Sweeping RMA changes for housing, freshwater, infrastructure rules proposed
The government has released discussion documents covering 12 national policy statements and similar instruments, with the aim of having 16 new or updated ones by the end of the year — ahead of legislation replacing the RMA next year.
The consultation covers three main topics: infrastructure and development, the primary sector and freshwater. It is open from May 29 to July 27.
The topics cover a wide range of portfolios, the early afternoon announcement fronted by RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop, Agriculture Minister Todd McClay, Energy Minister Simon Watts, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones, Associate Environment Minister Andrew Hoggard, and Associate Housing Minister Tama Potaka.
RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop. (Source: rnz.co.nz)
ADVERTISEMENT
"The changes we're now proposing to national direction under the existing RMA give effect to a range of coalition commitments, can be done quickly and relatively easily, and will help unclog the growth arteries of the economy," Bishop said.
"Next year we'll replace the RMA with new legislation premised on property rights. Our new system will provide a framework that makes it easier to plan and deliver infrastructure and energy projects, as well a protecting the environment."
Freshwater
The changes would "rebalance Te Mana o te Wai to better reflect the interests of all water users", with councils able to "tailor" monitoring and management to local conditions.
Councils would be directed to consider how they could help ensure stable domestic food supply, including providing for crop rotation in regional plans.
Crop rotation within catchments could be allowed without a consent. Water storage rules would change aiming to ensure water flows during dry periods, protect against climate-change-caused drought, and reduce the need for extraction from natural rivers and lakes.
Wetland regulations would change aiming to protect water filtration, flood control, and habitat for diverse species.
ADVERTISEMENT
The definition of "wetland" would be amended, now excluding unintentionally created "induced" wetlands, and allowing farming activities like irrigation, on-farm water storage and fencing considered "unlikely" to have an adverse effect, while constructed wetlands would have a new objective, standards, and consent pathway.
Councils would no longer need to map wetlands by 2030, but Source Water Risk Management areas would now need to be mapped "to help safeguard drinking water sources from contamination".
The government is also proposing to "simplify" requirements for fish passages to reduce the administrative burden "while still providing appropriate protection".
Changes to rules for synthetic fertiliser are also proposed.
Agriculture Minister Todd McClay. (Source: rnz.co.nz)
Primary sector
Highly productive land changes would extend the timeframes to 2027/28, see the removal of the "Land Use Capability 3" category and trial the use of "special agricultural areas".
ADVERTISEMENT
Grazed beef cattle and deer in low intensity farms would no longer need to be kept out of wetlands.
In forestry, councils would lose the ability to set harder controls, slash would need to be planned for and — above a certain size — removed, and low-intensity harvesting will be permitted by default if "any relevant forest planning requirement is complied with".
Restrictions on mines and quarries in wetlands would be loosened.
Aquaculture changes aim to streamline consenting for activities and research, and allow small structures in coastal marine areas with no consent.
Infrastructure and development
Granny flats of up to 70sqm, and papakāinga of up to 10 homes would be allowed without a consent on specific land zones. Papakāinga would also allow commercial activities of up to 100sqm, conservation activity, accommodation for up to eight guests, along with education, health, sports, marae, urupā and māra kai facilities.
Medium papakāinga of up to 30 homes would be considered a "restricted discretionary" activity, with those of more than 30 units becoming "discretionary" activities.
ADVERTISEMENT
Energy changes include new policies on supporting the needs of the electricity network and management of environmental interests, and another new policy on recognising and providing for Māori interests in electricity transmission, and other changes.
These would allow more routine work on electricity networks, establish a National Grid Yard and Subdivision Corridor, and scrap consenting for distribution and EV charging infrastructure.
A new policy for natural hazards — covering flooding, landslips, coastal erosion, coastal inundation, active faults, liquefaction and tsunami — would cover all environments and zones including coastal environments, directing councils to take a risk-based approach and assess risk based on "likelihood and consequence".
A definition of "significant risk" using a risk matrix would be provided, with councils directed to also use the best available information when making decisions.
In telecommunications, new poles would be allowed by default in more areas, with restrictions in the road reserve also removed. Renewable energy generation, temporary facilities and connection lines to heritage buildings for telecommunications would no longer need consenting.
rnz.co.nz
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
an hour ago
- Otago Daily Times
Farm forestry ban too late to help: advocate
The farm-to-forest ban passed its first reading last week but a Southland Federated Farmers executive says its too late, the damage has been done and is continuing. Executive member and farmer Dean Rabbidge said since the ban's announcement on December 4, there has been a rush to convert arable land into forests. "If anything, we've only seen an acceleration of it since December 4 with people knowing that this is their last chance," he said. The sheep, beef and dairy farmer said after pulling pines out of his own property he has learned the damage the conifers do to the soil. "It's taking a lot of work to get it back into productive land through fertiliser and seed and stuff," he said. Pine needles themselves are quite toxic, he said, and do not let anything else grow. He said the farms that have been converted into forestry would have had soil that was at the optimum level for animal health and pasture production. "[The soil] has been cared for and looked after for maximum food production values, and now we're just planting it in pine trees," he said. The ban, or Climate Change Response (Emissions Trading Scheme — Forestry Conversions) Amendment Bill, will include exemptions. After the first reading, Minister for Agriculture Todd McClay said investors that were able to prove intent to afforest between January 2021 and December 4 would be exempt from the ban. This exemption, which was part of the December 4 announcement, was clarified by the minister. Mr McClay said that the combination of buying land and ordering of trees prior to December 4 would be an example of proof of a qualifying investment. He said each of these actions alone would not. This exemption has been a source of confusion for concerned farmers who have said the grey area of "evidence of intent" opened up a loophole that has been exploited. Mr Rabbidge said the grey area remains and his organisation will continue to hold government ministers to account over this issue. "There's still been some very, very questionable land purchases go on recently under the guise of, hey, we had seedlings ordered — that was their intent to plant," he said. "We're still going to keep the pressure on the government to make sure that all the loopholes are closed." The Wyndham farmer said the rapid conversion is visible to those living rurally, but it will take a while for urban residents to recognise the affect. "It's far too late, but people are finally waking up to the damage that forestry, both production and carbon, is doing to the rural sector," he said. "It's not until the urban areas feel the effects of it that it's going to be far too late."
Otago Daily Times
4 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Iwi leader rebuts claims of consent power grab
Ngāti Waewae leader Francois Tumahai has rejected claims that a revamped iwi agreement with the West Coast Regional Council gives Māori too much say in planning and resource consents. The regional council has reworded more than 20 clauses in its Mana Whakahono a Rohe partnership document with Poutini Ngai Tahu, mainly to clarify how it will work in practice. Former chair Allan Birchfield, who signed the original document in 2020, has strongly criticised the new version, saying it puts iwi on the same governance level as the council. 'I am voting against (the amendments) because they will give iwi full control of the Council's consenting and compliance role under the RMA,' he told yesterday's council meeting. Mr Tumahai, one of two iwi reps on the council, says Mr Birchfield is deluded. 'He's had it explained to him, but he won't listen. Every other councillor has supported the changes but he has his world view, and he won't change it,' the Ngāti Waewae chair told Local Democracy Reporting. The agreement spells out how staff will involve manawhenua in resource consenting - a requirement under the Resource Management Act (RMA). 'The council will treat Poutini Ngāi Tahu as an affected party for all applications … where there is potential for adverse cultural effects, unless it is demonstrated otherwise,' an expanded clause says. Council staff would decide if adverse effects were likely by talking to the environmental agencies of the region's two Rūnanga, Poutini Ngai Tahu partnership manager Ashley Stuart said. A new clause in the agreement says the council will also 'strongly encourage' people applying for resource consents to talk to manawhenua themselves early on, through the iwi's environmental consultancies. Without a letter of approval from the iwi, the council will treat the consent as 'limited notified', adding potential costs and delays. Ngāti Waewae's environmental agency was already issuing at least one letter of approval a week to people checking in over resource consents, Mr Tumahai said. The council held back three of the amendments for further clarification, but endorsed the majority. Cr Birchfield was the sole objector, saying independent legal advice should been provided before these were put to council. "These are major changes … they should be deferred and the community should also be consulted,' he said. The former chair said he had signed the Mana Whakahono agreement in 2020 on the understanding it was a consultation document that would help to speed up and lower the cost of consenting, but this had turned out not to be the case. 'I did receive considerable criticism at the time and those critics have proven to be correct. This agreement is part of the reason why the council's compliance and consent function is so costly and delayed.' Mr Tumahai told LDR there were multiple factors causing the delays. 'It's convenient to blame Māori - we're kind of used to it - but I think with the changes the council is making we should see an improvement within a couple of months.' Part of the problem was overly-complex consent forms, and the council's use of North Island consultants who did not understand the West Coast context, Mr Tumahai conceded. The council had been swamped with applications for resource consents as the price of gold soared, and had to hire external planners to cope, he said. 'We had a workshop today on creating new templates with standard conditions for alluvial mining, and a schedule that walks you through how to apply - that should simplify it for everyone and speed things up.' Cr Birchfield - a veteran miner - did not attend the workshop, telling LDR later he needed to be at work to smelt some gold. Mr Tumahai said the clamour over consent delays was coming from a handful of miners who had not been successful with their applications. "They're not coming to grips with modern requirements and they are the ones making the noise.' The revamped Mana Whakahono agreement also sets out priority areas for improvement in which the council and iwi will collaborate as Treaty partners. They include planning for new sewerage infrastructure, and coastal retreat where buildings are at risk from erosion, flooding or sea level rise. District council and industry discharges into rivers or the sea are also seen as priorities for change, but over time. 'The discharge of wastewater into freshwater and coastal waters is an outdated solution from the last century which is culturally abhorrent to Poutini Ngai Tahu and is becoming unacceptable to others within communities,' the agreement declares. - By Lois Williams, Local Democracy Reporter
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Government begins negotiations with councils for regional deals
Minister Chris Bishop says all three regions have significant economic growth potential. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone The government is to begin negotiations with councils in Auckland, Otago and Western Bay of Plenty to set in place so-called city or regional deals. Mayors from those three regions have signed memoranda of understanding (MOUs) with the coalition, after earlier submitting "light-touch proposals". The proposed deals are a coalition initiative under which local and central government will agree funding and project priorities over 10 years. Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop said all three regions had significant economic growth potential and had already demonstrated an ability to partner with government. "These initial regions put together compelling proposals that reflect the government's and the regions' priorities through strong propositions that provide a clear pathway to getting important work done," he said in a statement. "The government will now begin negotiations with the three regions, with a view to agreeing the first deal by the end of 2025." Bishop said, as part of negotiations, the government was prepared to offer easier access to new and existing funding and financing tools, as well as more collaboration with its experts and officials. It could also set up already funded "innovation facilities" - such as public research institutions - in a desired location. Bishop said in return, councils would have to sign up to the government's vision around economic growth, housing, water services and transport. Councils would have to do a better job looking after pipes, roads, and other important assets, he said. They would also be expected to do more than just the bare minimum when it came to encouraging new housing - especially near "rapid transit corridors" where the government had already helped pay for infrastructure. Bishop said the government also wanted councils to consider congestion charging, special rates for certain areas, or development charges. The government hoped to finalise its first deal by the end of the year.
