Judicial reform in focus as Azalina leads comparative study with UK, Australia, India and Singapore
The Prime Minister's Department's Legal Affairs Division (BHEUU) announced this following a preliminary discussion today between Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said with the heads of two parliamentary special select committees.
'Among other things, this discussion agreed to carry out preliminary comparative research about the approaches of the judicial appointment systems in several selected countries, namely the United Kingdom, India, Australia and Singapore.
'This preliminary comparative research will give a holistic understanding about the process of judicial appointments in countries with similar systems in order to enable Malaysia to make an evidence-based evaluation of the need for reforms and to adapt best practices according to national context.
'This research is also intended to evaluate an effective model for judicial appointments, identify best practices and recommend reforms that are appropriate for Malaysia's context as a constitutional monarchy and in line with the Federal Constitution,' BHEUU said in the statement.
The statement said the Malaysian government through the BHEUU welcomes public feedback and the public's views about this matter.
'This inclusive approach is important to ensure each perspective is taken into account before the research outcome is tabled for the Cabinet's consideration.
'The government remains committed to strengthen public confidence by carrying out transparent and evidence-based reforms,' it concluded.
Earlier in the statement, the BHEUU said Azalina's meeting was with the Dewan Negara's Special Select Committee on Law Review's chairman Rita Sarimah Patrick Insol and with the Dewan Rakyat's Special Select Committee on Human Rights, Election and Institutional Reform's chairman MP William Leong Jee Keen.
The BHEUU said the meeting was held in relation to public concern about reforms in Malaysia's judicial system to ensure the integrity of the judiciary in upholding the rule of law.
BHEUU said both parliamentary committees' chairman had expressed concerns over the latest developments on the issue of judicial appointments and stressed the importance of more in-depth studies to ensure a more transparent and credible process of appointing judges.
Currently, in Malaysia, the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) vets and selects candidates to be recommended to the prime minister.
The prime minister can accept the recommendations or ask for alternative names from the JAC, and the Yang di-Pertuan Agong would appoint judges on the prime minister's advice and after consulting with the Conference of Rulers.
The Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law had in 2015 published a study on the best practices for appointing judges in the Commonwealth, with the report looking at 53 Commonwealth members including Malaysia.
There are currently 56 countries in the Commonwealth, including India, Australia and Singapore.
Recommended reading:JAC 101: The selection of Malaysia's judges, explained
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
28 minutes ago
- Forbes
British Parliamentarians Call For Action On Atrocity Crimes Prevention
[Stock photograph] A pedestrian stands under an umbrella depicting the Union Jack while looking at ... More Elizabeth Tower, commonly called Big Ben, on July 31, 2023, on a gloomy and rainy summer day. (Photo credit: HENRY NICHOLLS/AFP via Getty Images) On July 14, 2025, British Parliamentarians, as supported by civil society organizations, launched a new initiative on atrocity crimes prevention, the Standing Group on Atrocity Crimes (Standing Group), to convene an independent review of, and provide comprehensive advice on, the U.K. approach to atrocity prevention and response. The initiative comprises a group of leading international lawyers and experts (including Professor Christine Chinkin, Professor Fernand de Varennes, Oleksandra Matviichuk), cross-party parliamentarians (including Lord Alton KCSG, Lord Dubs, Baroness Helić, Baroness Hodgson CBE, Baroness Sugg) and policy advisers. The Standing Group's work comes at a time when mass atrocities, including the crime of aggression, war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide, are becoming a prominent and seemingly permanent feature of our world. The Standing Group's aim is to make timely, impactful, and expert recommendations to government officials, policymakers, and civil society to help bring the UK Government closer to creating a comprehensive framework to prevent and respond to international crimes in line with its existing international obligations. The Parliamentary launch will be hosted by a world-renowned lawyer, Baroness Kennedy of the Shaws LT KC, Director of the International Bar Association's Human Rights Institute (IBAHRI), who will be acting as the chair of the new initiative. The Standing Group's work also comes at a time when the political will to focus on atrocity crimes prevention work appears to have diminished. For example, with changes at the Department of State, it is yet unclear how the work on atrocity prevention will be affected. The United States has been leading some of the work on atrocity crimes prevention, including by implementing the Elie Wiesel Genocide and Atrocities Prevention Act (the Elie Wiesel Act). The Elie Wiesel Act, signed into law by President Trump during his first term, among other things, prioritizes the prevention of genocide and other mass atrocities as a matter of national security interest and ensures that foreign service officers receive adequate training in conflict and atrocity prevention. Over recent years, the Department of State have been submitting the annual report to Congress consistent with section 5 of the Elie Wiesel Act. The Elie Wiesel Act reports have been detailing U.S. interagency efforts to address genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity around the world. It also chronicles whole-of-government work over the past years to promote atrocity prevention programs, protect civilians at risk, and hold perpetrators accountable in places where some of the most heinous crimes have been committed. The 2024 Elie Wiesel Act Report was published in July 2024, and the 2025 report is yet to be released. In the U.K., several Parliamentarians have been trying to secure the much-needed reform, including with the Genocide Determination Bill and the Genocide (Prevention and Response) Bill; however, with no significant progress for now. The new initiative is to change it, by way of convening an independent review of, and providing comprehensive advice on, the U.K. approach to atrocity prevention and response. Atrocity crimes, including those meeting the legal definition of genocide, are more common than one would think. Crimes aimed at the destruction of communities are more common than one can comprehend. More than seven decades after the adoption of the U.N. Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Genocide Convention), three decades after the commitment to the Responsibility to Protect, two decades after the establishment of the International Criminal Court (ICC), we, as the international community, have been failing victims/survivors globally. We fail victims/survivors in that we continue to ignore early warning signs and risk factors of atrocity as they unravel before our eyes. We fail victims/survivors in that we affirm the perpetrators in the message that they can get away with their crimes. We fail victims/survivors in that we leave them without assistance to reestablish their lives, and under the constant fear of the recurrence of the crimes. The problem is not going to fix itself. Atrocity crimes prevention cannot be left to chance. Mechanisms for monitoring and analysis are key. Perpetrators will not hand themselves in to the authorities. Proactive documentation, investigation and effective prosecutions must prevail. We cannot wait decades more before taking stock and recognizing that more needs to be done. If we fail to act on prevention, there will be stormy times ahead of us.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Post Office transformation effort gets £118m funding boost
Efforts to turn around the crisis-hit Post Office have been given a £118m funding boost as the government continues to consider a new ownership structure. Sky News revealed in October last year, as the Horizon IT scandal inquiry neared its conclusion, that a government-commissioned review was to explore the idea of a mutual model. It would effectively see ownership transferred from the government to sub-postmasters, creating a John Lewis Partnership-style structure, if such an option was to be followed through. Money latest: It's being considered as a way to return public and postmaster trust to the Post Office. The options are to be the subject of a 12 week consultation on the organisation's future. The new £118m subsidy package was being made available, the Department for Business and Trade said, to fund the transformation plan and further investment. "This funding will protect key services, including access to cash deposits and withdrawals as well as key government services, such as passport applications and the DVLA, alongside helping the Post Office deliver cost-saving measures in its Transformation Plan, part of the New Deal for Postmasters", the statement said. Post Office minister Gareth Thomas added: "Post Offices continue to be a central part of our high streets and communities across the country. "However, after 15 years without a proper review, and in the aftermath of the Horizon scandal, it's clear we need a fresh vision for its future. "This Green Paper marks the start of an honest conversation about what people want and need from their Post Office in the years ahead." But the general secretary of the Communication Workers Union, Dave Ward, accused the department of lacking sincerity. He responded: "Successive governments have failed the Post Office, its workers and customers - and choosing to use government subsidies for planned redundancies, closures and so-called transformation plans that are nothing more than managed decline. "This Labour Government are unashamedly doing exactly the same as the Tories did - managing the politics of the Post Office, prioritising further cost-cutting and offering no vision for its future." The update was provided as sub-postmasters await further conclusions from the Horizon IT inquiry. The first volume, published last week, highlighted the impact of false theft and false accounting accusations made against at least 1,000 postmasters. It concluded that 13 people may have taken their own lives after being falsely accused of wrongdoing, based on evidence from the IT system that the Post Office and developers Fujitsu knew could be faulty. At the same time, inquiry chair Sir Wyn Williams recommended further action to improve compensation outcomes amid years of frustration over delays and wrangling over the sums due.
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Cambodia will start military conscription next year as tensions with Thailand persist
PHNOM PENH, Cambodia — Cambodia's Prime Minister Hun Manet said Monday that his country will implement military conscription starting next year, in an announcement that coincides with persistent border tensions with Thailand . Relations between the neighbors have deteriorated sharply following an armed confrontation on May 28 in which one Cambodian soldier was killed in one of several small contested patches of land.
