AI robots fill in for weed killers and farm hands
As farms across the United States face a shortage of labourers and weeds grow resistant to herbicides, startup Aigen says its robotic solution -- named Element -- can save farmers money, help the environment and keep harmful chemicals out of food.
"I really believe this is the biggest thing we can do to improve human health," co-founder and chief technology officer Richard Wurden told AFP, as robots made their way through crops at Bowles Farm in the town of Los Banos.
"Everybody's eating food sprayed with chemicals."
Wurden, a mechanical engineer who spent five years at Tesla, went to work on the robot after relatives who farm in Minnesota told him weeding was a costly bane.
Weeds are becoming immune to herbicides, but a shortage of laborers often leaves chemicals as the only viable option, according to Wurden.
"No farmer that we've ever talked to said 'I'm in love with chemicals'," added Aigen co-founder and chief executive Kenny Lee, whose background is in software.
"They use it because it's a tool -- we're trying to create an alternative."
Element the robot resembles a large table on wheels, solar panels on top. Metal arms equipped with small blades reach down to hoe between crop plants.
"It actually mimics how humans work," Lee said as the temperature hit 90 degrees Fahrenheit (32 degrees Celsius) under a cloudless sky.
"When the sun goes down, it just powers down and goes to sleep; then in the morning it comes back up and starts going again."
AFP | Josh Edelson
The robot's AI system takes in data from on-board cameras, allowing it to follow crop rows and identify weeds.
"If you think this is a job that we want humans doing, just spend two hours in the field weeding," Wurden said.
Aigen's vision is for workers who once toiled in the heat to be "upskilled" to monitor and troubleshoot robots.
Along with the on-board AI, robots communicate wirelessly with small control centres, notifying handlers of mishaps.
- Future giant? -
Aigen has robots running in tomato, cotton, and sugar beet fields, and touts the technology's ability to weed without damaging the crops.
Lee estimated that it takes about five robots to weed 65 hectares of farm.
AFP | Josh Edelson
The robots made by the 25-person startup -- based in the city of Redmond, outside Seattle -- are priced at $50,000.
The company is focused on winning over politically conservative farmers with a climate-friendly option that relies on the sun instead of costly diesel fuel that powers heavy machinery.
"Climate, the word, has become politicized but when you get really down to brass tacks farmers care about their land," Lee said.
The technology caught the attention of Amazon Web Services (AWS), the e-commerce giant's cloud computing unit.
Aigen was chosen for AWS's "Compute for Climate" fellowship program that provides AI tools, data center power, and technical help for startups tackling environmental woes.
"Aigen is going to be one of the industry giants in the future," said AWS head of climate tech startups business development Lisbeth Kaufman.
"I think about Ford and the Model T, or Edison and the light bulb -- that's Kenny and Rich and Aigen."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
More economic turmoil looms as Donald Trump threatens additional tariff for BRICS supporters
BRICS leaders on Sunday decried US President Donald Trump's "indiscriminate" trade tariffs. Image: Pablo Porciuncula / AFP US President Donald Trump has threatened an additional 10% tariff on any country aligning with the BRICS nations' policies, which could have severe implications for South Africa. "Any country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10% Tariff. There will be no exceptions to this policy," Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform on Sunday night. This levy would be implemented over and above the base 10% tariff that is already being planned for all of the country's global trade partners. The new tariff threat was in direct response to criticisms of Trump's unilateral tariff measures, made by BRICS members during a summit held in Rio de Janeiro on Sunday. A joint BRICS statement released after the summit said the upcoming tariffs risked hurting the global economy. Donald Trump has once again taken aim at BRICS nations. Image: Michael Kappeler / AFP At the event, BRICS leaders also collectively condemned the recent Israeli and US air strikes on Iran, expressing 'serious concern over deliberate attacks on civilian infrastructure and peaceful nuclear facilities,' and labelling the strikes a 'violation of international law'. Trump's tariff deadline looms Trump's new threats come at the beginning of a crucial week for the global economy as the US President's July 9 tariff deadline looms. While the White House is expected to start sending out letters to its trade partners this week, outlining the new tariffs, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick confirmed during a press conference over the weekend that the new tariffs will now take effect from August 1. The sweeping global tariffs were originally planned for April 1, but Trump announced a three-month delay after global markets reacted negatively to the looming trade war. South Africa has requested an extension of the 90-day tariff pause, after the US announced its intention to introduce a new trade template for countries in sub-Saharan Africa. The US President said he would impose unilateral levies on trade partners unless a deal could be struck by August 1, AFP reported. South Africa stands to lose billions in export revenue should the country face higher tariffs from the US, as well as the potential loss of the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), which provides duty-free access to that market. SA exports under AGOA amounted to $3.6 billion (R64bn) in 2022.
eNCA
8 hours ago
- eNCA
BRICS nations slam Trump tariffs, condemn strikes on Iran
BRFAZIL - BRICS leaders at a summit on Sunday took aim at US President Donald Trump's "indiscriminate" import tariffs and recent Israeli-US strikes on Iran. The 11 emerging nations - including Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa - account for about half the world's population and 40 percent of global economic output. The bloc is divided about much, but found common cause when it comes to the mercurial US leader and his stop-start tariff wars - even if they avoided naming him directly. Voicing "serious concerns about the rise of unilateral tariff" measures, BRICS members said the tariffs risked hurting the global economy, according to a summit joint statement. They also offered symbolic backing to fellow member Iran, condemning a series of military strikes on nuclear and other targets carried out by Israel and the United States. AFP | Mauro PIMENTEL In April, Trump threatened allies and rivals alike with a slew of punitive duties, before offering a months-long reprieve in the face of a fierce market sell-off. Trump has now warned he will impose unilateral levies on partners unless they reach "deals" by August 1. In an apparent concession to US allies such as Brazil, India and Saudi Arabia, the summit declaration did not criticize the United States or its president by name at any point. - No show - Conceived two decades ago as a forum for fast-growing economies, the BRICS have come to be seen as a Chinese-driven counterbalance to US and western European power. But as the group has expanded to include Iran, Saudi Arabia and others, it has struggled to reach meaningful consensus on issues from the Gaza war to challenging US global dominance. BRICS nations, for example, collectively called for a peaceful two-state solution to the Israel-Palestinian conflict - despite Tehran's long-standing position that Israel should be destroyed. An Iranian diplomatic source said his government's "reservations" had been conveyed to Brazilian hosts. Still, Iran stopped short of rejecting the statement outright. In perhaps a further sign of the diplomatic sensitivities, Saudi Arabia's foreign minister skipped Sunday's discussions entirely, according to a Brazilian government source. Saudi Arabia is among the world's leading beneficiaries of high-tech US military exports and is a long-standing US partner. AFP | Mauro PIMENTEL The political punch of this year's summit has been depleted by the absence of China's Xi Jinping, who skipped the meeting for the first time in his 12 years as president. The Chinese leader is not the only notable absentee. Russian President Vladimir Putin, charged with war crimes in Ukraine, also opted to stay away, participating via video link. He told counterparts that BRICS had become a key player in global governance. The summit also called for regulation governing artificial intelligence and said the technology could not be the preserve of only rich nations. The commercial AI sector is currently dominated by US tech giants, although China and other nations have rapidly developing capacity. By Facundo Fernández Barrio
IOL News
18 hours ago
- IOL News
The anatomy of decline: Unemployment and South Africa's structural crisis
Ban Ki-moon, former UN Secretary-General, reminds us that 'addressing unemployment is not just an economic imperative, it is a moral and social one that defines the future of peace and progress Image: AFP In 1994, South Africa emerged from apartheid with global goodwill, democratic legitimacy and the promise of shared prosperity. Yet three decades later, that promise remains unfulfilled. With an overall unemployment rate of 31.9% and youth unemployment at 59.6% (Q4 2024, Stats SA), the country faces a structural crisis that is eroding its economic base and social cohesion. This is not an isolated issue but a national reckoning that follows a pattern common to both collapsing companies and declining states. Jim Collins, in How the Mighty Fall, outlines five stages of institutional decline: hubris, undisciplined growth, denial of risk, superficial solutions and eventual stagnation. These stages offer a sobering framework for understanding South Africa's current position. 'Denial is the most dangerous stage of decline,' Collins warns, 'because it blinds leaders to reality.' Stage 1: Hubris Born of Triumph Between 2000 and 2008, South Africa enjoyed average GDP growth of 3.5%, buoyed by favourable commodity cycles and post-apartheid optimism. The country asserted its geopolitical presence, joined BRICS and positioned itself as a regional hub. But early success bred complacency. Rather than address long-standing structural inequalities or invest in productive capacity, economic momentum gave way to inertia. The Gini coefficient remained high at 0.67 while labour market rigidities discouraged job creation. State-owned enterprises, particularly Eskom, were allowed to expand without accountability. By 2024, public bailouts for Eskom had surpassed R500 billion. Argentina's early 20th-century trajectory offers a striking parallel: a commodity-rich economy that ascended rapidly only to decline due to internal mismanagement and premature confidence in global status. South Africa's early economic positioning masked unresolved domestic vulnerabilities. While attention turned outward to summits and regional diplomacy, the foundations beneath were quietly eroding. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Stage 2: The Undisciplined Pursuit of More South Africa's expansion of redistributive programmes, especially through social grants and state employment schemes, was not matched by corresponding economic productivity. The social grant system, projected to cost R259.3 billion by 2026, has been essential for poverty relief but increasingly burdens fiscal sustainability. Meanwhile, core infrastructure suffered. Transnet's freight efficiency declined sharply and energy supply instability continued to constrain investment. The World Bank reports average GDP growth of just 0.7% between 2014 and 2024. Yet state-led expansion persisted, often detached from output and institutional readiness. This pursuit of scale without returns mirrors firms that chase growth for its own sake. Public employment expansion - while well intentioned - has in some cases reinforced dependency. The logic that more 'boots on the ground' equals delivery has led to overstaffing, rising wage costs and limited institutional agility. Government visibility has been confused with public value. Climate risks have compounded the challenge. Extended droughts have reduced employment in agriculture and mining, weakening resilience in rural provinces. Without adaptation strategies, the employment impacts of environmental shocks will only intensify. Stage 3: Denial of Risk and Erosion of Trust Despite mounting evidence of institutional and economic strain, reforms have lagged. The Zondo Commission exposed over R500 billion in procurement-related losses, yet implementation remains slow. Labour market mismatches have worsened, with 42% of jobless individuals now classified as discouraged workers - those who have ceased to seek employment entirely. Total Factor Productivity has declined for over 15 years according to the International Monetary Fund, yet public discourse often defaults to rebranding or extending existing models. Persistent mismatches between the education system and labour market needs further entrench youth unemployment. Over a million students are enrolled in post-secondary institutions annually, yet far fewer graduate with skills aligned to economic opportunity. Technical and vocational education remains underfunded despite strong global evidence of its employment in government has declined. According to the Edelman Trust Barometer, only 22% of South Africans express trust in government compared to 62% in business. Many young people are now cycling through training schemes with no connection to employment. For them, the crisis is not theoretical - it is lived daily through delayed adulthood and social alienation. Stage 4: Superficial Solutions and Fiscal Pressure Short-term relief measures have become the norm. The Social Relief of Distress Grant and other temporary interventions offer necessary support but are not substitutes for structural employment generation. Public debt now stands at over 74% of GDP, edging towards unsustainable territory. The 2024 Budget Review confirmsdebt service costs are rising faster than allocations to education and infrastructure. Some initiatives under Operation Vulindlela and the Just Energy Transition Investment Plan show intent but require stronger execution and sustained adds further pressure. McKinsey estimates that automation could displace one in four jobs in South Africa by 2030, especially among low-skilled workers. Without a reskilling strategy, digital transformation may reinforce unemployment rather than resolve it. The African Development Bank warns that the continent adds 10 million job seekers to the labour force annually but creates only 3 million jobs. Grants and temporary schemes cannot bridge this gap. They must be paired with pathways into the formal economy - particularly for youth, women and small private sector must also adapt. Hiring practices, investment in entry-level talent and support for smallenterprises are necessary components of a functioning labour market. Stage 5: Recovery or Regression? South Africa remains at a critical juncture. Continued economic stagnation if unaddressed could normalise exclusion and dampen democratic participation. But recovery is not out of reach. Post-crisis recoveries in South Korea and post-war Germany show what is possible when discipline, targeted investment and reform align. In South Africa, green shoots exist. TymeBank has expanded financial inclusion through low-cost digital banking. Harambee Youth Employment Accelerator has supported over a million workseekers using demand-driven matching. AfCFTA implementation offers a strategic lever. If logistics and regulatory reform accompany it, the agreement could boost Africa's income by $450 billion (R7.9 trillion) by 2035. For South Africa, increased participation in regional manufacturing and agri-processing could transform employment patterns - particularly in secondary cities andrural districts. The informal economy, where most African employment resides, cannot be ignored. It requires accessible microfinance, simplified registration and recognition as a legitimate growth engine. Development cannot occur if the majority of economic activity is treated as marginal. None of this is possible without confronting inefficiencies in how public funds are deployed. While social grants and public employment programmes are essential lifelines for vulnerable populations, they have not translated into economic inclusion. Expanding headcounts in state departments is sometimes used as a proxy forperformance, yet without addressing institutional inefficiencies, this risks reinforcing dependency. Employment must become the central metric of public accountability. Conclusion: The Stakes and the Path Forward Failing to address unemployment is not a challenge that can be deferred without consequence. Beyond economic metrics lie the very fabric of social stability, public trust and democratic legitimacy. South Africa's experience offers a warning to all emerging and developing economies: the cost of delay is measured not only in GDP but in fractured communities and lost futures. Ban Ki-moon, former UN Secretary-General, reminds us that 'addressing unemployment is not just an economic imperative, it is a moral and social one that defines the future of peace and progress.' South Africa is not alone. Across emerging economies, unemployment, fiscal strain and youth disillusionment are converging into systemic risk. The lessons embedded in this crisis - about political will, economic realism and institutional reform - are applicable far beyond one nation's borders. The foundations for recovery exist but require clear-eyed leadership and a willingness to prioritise structural reform over symbolic intervention. South Africa's story will be determined not by its past but by how decisivelyit addresses the challenges of today. Nomvula Zeldah Mabuza is a Risk Governance and Compliance Specialist with extensive experience in strategic risk and industrial operations. She holds a Diploma in Business Management (Accounting) from Brunel University, UK, and is an MBA candidate at Henley Business School, South Africa. Image: Supplied
