Man charged with murdering housemate
Faisal Abdul Aziz, 41, nodded after the charge was read out to him before Magistrate Mohamad Redza Azhar Rezali.
However, no plea was recorded as the case fell under the jurisdiction of the High Court.
He is charged with murdering Muhammad Fakhrullah Pauzihal Ali, 33, at a house in Kampung Kubu Gajah, Sungai Buloh near here at 11.26pm on June 25.
The charge, under Section 302 of the Penal Code, provides the death sentence or imprisonment for not less than 30 years or not more than 40 years and not less than 12 strokes of the cane, if convicted.
The prosecution was conducted by deputy public prosecutor Alia Anisa Khairus Masnan while the accused was unrepresented.
The court set Oct 10 for mention of the case for the submission of the chemist's report.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
MCA rejects MCMC legal demand for Pahang youth chief's apology
PETALING JAYA: MCA has rejected a legal demand from the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) for Pahang MCA Youth chief Wong Siew Mun to issue a formal apology, stressing that freedom of speech must not be suppressed. MCA president Datuk Seri Dr Wee Ka Siong said the party held an urgent meeting and unanimously agreed that MCMC's demands were both unreasonable and unacceptable. 'MCA fully supports Wong Siew Mun. We firmly uphold the principle that freedom of expression must not be curtailed or compromised. We also believe she acted appropriately,' he said in a TikTok post on Friday (July 4). Dr Wee said Wong had received a legal letter on Thursday from a law firm representing MCMC. The letter reportedly demanded that she take down a Bahasa Malaysia TikTok video on freedom of speech, issue a public apology within 24 hours—with the content subject to MCMC's approval—and provide a written undertaking not to repeat similar comments on any social media platform. Failure to comply would result in civil legal action. Describing the conditions as excessive, Dr Wee said MCA would provide full legal support to Wong. He added that the party had assembled a legal team, including human rights lawyer Edmund Bon, to represent her in all legal proceedings. He reaffirmed MCA's long-standing stance on safeguarding civil liberties, especially the right to express opinions without undue interference or intimidation. On June 18, Wong was summoned by police over comments she made about the government's collection of mobile phone data. She is being investigated for allegedly causing public alarm and misusing network facilities. The investigation follows a TikTok post on 6 June, in which Wong questioned MCMC's move to collect mobile phone data from telecommunications providers. 'The video I posted was based on facts reported by mainstream media and official statements made by a minister and a government agency confirming that mobile phone data is indeed being collected from telcos,' Wong said. She is being investigated under Section 505 of the Penal Code and Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998, relating to causing public fear and misuse of network facilities. Earlier, MCMC clarified that the Mobile Phone Data Collection Initiative involves only eight types of anonymised data from network providers. It does not include personally identifiable information such as names, identity card numbers, or phone numbers. Instead, the data collected includes information such as the Mobile Station International Subscriber Directory Number (MSISDN), unique ID, mobile country code, and GPS coordinates of telco towers, among others. The data collection had raised privacy concerns. Dr Wee had highlighted that the government's efforts to collate detailed records of phone calls and internet usage from telecommunications firms are a violation of the people's right concerning their personal data. He questioned the necessity of such detailed information, especially when MCMC itself clarified that the data is intended for policymaking in the ICT and tourism sectors. 'This isn't about trust in the current government. The real question is: why collect such detailed data on citizens? 'If you're recording who we call, how long we speak, our IP addresses and precise locations—complete with time and date stamps—anyone with access could easily trace it back to our identities,' he had said. @drweekasiong MCA akan terus mempertahankan hak dan kebebasan bersuara rakyat Malaysia sepertimana yang dijamin dalam Perlembagaan Persekutuan. Tekanlah seteruk mana, ia sedikitpun tidak mematahkan semangat kami. Kami di MCA adalah #JurucakapRakyat #teamrakyat original sound - DrWeeKaSiong
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
JB petrol station shooting: Dead man with bullet wounds dumped at hospital
JOHOR BARU: A violent robbery attempt at a petrol station in Iskandar Puteri has taken a deadly turn, with one man later found dead at Hospital Sultanah Aminah (HSA). The incident unfolded around 12.10am on Thursday (July 3), when four masked men, each armed with a machete, attempted to ambush a vehicle parked at the petrol station near the Second Link Expressway. Closed-circuit television (CCTV) footage of the brazen attack, which has gone viral on social media, showed the men smashing the windows of a parked car. In response, one of the car's passengers fired several gunshots, forcing the attackers to flee. Three suspects ran back to their getaway vehicle, while the fourth escaped on foot. Johor police chief Comm Datuk M. Kumar confirmed the discovery of a body at HSA about an hour later after the robbery attempt. 'At approximately 1.40am, hospital staff alerted police to the presence of a man's body with multiple gunshot wounds. CCTV footage showed two men leaving the body at the hospital entrance in a dark-coloured vehicle before driving off,' he said in a statement here on Friday (July 4) night. ALSO READ: QuickCheck: Did a group of armed robbers turn tail and flee after being shot at? Comm Kumar added the deceased was later identified as a 42-year-old local man from Sungai Petani, Kedah, with a criminal record with four priors. He also said that a post-mortem confirmed the man died from multiple gunshot wounds to the chest and abdomen. When asked if the victim was one of the attackers in the attempted robbery, Comm Kumar said police were still investigating the matter. He added that following initial investigations, police arrested three men in Dang Wangi, Kuala Lumpur, around 7pm on the same day. 'The suspects, two Malaysians and one Indian national, aged between 30 and 40, were nabbed by a joint team from the Johor police headquarters and Iskandar Puteri district police,' he said. Comm Kumar added police also made several seizures during the arrest, including an upper receiver of a Glock 19 pistol, a licensed firearm permit, and six rounds of 9mm bullets, bullet casings and a black coloured car believed used in the incident. 'One of the suspects works as a licensed personal bodyguard, and preliminary checks show he has a firearm licence. 'However, police are investigating whether the weapon was used according to legal protocols,' he said, adding that the suspects were being remanded for seven days until July 10 to assist in the investigations. Comm Kumar said the police were investigating the incident under Section 302 of the Penal Code for murder, Section 148 of the same Act for rioting with weapons and Section 39 of the Arms Act 1960 for discharging a firearm outside a licensed shooting range. He added that further investigations are ongoing to establish the connection between the deceased and the suspects, as well as to trace other individuals involved in the attack. Comm Kumar urged the public to refrain from speculation or sharing misinformation about the case on social media. 'This is an isolated incident. There is no broader threat to public safety, and Johor remains secure,' he said. Comm Kumar urged those with information related to the case to contact the Johor police hotline at 019-2792095 or the operations room at 07-2212999.
The Star
4 hours ago
- The Star
Brunei court upholds jail for Bangladeshi man in kidnapping, carnal case
BANDAR SERI BEGAWAN: The Court of Appeal on June 17 dismissed the Public Prosecutor's appeal seeking a harsher sentence against a Bangladeshi man convicted of kidnapping and repeatedly engaging in unlawful sexual activity with a 14-year-old girl diagnosed with a learning disability. Chief Justice Dato Seri Paduka Steven Chong, sitting with Justices Michael Peter Lunn and Edward Timothy Starbuck Woolley, found no basis to disturb the Intermediate Court's sentence of eight years' imprisonment and four strokes of the cane imposed on Jahidul Islam, the first respondent in Criminal Appeal No 12 of 2024. Md Usuf Ali, the second respondent, also a Bangladeshi national, had been sentenced to six years' jail and two strokes of the cane. The Public Prosecutor had originally appealed both sentences on the grounds of manifest inadequacy but later withdrew the appeal against the second respondent. Court documents revealed that on January 3, 2023, both respondents were jointly charged before the Intermediate Court with kidnapping a girl under 14 from her lawful guardian—an offence under Section 361, punishable under Section 363 of the Penal Code. In addition, Jahidul, then aged 33, faced five counts of unlawful carnal knowledge under Section 2 of the Unlawful Carnal Knowledge Act, while Md Usuf, aged 36, faced one such charge. Both denied the kidnapping charge and claimed trial, but each pleaded guilty to their respective unlawful carnal knowledge charges. They were found guilty of kidnapping following trial. Intermediate Court Judge Pengiran Masni Pengiran Bahar sentenced Jahidul to a total of eight years' imprisonment and four strokes of the cane, comprising two years' jail and two strokes for each of two unlawful carnal knowledge charges and four years for kidnapping. The sentences were ordered to run consecutively in part. Md Usuf's six-year term comprised consecutive sentences for one count of unlawful carnal knowledge and the kidnapping charge, along with two strokes of the cane. The girl, a 14-year-old student diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), reportedly initiated contact with Jahidul by phone under the pretext of hiring a pickup vehicle for a friend. On Nov 12, 2022, she deceived her mother into allowing her to visit a family friend's shop. After briefly entering a nearby supermarket, she slipped away to meet Jahidul at a fast-food restaurant. The pair then walked to a lorry parked behind the building, where the Md Usuf was waiting in the driver's seat. Both men then transported the girl to Jahidul's residence, where she stayed for two nights. During this period, she had sexual intercourse with Jahidul Islam on five occasions and once with Md Usuf. The girl's absence raised alarm, prompting the domestic helper who had accompanied her to report to her mother, who in turn lodged a police report. Authorities located the girl on the night of November 13, 2022, and arrested both men. In their statements, they admitted to the sexual encounters and acknowledged knowing the girl's age. The appellate court noted that a psychological assessment submitted during the appeal painted a concerning picture of the victim's cognitive and social vulnerability. Conducted in April, the assessment revealed that the girl's IQ fell within the mildly impaired range—placing her at the 0.5th percentile—and that she suffers from a learning disability affecting multiple areas of functioning. Despite showing no immediate signs of psychological trauma, she was deemed highly susceptible to exploitation. A second report from the director of her learning centre noted she receives basic education and vocational training but requires constant supervision and step-by-step instruction due to her condition. The prosecution, represented by Prosecutor Atiyyah Abas, argued that the original sentence failed to reflect the severity and repeated nature of the offences and the heightened vulnerability of the victim. They proposed a sentence of at least nine years' imprisonment for Jahidul Islam, citing similar precedent cases including MZM Bin AT v Public Prosecutor (Criminal Appeal No 15 of 2021), where the court upheld higher sentences for multiple offences involving vulnerable victims. However, the Court of Appeal disagreed. The panel found that the trial judge had appropriately taken into account the aggravating factors, including the girl's vulnerability and the repeated sexual offences, by ordering consecutive terms of imprisonment. The court held that the sentence imposed—eight years and four strokes—was within the reasonable range for the offences and did not amount to a miscarriage of justice or sentencing error. – Borneo Bulletin/ANN
