UniCredit CEO says no plans to abandon Commerzbank investment, newspaper reports
German Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil on Thursday told press agency DPA that the government expected UniCredit to abandon its takeover plans, reiterating that Berlin saw the approach as "unfriendly" and backed Commerzbank's independence.
"On Commerzbank we'll press ahead despite the German government's stance. We were invited in September to buy a 4.5% stake, it's not clear why we should go away now," Il Messaggero quoted UniCredit CEO Andrea Orcel as telling a board meeting on Thursday.
UniCredit this week doubled its equity and voting stake in Commerzbank by turning derivatives into shares.
It lifted the equity portion of its 29% stake in Commerzbank to around 20%, from 9% previously, and said it would eventually acquire the full position in equity.
"We'll convert the remaining derivatives and go to 29%. We have asked for a meeting to outline our strategy and we'll wait until we're listened to. Our approach is respectful of Commerzbank's specific characteristics," Orcel was quoted as saying.
UniCredit first emerged as the biggest private investor in Commerzbank in September when it bought 4.5% from the German government and disclosed a similar-sized stake it had built in the preceding months.
In December it used derivatives to increase the stake, and this year obtained European Central Bank approval to own up to 29.9% of Commerzbank.
Orcel's acquisition strategy has run into difficulties at home, with a bid for smaller peer Banco BPM hampered by conditions the Italian government has set to authorise it.
A court ruling on UniCredit's appeal against the government's conditions is due by July 16. UniCredit has asked the court to annul the entire decision. It could modify only some of the terms.
"We would still be in an uncertain situation which discourages investors, weighs on the market, like I said before, the conditions to go ahead with the deal are not there," Il Messaggero quoted Orcel as saying.
(Reporting by Valentina Za Editing by Mark Potter)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Khaleej Times
2 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Impact of US tariffs varies across the European Union
European countries are not all equally exposed to the US market and so will not suffer the same consequences should President Donald Trump go ahead with his threats to impose 30-percent tariffs on the European Union. Ireland, with a major pharmaceutical industry, is in the front line along with Germany, for whom the United States is a major outlet for its cars, steel and machine tools. France is less exposed, even if it does have aeronautics, food, wine and luxury goods companies that risk losing markets. The EU as a whole has an annual trade surplus with the United States of $235.6 billion, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), which reports to the U.S. Department of Commerce. Only China has a higher amount. - Ireland, Europe's lab - Ireland has the largest surplus among EU members, at $86.7 billion. That is largely due to the presence of major American pharmaceutical companies such as Pfizer, Eli Lilly, and Johnson & Johnson. They all set up in Ireland to benefit from a 15 percent corporate tax, compared to 21 percent in the United States. These companies can thus host their patents in Ireland and sell on the American market, where drug prices are traditionally higher than in the rest of the world. Ireland also hosts most of the European headquarters of American tech giants, such as Apple, Google and Meta, also attracted by the attractive Irish tax system. Overall, pharmaceuticals account for 22.5 percent of EU exports to the United States, according to Eurostat, with many major players having announced major investments in the United States. - Germany, the industrial powerhouse - Germany, the EU's largest economy, is under particular pressure due to its dependence on exports: it has a surplus of $84.8 billion with the United States, thanks to its large automobile, chemical, steel and machine industries. The United States accounts for 23 percent of the revenue of Mercedes Benz. While some of that is accounted for by SUVs manufactured in the United States and exported, they risk being hit by any tariff reprisals from the EU. The Federation of German Industries (BDI) reacted promptly to Donald Trump's announcements on Saturday, calling on the EU and the United States to "quickly find solutions and to avoid an escalation". - Italy, France in the second line - Italy and France, with surpluses of $44 billion and $16.4 billion respectively, according to US statistics (French data says the surplus is much smaller), would appear to be less affected. But some sectors are heavily exposed. The food and wine industries would be particularly affected in both countries, as is also the case for Spain. A 30-percent tariff would be a "catastrophe" for the French wine and spirits sector, Jerome Despey, head of the viticulture branch of the FNSEA union, said Saturday. Coldiretti, Italy's main agricultural organisation, said Saturday that tariffs of 30 percent would cost US consumers and Italian food producers some $2.3 billion. Like Germany, Italy is also concerned about its automotive sector. Franco-Italian manufacturer Stellantis (particularly Fiat and Peugeot) has suspended its forecasts for the year due to these uncertainties. Exposed French sectors also include aeronautics and luxury goods. LVMH, the world's largest luxury conglomerate, makes a quarter of its sales in the United States. About a fifth of France's exports to the United States come from the aerospace industry, much of it from Airbus. Austria and Sweden also have surpluses with the United States, $13.1 billion and $9.8 billion respectively.


Khaleej Times
3 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
High-priced stocks and bonds raise tariff threat for markets
Global markets are telling conflicting stories about the possible longer-term impact of U.S. tariffs on growth, a schism that investors say means either stocks or bonds could see a steep correction once it's clear which is right. U.S. President Donald Trump's erratic approach to trade policy that generated so much volatility earlier this year seems to have left markets wary of reacting to his near-daily announcements on who, or what, might get hit with tariffs. The latest target is Canada, which on Thursday Trump said will face a 35% duty, while most other trading partners will get blanket tariffs of 15% or 20%, eliciting barely a flutter in the broader markets. An announcement on Europe is imminent. Investors say this apparent composure is less about confidence in an ultimately benign longer-term outlook, and more typical of a late-stage bull market, where the optimists scramble to catch the rally before it fizzles out, while the pessimists quietly prepare for trickier times ahead. In one corner are riskier assets like stocks and cryptocurrencies. Shares on Wall Street have hit record highs, powered by enthusiasm around artificial intelligence and the prospect of a string of interest-rate cuts from the Federal Reserve as the economy gradually slows and the hit to inflation from tariffs proves mild so far. Bitcoin is near a record $112,000. In the other corner are government bonds, gold and even crude oil, all of which are reflecting a belief that tariffs could derail the U.S. economy and growth everywhere will falter. Premier Miton chief investment officer Neil Birrell said the second half of this year will be when the impact of Trump's tariffs becomes obvious. "It's difficult for me to look at all this with any form of confidence or certainty," he said, referring to the unpredictability of Trump's policymaking and the possible impact of his "One Big Beautiful Bill". His main concern about stocks was U.S. households' high participation in Wall Street, where a decline could quickly spread globally. "Any stress in the U.S. economy that impacts the consumer and then impacts equity markets becomes a rather brutal and bloody downward spiral." 'This can't continue' Trump's 90-day pause after April 2's "Liberation Day" tariff announcement has been replaced by a scattergun application of levies on trading partners large and small, right ahead of the second-quarter earnings season which may yield the first clues about how severe the hit to corporate profits could be. "Things have settled down but not in a positive way," Amundi's head of global macro Mahmood Pradhan said. "The effective tariff rate for all imports coming into the U.S., if you calculated an average across the board, would be about 15%," he said. "This is broadly negative for growth in every country that is involved in world trade." The World Bank last month cut its global growth forecast for 2025 by four-tenths of a percentage point to 2.3%, saying that higher tariffs and heightened uncertainty posed a "significant headwind" for nearly all economies. With so much uncertainty hanging over U.S. assets, investors' cash has flowed elsewhere for much of this year, into the likes of European stocks and bonds, gold, Chinese tech stocks or emerging market currencies. Greasing the wheels of the stock market rally has been anticipation that Fed Chair Jerome Powell will cave to pressure from Trump to deliver a rapid string of rate cuts. Yet the data has been too strong to justify an aggressive loosening of monetary policy and too soft to argue that tariffs are having no effect. U.S. employment figures show the economy is still creating jobs at a firm clip, while business activity surveys show factories and services are flagging. In the meantime, Trump's landmark tax cut and spending bill will add an extra $3.3 trillion to the national deficit. Benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury yields have retreated from January's 15-month peaks at 4.8% to 4.35%. "Bonds are much more focused on growth (falling) than on inflation so when you see an upturn in trade war announcements bond yields tilt towards lower growth and rate cuts. But equities are emboldened because tariffs haven't shown up in the inflation numbers yet," Joost van Leenders, senior investment strategist at Dutch asset manager Van Lanschot Kempen, said. "We don't think this can continue," he said, adding he remains neutral on equities, with a small overweight position in government bonds. Gold has staged a blistering 26% rally this year, topping $3,300 an ounce, serving as a hedge against macro and geopolitical uncertainty, as well as an alternative to the dollar, the biggest tariff casualty, which has lost over 10% in value this year against a basket of currencies. Kevin Thozet, investment committee member at French asset manager Carmignac, said he is hedging against a fall in the U.S. stock market, but believes this is unlikely right now because retail traders are diving in to buy market dips. Further out, he said Trump's tax cut bill might offset some of the impact of tariffs, but the extra debt it could take to fund those cuts could drive the 10-year Treasury yield to 5% in the coming three months, a level that policymakers worry about given its impact on households, companies and the government. "We see significant cracks in U.S. markets, even though the Fed has ample room to cut," he said.


The National
a day ago
- The National
Heathrow expansion plan triggers airlines fury
London's Heathrow Airport risked a new breach with its airlines on Friday as it said it would increase fees to pay for a £10bn expansion to deliver 10 million extra passengers a year. Heathrow served almost 40 million passengers in the six months to June but says it can up numbers by faster security and baggage handling, as well as AI systems to improve punctuality. There would also be new lounges, shops and restaurants within existing terminals. Airlines are hostile saying the passenger ends up footing the bill for Heathrow's rising bills. Virgin Atlantic said 'it is ultimately consumers and airlines that pay the bill,' while British Airways owner IAG SA called the increase in charges 'excessive'. The airport has proposed bumping up landing charges from a current average of £28.46 to £33.26 per person in 2027 to be able to deliver the project. The extra charges are subject to approval by the UK's Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) and would kick in by 2031 at Europe's busiest airport. It has previously asked Heathrow to reduce fees charged to carriers. The carriers have launched a campaign to break the stranglehold of the operator on the airport. The airport hasn't yet finished installing next-generation security scanners, which don't require passengers to remove liquids and electronic items from hand luggage. Executives say there is no alternative to major investments as the airport gears up to deliver a third runway that would increase flight capacity. "This major infrastructure programme marks Heathrow's most significant transformation in over a decade," said chief executive Thomas Woldbye. "To compete with global hubs, we must invest." Infrastructure at the airport and its surrounding support facilities, controlled by other bodies, is creaking. Heathrow was closed for almost an entire day earlier this year after a 'preventable, technical fault' led to the fire at an electrical substation. It was probably caused by moisture that had been present in electrical components for seven years but went 'unaddressed', a review by the National Energy System Operator (Neso) has found.