You Don't Have to Be a Doctor to Understand This
If I had to guess, the virus probably breached my protective gear while my colleagues and I cared for a young woman in the final moments of her battle with the disease. Each time she vomited or soiled herself, we changed her linens, gently laying her listless body back onto clean, burgundy floral sheets. I knew this ritual wouldn't save her life. I also knew it carried substantial personal risk. But I refused to let her die without dignity. I know there are many who would do the same.
You may never find yourself in a treatment center halfway across the world, but when suffering is close enough to touch, most of us feel the same human instinct to offer a helping hand, to not turn away.
America's leaders are increasingly casting aside empathy and compassionate care as dangerous liabilities. Elon Musk has called empathy 'the fundamental weakness of Western civilization,' and the Trump administration governs as if that is a guiding principle. The growing philosophical backlash against empathy overlooks a deeper truth: America's strength has never come from isolation or indifference, but from an instinct to care beyond our borders. If we allow the Trump administration's assault on empathy to define our global health agenda, or ourselves, we won't just be turning away from the world — we'll be turning away from who we are. The belief that we have a responsibility to others isn't shortsighted sentimentalism; it's the moral foundation of a meaningful life.
Historically, the United States has strongly supported — strategically, financially and philosophically — the individuals and organizations carrying out this kind of care. I've worked alongside health care providers responding to crises abroad because they recognize it's where their skills are most meaningful and others who do it because of a spiritual duty to serve the suffering and uphold human dignity. Collectively, we were driven by the conviction that it was the morally right thing to do.
The United States government, and perhaps many Americans, no longer view global health in the same way. This is despite the fact that American involvement has helped eradicate smallpox, halved malaria deaths in many countries and prevented an estimated 26 million deaths through the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, or PEPFAR. All told, U.S. global health support saves 3.3 million lives a year — or at least did, before its recent and rapid dismantling.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Planned Parenthood sues Trump administration over planned defunding
Planned Parenthood sued the Trump administration Monday over a provision in the newly signed Republican tax and spending cut bill that would end Medicaid payments to abortion providers for one year.
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Federal judge pauses Trump administration's Planned Parenthood defunding measure
A federal judge on Monday prevented the Trump administration from enforcing part of a massive tax and spending bill that would block Medicaid funding for Planned Parenthood health centers. The temporary restraining order by Judge Indira Talwani in Massachusetts blocks the "big, beautiful bill's" provision to defund the family planning provider. At issue is the provision in the new tax and spending bill signed into law by President Donald Trump on July 4 that eliminates one year of Medicaid payments from Planned Parenthood health centers because the organization also provides abortions. A White House official told Fox News Digital that the Trump administration is committed to ending the use of federal taxpayer dollars to fund or promote elective abortions. The official noted that the administration's stance is a commonsense position that the overwhelming majority of Americans agree with. On Monday, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, the Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts and Planned Parenthood Association of Utah filed a lawsuit in federal court. "The prohibition specifically targets Planned Parenthood Federation of America and its member health care providers in order to punish them for lawful activity, namely advocating for and providing legal abortion access wholly outside the Medicaid program and without using any federal funds," the lawsuit states. If allowed to stand, Planned Parenthood said the provision would have "devastating consequences" for the more than 1 million patients who use Medicaid as their insurance at Planned Parenthood health centers across the country to get birth control and cancer screenings, among other services. Dominique Lee, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, said the organization has a long history of fighting for sexual and reproductive freedom. "The Trump administration's hell-bent ambitions to close our clinics and abandon our patients won't stop us. Let me be crystal clear: We are not intimidated. We were built for this moment," she said. "Here in Massachusetts, we fight back, and we will never be bullied into turning our backs on health care or human rights."
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Trump Megabill Threatens Low-Income Health Insurance And Nursing Homes
Port Washington, N.Y.: The residents of the Harborside, a retirement community that has filed for ... More bankruptcy three times in nine years, hold a rally to call on politicians and others to save their homes and life savings on Oct. 24, 2024 in Port Washington, New York. (Photo by Howard Schnapp/Newsday RM via Getty Images) In the scramble for Donald Trump's megabill, the Senate had to make changes to the House version to pass the body's rules for reconciliation. The result included large cuts in programs that serve the financially needy, including Medicaid. There are two major implications of the Medicaid cuts. One has been discussed widely: the loss of health insurance coverage for millions and the impact on the nation's healthcare system. The second has garnered less attention. There are enormous implications for the availability of nursing homes at a time when changes in demographics have made all forms of senior housing much more important in the U.S. The Medicaid Numbers Medicaid is an expansive program dually funded by the federal and state governments. KFF, formerly known as the Kaiser Family Foundation, has compiled extensive data on the program by analyzing federal government statistics. In 2023, Medicaid covered 19% of all hospital care spending. That was $283 billion out of $872 billion in total Medicaid expenditures, or 32%. Physician and clinical services were 14%, and retail prescription drugs, another 6%. There has been no Congressional Budget Office scoring on the Senate version because of timing. According to KFF's estimate, the Senate bill, which became the law, will reduce federal Medicaid spending by $1.04 trillion over the next ten years, or a $104 billion per year reduction on average. That will result in 11.8 million more people nationwide without insurance. Another measure is the amount of Medicare funding states would lose. Thirty-seven states would lose a minimum of 13% annually, and another five would lose between 7% and 10%. The lack of insurance has broader implications as well because the medical care those 11.8 million people need affects many more. KFF projects the cuts to ultimately affect an estimated 83 million people. In addition to those covered by Medicaid, there are state workers (Medicaid, again, isn't purely federal), and healthcare providers who are independent, working in clinics, and associated with hospitals. As U.S. health expenditures as of 2023 were 17,6% of gross domestic product according to the Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker, there is a potential significant impact on the entire economy. Senior Housing The senior housing real estate market incorporates several types of living arrangements, including independent living, assisted living, skilled nursing (also known as nursing homes), memory care, and in-home care. Around for many years, these options are becoming more important because of the country's aging demographics. From 1920 to 2020, the U.S. population age 65 and older grew about five times faster than the total population, as the Census Bureau has written. By 2020, that group numbered 55.8 million, or 16.8% of the U.S. population. By 2024, the 65-and-older group numbered 61.2 million. The under-18 population decreased by 0.2% to 73.1 million. The number of metro areas with more older adults than those under 18 grew from 58 to 112. By 2030, 20% of the population is expected to be 65 years or older, or 71.6 million, as S&P Global notes. The older people grow, the greater the need for specialized housing. However, Medicaid is the primary payer of nursing facility residency, covering 63% of the residents, KKF says. The program paid for 44% of the $147 billion the U.S. spent on long-term care in 2023. 'Most Medicaid enrollees using institutional [long-term care] are dually enrolled in Medicare, compared to just over half of those using home care,' the organization said. According to Senior Housing News, senior living broadly is somewhat insulated from the Medicaid spending cuts, but not immune. 'The bill likely means more financial challenges ahead for nursing homes, hospitals and community health centers and could push them to scale down services or even close their doors,' they wrote. It will take time for the effect of the cuts on senior housing, hospitals, and insurance for lower-income to become obvious. However, it could be disastrous.
