logo
OPINION: Another week, another attempt to bring down the French government

OPINION: Another week, another attempt to bring down the French government

Local France4 days ago

The world is a dangerous and chaotic place. What should French politicians do about it? Bring down another French government, of course.
The prime minister François Bayrou faces two censure motions in the National Assembly next Monday or Tuesday. He will almost certainly survive – but not for long. His six-months-old government, the fourth French government in the last eighteen months, is likely to fall when it tries to pass a deficit-cutting 2026 budget in September and October.
Early next week, Bayrou faces separate censure motions from the Socialists and from the Greens and harder Left. Which of the many threats to the prosperity of France and the peace of the world have provoked these attacks on a stumbling, minority government?
Ukraine? The middle east? Rising unemployment? A runaway budget deficit?
Advertisement
None of them. The Socialist censure motion is nominally about the modest and inadequate pension reform imposed two years ago. In truth, it is about the Socialists themselves, their internal divisions, their quarrels with the rest of the Left and their inability to decide whether to aspire to become once again a party of government or remain in radical, powerless opposition.
Both motions will fail because Marine Le Pen's Far Right Rassemblement National has decided to stand aside – for now. Le Pen thinks that is not the right time to bring Bayrou down. She could yet change her mind, as she did last December when she capriciously joined the Left to destroy the government of Michel Barnier.
All the indications are that Le Pen would rather wait until the Autumn before pulling the plug on Bayrou. Does that mean that the Far Right is now more responsible than the Left? Scarcely.
Le Pen is keeping the knife behind her back for personal and party reasons. She may have some slight concern about the impact on public opinion if she pushes France into domestic disarray at a time of multiple, global crises. Mostly, she is still trying to work out how to respond to her five-year ban from seeking electoral office and how to contain the sly ambitions of her Number Two, Jordan Bardella.
The arithmetic is simple. A censure motion needs the votes of 289 of the 577 deputies in the National Assembly to succeed. The minority government has 220 seats. No censure can pass without the 140 votes of Le Pen's RN and her allies.
So why are the 66 Socialist deputies bringing a doomed censure motion despite their agreement last February to a passive alliance with Bayrou which allowed the 2025 state budget to pass?
I
wrote last week
that there was a chance that the sea serpent of pension reform could be removed from the French political conversation for a few years. I was over-optimistic.
Part of Bayrou's deal with the Socialists in February was a 'conclave' between employers and unions to 'improve' President Emmanuel Macron's 2023 pension reform which increased the state retirement age from 62 to 64. There was little hope at the time that these negotiations could succeed. The more radical trades union federations walked out immediately.
Advertisement
In fact, other unions and the employers made more progress than expected. To the fury of some Socialists, the three moderate union federations accepted the increased retirement age. In return they demanded that pension rights should be improved for women with families and that people in arduous jobs should be allowed early retirement.
On Monday, a last round of talks came close to a deal but the employers refused to consider any increase in their contributions to balance their books. The Prime Minister is still trying to put Humpty Dumpty together again as I write. He may put forward a draft law, to be debated in the Autumn, which would codify the advances made in the talks.
No matter. The Socialists have decided not to wait and see. They are furious - or pretending to be furious – that the 'conclave' did not recommend a reduction in the pension age to 62 or at least 63.
Advertisement
This was never likely to happen. The Socialist leadership insisted that that it must – to justify their decision to split with the rest of the Left and allow Bayrou's 2025 budget to pass in February.
The issue has come to symbolise the party's debate on its own future. Will it remain allied to Jean-Luc Mélenchon's tear-it-all-down La France Insoumise (LFI)? Or will the Socialists become once again a would-be reformist party-of-government?
The narrow re-election as party leader this month of Olivier Faure, the man who entered the alliance with Mélenchon's LFI, has left the Socialists deeply divided and with no obvious strategy. The party might have entered the real world by praising the genuine pension advances made by the moderate union federations. Instead, it reverted to an obsession with a pension age of 62 - which will allow some form of new electoral alliance with the Greens and harder Left to be cobbled together.
In sum, next week's censure motions are mostly about sterile manoeuvring on the Left but they will further weaken an already fragile, minority coalition government. Bayrou's greatest achievement as PM was to split the Left and bring the Socialists into a kind of uneasy association with the Centre and the Centre-Right. He has now 'lost' the Socialists again, as it was perhaps inevitable that he would.
Like Michel Barnier before him, Bayrou will therefore become a prisoner of the selfish and electoral calculations of Marine Le Pen and the Far Right. A successful censure motion seems just a matter of time.
What will Emmauel Macron do then? Appoint another fragile Prime Minister? Or call a new election, which would be unlikely to change much in the splintered Assembly?
He has no good choices but I fear we may be heading for an October or November election.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

France sets framework for EU's 2040 climate targets
France sets framework for EU's 2040 climate targets

Euronews

time41 minutes ago

  • Euronews

France sets framework for EU's 2040 climate targets

The battle to reach Europe's 2040 climate targets has begun. On 2 July, the European Commission is due to present its proposals for reducing CO2 emissions. It is expected to announce a 90% reduction to take the EU towards carbon neutrality by 2050. This proposal comes at a time when the European Green Deal is being called into question and the EU's competitiveness is being strengthened in the face of international competition. Member states are preparing their political arguments for the debate. France has already taken the first offensive at last week's European summit, setting out its framework. "I'm in favour of having these targets in 2040, but basically I said some very simple things. Firstly, if we want these targets by 2040, we have to give ourselves the means to do so and make them compatible with our competitiveness. What does that mean? Technological neutrality, flexibility, investment," French President Emmanuel Macron said at the end of the meeting of the 27 EU leaders. Flexibility: the word has been thrown around and is used repeatedly in Europe's corridors of power. The Commission has also adopted the same term. The Vice-President of the institution responsible for the Clean, Fair and Competitive Transition seems ready to grant flexibility to convince capitals. "Reducing our emissions by 90% by 2040 is a clear objective. We then need to discuss how we can combine the different elements, the possible flexibilities," Teresa Ribera told Euronews. The grey area of flexibility For environmental NGOs, the figure of 90% reduction in emissions is an important marker, but they do not wish to limit the debate to this numerical assessment. Several organisations are warning of the flexibility and possible flaws in the Commission's proposal. Flexibility could take the form of international credits. "Essentially, the EU and its member states could pay other countries outside the EU to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. This amount would then be included in the 90% of greenhouse gas emissions within the EU's borders," explains Michael Sicaud-Clyet, Climate Governance Officer at WWF EU. For him, this political sleight of hand is "a major problem, because it will divert investment to industry, or to people and municipalities outside the EU and it will cost more and have less positive impact on people and industry in the EU." Other forms of flexibility could involve absorbing carbon through carbon sinks, which are natural carbon absorbers, and permanent absorbers, which are technologies whose large-scale development has not yet been proven", warns Michael Sicaud-Clyet. Time for negotiations France says it does not want to rush the negotiations. The 2040 targets "cannot be a technical debate that takes place in a few weeks. It must be a democratic debate," Macron warned. "It's not a target for Belém (the Brazilian city will host COP30, the UN climate conference, this year). If we have it for Belém, great. If it's going to take longer, let's take longer to do it right." The President repeated his mantra of "flexibility, investment, technological neutrality and trade coherence, meaning that if we set targets for 2040, we want a trade policy that protects us." In this debate, Paris should be able to count on the support of Budapest and Warsaw. However, other member states such as Germany, Spain, Finland and Denmark (which holds the six-month EU presidency from 1 July) fully support the 90% emissions reduction target . The WWF EU also mentions a number of "swing states," countries that are keeping their final position vague. For the European Commission, it is vital that the EU does not miss the turning point represented by the 2040 target. "I think this could be a mistake. I think that this year (2025) marks the 10th anniversary of the Paris Agreement (on climate), and we want to determine how we can continue to make progress in an area that we consider essential for the economic and social well-being of Europeans," says Teresa Ribera. The Spanish official also opened the door to debate. "We will have to identify the challenges that lie ahead, while trying to reach an agreement between all the European countries."

What is France's Loi Duplomb and why are farmers protesting about it?
What is France's Loi Duplomb and why are farmers protesting about it?

Local France

time2 hours ago

  • Local France

What is France's Loi Duplomb and why are farmers protesting about it?

Back in January 2024, French farmers began a series of protests that included roadblocks on motorways and a 'siege' of the city of Paris. Their demands were varied, but among them was a request for a simplification and scaling back of the rules and paperwork that French farmers operate under. Eighteen months on, a piece of legislation that attempts to address those demands is coming before the French parliament - the Loi Duplomb, named after the right-wing Senator Laurent Duplomb who introduced it. The bill aims to "lift the constraints on the profession of agriculture". It has some measures to simplify the paperwork that farmers must deal with, which are relatively uncontroversial, but the other aspect of "lifting constraints" goes much further - relaxing or scrapping altogether rules relating to the use of pesticides, insecticides and other chemicals as well as rules on water storage and extraction. Advertisement Do farmers support it? This bill illustrates neatly why it's impossible to talk about 'the farmers' - agriculture is a huge and very varied industry that does not speak with one voice. Different types of farmers have different needs and problems, and sometimes those interests are in direct competition. The Loi Duplomb is supported by France's largest farming union the FNSEA - this union is dominated by the large cereal farmers and agri-businesses. They say that they face unfair competition because they cannot use certain types of pesticides and weedkillers which are legal in other EU countries. However other farmers and agricultural producers - especially beekeepers - are staunchly opposed to the Loi Duplomb, with many holding protests over the weekend. The country's third largest farming union, Confédération paysanne which advocates an agro-ecological transition, is opposed to the bill, but the Jeunes Agriculteurs (young farmers) union supports it. What's in the bill? The bill is wide-ranging and contains provisions on a number of topics. Among the most controversial are the relaxing of the rules on pesticide use and changes to rules on water storage. Also proposed are a relaxation around the rules on constructing new agricultural buildings and a weakening of the powers of the French biodiversity office. Advertisement Particularly controversial is the proposal to allow farmers to use a currently banned type of insecticide - acétamipride - which can be fatal to bees. Christian Pons, president of the beekeepers' union Union nationale de l'apiculture française (Unaf) denounced the law , which he says "claims to defend food sovereignty, but since when has it been acceptable to destroy one sector, that of beekeepers, in order to save another, that of hazelnut trees, for example?" Water storage and in particular the building of new water storage sites would be made easier under the Loi Duplomb, with exemptions granted to general rules that require any new project to protect local biodiversity. With increasing temperatures and drought, water supplies are likely to become more and more of a flashpoint in the years to come - in France the issue already led to violent clashes in the south-west town of Sainte-Soline where giant underground water storage basins were being built. Advertisement Farmers insisted the water storage basins were necessary to deal with drought, environmental campaigners accused them of diverting water supplies from local people and effectively trying to 'privatise' water. "The proposed Loi Duplomb will be detrimental to the proper functioning of natural environments, at a time when more than a third of France is already suffering from structural water shortages," said the group France nature environnement , adding that the water clauses of the bill are "yet another gift to a few industrial farmers, and detrimental to future production capacities". Environmental groups including Greenpeace have also raised concerns over the bill. So what next? Debates begin in the French parliament this week and are expected to be finely balanced, making it unclear whether the text will pass. Even within the government there are divisions - the agriculture minister Annie Genevard has asked MPs not to oppose it, saying that "farmers need it", while the environment minister Agnès Pannier-Runacher has said she is against the section on relaxing pesticide rules. The debates are expected to last at least a week, while if the law is passed it would likely need to be referred to the Conseil constitutionnel , which will judge whether the bill strikes a balance with France's environmental obligations. Further protests are also possible - the FNSEA began preemptive protests in May in an attempt to pressure MPs into supporting the bill, while environmental groups and other farming unions may continue protests against the bill.

'Science refugees': French university welcomes first US researchers
'Science refugees': French university welcomes first US researchers

Local France

time2 hours ago

  • Local France

'Science refugees': French university welcomes first US researchers

The University of Aix-Marseille (AMU) welcomed the scholars on Thursday, following the March launch of its "Safe Place for Science" initiative, the first among 20 set to relocate there in coming months. The programme has already drawn nearly 300 applicants from top institutions such as Stanford, NASA, and Berkeley. The development comes as US universities have been threatened since Trump's return to the White House with massive federal funding cuts, causing research programmes to face closures. Some staff also fear possible detention and deportation for their political views. Advertisement AMU - one of France's largest universities, with some 12,000 international students alone - is eager to provide a home for these scholars, with research funding for up to three years. Historian Brian Sandberg said he decided to apply to the university in the southern Provence region on a return trip to the United States from France, when he feared he might face arrest at the border of his own country. Though he was not detained, "it makes you think about what is your status as a researcher", said the academic from Illinois whose work focuses on religion, gender and violence. Sandberg is now one of 20 scholars specialising in subjects ranging from health, climate science, astrophysics and the humanities set to relocate to France in September. There, they hope to pursue their research in what they see as a more open academic environment. "The principle of academic freedom, as well as the entire system of research and higher education in the United States is really under attack," said Sandberg. "If I stay in the United States, I can continue to teach, but as a researcher, for the next four years, we're stuck," he said, referring to Trump's term in office. One academic who requested anonymity said Trump's policies directly threatened her work on gender and human-caused global warming. "Apparently, one of the banned words... is 'female'," she said. "I don't know how you can get around speaking about females without using the word," she said. Advertisement In February, the Washington Post reported that the National Science Foundation was flagging research using terms such as "female" and "women" that could violate Trump's orders rolling back diversity initiatives. But she said her decision to move to France went beyond her professional freedom. "I've got kids, I don't want them to grow up in a very hostile area," she said. AMU's programme is part of a broader push to cash in on US President Donald Trump's massive cuts in funding for education. In May, France and the EU announced plans to attract US researchers in hopes of benefiting from the potential brain drain by supporting the costs of hosting foreign researchers. Advertisement French President Emmanuel Macron, who called the growing pressure on academia by Trump's administration "an error", has encouraged US scientists to "choose France". He announced that his government would earmark €100 million to help attract foreign talent. French lawmakers have introduced a bill to create a special status for "science refugees". European Commission head Ursula Von der Leyen has said the European Union will launch an incentives package worth €500 million to make the 27-nation bloc "a magnet for researchers". For its part, AMU expects to welcome the other 12 American researchers in the coming months, with its budget of €15 million. "Saving our American colleagues and welcoming them is also a way of welcoming and promoting global research," said the university's president Eric Berton. "This is a science welcome programme, a science asylum programme. And above all, we want to enshrine the concept of science refugees in law," he added. In recent years, France has already welcomed scholars forced into exile from Ukraine, Yemen, Afghanistan and the Palestinian territories.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store