrupted the Sukhoi, whose systems Delhi is now upgrading. Other Indian security officials have deflected questions away from the Rafale, a centerpiece of India's military modernisation, to the orders given to the air force. India's defence attache in Jakarta told a university seminar that Delhi had lost some aircraft "only because of the constraint given by the political leadership to not attack [Pakistan's] military establishments and their air defences". India's chief of defence staff Gen. Anil Chauhan previously told Reuters that Delhi quickly "rectified tactics" after the initial losses. After the May 7 air battle, India began targeting Pakistani military infrastructure and asserting its strength in the skies. Its Indian-made BrahMos supersonic cruise missile repeatedly sliced through Pakistan's air defences, according to officials on both sides. On May 10, India said it struck at least nine air bases and radar sites in Pakistan. It also hit a surveillance plane parked in a hangar in southern Pakistan, according to Indian and Pakistani officials. A ceasefire was agreed later that day, after US officials held talks with both sides. 'Live inputs' In the aftermath of the episode, India's deputy army chief Lt. Gen. Rahul Singh accused Pakistan of receiving "live inputs" from China during the battles, implying radar and satellite feeds. He did not provide evidence and Islamabad denies the allegation. When asked at a July briefing about Beijing's military partnership with Pakistan, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning told reporters the work was "part of the normal co-operation between the two countries and does not target any third party." Beijing's air chief Lt. Gen. Wang Gang visited Pakistan in July to discuss how Islamabad had used Chinese equipment to put together the "kill chain" for the Rafale, two PAF officials said. China did not respond when asked about that interaction. The Pakistani military said in a statement in July that Wang had expressed "keen interest in learning from PAF's battle-proven experience in Multi Domain Operations". ALSO READ: Defence minister denies India bowed to pressure to end fighting with Pakistan
