Baltimore is seeing the city's fewest homicides in 50 years. Here's why.
The strategy was to approach gun violence as a public health threat instead of simply a crime issue and to treat that threat at the source by investing in violence interrupters, community organizations and trauma-informed support systems in impacted neighborhoods. The plan's goal: reduce shootings by 15 percent every year for five years.
Now four years in, Scott said, the plan is working.
As of July 1, 68 people in Baltimore had died by homicide this year, the fewest during the first six months of the year in more than five decades. It marks a nearly 23 percent decrease compared to the first half of 2024. Shootings where nobody was killed have also fallen by nearly 20 percent compared to the same time period last year. The falling statistics, mirroring a national drop in violent crime, follow years of similar declines.
'Everybody plays a part,' Scott said in an interview. 'Yes, I'm the mayor. Yes, I had to come up with and deliver this plan. But none of it works without every single one of our partners.'
Among them, the mayor said, are the 40 or so employees of the Mayor's Office of Neighborhood Safety and Engagement; the dozens of people who work as violence interrupters with the city's flagship gun violence reduction program, Safe Streets; the Baltimore Police Department; the Baltimore City State's Attorney's Office; the U.S. attorney's office and the Office of the Maryland Attorney General.
'But most importantly,' Scott said, 'the folks in the community.'
After a spike during the pandemic, homicides by guns in the United States have steadily dwindled, to 17,927 in 2023, according to the most recent Center For Disease Control data available. In D.C., there have been 85 homicides this year as of July 3, compared to 89 during the same time last year, according to police department data.
The historically low violent crime rate in Baltimore has prompted a scramble to take credit among state and city leaders, all of whom are acknowledging each other's roles while emphasizing their own parts.
The office of Gov. Wes Moore (D) pointed to the $50 million in state funding to the Baltimore Police Department and additional $10.8 million to the city's state's attorney's office since he took office in 2023. Under the Moore administration, state leaders and lawmakers have also focused on changes to the juvenile justice system, measures for stricter gun regulations, and coordination about experts, advocates and officials on commissions centered on best practices for crime-fighting and restorative justice.
In a statement, Moore praised the 'all-of-the-above approach to public safety that is showing results across the state.'
'While there is still work to be done,' Moore said, 'it is clear that this close collaboration with all partners involved is helping Maryland boast some of the most impressive crime drops in the entire country.'
Baltimore City State's Attorney Ivan Bates (D) credited the shifting philosophy of the office since he defeated former state's attorney Marilyn Mosby (D) in the 2022 election.
'While some have criticized our office for moving beyond the policies of the previous administration, the progress we've made in reducing homicides in Baltimore tells a different story — one grounded in results, not rhetoric,' Bates said in a statement. 'By repealing ineffective non-prosecution policies, we've empowered our police officers to reengage fully in the mission of public safety — not only as law enforcers, but as violence interrupters working proactively in our communities.'
In an op-ed she penned in the Baltimore Sun, the state's chief public defender, Natasha Dartigue, said the 'intense debate' sparked over who can claim credit for the fall in violent crime misses the point. Some, she said, 'were quick to claim credit for the drop by relying on a well-worn 'tough-on-crime' narrative despite research and data that demonstrate the negative impact of incarceration and an overly punitive approach to public safety.'
'Our daily experiences as public defenders underscore the correct answer to the question of what is causing the decline in crime,' Dartigue wrote. 'After years of investing in violence interrupters, community outreach workers and neighborhood-based prevention initiatives, Baltimore is witnessing the fruits of this focused approach.'
She credited community organizations like the Baltimore Community Mediation Center, We Our Us and Roca, which works with those age 16 to 24.
'The people behind these programs are the true heroes of Baltimore's crime reduction story,' Dartigue wrote.
Scott likewise praised those organizations — as well as what he characterized as a more targeted approach to policing at the local, state and federal level, focusing on violent gun offenders and group violence. The strategy, he said, was informed by data work that showed the people most likely to victimize or be victimized through gun violence was contained to a narrow group.
The strategy isn't about volume, he said.
'We are not going back to the days of arresting any and every Black person who is just outside,' Scott said.
Partnerships with the U.S. attorney's office and federal law enforcement have been a critical element of this new tactic, pulling in federal resources on major criminal investigations that have brought down violent groups. Federal funding for violence prevention programs is now under threat as part of the Trump administration's budget cuts.
For now, those partnerships have continued, Scott said, adding that he hopes politics don't 'interfere with public safety.'
The numbers, he said, show what's working.
Homicides and nonfatal shootings dipped slightly from 2021 to 2022, but then fell off precipitously after that. In 2023, homicides fell nearly 24 percent compared to 2023, then fell another 23 percent in 2024, according to city data. In 2021, there were 726 nonfatal shootings in the city. In 2024, there were 412.
Beyond those trends, carjackings are down 15 percent so far this year, robberies are down 22 percent, and auto thefts are down 34 percent.
Scott, who recalled that 'people laughed at me' when he first advocated for a community-based approach, doesn't see it as unusual.
'For us,' he said, 'it's not optional.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
13 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Human remains located after California fireworks warehouse explosion
Investigators have located human remains following an explosion at a Northern California fireworks warehouse, Yolo County said in a statement Friday. Seven were missing after the Tuesday fireworks explosion near Esparto, which gripped the small farming community. It sparked a massive fire that led to other spot fires. Nearby Fourth of July celebrations were called off.
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Human Remains Found at Site of Calif. Fireworks Explosion Days After 7 People Were Reported Missing
Local authorities in northern California have discovered human remains at the site of a fireworks facility that exploded earlier this week Officials said in a statement released on Friday, July 4, that "no positive identifications have been made" The deadly incident took place on Tuesday, July 1, at around 6 p.m. local time, PEOPLE previously reported, and seven people were unaccounted for after the blastLocal authorities in northern California have discovered human remains at the site of a fireworks facility explosion days after the deadly incident first occurred. Yolo County officials announced the grim discovery in a statement on Friday, July 4, three days after the explosion and fire broke out on the evening of Tuesday, July 1. Workers from the Yolo County Coroner's Division accessed the site after it was confirmed to be safe and discovered the remains during a recovery operation, according to a statement from multiple emergency response agencies. "At this time, no positive identifications have been made," an official wrote in the release. Seven people remained unaccounted for following the incident, PEOPLE previously reported. "Recovery efforts are expected to continue throughout the weekend as investigators, coroner personnel, and fire crews work carefully and respectfully through the process," the statement said. "The Coroner's Office has been in contact with the families of those previously reported missing." Arson and bomb investigators from CAL FIRE's Office of the State Fire Marshal are leading the ongoing investigation. "Our hearts and thoughts are with those we lost, their families, and everyone impacted in our community. We are grateful for the swift response of law enforcement and emergency personnel," a spokesperson for the company operating the facility, Devastating Pyrotechnics, said in an online statement. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. "Our focus will remain on those directly impacted by this tragedy, and we will cooperate fully with the proper authorities in their investigation," the spokesperson added. Marisol Ramos told NBC News earlier this week that her three sons worked at the site and have been missing since the explosion occurred. 'Let us do it,' Ramos said as she begged authorities to let her look for her adult children. 'I'm willing to go in … I want to search for my kids.' Read the original article on People

CNN
24 minutes ago
- CNN
Fact check: Trump falsely claims his highly unpopular big bill is the ‘single most popular bill ever signed'
On Friday, before signing his massive domestic policy bill, President Donald Trump proclaimed at the White House that 'it's the most popular bill ever signed in the history of our country,' adding for emphasis that 'this is the single most popular bill ever signed.' That is an up-is-down reversal of reality. The bill is wildly unpopular, poll after poll has found. While polls can be off, this bill wouldn't be popular – let alone the most popular US bill ever signed – even with a massive and widespread polling error. In a Fox News poll in mid-June, 59% of registered voters said they opposed the bill and 38% said they favored it, with another 3% saying they didn't know. In a Quinnipiac University poll in late June, 55% of registered voters said they opposed the bill and 29% said they supported it, with another 16% not weighing in. In a Pew Research Center poll in early June, 49% of adults said they were opposed and 29% said they were in favor, with 21% unsure. Reviewing these numbers and the similar findings of two other polls about the bill, CNN chief data analyst Harry Enten said on air on Monday: 'You just never see numbers this poor. I have been trying to look through the history books to find if there was another piece of legislation that was on the verge of passing that was as unpopular as this one, and…I cannot find one.' CNN senior reporter Aaron Blake reported June 20 that the polling numbers made the bill 'more unpopular than any piece of major legislation passed since at least 1990, according to data crunched by George Washington University political science professor Chris Warshaw.' And in an analysis published Friday, before Trump spoke, data journalist G. Elliott Morris wrote, 'On average across pollsters and methods, 31% of Americans support the One Big Beautiful Bill, while 54% oppose it. That net rating of -23 is, to put it mildly, absolutely abysmal.' It's possible that Trump has seen private polling that has found different numbers. And, of course, the popularity of legislation can improve after it passes and Americans feel its impacts; that's what happened with Obamacare. But if Trump has any evidence for his claim that this is the most popular bill in American history, he did not provide it on Friday. The president also made other false claims in his White House remarks: – A false claim that 'we've delivered … no tax on Social Security for our great seniors.' The bill does not completely eliminate tax on Social Security; rather, it creates a temporary additional tax deduction of $6,000 per person age 65 and older every year from 2025 through 2028 (it's a smaller deduction for individuals earning more than $75,000 per year). The White House has said that 88% of seniors will not pay tax on Social Security benefits with this additional deduction in place, up from 64% not paying tax on those benefits under current law, but even if the White House is right, the millions of seniors in the remaining 12% will still have to pay – and so will some Social Security recipients under the age of 65, who do not get this new deduction. – A false claim, which Trump has made repeatedly, that President Joe Biden allowed in '21 million' migrants. Through December 2024, the last full month under Biden, the country had recorded under 11 million nationwide 'encounters' with migrants during that administration, including millions who were rapidly expelled from the country. Even adding in so-called gotaways who evaded detection, estimated by House Republicans as being roughly 2.2 million, there's no way the total is 21 million.