logo
Deadly Border Feud Between Thailand & Cambodia

Deadly Border Feud Between Thailand & Cambodia

Scoop11-06-2025
BANGKOK, Thailand -- A deadly border feud between Thailand's U.S.-trained military and Cambodia's Chinese-assisted troops has resulted in a surprise agreement with Phnom Penh retreating and abandoning a freshly dug trench after one Cambodian soldier was killed and both sides reinforced their armies in the disputed Emerald Triangle jungle.
The face-to-face gunfight at the border also sparked questions about Bangkok's fragile civilian-led coalition government and its ability to control Thailand's politicized military which has, when displeased, unleashed 13 coups since the 1930s.
While villagers hurriedly dug schoolyard bunkers, and thousands of travelers were left stranded due to temporary checkpoint closures, Thailand announced on Sunday (June 8) that Cambodian troops agreed to withdraw to their pre-confrontation positions and make other concessions.
"Cambodia agreed to fill in the trenches, to restore the area to its natural state," the Bangkok Post reported on Monday (June 9).
The Thai Army displayed photos of what it said showed a 2,100-ft.-long (650-meter) trench dug by Cambodian troops in the disputed zone.
Two pictures showed a freshly dug trench on May 18 and May 28. Two other photos displayed the site restored and filled with dirt on Sunday (June 8).
In Cambodia, details about the agreement were sketchy.
"The Ministry of National Defense of Cambodia announced today that military commanders from Cambodia and Thailand have agreed to adjust the positions of their troops along certain areas of the border to reduce tensions and avoid confrontation," the Khmer Times reported on June 9 (Monday).
'I ask the public to trust that the government is working to solve this through peaceful means, which is the only way to avoid violence and maintain good relations with our neighboring country,' Cambodia's influential former prime minister Hun Sen said.
Cambodia blames Thai forces for allegedly shooting dead a Cambodian soldier on May 28 during a brief firefight in the Emerald Triangle where eastern Thailand, northern Cambodia, and southern Laos meet.
The jungle and scrubland includes a no man's zone that is not officially demarcated, attracting human and wildlife traffickers, illegal loggers, smugglers, fugitives, and other criminals.
The disputed zone also boasts the ruins of ancient Hindu temples including Ta Moan Thom, Ta Moan Toch, and Ta Kro Bei.
The latest deadly confrontation began when the two nation's armed forces opened fire at each other at Chong Bok pass on the Thai-Cambodian border.
The Cambodians were allegedly digging a trench along the rugged, porous frontier -- drawn 100 years ago by French colonialists.
According to the Thai army, Cambodia's troops "encroached" and shot first when the Thais approached to talk.
Cambodian troops 'misunderstood the situation and started using weapons, so Thai forces retaliated,' a Thai army spokesman said.
In an official letter to Thailand's embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia's Foreign Ministry officially demanded an investigation and trial for Thailand's troops who "without provocation" allegedly killed the Cambodian.
The Cambodian soldier's death created increased public support for authoritarian Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet.
"The reaction of the Cambodian public to this situation has surprised me, in how it has caused a large upswell in patriotic sentiment and pro-government support, even from a lot of people I know to be very skeptical of the government," Craig Etcheson, an author and researcher about Cambodia, said in an interview.
"In that sense, it has been very good for the CPP," Mr. Etcheson said, referring to the long-ruling, monopolistic Cambodian Peoples' Party.
Coincidentally, miles away, China was concluding its two-week-long Golden Dragon military exercises with Cambodia which included 2,000 combined personnel, fearsome galloping "robot combat dogs" with assault rifles mounted on their backs, plus helicopters, vehicle-mounted rockets, mortars, and other weaponry.
The Golden Dragon drills do not "threaten or harm any country," said Cambodia's Defense Ministry spokesman Gen. Chhum Socheat.
China is Cambodia's biggest source for weapons and other military needs, including Chinese tanks, armed vehicles, and air defense training, but there was no indication of any Chinese involvement in the border confrontation.
China's President Xi Jinping boosted Phnom Penh's faith in more aid and investment from Beijing during his April visit to Cambodia.
In May, U.S. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Indo-Pacific Security Affairs John Noh met Cambodia's Defense Minister and Secretary of State Lt. Gen. Rath Dararoth to discuss security and military relations.
"Both leaders look forward to a U.S. Navy ship visit, and maritime training, to occur at Ream Naval Base later this year, as well as travel by Secretary Hegseth to visit the U.S. ship while in port at Ream," the U.S. Defense Department said on May 31.
U.S. officials hope a U.S. ship will be able to dock, for the first time, near Sihanoukville in Cambodia's Ream Naval Base which is undergoing massive upgrades by China as part of Beijing's Belt and Road Initiative.
Thailand conducts large-scale military exercises with the Pentagon each year and allows the U.S. Navy docking facilities, including the U.S. 7th Fleet's nuclear-powered aircraft carriers, along its shallow Gulf of Thailand coast, bolstering the U.S. Pacific Fleet in the Indo-Pacific region.
The Thai-Cambodian border clash meanwhile exposed cracks between Thailand's elected, civilian-led government and its cautious relationship with the military.
Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra said she wants a peaceful, behind-the-scenes, negotiated settlement between Bangkok and Phnom Penh, but has not announced its terms.
Thailand's military is perceived as bristling against Cambodia.
"The Thai army would prefer a hawkish response," Paul Chambers, a visiting fellow at the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies in Singapore, said in an interview before the border agreement was reached.
"As tensions have risen, alarm has grown. Such alarm could intensify to an extent that it affects Thai civil-military relations.
The mood among the public has risen "from apathetic to increasingly alarmed in both countries," Mr. Chambers said.
Others said the differences between Thailand's government and military were not destabilizing -- yet.
"Currently, the Thai military and the civilian government under Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra appear to be aligned in their approach to the border dispute," Sophal Ear, an associate professor of Southeast Asian and other international relations at Phoenix's Arizona State University, said in an interview.
"Both have expressed a preference for peaceful resolution through existing bilateral mechanisms. However, the military has indicated readiness for a 'high-level operation' if necessary, reflecting a cautious stance amid increased Cambodian military activity near the border," Mr. Sophal Ear said.
Prime Minister Paetongtarn expressed her relationship with the army when she said, "The military understands precisely what is happening on the ground. It is the military's responsibility to evaluate whether the situation has reached a point where confrontation is necessary.
"If not, then engaging prematurely could result in great harm."
Thailand and Cambodia meanwhile cooperate on several vital issues including trade and security which may help temper their feud.
Their relations are so tight, for example, that they are jointly accused of helping each other crush political dissidents, according to New York-based Human Rights Watch (HRW).
"The Cambodian and Thai governments have engaged in transnational repression -- government efforts to silence dissent by committing human rights abuses against their own nationals outside their own territory -- through reciprocal arrangements targeting dissidents and opposition figures, colloquially known as a 'swap mart'," HRW said.
"Both governments have facilitated assaults, abductions, enforced disappearances, and the forced return of people to their home countries where their lives or freedom are at risk," the rights group said in April.
Thailand and Phnom Penh deny violating the law when it comes to deporting people back to each other's country, despite pleas that fleeing political activists be spared.
In 1999, Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet was a cadet at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point.
It is unknown if that will temper or give confidence to his military dealings with Thailand.
Ms. Paetongtarn's father, former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra, had close fraternal ties with Cambodia's previous prime minister and former Khmer Rouge regiment commander Hun Sen, the father of Prime Minister Hun Manet.
Those generational links were especially valuable after Mr. Thaksin was overthrown in a military coup in 2006, leading to 15 years as a self-exiled fugitive from prison sentences for corruption and other financial crimes.
Those enmeshed personal relationships had recently been blamed by some Thais for weakening Bangkok's negotiating stance in an ongoing dispute with Cambodia over mapping their shared Gulf of Thailand which hosts oil and natural gas extraction platforms.
"Right-wing opponents of the Shinawatras, in particular, are using the issue of Thai-Cambodian border issues to attack the Paetongtarn government," Mr. Chambers said.
"This issue could become increasingly productive for the right wing opposition."
Sophal Ear said: "Opposition groups in Thailand have criticized the Shinawatra-led government for its handling of the border dispute, accusing it of being too conciliatory towards Cambodia.
"This strategy taps into nationalist sentiments, but risks being counterproductive if perceived as undermining efforts for a peaceful resolution. The [Thai] government's emphasis on diplomacy may appeal to moderates who prioritize stability over confrontation.
"In Cambodia, there is a sense of nationalistic fervor, with support for the government's decision to seek ICJ intervention.
"In Thailand, the public is more divided, some express concern over national sovereignty, while others prioritize economic and political stability," Mr. Sophal Ear said.
Thailand and Cambodia will engage in talks at a June 14 meeting of the Joint Boundary Committee, said Thai Defense Minister Phumtham.
'The government has made preparations, both the legal aspects and negotiations through mechanisms, along with military preparations on the frontline if that proves necessary,' said the defense minister who is also a deputy prime minister.
"For those who stir up nationalist sentiments, they should understand that war is best avoided," Mr. Phumtham said.
"Don't stir it, or problems will follow."
Richard S. Ehrlich is a Bangkok-based American foreign correspondent reporting from Asia since 1978, and winner of Columbia University's Foreign Correspondents' Award. Excerpts from his two new nonfiction books, "Rituals. Killers. Wars. & Sex. -- Tibet, India, Nepal, Laos, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka & New York" and "Apocalyptic Tribes, Smugglers & Freaks" are available at
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India: End Unlawful Expulsion Of Indian Muslim Citizens And Rohingya Refugees
India: End Unlawful Expulsion Of Indian Muslim Citizens And Rohingya Refugees

Scoop

time2 days ago

  • Scoop

India: End Unlawful Expulsion Of Indian Muslim Citizens And Rohingya Refugees

(Dhaka, July 31, 2025)—The Indian Government must immediately end its unlawful campaign of expulsion against Indian Muslim citizens and Rohingya refugees, said Fortify Rights today. Indian authorities have intensified their 'illegal immigrant' verification campaign in recent months, arbitrarily arresting, detaining, torturing, and coercively removing members of its Muslim minorities—including those with valid documentation or citizenship—as well as Rohingya refugees, in violation of India's international human rights obligations. 'India is targeting its Muslim citizens and refugees with a discriminatory campaign of arrest, detention, and forced expulsion in violation of their rights,' said John Quinley, Director at Fortify Rights. 'These actions not only violate international human rights law, but deepen the dangerous marginalization of Muslims and refugees in India.' Muslim communities and refugees in India are increasingly at risk since the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government, led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, was first elected in 2014. Fortify Rights' new investigation finds that in recent months, authorities in BJP-run states have arbitrarily arrested, detained, tortured, and coercively expelled Muslim minorities and Rohingya refugees. These efforts intensified in recent months, after deadly attacks in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, which Indian authorities alleged were linked to Pakistan-based militant groups. In response, on May 7, 2025, India launched Operation Sindoor, a retaliatory military campaign targeting alleged terrorist camps within Pakistan. Following the terror attack, BJP leaders and lawmakers have renewed their calls for stricter measures against what they termed 'infiltrators' and 'illegal immigrants' on Indian soil. Advertisement - scroll to continue reading In May 2025, India's Ministry of Home Affairs issued a directive mandating all states and union territories to verify the credentials of individuals suspected to be 'illegal immigrants' within 30 days. The directive was sent to India's Border Security Force (BSF) and Assam Rifles, which guard the country's borders with Bangladesh and Myanmar. Since this directive was issued, Indian authorities have conducted mass raids, forcibly returned Rohingya refugees and expelled Indian Muslims, to Myanmar and Bangladesh. According to Bangladeshi government data, since May 7, more than 1,800 people have been forced into Bangladesh from India. Indian officials reported that more than 2,000 have been sent to Bangladesh since May 7, 2025. From May to July 2025, Fortify Rights spoke with 16 individuals, including Muslim residents in the states of Assam and Gujarat, Rohingya refugees in India, relatives of detainees, as well as an Indian lawyer and a Bangladesh police officer at the border. Fortify Rights also documented torture and ill-treatment during India's arrest and expulsion campaign. An Indian Muslim citizen, 30, in Gujarat State, but originally from the state of West Bengal, told Fortify Rights how the Indian police detained and later expelled him to Bangladesh in May 2025, where he now remains: 'The police told us, 'Acknowledge that you are from Bangladesh, you are Bangladeshi. [Or] we will kill you.' … For 15 to 20 days, they kept us in an Indian jail.' Indian police demanded he convert to Hinduism if he wanted to remain in India: They [the police] said, 'If you convert to become a Hindu, we will release you. Then I said, 'No, I don't want to change my faith. If I have to die, I will die.' … They [the police] said, 'We will send you to Pakistan, you are all extremists.' ... From the prison, they took us to an airplane, we were blindfolded, and our hands were tied. They onboarded us, and [after the flight] they took us on a vessel. On the ship, they tortured us very brutally. … I have never been to Bangladesh; this is my first time in this country. I don't have any relatives in Bangladesh. … I want to return to India. … They sent me to Bangladesh forcefully. The man remains in Bangladesh and is unable to return to India. In Assam State, the state government is revising the National Register of Citizens (NRC) campaign to identify and expel 'illegal immigrants,' many of whom have families who have lived in the country for generations. Another Indian Muslim, 50, told Fortify Rights about being detained at Matia Transit Camp, India's largest detention facility for irregular migrants and refugees, in Assam's Goalpara District, and days later, being forcibly expelled to Bangladesh, saying: On May 23 [2025], I was asked to report to the Mikirbheta police station at 11 p.m. As soon as I arrived at the police station, I was detained. … I kept screaming that I was born and raised in India, that I am a government teacher, and that I had already served time in a detention camp for two years from 2018 to 2020. I spent at least a couple of days in the [Matia] Transit Camp before I was taken to a military camp of the BSF [Border Security Force]. … On the night of May 26, we were driven overnight with the BSF through the jungle and waterways, and were left in no man's land [on the India and Bangladesh border]. … I was in a group of 14 people pushed back … My hands were tied, and I was blindfolded. The man continued: 'The BSF fired rubber bullets at us while we were in no man's land just to force us to the other side [in Bangladesh]. I never thought that I would be made a foreigner in my own country.' Four days later, with support from his relatives in India, the man negotiated with the Indian authorities to be allowed back into Assam State because of a pending petition to the Supreme Court filed in December 2024 related to his family's citizenship. The court case is still pending. An Indian lawyer representing the family told Fortify Rights: 'Their family has a history going back at least a hundred years to colonial Assam. They have documents [proving their residence in Assam] from the 1900s, and Bangladesh was created in 1971.' Another Indian Muslim resident of Assam State told Fortify Rights how her father was taken into Indian police custody and later forced into Bangladesh on May 23, 2025. She said: My father was called a Bangladeshi all his life, but that he would be sent to Bangladesh was unimaginable. We are Indians. … We are being thrown out of our country. Why was my father sent to Bangladesh when he had all the documents [proving his Indian citizenship]? The woman's father was then intercepted by Bangladesh border guard forces and sent back again to India. Her grandmother, father, aunt, and other relatives had been declared ' bidexi' or 'foreigners' by a Foreigners Tribunal in Assam State, a quasi-judicial body, in 2011 and 2012. Others who were expelled were reportedly transported to coastal areas and forced into the water near the maritime border of Bangladesh. A Bangladeshi police officer, who received a group of more than 70 people pushed by Indian authorities into Bangladesh, told Fortify Rights: 'On the night of May 8, 2025, speedboats pushed them into the sea and forced them to swim ashore.' Rohingya refugees are also being detained and sent to Bangladesh, as part of India's campaign against 'illegal immigrants.' On May 6, 2025, authorities arrested scores of Rohingya, including both Muslim and Christian refugees, during coordinated raids in New Delhi under the pretext of a refugee biometric verification exercise, detaining men, women, and children, and later forcibly returning dozens to Myanmar, where they face an ongoing genocide. Around the same time in May, Indian authorities forcibly transferred at least 150 Rohingya refugees to Bangladesh. A 29-year-old Rohingya refugee and U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) cardholder, told Fortify Rights: 'We were put into vehicles and, in the middle of the night, taken to the border by the BSF [Border Security Force],' he said. '[They] told us, 'Now go straight into Bangladesh. Do not come back. If you return, we will shoot you dead.'' The man is now in the Cox's Bazar refugee camps in Bangladesh. The authorities continue to harass and routinely threaten other Rohingya refugees with forcible returns. A 23-year-old Rohingya refugee told Fortify Rights that police arrested and beat him on the street on May 8, 2025, falsely labelling him a Pakistani despite possessing a valid UNHCR refugee card. They also invited passing civilians to join the beatings. He told Fortify Rights, 'The police said, 'He's a Pakistani, if you want to beat him with us.' … So when the locals heard that I am Pakistani [and joined the beatings] … They were beating me continuously.' While in custody, officers stripped the man naked, beat the soles of his feet, and forced him to jump on his bruised and injured feet. 'You deserve to be under our feet … since you are not Indian,' they told him. Authorities later processed him for deportation, but ultimately released him due to a lawyer's intervention. In a separate incident, a 37-year-old Rohingya refugee was arrested by police officers on June 26 in New Delhi and brought to the police station, where officers forced him to write a confession. 'One of the police officers gave me a blank white paper. He told me, 'You write there, your story—that you came to India illegally, we detained you, and we will deport you. You sign there,'' he told Fortify Rights. He was released the same day due to his impending resettlement to a third country. A Bangladesh Foreign Ministry official told the media that Dhaka had raised the issue with New Delhi multiple times, "We've asked India to follow proper procedures, but have yet to receive a response. Meanwhile, the push-ins continue,' he said. In December 2019, the Modi administration passed the discriminatory Citizenship (Amendment) Act. Under the act, for the first time in India, religion is a basis for granting citizenship. Furthermore, Indian officials rely on the Foreigners Act of 1946, which grants sweeping powers to detain and remove any non-citizen deemed a 'foreigner.' The Citizenship Act (1955), Section 2(b), defines an 'illegal migrant' as a person who enters India without valid documents or overstays a visa. In 2019, U.N. experts specifically expressed concern over the implementation of the NRC in Assam State and 'its potentially far-reaching consequences for millions of people, in particular persons belonging to minorities who risk statelessness, deportation or prolonged detention.' Customary international law, which reflects widespread and consistent state practice and is legally binding on all states, obliges the Indian government and, by extension, Indian state-level authorities to protect Indian citizens from expulsion, prevent statelessness, and ensure that refugees are not forcibly returned to situations where they may face harm or persecution. Article 15 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, to which India is a signatory, states that: 'Everyone has a right to a nationality; No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality.' The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which India is a state party, prohibits discrimination before the law 'on any ground such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.' India is not a party to the 1951 Refugee Convention nor its 1967 Protocol and lacks a domestic law protecting refugees; however, it remains obligated to respect the international customary law principle of non-refoulement, which prohibits the forced return of Rohingya refugees to situations where they will face persecution and other serious human rights abuses.. 'India is stripping Indian Muslim citizens and Rohingya refugees of their rights,' said John Quinley. 'Despite its obligations under international law, India continues to violate these commitments through a series of disturbing official laws and policies tinged with ethno-religious supremacism.'

Five Big Things That Happened Today: Friday, August 1
Five Big Things That Happened Today: Friday, August 1

1News

time2 days ago

  • 1News

Five Big Things That Happened Today: Friday, August 1

Trump slaps a surprise 15% tariff on New Zealand; China responds to Wellingtons new FBI office; Today's cold weather gives way to a sunny weekend. 1 Trump set to level 15% tariff on New Zealand US President Donald Trump has slapped New Zealand with a 15% tariff on exports after signing an executive order that would impose new tariffs on a wide swath of US trading partners. According to Stats NZ, the US was the second-largest export destination for New Zealand goods in 2024, behind China. The tariffs will go into effect in seven days and are the next step in Trump's trade agenda that will test the global economy and alliances. ADVERTISEMENT Read More 2 China hits back at FBI director's 'groundless assertions' in Wellington China has said it strongly opposes any "groundless assertions" from America after the US Federal Bureau of Investigation announced opening an office in the capital to investigate threats and counter China's influence in the Pacific. The Chinese Embassy hit back by saying it took note of the comments and described them as part of a "Cold War mentality". The NZ Government has pushed back on suggestions that the FBI's new office in Wellington aimed to counter China, with Winston Peters saying China was not mentioned in his meeting with the FBI director. Read More 3 'Really lovely weekend' for much of New Zealand - MetService ADVERTISEMENT A MetService meteorologist said this morning's cold temperatures would ease into a "really lovely weekend" for many areas, with the last month of winter looking brighter. Today's temperatures were probably going to be "the coldest morning out of the next few days" as a southerly flow swept in. Read More 4 Around 100 roles under threat at Wētā FX, mostly in Wellington A consultation period has started with 100 crew members at Wētā, whose jobs may be affected by proposed changes to its support departments. The company said a number of "macro factors have led to the proposed changes, including current challenges facing the global entertainment industry". Wētā FX has approximately 2200 staff globally, but most of the positions included in the proposal are in Wellington. ADVERTISEMENT Read More 5 Three-month-old girl in critical care with 'non-accidental injuries' An investigation has been launched to establish how a three-month-old baby from Masterton sustained "non-accidental" critical injuries on July 24. "Someone knows what happened, and we're doing everything we can to get answers for a victim who has no way of speaking up for themselves," a police inspector said. Police and other agencies were supporting the whānau and asking the public to come forward with any information. Read More Watch: Passengers describe 'scary' turbulence that left 25 injured ADVERTISEMENT Anyone who wasn't buckled in was thrown into the ceiling when unexpected severe turbulence struck a Delta flight. Watch Here ONE DECAYING BUILDING Auckland's entertainment centre, Sky World, has been slowly decaying over the last decade due to numerous businesses shutting up shop and a lack of foot traffic. Remaining businesses are left wondering about the future of the Queen St complex and whether a new stakeholder will invest in its renovations. One of the three architects behind the design of the building said he has "a sadness that the generation of children who enjoyed this space now, as adults, see its demise. Read More

China hits back at FBI director's ‘groundless assertions' in Wellington
China hits back at FBI director's ‘groundless assertions' in Wellington

NZ Herald

time3 days ago

  • NZ Herald

China hits back at FBI director's ‘groundless assertions' in Wellington

FBI director Kash Patel at the opening ceremony for a dedicated law enforcement attaché office in Wellington. Photo / Supplied, Ola Thorsen 'Transnational crime is a common challenge encountered by all countries requiring co-operation to tackle,' a spokesperson said. 'On the opening of a new FBI office in Wellington with a permanent Legat [legal attaché] position, we have taken note of the assertions by the American side, as well as the remarks by relevant New Zealand ministers in response to the media. 'We believe that relevant co-operation should not target any third party. And we strongly oppose any attempt to make groundless assertions or vilification against China out of the Cold War mentality. Such acts are against people's will and are doomed to fail.' The Government has pushed back on suggestions that the FBI's new office in Wellington aimed to counter China. Foreign Minister Winston Peters said China was not raised in his meeting with Patel, and the minister responsible for the spy agencies GCSB and NZSIS, Judith Collins, said it was up to Patel what he wanted to say. The Chinese Embassy building in Wellington. Photo / Reece Baker, RNZ 'When we were talking, we never had raised that issue,' Peters said. 'We talked about the Pacific, what we could do to improve the law and order situation and the great concern that Pacific countries had and that they needed help, and that we need to be part of the solution.' Collins said the US was 'very focused on fentanyl' and knew New Zealand was focused on disrupting the methamphetamine trade. 'We know that we do have international criminals ... let's just understand that our security agency is also involved in this. We're not going to single out any particular country.' University of Otago lecturer Dr Peter Grace said drug and human trafficking was 'spiralling out of control' in the region, and New Zealand had limited resources to fight it. 'New Zealand is a small state, and we just don't have the kind of resources that are going to help solve these problems… So the fact that you've got somebody with much deeper pockets coming down and cooperating can be a particularly good thing.' Opposition parties expressed surprise at the announcement, Labour saying it had come without explanation and Greens saying the office should not exist and New Zealand should exit the Five Eyes arrangement altogether. - RNZ

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store