
How to Use Workplace Conflict to Strengthen Your Culture
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
When I ran my ad agency, I encouraged healthy, constructive debate. I discouraged unproductive arguments. I'm not a conflict expert, but I spent enough time as a business owner, on several boards, and running various programs to recognize when things were working and when they went awry. Once I learned that I needed to manage conflict, not avoid it, I developed tools and processes that turned most conflicts into productive outcomes.
Let's face it, conflict is going to happen. Anyone who has worked with more than a few people knows this. It shows up in every workplace, at every level. It happened at my agency, and I'm willing to bet it happens at your organization, too. No matter how strong the culture is, we're still dealing with people. And people are going to clash. Put people together in a work environment, and conflict is part of the package.
Sooner or later, you'll find yourself in a "passionate" or possibly tense situation with a coworker, a supervisor, a vendor or a customer. No matter who it involves, how you handle that situation will determine whether the outcome is productive or damaging.
Here's the surprising part. When it's handled the right way, conflict can actually be a good thing. When it's managed with intention and clarity, conflict can lead to better communication, deeper trust and smarter teamwork. But it takes time, patience, and a real process.
Here are some approaches that have worked for me, and if you put them into practice, there's a good chance they'll work for you too, helping build a stronger team and an even stronger culture.
Related: 3 Things I've Learned About Hiring and Firing After 35 Years in Business
Conflict is your friend
The first thing you must do is normalize conflict. Conflict doesn't mean something is broken. It often means people are engaged. They care. They have opinions. In fast-paced, high-demand organizations, disagreements are inevitable. What matters is how we respond when those moments show up.
Avoiding conflict doesn't make it disappear. It just sends it underground, where it does more damage. It's like noticing a crack in the foundation of your house. You see it. You know it's there. But because it's not causing immediate problems, you tell yourself it's no big deal.
Meanwhile, that crack is slowly expanding, weakening everything underneath. Eventually, it shows up in places you can't ignore. Doors stop closing properly, walls start shifting and by then, fixing it is a much bigger job.
Conflict works the same way. When it's buried, it spreads. Resentment builds, trust fades and collaboration breaks down. That's how good teams fall apart. Not from what's visible, but from what's been ignored. So speak up early. Respectfully. Calmly. Directly. That's how we keep the foundation strong.
Look beneath the surface and use productive conflict strategies
Did you know that 60% to 80% of couples' arguments are not about the surface issue, but about deeper, underlying concerns? At work, it's pretty much the same. Most conflict isn't about the obvious issue. More often, it's about a gap in communication, unmet expectations or insecurities. Maybe someone feels left out. Maybe they weren't looped in soon enough. Maybe they're worried about losing control.
Before reacting, ask yourself, "What else might be going on here?" Lead with curiosity. Not assumptions.
Here are seven practical ways to keep conflict from becoming chaos:
1. Start light and casual
You don't always need a scheduled meeting. Sometimes, a simple check-in can prevent a situation from escalating.
"Hey, I felt like we were a little bit at odds on that last project. Can we take a few minutes to regroup?"
Tone matters. Come in looking to understand, not to win. That lowers defenses and opens the door to honest dialogue.
Related: 5 Ways to Effectively Manage Conflict (and Stay Calm Doing It)
2. Take it private
Never confront someone in front of others. I've done it and I've learned to never do it again. Pull them aside. One-on-one conversations reduce embarrassment and allow both people to be more transparent. Privacy builds trust.
3. Be direct, not harsh
Get to the point without being abrasive. Don't drop hints or dance around the issue. Say what you need to say.
"I've noticed some tension during meetings, and I want to understand what's behind it."
Clarity without blame invites collaboration instead of conflict.
4. Use specific examples
Don't label someone as difficult. Point to specific behavior.
"In yesterday's meeting, when I brought up the schedule, you said, 'That'll never happen.' That felt dismissive."
Stick to facts, not feelings. That keeps the conversation grounded and constructive.
5. Give people a stake
Sometimes, difficult behavior is rooted in feeling powerless or left out. Give the person a role in the solution.
"You've got a strong field perspective. Can I get your input before we finalize the rollout?"
You're not feeding an ego, you're inviting ownership.
Related: I Transformed My Company With Employee Ownership — Here's Why You Should Too
6. Set boundaries
If someone crosses a line, speak up.
"I want to keep working through this, but I need to feel respected while we do."
Boundaries create safety, and safety leads to better conversations.
7. Know when it's toxic
There's a difference between someone who's difficult and someone who's toxic. Difficult people can often be reached with communication. Toxic people manipulate, deflect and disrupt no matter what. If you've tried everything and nothing changes, it's time to make a change. Protecting the culture means knowing when enough is enough.
Adapt to how others communicate
Not everyone processes conflict the same way. Some people prefer in-person conversations. Others need time to respond in writing. If you've been going back and forth over email with no progress, pick up the phone. If face-to-face conversations get heated, switch to a written message.
You're not changing your message. You're changing the medium so that the message is received more effectively.
Related: How to Communicate to a Global Workforce
Document when necessary
If a pattern starts to form, whether it's good or bad, take notes. Keep a journal: what happened, when it happened and what steps you took to address it. If the issue escalates, documentation helps HR or leadership understand the full context. It's not about winning the blame game. It's about being prepared.
Lead by example
Remember this, people around you are watching how you handle conflict. Are you calm under pressure? Are you respectful, even when you disagree? Do you listen? Do you ask meaningful questions?
Your example sets the tone. Teams don't just learn from training. They learn by observing. Be an example of what respectful conflict resolution looks like, and others will follow your lead.
Conflict can be a catalyst
Remember that conflict isn't bad, and it's not the opposite of collaboration. It's often the first step toward it. When addressed early and handled correctly, conflict can clarify expectations, improve processes and even deepen trust.
So the next time you're in a tense moment, take a breath. Take a step back. And remember, this isn't just a problem to fix. It might be an opportunity to lead, connect and build something better.
Because the best teams aren't the ones that avoid conflict, they're the ones that know how to move through it together.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)'s CEO Has A Great Relationship With Trump, Says Jim Cramer
We recently published . NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. After bleeding close to $600 billion in market value in January amidst the DeepSeek selloff, Wall Street's AI chip darling, NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA) is once again the most valuable company in the world. The firm has benefited from growing investor bullishness about the long-term prospects of AI. NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA)'s shares closed the week 1% higher after big tech's continued persistence to spend billions of dollars to buy AI chips. Cramer discussed the impact and the CEO's relationship with President Trump: 'All CapEx go up, it's all NVIDIA. . .it's really good for NVIDIA. But of course, NVIDIA, the President talking about breaking them up, we'll get to that later. It was an out of body comment. Previously, the CNBC TV host commented on NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA)'s shares and parabolic moves: 'What is the solution to this? Look, in my forthcoming book, How to Make Money in Any Market, I have banished my antiparabola bias. I have a method I reveal of picking five stocks to go alongside an index fund with some money added each month. I state point blank that if you are in your 30s or older, you should own one speculative situation like an Oklo, okay, or a Joby. Just one. It could fail you after going parabolic. Moreover, if you're under 30, you can pick two speculative names out of five because you've got enough time to make back any potential losses. Photo by Javier Esteban on Unsplash Now, you may think I'm reckless for endorsing any of these even with caveats, but it's time to admit that for many years now, speculative stocks with great growth, they've worked. Oh, and let's not forget, they don't have to stay speculative. NVIDIA stock has had many parabolic moves, including the one that started in April. To keep yourself out of these runs because of a principle that stopped working ages ago, that's to be blind to change, and I don't like it. I don't want to be that way.' While we acknowledge the potential of NVDA as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen If Billionaires Paid Taxes at the Same Rate as the Upper Middle Class
There are many questions that don't have simple answers, either because they're too complex or they're hypothetical. One such question is what it might mean for billionaires to pay taxes at the same rate as the upper middle class, whose income starts, on average, at around $168,000, depending on where you live. Find Out: Read Next: ChatGPT may not be an oracle, but it can analyze information and offer trends and patterns, so I asked it what would happen if billionaires were required to pay anywhere near as much as the upper middle class. Here's what it said. A Fatter Government Larder For starters, ChatGPT said that if billionaires paid taxes like the upper middle class, the government would bring in a lot more money — potentially hundreds of billions of dollars more every year. 'That's because most billionaires don't make their money from salaries like upper-middle-class workers do. Instead, they grow their wealth through investments–stocks, real estate, and businesses–which are often taxed at much lower rates or not taxed at all until the assets are sold,' ChatGPT told me. Billionaire income is largely derived from capital appreciation, not wages. In other words, they make money on their money through interest. And as of yet, the U.S. tax code doesn't tax 'unrealized capital gains' so until you sell your assets, you could amass millions in appreciation and not pay a dime on it, ChatGPT shared. Learn More: What Do Billionaires Pay in Taxes? Right now, many billionaires pay an effective tax rate of around 8% or less, thanks to loopholes and tax strategies. Meanwhile, upper-middle-class households earning, say, $250,000 might pay around 20% to 24% of their income in taxes. (Keep in mind that the government doesn't apply one tax bracket to all income. You pay tax in layers, according to the IRS. As your income goes up, the tax rate on the next layer of income is higher. So you pay 12% on the first $47,150, then 22% on $47,151 to $100,525 and so on). So, if billionaires were taxed at the same rate as those upper-middle-class wage earners, 'it would level the playing field–and raise a ton of revenue that could be used for things like infrastructure, education or healthcare,' ChatGPT said. The Impact on Wealth Equality I wondered if taxing billionaires could have any kind of impact on wealth equality, as well. While it wouldn't put more money in other people's pockets, 'it could increase trust in the tax system, showing that the wealthiest aren't playing by a different set of rules,' ChatGPT said. It would also help curb 'the accumulation of dynastic wealth,' where the richest families essentially hoard wealth for generations without contributing proportionally to the system. But it's not a magic bullet. 'Wealth inequality is rooted in more than just taxes–wages, education access, housing costs, and corporate ownership all play a role,' ChatGPT said. Billionaires paying taxes doesn't stop them from being billionaires, either, it pointed out. Taxing Billionaires Is Not That Simple While in theory billionaires paying higher taxes 'would shift a much bigger share of the tax burden onto the very wealthy,' ChatGPT wrote, billionaires are not as liquid as they may seem. 'A lot of billionaire wealth is tied up in things like stocks they don't sell, so taxing that would require big changes to how the tax code works.' Also, billionaires are good at finding loopholes and account strategies — it might be hard to enforce. What's a Good Middle Ground? We don't live in a black and white world, however. There's got to be a middle ground, so I asked ChatGPT if there is a way to tax billionaires more, even if it's not quite how the upper middle class are taxed. A likely compromise would come from a policy decision, which isn't likely to be forthcoming anytime soon. President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill only offered more tax breaks to the wealthiest. However, policy proposals that have been floated, include: A minimum tax on billionaires where they might pay around 20% of their overall income Limiting deductions and closing tax loopholes that allow them to significantly reduce taxable income Tax unrealized gains (those assets that have only earned but not yet been sold), gradually. ChatGPT agreed that billionaires could pay more than they currently do, even if they don't pay exactly what upper-middle-class workers pay in percentage terms. 'The key is to design policies that are fair, enforceable, and politically feasible.' I asked how realistic such policy proposals are, and ChatGPT told me what I already knew: They're 'moderately realistic' but only with the 'right political alignment.' More From GOBankingRates 9 Downsizing Tips for the Middle Class To Save on Monthly Expenses This article originally appeared on I Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen If Billionaires Paid Taxes at the Same Rate as the Upper Middle Class Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Inicia sesión para acceder a tu portafolio Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Not Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) But RTX, Say A Lot Of People According To Jim Cramer
We recently published . Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT) is a key American defense contractor when it comes to the aerospace industry. Its fighter aircraft form the backbone of US air superiority. The shares have lost 11.9% year-to-date on the back of a major 10.8% dip in July after its Q2 profit dipped by a whopping 80% on the back of a classified $1.6 billion loss on a classified aeronautics project. Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT)'s Q2 revenue of $18.16 billion also missed analyst estimates of $18.57 billion. No wonder Cramer made the following remarks about the firm: 'RTX, by the way, pushed by a number of people, saying that's the defense stock you want to be in, not Lockheed Martin.' Source: Pexels Previously, Cramer had advised viewers to stay long on Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT): 'I like Lockheed Martin too much to tell you to do that. Every time I see Jim Taiclet, I say to myself, why does anyone want to sell that stock with a 3% yield and a great book of business and a terrific CEO? No, you stay long, Lockheed Martin.' While we acknowledge the potential of LMT as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data