PTI strategy stalls oath-taking of reserved seat lawmakers in KP Assembly
The assembly session, scheduled to begin at 9:00 a.m., was delayed by nearly two and a half hours and eventually adjourned until July 24 at 2:00 p.m. due to a lack of quorum. The adjournment halted the swearing-in of several women and minority lawmakers from the opposition, despite their presence in the house.
The session, chaired by Speaker Babar Saleem Swati, began only briefly before PTI lawmaker Sher Ali Afridi pointed out the quorum, prompting government members to start leaving the hall one by one. Only four PTI lawmakers were present in the chamber at the time, sources said.
Opposition parties, including PML-N, JUI-F, and PPP, slammed the government's tactics, accusing it of deliberately obstructing the democratic process. Several opposition lawmakers gathered in front of the speaker's dais, shouting slogans and urging him to proceed with the oath-taking.
Speaker Swati noted that the required strength of 25 members was not met, and therefore, the session could not continue. A female member from the opposition objected, saying quorum cannot be pointed out during Quranic recitation, but the speaker insisted on counting members before any further debate.
Among those present to take oath were PML-N's Farah Khan, Amina Sardar, Faiza Malik, Shazia Jadoon, Afsha Hussain, Jameela Paracha, and Sonia Hussain, along with JUI-F's Bilqees, Sitara Afrin, and Aiman Jaleel Jan. PPP's Madiha Afridi and Rabia Shaheen, and other minority and women lawmakers were also in attendance.
PHC bars elected MPAs on reserved seats from taking oath
The move comes amid reports of widening cracks within the ruling PTI's provincial chapter. According to party insiders, tensions between Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur and a breakaway faction of PTI lawmakers have intensified, particularly over the allocation of Senate tickets.
Sources claimed that the party leadership, anticipating backlash from disgruntled members, had devised a 'Plan B' to avoid the oath-taking altogether. The tactic: disrupt the quorum to prevent the opposition from gaining voting strength ahead of the upcoming Senate elections.
Opposition Leader Dr Ibadullah told reporters that if the government continues to block the process, the opposition alliance has alternative legal routes to ensure the swearing-in takes place. He added that any delay is a 'blatant subversion of parliamentary norms' and called on the Election Commission to take notice.
Meanwhile, opposition parties held an emergency meeting at the Governor's House to outline their next steps. With political temperatures rising in the province, both sides appear locked in a high-stakes standoff that could shape the composition of the upper house in the weeks to come.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
13 hours ago
- Business Recorder
PTI strategy stalls oath-taking of reserved seat lawmakers in KP Assembly
A session of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Assembly scheduled for oath-taking of lawmakers on reserved seats was adjourned on Sunday after the treasury benches raised the issue of quorum, a deliberate move seen as part of the ruling Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf's (PTI) strategy to delay the process amid internal rifts and growing pressure ahead of Senate elections, Aaj News reported. The assembly session, scheduled to begin at 9:00 a.m., was delayed by nearly two and a half hours and eventually adjourned until July 24 at 2:00 p.m. due to a lack of quorum. The adjournment halted the swearing-in of several women and minority lawmakers from the opposition, despite their presence in the house. The session, chaired by Speaker Babar Saleem Swati, began only briefly before PTI lawmaker Sher Ali Afridi pointed out the quorum, prompting government members to start leaving the hall one by one. Only four PTI lawmakers were present in the chamber at the time, sources said. Opposition parties, including PML-N, JUI-F, and PPP, slammed the government's tactics, accusing it of deliberately obstructing the democratic process. Several opposition lawmakers gathered in front of the speaker's dais, shouting slogans and urging him to proceed with the oath-taking. Speaker Swati noted that the required strength of 25 members was not met, and therefore, the session could not continue. A female member from the opposition objected, saying quorum cannot be pointed out during Quranic recitation, but the speaker insisted on counting members before any further debate. Among those present to take oath were PML-N's Farah Khan, Amina Sardar, Faiza Malik, Shazia Jadoon, Afsha Hussain, Jameela Paracha, and Sonia Hussain, along with JUI-F's Bilqees, Sitara Afrin, and Aiman Jaleel Jan. PPP's Madiha Afridi and Rabia Shaheen, and other minority and women lawmakers were also in attendance. PHC bars elected MPAs on reserved seats from taking oath The move comes amid reports of widening cracks within the ruling PTI's provincial chapter. According to party insiders, tensions between Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur and a breakaway faction of PTI lawmakers have intensified, particularly over the allocation of Senate tickets. Sources claimed that the party leadership, anticipating backlash from disgruntled members, had devised a 'Plan B' to avoid the oath-taking altogether. The tactic: disrupt the quorum to prevent the opposition from gaining voting strength ahead of the upcoming Senate elections. Opposition Leader Dr Ibadullah told reporters that if the government continues to block the process, the opposition alliance has alternative legal routes to ensure the swearing-in takes place. He added that any delay is a 'blatant subversion of parliamentary norms' and called on the Election Commission to take notice. Meanwhile, opposition parties held an emergency meeting at the Governor's House to outline their next steps. With political temperatures rising in the province, both sides appear locked in a high-stakes standoff that could shape the composition of the upper house in the weeks to come.
Express Tribune
18 hours ago
- Express Tribune
PTI rift threatens to unravel govt-op bonhomie
Listen to article The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) found itself in the throes of a growing internal rift on Saturday as rebel Senate candidates rejected the party's 'diktat' to withdraw their nomination papers, vowing instead to contest the July 21 polls in open defiance of an opposition-backed consensus deal. The development came as the government and opposition in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa have struck a rare unity pact to ensure the victory of 11 agreed-upon Senate candidates in a move to sideline the party's rebels. PTI's political committee, meeting late Saturday night, endorsed a power-sharing agreement with the opposition and reaffirmed the list of official candidates issued by party founder Imran Khan. However, the move has triggered a backlash from sidelined aspirants, who accuse the leadership of capitulating to what they term an "establishment-sponsored deal". Despite the directive to withdraw, five rebel candidates, including Irfan Saleem, Khurram Zishan, Waqas Orakzai, former IG Irshad Hussain and Aisha Bano, stood their ground following internal consultations. In public statements and video messages, they declared they would not bow to what they alleged to be "political expediency" and "closed-door compromises". "This has gone far beyond the Senate elections," Khurram Zishan said in a defiant message. "We're being asked to hand over our trust to the very people who jailed our workers, tortured our elders, and stole our mandate via Form 47. We reject political wheeling and dealing. We are not playing politics ... we are waging resistance." Party pushes back, rebels dig in The party's political committee, while backing PTI Imran Khan's handpicked list, acknowledged internal objections, including to candidates like Mishal Yousafzai and Irfan Saleem, but said the founder's decisions were final. The committee warned dissidents that they could face disciplinary notices if they did not comply. PTI leadership has given the rebel candidates a deadline of 12 noon today to withdraw. However, the dissenters, emboldened by what they claim are 20 MPAs in contact with them, appear undeterred. Irfan Saleem accused PTI's leadership of forming an "unholy alliance" to install establishment-backed candidates. "We will not allow this taint on a legislature built on Imran Khan's name," he said. "Our resistance is not personal, it is ideological." Aisha Bano said the Senate seats were "a trust given to us by the party's workers and Khan himself," and would not be handed to those who "stole our mandate". "This is not just another election ... it's the front line of a movement," she said. Govt, opposition join forces to shut out rebels Meanwhile, sources confirmed that the government and opposition in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa have struck a rare unity pact to ensure the victory of 11 agreed-upon Senate candidates in a move to sideline the PTI rebels. Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur and opposition leader Dr Ibadullah will jointly oversee the formation and coordination of seven special voting panels. Four of these will be supervised by provincial ministers, with the remaining three managed by opposition parliamentary leaders. Under the plan, government MPAs will be gathered at the CM House and dispatched in groups to cast votes under ministerial supervision. Opposition MPs will follow a similar strategy. Each panel will be instructed to vote for specific general, women, and technocrat candidates. The cooperation includes an accountability mechanism, with both sides agreeing to investigate if votes slip toward rebel candidates. A backup Plan B, involving delaying the election or swearing in new MPAs, was discussed but ultimately set aside due to a lack of consensus. Senior PTI leaders are expected to be present in the assembly during the vote, as are key opposition figures. Sources within the opposition expressed confidence in the arrangement. "We are satisfied with the government's commitment. All eleven candidates should win smoothly if the agreement holds," they said.
Express Tribune
18 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Speaker puts brakes on PTI MPAs disqualification move
Listen to article Punjab Assembly Speaker Malik Muhammad Ahmad Khan apparently put the matter of PTI disqualifications to rest on Saturday by ruling the disqualification applications against 26 suspended lawmakers as non-maintainable, but by passing the buck to the judiciary and election tribunal. The sword of litigation still dangles over the suspended lawmakers, with the speaker making it clear that while his doors were not closed, the petitioners must first knock on the right ones, by securing a declaration from a court of competent jurisdiction before revisiting his office. In a move seen as a political de-escalation, the speaker has dismissed the applications filed against 26 suspended opposition lawmakers, following a successful round of talks between the treasury and opposition benches. A six-page ruling signed by the speaker outlines the rationale for rejecting the four separate applications, which sought to disqualify the PTI-affiliated MPAs over their disorderly and abusive conduct during the budget session. The move to dismiss the applications gained momentum after recent behind-the-scenes negotiations between government and opposition leaders bore fruit. According to sources, the reinstatement of the suspended MPAs is now expected soon. It is noteworthy that Speaker Khan had earlier suspended the 26 PTI lawmakers under Rule 210(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the Provincial Assembly of the Punjab, 1997, following their disruption of Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz's speech on June 27. In his detailed ruling, Speaker Khan noted: "Though serious legal and constitutional violations, including constitutional oath, have been alleged by the applicants, these violations first need to be established in a court or tribunal of competent jurisdiction before I could decide whether a question of qualification has arisen in terms of Article 63(2) of the Constitution and refer the question to the Election Commission of Pakistan." "The people are the source of all power, and through their vote, they confer trust — not to be undone without the gravest reasons. To disqualify a representative is not merely to silence a voice — it is to disenfranchise people. For an elected House is not only a chamber of laws; it is the echo of the people's will. That voice must not be silenced," he added. The speaker ruled that references to past cases, such as the Panama Papers and other disqualification jurisprudence under Articles 199 and 184(3) of the Constitution, were not valid in the current context. Such petitions, he noted, could undermine freedom of speech in the House and nullify the opposition's presence. Article 19 protects robust debate — even if abrasive — subject to reasonable legal restrictions. "These restrictions are found in our Rules, not in threats of permanent disqualification. Let the welfare of the people be the supreme law, the Assembly must remain a forum where dissent is voiced, not extinguished," the ruling stated. Speaker Khan stressed that the welfare of the electorate is best preserved when the House handles internal disorder itself, without disenfranchising voters' chosen representatives. He also expressed concern about many members' lack of familiarity with assembly rules, legislative processes, and the effective use of standing committees. He called for targeted training to uphold parliamentary supremacy and democratic accountability. "As elected representatives, we must legislate responsibly, put an end to political victimisation, and work together to uphold the supremacy of the people's Assembly and protect our democracy. Political parties are, after all, the true guardians of democracy and the responsibility to uphold the democratic functioning of the House lies with all of them collectively," the speaker added. He called for inter-party dialogue reminiscent of the Charter of Democracy to ensure the Assembly functions effectively as a space for public interest and genuine debate. Referring to political theory, Khan noted: "Modern societies are built upon dialogue; as Jürgen Habermas wrote, 'The public sphere is that realm of our social life in which something approaching public opinion can be formed,' underscoring that free, inclusive and reasoned discourse within parliaments forms the bedrock of democratic communities. Safeguarding this vital exchange of ideas is indispensable for our collective democratic future." In a strong critique of constitutional clauses historically used to undermine democracy, Speaker Khan declared: "As Speaker and a political worker, I firmly oppose anti-democratic constitutional provisions. This includes the infamous Article 58(2)(b), and Articles 62 and 63, all imposed by authoritarian dictators, notably General Zia-ul-Haq. These Articles have historically been weaponised to unjustly target elected politicians. We must end this vicious cycle; the Panama Case cannot become another tool like Article 58(2)(b). Otherwise, we succumb to Nietzschean nihilism, believing time is a flat circle and we are condemned to repeat mistakes." He asserted that misuse of these Articles undermines the constitutional right to political association and representation under Article 17. Disqualifying elected representatives on allegations or technicalities violates the presumption of innocence, disenfranchises voters and erodes the legitimacy of parliament. "The disqualification of elected representatives has deep roots in Pakistan's history. Early examples are the Public Representative Offices Disqualification Act 1949, and Elective Bodies Disqualification Order (EBDO) 1959. These 'backdoor tools' have consistently served non-democratic elements," the speaker stated. He criticised political parties for occasionally abetting such practices, citing the Panama "show trial" as an example of judicial overreach that continues to affect the political landscape through undemocratic means. "This destructive chain must be broken," Speaker Khan emphasised. "The very fact that the Constitution has been exploited this way means such challenging questions can be, and have been raised." He called upon the federal parliament to remove such dictatorial remnants from the Constitution to reclaim democratic values. Concluding his remarks, Speaker Khan affirmed: "During my tenure as Speaker, I will work to uphold parliamentary rule and the principles of representative constitutional democracy, as envisioned by our great Islamic Republic's founding fathers."
