
We Reject Human Rights Watch Bias And Libellous Report Against Burkina Faso
Human Rights Watch behaves like any organic intellectual in the imperialist hegemony, fiddling around the edges and adjusting details. It plays approximately the same game as the European-based Cultic Empire.
The dawn of the Sahel Revolution has led to remarkable advances in defeating terrorism, poverty alleviation, regional integration and unity, and a reassertion of sovereignty and true independence. France and the United States and their allies have been antagonistic toward the Sahel Revolution, and have concurrently pursued a covert foreign policy, aimed at destabilising the Sahel States of Mali, Burkina Faso and the Republic of Niger, and murdering their leaders, as they did to past progressive leaders across Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean nations.
So why has international instruments like Human Rights Watch (HRW) and other Organisations and the corporate media so desperately wanting to interpret the foreign policies of France and US, toward Africa? This affinity for imperialist and neo-colonial-driven agendas are not limited to the Sahel or Africa. Human Rights Watch behaves like any organic intellectual in the imperialist hegemony, fiddling around the edges and adjusting details. It plays approximately the same game as the European-based Cultic Empire.
It is not the policy of the New African Charter International (NACI) to argue that Human Rights Watch is not among the recognized non-governmental organizations in the forefront of the global advocacy for promotion of human rights. But despite its claims to be an advocate of international human rights law, Human Rights Watch ill-intended mistakes and biased judgement and methodology applied on African issues are too numerous and too serious to ignore.
More precisely, Human Rights Watch repeatedly focuses on vilifying the leaders of Mali, Burkina Faso and the Republic of Niger, while ignoring rapid development in the social and economic sectors that is taking place in those progressive African countries. The US-based NGO has also ignored the fact that the ongoing terrorism war was imposed on the Sahel region by those foreign powers that initiated and spearheaded the genocide campaign in Libya, notably NATO members-states led by France, the US and Britain. As a result, it routinely judges the African continent in a manner that promotes colonial and imperialist-driven agendas, and discredits governments seeking sovereignty and total independence from foreign manipulative mechanism. It is this bias that lies at the root of the spurious attacks on the progressive and visionary governments of Mali, Burkina Faso and the Republic of Niger, by Human Rights Watch.
On 12th May, 2025 Human Rights Watch (HRW) released a report publication titled: 'Burkina Faso: Army Directs Ethnic Massacres.' The US-based NGO assumed that the Burkinabe military coordinated the massacres of more than 130 civilians, most of whom were Fulani speaking people living in the west of Burkina Faso. Mass killings of civilians by government security forces, militias, and Islamist armed groups amount to war crimes and other possible atrocity crimes, Human Rights Watch stated in the report.
The sad part of the report is that, no Human Rights Watch official or representative was present in where the said crime was assumed to be committed. No gainsaying the fact that recently, there were terrorist attacks on security bases in northern Burkina Faso, killing a large number of soldiers, and another in the south of the country that led to the massacre of civilians. Other military bases have been targeted as well, including also police and market places in the Sahel nation. The Djibo military base has suffered serious attacks by terrorist forces under the Al-Qaeda and its affiliate outfits. Many soldiers and civilians as well have been killed, and wounded in that security base.
Day-in-and-day-out terrorist forces are unleashing mayhem and heinous attacks in the Sahel region. There are attacks recorded in the South of Burkina Faso, killing scores of security men and women, and civilians in Bousgou, Salemboare and Yonde villages near the borders with the Republic of Togo. While these attacks are being clinically executed, there have been arrests of foreign mercenaries of European nationalities hired to advance the genocide campaign in the Sahel region. Recently in Nigeria, a British mercenary soldier was arrested and investigated for arms trafficking to West Africa.
These are facts, which the Human Rights Watch cannot dispute, but instead sit in well-dressed air-conditioned board rooms in New York and rely on hearsay to gather information, which it uses to spoon-feed the international community, as the truth and reality in the Sahel region.
The title of the May 12, 2025 report and its contents assert that the alleged massacre of Fulani people in Burkina Faso took place in March of this year, and was directed by the Burkinabe military. The fact is that the HRW and other western NGOs, and the corporate media are hell-bent on an intensive campaigned designed to promote international capitalist system in the Sahel region. As detailed in this latest report, the publication is fundamentally flawed, using lies, distortions, omissions, and egregious double standards to construct a fraudulent and libellous narrative of Burkinabe military attacks on the Fulani civilian population. The report adds Human Rights Watch's obsessive campaign to single out the progressive governments of the Sahel region for destruction.
Having stated the above, the New African Charter International takes a very strong exception to the biased, baseless, misleading, racist and hate-filled human rights report on Burkina Faso, which has been disseminated worldwide by US-based Human Rights Watch. The report should be seen here as nothing but selective, colonial and imperialist-driven, ill-intentioned and reminiscent of the game played in Libya, to kill Colonel Gaddafi in 2011, to destroy Libya, to unleash genocide wounds and loot natural resources and wealth of the North African nation. The question now is what really the intent in bringing out such a tendentious report that seeks to build a false narrative against Burkina Faso and other nations of the Sahel?
Since the dawn of the African revolution in the Sahel region, under the wise and visionary leadership of Presidents Asimi Goita (Mali), Ibrahim Traore (Burkina Faso) and Abdourahamane Tchiani (Republic of Niger), the corporate NGOs and media have gone wild to promote anti-African agenda, to incite ethnic violence and possible foreign military intervention in the region. The three Sahel leaders have been selected for red-tagging and target for online harassment and vilification. In Burkina Faso in particular, the issue is now assassination bid on the life of President Ibrahim Traore.
NACI agrees that the ongoing terrorist war in the Sahel or in any parts of the world should be a major concern, we are disappointed that the US-based NGO has failed to mention in all of its reports on the Sahel about the root causes of the ongoing terrorism in the region. The truth is that, violence between farmers and herders has a long history in West Africa. For Human Rights Watch to assume that the Burkinabe military is coordinating an ethnic genocide against Fulani civilians is fundamentally flaw, fallacious and violates Burkina Faso's sovereignty and territorial integrity. It is a sham and figment of imagination.
Human Rights Watch should understand that, Africans can no longer afford to witness another genocide on the continent. The 1994 Rwandan ethnic genocide is now history, and we do not want a repetition of such despicable act in any parts of Africa. We believe terrorism is the most egregious violation of human rights, and yet the authors of the Human Rights Watch's report have deliberately decided to bypass the fact that NATO members-states and their allies initiated and are behind the ongoing terrorist war in the Sahel region.
The report clearly reflected the view of France's former Economy Minister, Hon Thierry Breton, who once said: 'It was Emmanuel Macron's stupidity that opened the eyes of Africans. One thing is certain if France loses its colonies our children and grandchildren will go to Africa in search of their livelihoods. Immigration will change direction. Macron needs to go or France will suffer. Europe need to unite to fight this new African vision Mali, Niger, Burkina Faso and other countries will follow suit. If one of the puschists' heads falls, the others will abandon the vision. Africa has no history therefore, cannot run the world.' One only needs to take a look at the comments above to illustrate the ludicrousness of the Human Rights Watch's report.
The timing of the report puts the credibility of Human Rights Watch at its lowest ebb. We warn the HRW against attempt to dabble into the politics of the Sahel region, and refrain from setting a dangerous precedent in the work of international NGOs across Africa. Despite this report, we would like to assure the international community that no set-up conspiracy theory can distract the Sahel leaders from their responsibility of protecting and defending sovereignty and territorial integrity of the three countries that made up of the Alliance of Sahel States (AES), which includes Mali, Burkina Faso and the Republic of Niger. Not even the aggressive rhetoric of France's former Economy Minister, Thierry Breton can distract the resolved of the Sahel leaders, to bail their region out of the mess left behind by colonial France and its puppets in the region.
Much as the New African Charter International is concerned, the report peddled around by Human Rights Watch does not reflect the actual situation in the Sahel region. It only succeeded in projecting the current situation in a gloomy and negative light with a political intent to justify US and France overt and covert attacks and plots to destabilize Burkina Faso and by extension, to assassinate President Ibrahim Traore.
We want to make it crystal clear that the Human Rights Watch deliberately dodged in its report the commitment of the Government of President Ibrahim Traore, to ensure law and order in areas of Burkina Faso held by Al-Qaeda terrorist outfit and its affiliates. Burkina Faso and the other Sahel nations, Mali and the Republic of Niger are committed to ensuring the fulfilment of their international obligations, and they need no one to inform or remind them of their human rights obligations in their countries. Since the Human Rights Watch believes it operates in more than 100 countries, it should now redirect its mission on peace, development, sovereignty and dignity of Africa, and to refocus on providing support to the Sahel nations in building institutions to protect human rights in the region. It should devote itself to monitoring human rights violations and environmental degradation by some European states against the people of Africa, Latin America, and the Caribbean, and Asia regions.
We conclude by demanding the Human Rights Watch, to make a clear and unqualified apology and retraction for its missteps and biased report. We warn the US-based NGO against dispensing allegations without proof; rather than attacking the Burkinabe army for its successes in the frontlines against terrorism actions, we urge the Human Rights Watch to display sincere commitment to fair, ethical and competent reporting about Africa.
God save Africa!
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
14 hours ago
- RNZ News
The Panel with Chris Wikaira and Leonie Freeman Part 1
Tonight, on The Panel, Wallace Chapman is joined by panellists Chris Wikaira and Leonie Freeman. To begin, it's D-Day for the US tariffs, and New Zealand has been hit with a 15% rate. This is a rise from the originally proposed 10%. Kate Acland, chair of Beef and Lamb NZ, joins the panel to unpack how much of an impat this will have on exports. Then, they revisit speed humps in Manurewa: are there too many, or is their presence justified? To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.


NZ Herald
16 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Michelle Montague: the first NZ woman to sign with the UFC
National Minister Erica Stanford and Labour MP Willie Jackson talk NCEA, emergency alerts, oil and gas. Video / Herald NOW Mount Albert Grammar School Principal Patrick Drumm talks NCEA in schools ahead of the looming announcement. Video / Herald NOW MetService Weather: 1 August. Video / MetService Lewis Clareburt has produced a new national record in the 200-metre medley and the Storm have beaten the Eels 16-10. Video / NZ Herald Crimson Education has been valued at NZ$1 billion (US$600 million) - but could its core business, getting kids into Ivy league, be destroyed by AI? Ministerial briefing on NCEA suggests the current system does not support pathways into trades; and rebounding tsunami swells still pose a risk. Video / NZ Herald Today on The Front Page, author Jared Savage joins us to discuss the rising threat of organised crime in New Zealand. MetService national weather July 31 - August 3. Video / MetService From regional TV station to global gold standard documentary production: the story of Natural History New Zealand. Near the start of the livestream of the council meeting, Brown discusses absent councillors. Video / Auckland Council A person has been spotted surfing at Scarborough Beach despite a national tsunami warning. Video / Supplied Judith Collins and Winston Peters say the base will help in the fight against transnational crime. Video / Mark Mitchell Liam Napier and Elliott Smith discuss injury gaps, who will cover the third halfback role and the Lions' win in the lead-up to the All Blacks tour squad naming. Video / NZ Herald Mike Seawright, Director of ReliefAid, speaks to Ryan Bridge about the situation on the ground in Gaza and what urgent action is required to relieve the issues of hunger there. Business with 2degrees: Kiwibank $500M cap raise landing flat and the flightpath for the new Air NZ chief executive.


Scoop
16 hours ago
- Scoop
New Caledonia's Oldest Pro-Independence Party Denounces 'Bougival' Deal
, Correspondent French Pacific Desk New Caledonia's oldest pro-independence party, the Union Calédonienne (UC), on Thursday officially rejected a political agreement signed in Paris last month. The text, bearing the signatures of all of New Caledonia's political parties represented at the local Congress, a total of 18 leaders, both pro-France and pro-independence, is described as a "project" for an agreement that would shape New Caledonia's political future. Since it was signed in the city of Bougival (West of Paris) on 12 July, after ten days of intense negotiations, it has been dubbed a "bet on trust" and has been described by French Minister for Overseas Manuel Valls as a commitment from all signing parties to report to their respective bases and explain its contents. The Bougival document involves a series of measures and recognition by France of New Caledonia as a "State" which could become empowered with its own international relations and foreign affairs, provided they do not contradict France's key interests. It also envisages a double citizenship - French and New Caledonian - provided future New Caledonian citizens are French nationals in the first place. It also describes a future devotion of stronger powers for each of the three provinces (North, South and Loyalty Islands), especially in terms of tax collection. Since it was published, the document, bearing a commitment to defend the text "as is", was hailed as "innovative" and "historic". New Caledonia's leaders have started to hold regular meetings - sometimes daily - and sessions with their respective supporters and militants, mostly to explain the contents of what they have signed. The meetings were held by most pro-France parties and within the pro-independence camp, the two main moderate parties, UPM (Union Progressiste en Mélanésie) and PALIKA (Kanak Liberation Party). Over the past two weeks, all of these parties have strived to defend the agreement, which is sometimes described as a Memorandum of Agreement or a roadmap for future changes in New Caledonia. Most of the leaders who have inked the text have also held lengthy interviews, in explanation mode, with local media. Parties who have unreservedly pledged their support to and have signed the Bougival document are: on the pro-France side, Les Loyalistes, Rassemblement-LR, Wallisian-based Eveil océanien and Calédonie ensemble and on the pro-independence side, UNI-FLNKS (which comprises UPM and PALIKA). But one of the main components of the pro-independence movement, the FLNKS (Kanak and Socialist National Liberation Front) and its main pillar, the Union Calédonienne, have held a series of meetings at different levels, indicating their resentment of their negotiators signing the contested document. UC held its executive committee on 21 July, its steering committee on 26 July, and FLNKS convened its political bureau on 23 July. A 'lure of sovereignty' All of these meetings concluded in an increasingly clear rejection of the Bougival document. Speaking at a news conference on Thursday in Nouméa, UC leaders made it clear that they "formally reject" the agreement because, in their view, it is a "lure of sovereignty" and does not guarantee neither real sovereignty nor political balance. FLNKS chief negotiator Emmanuel Tjibaou, who is also UC's chair, told local reporters he understood his signature on the document meant a commitment to return to New Caledonia, explain the text and obtain the approval of the political base. "I didn't have a mandate to sign a political agreement, my mandate was to register the talks and bring them back to our people so that a decision can be didn't mean an acceptance on our part", he said, mentioning a "temporary" document subject to further discussions. Tjibaou said some amendments his delegation had put on the table in Bougival "went missing" in the final text. 'Bougival, it's over' "As far as we're concerned, Bougival, it's over", UC vice-president Mickaël Forrest said. He said the time was now to move onto a "post-Bougival phase". Meanwhile, the FLNKS also consulted its own "constitutionalists" to obtain legal advice and interpretation on the document. In a release associated with Thursday's media conference, UC states that the Bougival text cannot be regarded as a balance between two visions, but rather a way of "maintaining New Caledonia French". The text, UC said, has led the political dialogue into a "new impasse" and it leaves several questions unanswered. "With the denomination of a 'State', a fundamental law (a de facto Constitution), the capacity to self-organise, an international recognition, this document is perceived as a project for an agreement to integrate (New Caledonia) into France under the guise of a decolonisation". "But the FLNKS has never accepted a status of autonomy within France, but an external decolonisation by means of accession to full sovereignty (which) grants us the right to choose our inter-dependencies", the release states. The pro-independence party also criticises plans to enlarge the list of persons entitled to vote at New Caledonia's local elections, the very issue that triggered deadly and destructive riots in May 2024. It is also critical of a proposed mechanism that would require a vote at the Congress with a minimum majority of 64 percent (two thirds) before any future powers can be requested for transfer from France to New Caledonia. Assuming that current population trends and a fresh system of representation at the Congress will allow more representatives from the Southern province (about three quarters of New Caledonia's population), UC said "in other words, it would be the non-independence (camp) who will have the power to authorise us -or not- to ask for our sovereignty". They party confirmed that it had "formally rejected the Bougival project of agreement as it stands" following a decision made by its steering committee on 26 July "Since the fundamentals of our struggle and the principles of decolonisation are not there". Negotiators no longer mandated The decision also means that every member of its negotiating team who signed the document on 12 July is now de facto demoted and no longer mandated by the party, until a new negotiating team is appointed, if required. "Union Calédonienne remains mobilised to arrive at a political agreement that takes into account the achievement of a trajectory towards full sovereignty". On Tuesday, FLNKS president Christian Téin, as an invited guest of Corsica's "Nazione" pro-independence movement, told French media he declared himself "individually against" the Bougival document, adding this was "far from being akin to full sovereignty". Téin said that during the days that lead to the signing of the document in Bougival "the pressure" exerted on negotiators was "terrible". He said the result was that due to "excessive force" applied by "France's representatives", the final text's content "looks like it is the French State and right-wing people who will decide the (indigenous) Kanak people's future". Facing crime-related charges, Téin is awaiting his trial, but was released from jail, under the condition that he does not return to New Caledonia. The leader of a CCAT (field action coordinating cell) created by Union Calédonienne late 2023 to protest against a proposed French Constitutional amendment to alter voters' rules of eligibility at local elections, was jailed for one year in mainland France, but was elected President of FLNKS in absentia late August 2024. CCAT, meanwhile, was admitted as one of the new components of FLNKS. In a de facto split, the two main moderate pillars of FLNKS, UPM and PALIKA, at the same time, distanced themselves from the pro-independence UC-dominated platform, materialising a rift within the pro-independence umbrella. The FLNKS is scheduled to hold an extraordinary meeting on 9 August 2025 (it was initially scheduled to be held on 2 August), to "highlight the prospects of the pursuit of dialogue through a repositioning of the pro-independence movement's political orientations". Valls: 'I'm not giving up' Reacting to the latest UC statements, Valls told French media he called UC "on a great sense of responsibility". "If tomorrow there was to be no agreement, it would mean the future, hope, would be put into question. Investment, including for the nickel mining industry, would no longer be possible." "I'm not giving up. Union Calédonienne has chosen to reject, as it stands, the Bougival accord project. I take note of this, but I profoundly regret this position." "An institutional void would be a disaster for [New Caledonia]. It would be a prolonged uncertainty, the risk of further instability, the return of violence," he said. "But my door is not closed and I remain available for dialogue at all times. Impasse is not an option." Valls said the Bougival document was "'neither someone's victory on another one, nor an imposed text: it was build day after day, with partners around the table, following months of long discussions." In a recent letter specifically sent to Union Calédonienne, the French former Prime Minister suggested the creation of an editorial committee to start drafting future-shaping documents for New Caledonia, such as its "fundamental law", akin to a Constitution for New Caledonia. Valls also stressed France's financial assistance to New Caledonia, which last year totalled around €3 billion because of the costs associated to the May 2024 riots. The riots caused 14 dead, hundreds of injured and an estimated financial cost of more than €2 billion in material damage.