Cologne Pride draws thousands in defiance of rising LGBTQ+ hostility
Some 60,000 people and 90 floats took part in the parade in the western German city.
Rainbow colours, a symbol of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ+) community, could be seen across the city, in people's clothing and on flags lining the streets.
Cologne is sending a strong signal today in support of human rights and everyone's right to live as they want, the city's mayor, Henriette Reker, said.
"The mood is different this time," said Jens Pielhau, chairman of the Cologne Pride association, at the opening of the event. Freedom and the right to demonstrate openly and peacefully are in danger, he said.
Germany's LGBTQ+ community is facing increased hostility and is the target of a rising number of crimes.
In the face of this hostility, Pielhau stressed that it is all the more important to take to the streets in support of queer rights and to show up as a large community.
The local police said a large number of officers were on duty to protect the event.
Cologne Pride is one of the largest events for the LGBTQ+ community in Europe, hosting a march that is similar in size to the one in Berlin.
In Germany, the marches are known as Christopher Street Day (CSD), in honour of the 1969 protest against the police storming of the Stonewall Inn on Christopher Street in New York, which helped spark the modern LGBTQ+ rights movement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
UN adopts resolution on Afghanistan's Taliban rule over US objections
UNITED NATIONS (AP) — The U.N. General Assembly adopted a resolution Monday over U.S. objections calling on Afghanistan's Taliban rulers to reverse their worsening oppression of women and girls and eliminate all terrorist organizations. The 11-page resolution also emphasizes 'the importance of creating opportunities for economic recovery, development and prosperity in Afghanistan,' and urges donors to address the country's dire humanitarian and economic crisis. The resolution is not legally binding but is seen as a reflection of world opinion. The vote was 116 in favor, with two — the United States and close ally Israel — opposed and 12 abstentions, including Russia, China, India and Iran. Since returning to power in Afghanistan in 2021, the Taliban have imposed harsh measures, banning women from public places and girls from attending school beyond the sixth grade. Last week, Russia became the first country to formally recognize the Taliban's government. Germany's U.N. Ambassador Antje Leendertse, whose country sponsored the resolution, told the assembly before the vote that her country and many others remain gravely concerned about the dire human rights situation in Afghanistan, especially the Taliban's 'near-total erasure' of the rights of women and girls. The core message of the resolution, she said, is to tell Afghan mothers holding sick and underfed children or mourning victims of terrorist attacks, as well as the millions of Afghan women and girls locked up at home, that they have not been forgotten. U.S. minister-counselor Jonathan Shrier was critical of the resolution, which he said rewards 'the Taliban's failure with more engagement and more resources." He said the Trump administration doubts they will ever pursue policies "in accordance with the expectations of the international community.' 'For decades we shouldered the burden of supporting the Afghan people with time, money and, most important, American lives,' he said. 'It is the time for the Taliban to step up. The United States will no longer enable their heinous behavior.' Last month, the Trump administration banned Afghans hoping to resettle in the U.S. permanently and those seeking to come temporarily, with exceptions. The resolution expresses appreciation to governments hosting Afghan refugees, singling out the two countries that have taken the most: Iran and Pakistan. Shrier also objected to this, accusing Iran of executing Afghans 'at an alarming rate without due process' and forcibly conscripting Afghans into its militias. While the resolution notes improvements in Afghanistan's overall security situation, it reiterates concern about attacks by al-Qaida and Islamic State militants and their affiliates. It calls upon Afghanistan "to take active measures to tackle, dismantle and eliminate all terrorist organizations equally and without discrimination.' The General Assembly also encouraged U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres to appoint a coordinator to facilitate 'a more coherent, coordinated and structured approach' to its international engagements on Afghanistan.
Associated Press
5 hours ago
- Associated Press
UN adopts resolution on Afghanistan's Taliban rule over US objections
UNITED NATIONS (AP) — The U.N. General Assembly adopted a resolution Monday over U.S. objections calling on Afghanistan's Taliban rulers to reverse their worsening oppression of women and girls and eliminate all terrorist organizations. The 11-page resolution also emphasizes 'the importance of creating opportunities for economic recovery, development and prosperity in Afghanistan,' and urges donors to address the country's dire humanitarian and economic crisis. The resolution is not legally binding but is seen as a reflection of world opinion. The vote was 116 in favor, with two — the United States and close ally Israel — opposed and 12 abstentions, including Russia, China, India and Iran. Since returning to power in Afghanistan in 2021, the Taliban have imposed harsh measures, banning women from public places and girls from attending school beyond the sixth grade. Last week, Russia became the first country to formally recognize the Taliban's government. Germany's U.N. Ambassador Antje Leendertse, whose country sponsored the resolution, told the assembly before the vote that her country and many others remain gravely concerned about the dire human rights situation in Afghanistan, especially the Taliban's 'near-total erasure' of the rights of women and girls. The core message of the resolution, she said, is to tell Afghan mothers holding sick and underfed children or mourning victims of terrorist attacks, as well as the millions of Afghan women and girls locked up at home, that they have not been forgotten. U.S. minister-counselor Jonathan Shrier was critical of the resolution, which he said rewards 'the Taliban's failure with more engagement and more resources.' He said the Trump administration doubts they will ever pursue policies 'in accordance with the expectations of the international community.' 'For decades we shouldered the burden of supporting the Afghan people with time, money and, most important, American lives,' he said. 'It is the time for the Taliban to step up. The United States will no longer enable their heinous behavior.' Last month, the Trump administration banned Afghans hoping to resettle in the U.S. permanently and those seeking to come temporarily, with exceptions. The resolution expresses appreciation to governments hosting Afghan refugees, singling out the two countries that have taken the most: Iran and Pakistan. While the resolution notes improvements in Afghanistan's overall security situation, it reiterates concern about attacks by al-Qaida and Islamic State militants and their affiliates. It calls upon Afghanistan 'to take active measures to tackle, dismantle and eliminate all terrorist organizations equally and without discrimination.' The General Assembly also encouraged U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres to appoint a coordinator to facilitate 'a more coherent, coordinated and structured approach' to its international engagements on Afghanistan.
Forbes
9 hours ago
- Forbes
Parades Over People
Soldier receiving pin. I served in Vietnam as an infantry paratrooper. I spent 25 years in uniform, both active duty and National Guard. I believed in the mission - even when this country didn't believe in me. I put on that uniform knowing I'd be seen differently as a Black man, as someone who had to prove more to be treated the same. But I still served. I showed up. And yes, I am proud to have done it. But the current political and economic landscape is making it challenging to maintain that same sense of pride today. Last month, the Army held a $45 million parade to mark its 250th birthday. While framed as a tribute to service, the extravagant event appeared to center largely on spectacle rather than genuine appreciation for those in uniform. During the parade, soldiers were sent to monitor peaceful protests in Los Angeles. Others stood watch at the southern border with no clear mission. Some were positioned behind podiums like stagehands at a campaign rally. Meanwhile, veterans face significant hardships. Many are sleeping on the street, children are missing meals, and whole communities are lacking adequate resources to function sustainably. According to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), more than 33,000 veterans experience homelessness on any given night. At the same time, the USDA reports that nearly 9 million children are food insecure in the United States, many regularly missing meals. Across the nation, infrastructure is deteriorating—roads are crumbling, and local healthcare facilities struggle to stay open, often due to funding shortages. There were many opportunities that $45 million could've have been utilized for to contribute to the betterment of our nation. Those funds could've provided lunch for children, sheltered homeless veterans, and even improved the infrastructure and living conditions of underserved communities where individuals often face challenges due to lack of access to capital. Instead, it paid for a parade. That's the cost of forgetting what service really means. Repeatedly, we're told that there aren't funds for assistance programs such as Medicaid and food stamps or for vital infrastructure like housing and schools. Basic care for the people who've sacrificed their lives for this country is difficult to obtain even though we are witnessing millions of dollars go towards insignificant matters. This same administration wants to cut job programs at the Economic Development Administration, shut down the Minority Business Development Agency that helps entrepreneurs of color, strip funding from the CDFI Fund, which brings capital to places banks won't go, and claw back billions from the Environmental Protection Agency's Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, even though it targets pollution in communities that breathe the dirtiest air. It's interesting to see we have sufficient funds when it involves tax breaks for the wealthy or organizing a $45 million parade. This stark contrast in funding priorities reveals a troubling disconnect from genuine public service. I still remember standing on the battlefield - heart racing and adrenaline pumping - not for glory or politics, but for the freedom of a country that had yet to grant me full freedom, and for the person next to me. That was the service. That was the job. It had nothing to do with parades or cameras. It was about showing up to defend this country even if I did not understand why and for people when it mattered. This? This isn't it. Service is supposed to be about people, care, sacrifice, and showing up when it's hard. When I wore the uniform, I wouldn't have imagined that troops would turn into props and that patriotism would be reduced to performance. We've lost track of what our country represents and until we remember it, no amount of fireworks or marching bands is going to bring us back. I'm still proud of my years of service and believe deeply in the ideals the uniform represents. That pride will never fade. But I cannot celebrate what it has become—not until this nation commits to serving all its people with the dedication we have shown to power. So today, I won't salute empty gestures. I won't pose for photo ops. Instead, I'll speak a truth that needs airing: Shame.
