How To Get Into Google Summer Of Code: Selected Student Shares Simple 5-Step Journey
GSoC connects contributors-especially students and beginners-with experienced mentors. Participants work remotely on coding projects while learning best practices and building professional networks.
Among those selected this year is Krishna Dave, a BTech Computer Science student at Newton School of Technology. His selection followed months of consistent contributions, learning, and meaningful community engagement within the open-source ecosystem.
Reflecting on his experience, he shared: "You don't need perfect code or perfect timing-what matters is consistency, curiosity, and presence. GSoC rewards commitment, not perfection."
He also shared a step-by-step approach that worked for him. Here are the steps:
Step 1: Start Early
Instead of waiting for the official GSoC timeline, he began contributing about four months in advance. This early start gave him time to understand open-source workflows and explore different communities without pressure.
Step 2: Choose the Right Organisation
He studied previous GSoC archives and community forums to find an organisation that matched his interests and had a welcoming codebase. Picking a well-documented and actively maintained project kept him engaged.
Step 3: Begin Small
He started with a small contribution-fixing a minor styling issue. This simple task helped him learn about teamwork and version control, and also got him noticed in the community.
Step 4: Build Communication
He stayed active in community channels, asked questions, and regularly updated mentors. This consistent communication helped build trust with the maintainers.
Step 5: Mention GSoC Later
Only after weeks of contribution did he bring up GSoC. By then, he was already seen as a serious contributor, making the transition feel natural and well-earned.
The 2025 GSoC timeline began with mentoring organisations applying between January 27 and February 11. After evaluation, the selected organisations were announced on February 27. Between then and March 24, interested contributors or developers interacted with mentors and discussed project ideas. Applications were submitted from March 24 to April 8, with final selections revealed on May 8 after proposal reviews.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
CCI closes startup body's complaint against Google, refrains from probe
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has decided against launching a probe into the Alliance of Digital India Foundation 's (ADIF's) complaint against tech giant Google 's alleged anti-competitive practices in the practices in online advertising , and has closed the startup body had essentially challenged Google's alleged dominant position and "purportedly abusive behaviour" in the online search advertisement and online display advertisement an order dated August 1, reviewed by ET, the antitrust regulator, however, said, 'ADIF hasn't pointed out any specific part of any policy or conduct of Google in support of its claim that the allegations made in the present matter also extend to Google's Online Display Advertising services'.'Therefore, in light of there being no supporting evidence to such claim, the Commission does not deem fit to take cognizance of such claim of ADIF,' it for some other allegations by the ADIF, the regulator said it had addressed similar issues in certain earlier cases and 'no purpose would be served by inquiring into the same issue yet again without there being any material change in circumstances being pointed out'.The regulator added that re-investigating the same issue again 'would simply lead to a wastage of time and resources of the public exchequer'.The Commission has stressed that it has 'examined in detail the averments made by ADIF and the submissions thereto made by Google, on all the issues related to alleged unfair and discriminatory conditions imposed by Google upon advertisers as part of its Google Ads Policies' before reaching its also said that all the four instances of alleged unfair and discriminatory conditions imposed by Google upon advertisers as part of its Google Ads Policies as raised by ADIF in the present matter, 'have already been examined in substance and set to rest by the Commission in its previous decisions in Matrimony case (supra) and/ or Vishal Gupta case (supra)'.'The Commission is not convinced with the reasons stated by ADIF for distinguishing its allegations from the issues examined in previous orders passed by the Commission. As per the clear language of Section 26(2A) of the Competition Act, the issues examined in the previous order may be 'the same' or 'substantially the same',' it said in the order.'Therefore, the present matter is directed to be closed forthwith in terms of the provisions of Section 26(2A) of the Act,' it added.
Economic Times
17 minutes ago
- Economic Times
CCI closes startup body's complaint against Google, refrains from probe
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has decided against launching a probe into the Alliance of Digital India Foundation's (ADIF's) complaint against tech giant Google's alleged anti-competitive practices in the practices in online advertising, and closed the startup body had essentially challenged Google's alleged dominant position and "purportedly abusive behaviour" in the online search advertisement and online display advertisement markets. In an order dated August 1, reviewed by ET, the antitrust regulator, however, said, 'ADIF hasn't pointed out any specific part of any policy or conduct of Google in support of its claim that the allegations made in the present matter also extend to Google's Online Display Advertising services'. 'Therefore, in light of there being no supporting evidence to such claim, the Commission does not deem fit to take cognizance of such claim of ADIF,' it for some other allegations by the ADIF, the regulator said it had addressed similar issues in certain earlier cases and 'no purpose would be served by inquiring into the same issue yet again without there being any material change in circumstances being pointed out'.The regulator added that re-investigating the same issue again 'would simply lead to a wastage of time and resources of the public exchequer'. The Commission has stressed that it has 'examined in detail the averments made by ADIF and the submissions thereto made by Google, on all the issues related to alleged unfair and discriminatory conditions imposed by Google upon advertisers as part of its Google Ads Policies' before reaching its conclusion. It also said that all the four instances of alleged unfair and discriminatory conditions imposed by Google upon advertisers as part of its Google Ads Policies as raised by ADIF in the present matter, 'have already been examined in substance and set to rest by the Commission in its previous decisions in Matrimony case (supra) and/ or Vishal Gupta case (supra)'. 'The Commission is not convinced with the reasons stated by ADIF for distinguishing its allegations from the issues examined in previous orders passed by the Commission. As per the clear language of Section 26(2A) of the Competition Act, the issues examined in the previous order may be 'the same' or 'substantially the same',' it said in the order. 'Therefore, the present matter is directed to be closed forthwith in terms of the provisions of Section 26(2A) of the Act,' it added.
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Bad news for Sundar Pichai's Google, loses appeal in…, major victory for video game maker…
Home Business Bad news for Sundar Pichai's Google, loses appeal in…, major victory for video game maker… Bad news for Sundar Pichai's Google, loses appeal in…, major victory for video game maker… Google is also facing a proposed breakup of its advertising technology as part of the countermeasures to its monopoly in that business. A trial on that proposal is scheduled to begin in September. Sundar Pichai- File image A federal appeals court has upheld a jury verdict declaring Google's Android app store an illegal monopoly, due to which a federal judge can implement changes at increasing consumer choice. The unanimous decision by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals is a legal setback for Google. It is the third major antitrust ruling against the tech giant since late 2023, with various aspects of its digital empire being found in violation of monopoly laws. How Will Verdict Benefit Google's Competitors? It is considered a major victory for video game maker Epic Games, which launched a legal battle against Google's Play Store for Android apps and Apple's iPhone app store nearly five years ago in an attempt to bypass payment processing systems that charged 15% to 30% commissions on in-app transactions. What Jury Found About Google? Following a month-long trial, a nine-person jury determined that Google had rigged its system to thwart alternative app stores from offering better deals to consumers and software developers. That verdict resulted in US District Judge James Donato ordering Google to tear down digital walls shielding the Play Store from competition, triggering the company's appeal to overturn the jury's finding and void the judge's mandated shakeup. But a three-judge panel that heard Google's appeal in February rejected its lawyers' contention that Donato erred by allowing the case to be determined by a jury that deviated from the market definition outlined by another federal judge who mostly sided with Apple in Epic's case against the iPhone maker's app store. What Was Google's Stand In Case? Google has argued that the required revisions will raise privacy and security risks by exposing consumers to scam artists and hackers masquerading as legitimate app stores. But Epic's lawyers have ridiculed Google's warnings about the changes as scare tactics in a desperate attempt to protect the fortunes of its corporate parent Alphabet Inc. Although Epic fell short in its attempt to have the iPhone's app store declared a monopoly, that case resulted in a judge issuing an order that required Apple to surrender exclusive control over the payment processing of in-app transactions and allow links to alternative systems without collecting a commission. (With Inputs From Agencies) For breaking news and live news updates, like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter and Instagram. Read more on Latest Business News on
