Rule changes about chores children can do on farms misunderstood, Federated Farmers says
Photo:
Frank Film / supplied
People have misunderstood the government's announcement regarding the threshold for light chores that children can do on farms, Federated Farmers says.
On Tuesday
Labour ridiculed the government's consultation with the agricultural sector
after Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden's announcement included the examples collecting eggs and watering plants.
In the announcement, van Velden said one proposed change was to amend the General Risk Regulations to make it clear that
young people could safely take part in light chores on family farms
.
"We'll be consulting with farmers and the agriculture sector on the thresholds for light chores children can do on farms, like collecting eggs, feeding small animals and watering plants, while ensuring safety is not compromised.
"I expect higher-risk activities such as being near heavy machinery like a hay baler will remain off-limits. As children grow older, they'll be able to undertake more complex tasks with supervision and training, such as driving a tractor."
Federated Farmers New Zealand president Wayne Langford said farmers had been calling for clarity on the rules.
"Taking a closer look at these rules is really important, so it's disappointing a lot of people have gotten the wrong end of the stick," Langford said.
"The government aren't trying to add layers of bureaucracy or wrap farm kids up in cotton wool. They're actually trying to do the exact opposite of what's been portrayed in the media so far.
"This is all about making sure health and safety rules are practical, common sense, and easy to understand - and Federated Farmers absolutely welcome that conversation."
He said the examples given by van Velden were unfortunate and concerns related to situations where children could be harmed, such as around large stock, heavy machinery and quad bikes.
"What she was saying was that, 'Hey, let's look at the roles that kids can play on farm and some of those that maybe should be avoided'.
"For example, on my farm I keep my young children out of the milking shed. It's a dangerous place for the kids to be. It's a place where they could be kicked or harmed."
In a statement, van Velden said the government was proposing making it clear that children could safely take part in "light chores" on family farms - but she expected higher-risk activities involving heavy machinery would remain off-limits.
Farmers had told her they wanted the law to recognise that the farm was both their workplace and home, she said.
Langford said the current health and safety rules for farmers had gone "way too far" and were unnecessarily confusing for smaller family-owned farming operations.
"We're talking about small mum and dad type businesses which might only employ one or two staff members.
"They're certainly not big corporates with a health and safety manager on staff.
"They're hands-on farmers who actually spend their days farming rather than sitting in an office. That's why it's so important these rules are practical and easy to understand."
He said confusion about health and safety obligations meant some farmers no longer allowed children on the farm like they would have in the past, for fear of falling foul of the law.
"There's something very special about growing up on a farm and having that classic rural childhood many farmers enjoyed themselves," Langford said.
He said his own son was very good at reading stock because he'd grown up around them and spent so much time by his father's side on the farm.
"That's the childhood I had, and my own kids have had something similar, but I think we're at risk of losing that kind of upbringing if we don't get these rules right."
Langford said preserving that traditional rural Kiwi upbringing, while still keeping kids safe, was what was trying to be achieved.
Labour's workplace relations and safety spokesperson Jan Tinetti said the government was focusing on a non-existent problem and her colleague Kieran McAnulty questioned the rationale and said he "wouldn't have thought" it was an issue.
"It's pretty common knowledge if an egg is covered in poo, you don't lick it. Wash your hands afterwards, what's the problem?" McAnulty said.
But Langford said collecting eggs and watering plants was "not really what we're talking about here".
"The fact those are the talking points the minister was provided with by bureaucrats tells you everything you need to know about why we need to get Wellington out of farming," Langford said.
"In reality, we're talking about things like feeding calves, shifting stock, or helping mum and dad hose down the shed after milking - perfectly safe everyday farming activities."
He said Federated Farmers looked forward to engaging in the consultation process.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
10 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Government forges ahead with foreshore and seabed law
Paul Goldsmith has welcomed Cabinet's move to press ahead with the law change. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii The government is forging ahead with plans to change the law governing New Zealand's foreshore and seabed, despite a Supreme Court ruling last year that appeared to undercut the rationale for the change. The proposed legislation stems from a clause in National's coalition deal with NZ First, which promised to revisit the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Act. That commitment was driven by fears that a 2023 Court of Appeal decision could have made it significantly easier for Māori groups to win recognition of customary rights over parts of the coastline. The government introduced a bill to Parliament last year to prevent that, but it hit pause in December after the Supreme Court effectively overturned the earlier ruling. At the time, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith welcomed the development and said ministers would take time to reassess their plans. On Tuesday, Goldsmith confirmed to RNZ that Cabinet had agreed to press ahead with the law change regardless and to pass it before October. "Everybody in New Zealand has an interest in what goes on in the coastline, and we're trying our best to get that balance right." Goldsmith said he was not convinced that last year's Supreme Court ruling had set a high enough test for judging whether customary rights should be granted. "We've had a couple of cases that have been decided since then - which have shown almost 100 percent of the coastline and those areas being granted customary marine title - which confirmed to us that the Supreme Court test still didn't achieve the balance that we think the legislation set out to achieve." Asked whether he expected an upswell of protest, Goldsmith said that had been an earlier concern but: "time will tell". "There's been a wide variety of views, some in favour, some against, but we think this is the right thing to do." The legislation was one of the key objections raised by Ngāpuhi leaders last year when they walked out on a meeting with Prime Minister Christopher Luxon in protest. More than 200 applications for customary marine title are making their way through the courts. Under the amendment bill, any court decisions issued after 25 July 2024, will need to be reconsidered. That would appear to cover seven cases, involving various iwi from around the country. "I understand their frustration over that," Goldsmith said. "But we believe it is very important to get this right, because it affects the whole of New Zealand." Goldsmith said the government had set aside about $15 million to cover the additional legal costs. The Marine and Coastal Area Act was originally passed by the National-led government in 2011, replacing the controversial Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004, which had extinguished Māori customary rights in favour of Crown ownership. The 2004 law - introduced by Helen Clark's Labour government - provoked widespread protest and led to the creation of the Māori Party, now known as Te Pāti Māori. National's 2011 replacement declared that no one owned the foreshore and seabed but allowed Māori groups to seek to recognition of their rights - or "Customary Marine Title" - through the courts or in direct negotiations with the Crown. Customary title recognises exclusive Māori rights to parts of the foreshore and seabed, provided certain legal tests are met, including proving continuous and "exclusive" use of the area since 1840 without substantial interruption. The 2023 Court of Appeal ruling, however, declared that groups only needed to show they had enough control over the area that they could keep others from using it, and that situations where the law itself had prevented them from doing so could be ignored. The Supreme Court subsequently overturned that and said the Court of Appeal had taken an unduly narrow approach in its interpretation. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
10 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Garden shed, sleepout and garage rules to be eased by government
Chris Penk. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone Consenting rules for small garden sheds, sleepouts and garages are being changed by the coalition government. Cabinet has agreed to remove the minimum required distance between small single-storey structures under 10 square metres and a property boundary. It has also agreed to reduce the setback distance for single storey buildings between 10 and 30 square metres to just one metre. Previously, garden sheds had to be as far from a property boundary as they were tall - anything closer than that required building consent. Minister for Regulation David Seymour said there was no justification for such generous setback distances on private property. "Section sizes are shrinking, and the cost of living rising. Forcing people to put sheds in the middle of their lawn or pay for a consent to store tools doesn't make sense." David Seymour. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii Seymour said space was right and building costs high in today's housing market, making today's changes good news for homeowners. "These types of property developments are practical and affordable improvements. We want people to be able to utilise them without hassle." He credited his 'Red Tape Tipline' for the idea and asked the public to keep the feedback coming. "We're acting on the tips we get through the red tape tipline by removing regulation and making it easier for Kiwis to get things done. "We want to hear about red tape like this that's getting in the way - I encourage anyone with a red tape issue to report it on the Ministry for Regulation website." Minister for Building and Construction Chris Penk said people shouldn't be "bogged down in bureaucracy" when making use of their own backyard. "By the end of the year, homeowners will be able to put up a small shed or garage closer to their boundary or another building without needing a consent. "That's a real win for anyone short on space, giving them more freedom to add a bike shed, protect their tools, cover a vehicle, or even create a small sleepout for guests - all without extra paperwork." These changes are expected to be in force by the end of the year. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
40 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Taranaki Regional councillors urged to quit election over Treaty Principles fiasco
Dinnie Moeahu directs his ire at regional councillors Neil Walker and Donald McIntyre. Photo: RNZ / Robin Martin Councillors involved in quashing debate over the Treaty Principles Bill at the Taranaki Regional Council have received a dressing down at a fiery meeting in Stratford. Council was considering a report which found councillors colluded not to make a submission on the bill and halt debate. New Plymouth District Councillor Dinnie Moeahu - whose deputation was shunted down the agenda in December - addressed council today in front of whanau and supporters. "What unfolded that day was absolutely disgusting and shameful. I witnessed some elected members bully their way to getting what they wanted. "And now your conduct has been extensively investigated, documented, reviewed and condemned and made public for the world to see." Dinnie Moeahu. Photo: RNZ / Robin Martin He said what happened was not just a breach of process, but a breach of trust and the fundamental democratic and cultural responsibilities the TRC was obligated to uphold. Moeahu said a submission prepared by TRC which expressed concern about the Treaty Principles Bill was abruptly dismissed without discussion. "Let's not mince words that was not governance, that was cowardice hiding behind collusion." He said the offending councillors attempt to brush-off their actions as a miscommunication didn't wash with him. "I was met with contempt, I was made to feel less." Moeahu said the TRC had statuary obligations to take the Treaty of Waitangi into account and it had partnering with Māori explicitly enshrined as a strategic priority in its long-term plan. The Moeahu whanau perfom a haka at the conclusion of Peter Moeahu's deputation. Photo: RNZ / Robin Martin "This isn't a training issue. It's an absolute failure in governance. When elected members treat Treaty matters as too political or not appropriate you betray your role." He hoped the point of reckoning the report represented could be a turning point for the TRC. "Leadership is a privilege you have been afforded ... do better Taranaki Regional Council." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.