
I continue to use Google Home and its speakers, but I hate everything about it
I don't think I'm alone in this contradictory state. Every week I run across a Reddit thread of frustrated users reporting new bugs and issues, or voicing their impatience at the state of Google's smart home. And I nod in agreement, again and again, because I am them. They are me. We're all in this unhealthy relationship with Google's smart home platform together. And we can't escape.
Why are you still using Google Home in 2025?
0 votes
I've invested too much time/money into it.
NaN %
The bugs and glitches don't bother me that much.
NaN %
My experience has been seamless and bug-free.
NaN %
Other (let us know in the comments).
NaN %
What annoys me about my Google smart speakers, every day
C. Scott Brown / Android Authority
If I had a penny for every time my Google speakers and hubs… plain out refused to hear me,
misunderstood what I said,
decided this is not my own voice,
forgot that they can control a specific device,
forgot that they can execute a certain command on a device,
forgot my entire routine and the keyword that triggers it,
decided to tell me a long story instead of giving a short answer,
told me they're executing a command and then failed to do it,
took forever to do something,
or answered on the furthest speaker away despite me being literally in front of another one,
… well, then I'd be a millionnaire.
Not a day goes by without my Nest speaker, hub, or Pixel tablet failing at some point. It's so frequent that I'm desensitized to it now; I try again and insist as if it's normal for tech to fail this frequently before getting it right. Or, if I'm in a hurry, I grab my phone to tap a button, manually, bypassing the entire raison d'être of a smart speaker.
My Google smart speakers are useless, on average, about half the time I try to use them.
'Hey Google, I'm cooking,' is a routine I use every day to trigger all three air purifiers in my home and set them to the highest fan speed. Google understands me one time out of three when I say those simple words. My husband is luckier; Google gets him about four out of five times. So I've resorted to asking my husband to tell Google to start the routine because I'm tired of hearing nothing but silence. On the other hand, 'Set a chicken timer' sets a normal timer for my husband, but does the whole chicken animation when I ask for it, which irritates my husband. He wants the animation and sounds, too.
For several weeks, 'Set a 20-minute timer' would open the French 20minutes news website. Anytime my husband says, 'Nothing,' the speakers answer him with the Wikipedia page of the Nothing phone company. When I play music on the ground floor, which is supposed to include both my Nest Hub and my Samsung Soundbar, the music is out of sync half the time; the other half, Google says it'll play music on my speaker group and then tells me 'Something went wrong, try again later.'
Talking to this so-called smart speaker feels dumber than chatting with the snail chilling on my wet porch now. The one thing it excels at is telling me and my husband the weather, and even then, it switches to Fahrenheit every few weeks even though we've repeatedly set it and told it and insisted to get it in Celsius.
'Something went wrong, try again later,' is the soundtrack of my life.
When a timer goes off in one room and I'm in another, I have to shout and hope the other speaker hears me: 'Stop' doesn't do anything on the speaker near me; it might even confuse Google because 'Nothing is playing right now.' How can it not understand that I'm stopping the timer in the other room baffles me.
Plus, because I use Gemini on my phone, multiple calendar support has been kaput for me for several months now. I can have the busiest day with work and family engagements, but my Nest Audio will tell me my calendar is free because none of these are on my personal account.
And don't get me started on how atrociously limited the Pixel Tablet is in a multi-user house. It only supports one voice — mine — so my husband can never ask it for his events, his shopping list, his music, or his reminders. We've relegated it to my office so he doesn't throw it out the window after the millionth, 'I'm sorry, I can't do that yet.'
I've tried enrolling in Google Home previews and leaving them, updating my speakers and resetting them, improving my router and home connection, as well as every other trick in the book to no avail. My Google smart speakers are useless, on average, about half the time I try to use them.
The Google Home app got better, but is still very frustrating
Rita El Khoury / Android Authority
It's been 18 months since I wrote an article praising the Google Home app, saying it's on the right path. Sadly, not much has changed since, and even though I love the ubiquitous smart home panel, there's so much that annoys me every day about this app.
The biggest example for me is how the Google Home app becomes less useful the more devices you have. Scrolling endlessly through large similar icons becomes a waste of time, and I'm tired of having my rooms sorted alphabetically without any custom sorting. I don't want to see the bathroom lights before the bedroom or living room. I don't want to see my motion sensors take up a large tile like every other light or thermostat either, so why can't I hide them? I've set up my Favorites to create a semblance of a custom panel, but even then, why can't I make smaller tiles for the devices I use less often?
Support for third-party cameras is still abysmal, too. I have two TP-Link cameras that are compatible with Google Home, but they don't show their live feed in the app or on the home panel of my Google TV Streamer. Why? Because Google still chooses a few partner companies to elevate to a status similar to the Nest Cams, while the others are left in nowhere land.
And then, there are the routines. In an ideal world, I'd be able to set those up so I rarely, if ever, speak to Google Assistant, letting my home react to certain conditions and situations by itself without any voice commands. In reality, I've been able to create a few routines, but not nearly as many as I would've liked. For instance, Home and Away routines are restricted to light controls only. Why can't I turn off my TV or change the thermostat's mode when I leave home? Why can I not turn on the A/C when I get back home? I don't know.
My air purifier supports all these modes
But not in custom routines
So I work around that by writing voice commands
Custom routines are a bit more powerful, but still lack so many options. For example, I can control my air purifier's mode and fan speed in the Google Home app, but when I build a routine, I can only turn it on or off. Additionally, I can see several air quality metrics from my Sensibo Elements in the Google Home app, but I can't create a routine that turns on the air purifier each time the TVOC or CO2 levels are high; that data just doesn't appear in the 'if' part of the routine creation. The only way to bypass these is to use the code editor, and even then, the results have been hit-or-miss for me. And to make my Pixel Tablet play music when I turn on my office light, I had to type the command instead of using the visual picker because, for some unknown reason, you can't create a routine that plays music on the Pixel Tablet (on other speakers, yes).
When all of these controls and parameters are available in the Google Home app, why do they not show up in the routine creation menu? I couldn't tell you.
Why do I keep torturing myself then?
Rita El Khoury / Android Authority
Ah, the million-dollar question.
To be honest, I don't really know or have an answer. I have a series of theories and thoughts about why I stick with Google's excruciating smart home platform, and I think the reality is somewhere in the middle.
There's the sunk cost fallacy where I just can't walk away from something I've invested so much money and time in. There's the evil you know versus the evil you don't; I keep testing the Alexa app on my devices to see if it's any better and realize it has a different and equally frustrating set of issues, too. There's the hope that with Gemini, things will get better. There's the fact that I write on Android Authority, I own Pixel phones and watches and Google TVs, and so does my husband, and Google Home is the only platform that makes sense for us. There's the casting capability and its compatibility with my Samsung soundbar. And there's the simple photo album feature that I cherish more than anything on my Pixel Tablet and Nest Hub and that I wouldn't give up for anything else.
Between the sunk cost fallacy, reticence to change, and the evil I know, there are many reasons why I stick with Google Home.
There's also the fact that when things work, they work. And I'm an optimist who hopes they'll work the same way next time, too.
I've bought and started using a Home Assistant Yellow to try to extricate myself from Google's ecosystem. That has been a long, painful, and frustrating journey, too. I love that I'm in control of my new Home Assistant setup, but I hate having to babysit every aspect of it. What I gained in control over my smart home, I lost in troubleshooting, setup, and ease of use. There's no ideal smart home platform out there, and as I said earlier… the evil I know.
I feel that that's where most of us, Google Home survivors, are nowadays. We don't see the grass being greener anywhere else, so we might as well stick with the patchy blot we have here in the hopes that it'll get better. Soon™.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Geek Wire
7 minutes ago
- Geek Wire
Microsoft cuts another 40 jobs in Washington state, continuing layoffs amid AI investment surge
Microsoft has laid off more than 15,000 people globally since May. (GeekWire File Photo / Todd Bishop) Microsoft laid off another 40 employees in Washington, bringing the total number of job cuts in its home state to 3,160 since May, according to a public filing. These latest cuts are on a much smaller scale than those made by Microsoft in May and July, when it eliminated 1,985 and 830 positions in the state, respectively, as part of broader layoffs that impacted more than 15,000 people globally. Microsoft confirmed that these cuts are separate from the prior reductions. The company declined to provide details about the teams, roles, or regions impacted. 'Organizational and workforce changes are a necessary and regular part of managing our business,' a Microsoft spokesperson said in a statement. 'We will continue to prioritize and invest in strategic growth areas for our future and in support of our customers and partners.' The company said it is providing severance packages and outplacement services to affected employees, including career counseling and job search support. Microsoft noted that some laid-off workers have transitioned to other roles at the company. The layoffs coincide with record capital spending on AI infrastructure, with the company investing more than $30 billion this quarter alone, in part to expand capacity for training and running AI models. Rising capital expenditures have created pressure to reduce operating costs through workforce reductions. The ongoing layoffs have created tension inside Microsoft's workplace culture, with some employees expressing concern about job insecurity and what some see as an erosion of the more compassionate environment under CEO Satya Nadella. In a company-wide memo July 24, Nadella acknowledged the 'uncertainty and seeming incongruence' of cutting jobs while simultaneously making record investments in AI infrastructure, calling the layoff decisions 'among the most difficult we have to make.' Microsoft's global headcount held steady at 228,000 over the past year, according to its annual 10-K filing. That reflected an initial round of layoffs in May, prior to larger cutbacks in July, even as the company continues to hire in some areas. The company briefly surpassed a $4 trillion market value after a blockbuster earnings report last week, becoming only the second company to reach that mark. Its stock closed Monday up 2.2%, at a market value of $3.98 trillion.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Palantir Reports Sales Up 48%, Cites ‘Astonishing' AI Impact
(Bloomberg) -- Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a 48% increase in revenue for the second quarter to more than $1 billion, citing the 'astonishing impact' of artificial intelligence technology on its business. PATH Train Service Resumes After Fire at Jersey City Station Chicago Curbs Hiring, Travel to Tackle $1 Billion Budget Hole Seeking Relief From Heat and Smog, Cities Follow the Wind Mayor Asked to Explain $1.4 Billion of Wasted Johannesburg Funds The data software company also raised its revenue outlook for the full year to a range of $4.14 billion to $4.15 billion, exceeding analysts' prior expectation of $3.91 billion. The shares gained about 3.5% in extended trading after closing at $160.66 in New York. Denver-based Palantir has seen its stock price surge more than 500% over the past year — buoyed by high expectations from investors, growth in demand for AI tools, and a deep reach into both the private and public sectors. The company's $1 billion revenue in the period ended June 30 exceeded analysts' average estimate of $939 million. Growth was particularly strong in the US, where sales jumped 68% to $733 million, the company said Monday in a statement. Palantir said adjusted earnings per share for the quarter were 16 cents, exceeding analyst expectations of 14 cents. In a letter to shareholders, Chief Executive Officer Alex Karp lingered on the company's at-times tenuous relationship with Wall Street. 'The skeptics are admittedly fewer now, having been defanged and bent into a kind of submission,' he wrote. He also said that AI breakthroughs had helped fuel Palantir's growth, pointing to the development of large language models and the chips required to power them. Going forward, Karp said that Palantir planned to be the 'dominant software company of the future,' and added, 'the market is now waking up to this reality.' The company's US government revenue climbed 53% in the quarter to hit $426 million. Meanwhile, its revenue from commercial contracts in the US climbed even quicker, rising 93% for the year to hit $306 million. The 'outperformance' in Palantir's US commercial business is a key indicator of robust demand, particularly for the company's AI products, Jordan Berger, an analyst at Third Bridge, said in a note. 'We continue to hear from experts that Palantir maintains unique market positioning for monetizing AI technology amid a noisy, crowded, and hype-laden market, and the company's Q2 2025 performance further validates that sentiment,' Berger said. Palantir has long played a role as a key US government contractor, working with both the US military, those of allied countries like Ukraine, and partnering with new defense tech startups. The company solidified its relationship with the Pentagon during the quarter, striking new deals with the US Space Force and US Army, executives said during a conference call after the results. Palantir also consolidated 15 prime contracts and 60 related contracts with the Army into one single deal — a 10-year, $10 billion arrangement. While the agreement was designed to cut costs for the government and didn't boost the company's bottom line, it could provide a template for future federal deals, analysts said. In his letter to shareholders, Karp emphasized Palantir's commitment to defense tech, writing that the US is 'the most consequential country in the West,' and adding, 'it must be protected.' Karp ended the call with a message to retail investors, thanking them for their support and urging them to be kinder to analysts who doubted Palantir. 'Stop talking to all the haters. They're suffering,' he said. (Updates with analyst's comments in the ninth paragraph.) AI Flight Pricing Can Push Travelers to the Limit of Their Ability to Pay Government Steps Up Campaign Against Business School Diversity What Happens to AI Startups When Their Founders Jump Ship for Big Tech How Podcast-Obsessed Tech Investors Made a New Media Industry Everyone Loves to Hate Wind Power. Scotland Found a Way to Make It Pay Off ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AMD & Pfizer earnings, ISM services data: What to Watch
Market Domination Overtime host Josh Lipton takes a look at the top stories for investors to watch on Tuesday, Aug. 5. In the morning, Caterpillar (CAT) and Pfizer (PFE) will announce earnings results. Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), Amgen (AMGN), Snap (SNAP), and Rivian (RIVN) will announce results in the afternoon. In the morning, Institute for Supply Management (ISM) services data for July will be released. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination Overtime. Time now for what to watch Tuesday, August 5th. Gonna start off on the earnings front. Big names reporting on Tuesday, including Pfizer and AMD. Pfizer announced results for the second quarter in the morning. Pharmaceutical company's drug pipeline in focus for investors with some key patents expiring in the coming years. Pfizer trying to offset that loss with a $7.2 billion cost cutting plan. The company says it has a pipeline of new drugs coming, but data on how effective those will be remains to be seen. And moving over to AMD, the semiconductor company reporting second quarter earnings after the market's closed on Tuesday, and was expecting the company to post strong results for Q2, driven by its ramp up of AI chips, which could significantly boost revenue, especially if export restrictions to China ease. And taking a look at the economy, monthly ISM services data for July coming out on Tuesday. Cons forecasting that number rise to 51.5, signaling that the service sector is growing and there's steady demand from consumers and businesses.