‘Sick of it': Liberals pledge to scale back Welcome to Country ceremonies
But Mr Dutton and Liberal frontbencher Jacinta Nampijinpa Price have previously backed scaling back the use of Welcome to Country ceremonies, with Senator Price warning people are 'sick if it'.
Amid the Shrine clash and a fresh furore over claims the NRL's Melbourne Storm 'cancelled' the welcome at AAMI Park on Friday the topic is back on the agenda.
Wurundjeri elder Aunty Joy Murphy was scheduled to perform the service at the match before she was informed just hours before kick-off the Welcome to Country ceremony was no longer wanted.
'We were all just dumbfounded,' Aunty Joy said.
'We would dearly love to be out there, but they've broken our hearts.'
A Storm statement insisted there was 'a miscommunication of expectations regarding the use (of) Welcome to Country at Melbourne Storm events throughout the year'.
'We acknowledge and accept the timing and miscommunication was not ideal and we have spoken to the groups concerned this afternoon,'' a spokesman said.
Former prime minister Tony Abbott, federal opposition leader Peter Dutton and National Party leader David Littleproud have all indicated support for a winding back of the tradition.
Speaking at a Voice to parliament No campaign event in 2023, Mr Abbott said he is 'getting a little bit sick of Welcomes to Country because it belongs to all of us, not just to some of us'.
'And I'm getting a little bit tired of seeing the flag of some of us flown equally with the flag of all of us,'' he said.
'And I just think that the longer this goes on, the more divisive and the more difficult and the more dangerous that it's getting now.'
Mr Dutton has also expressed some reservations over Acknowledgement of Country and Welcome to Country ceremonies.
'It's a respectful way to acknowledge the Indigenous heritage of our country,'' he said.
'But I do get the point that when you go to a function and there's an MC who I think appropriately can do recognition, you then get the next five or ten speakers who each do their own Acknowledgement to Country, and frankly, I think it detracts from the significance of the statement that's being made,' he told 2GB radio.
Price: 'Everyone's getting sick of it'
Senator Price has described the tradition as 'divisive'.
'There is no problem with acknowledging our history, but rolling out these performances before every sporting event or public gathering is definitely divisive,' she said.
'It's not welcoming, it's telling non-Indigenous Australians 'this isn't your country' and that's wrong. We are all Australians and we share this great land.'
She said 'around the country' there were some people whose 'only role, their only source of income, is delivering Welcome to Country'.
'Everyone's getting sick of Welcome to Country,'' she said.
Victoria Police have confirmed the man who led the booing in Melbourne expected to be charged on summons with offensive behaviour.
'There is no place in Australia for what occurred in Melbourne,' Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said in a statement.
'A neo-Nazi disrupting Anzac Day is abhorrent, un-Australian, and disgraceful. The people responsible must face the full force of the law.'
Why Peter Dutton won't display Aboriginal flags
But Peter Dutton has also declared he will not display the Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander flags during press conferences if he is elected prime minister, arguing the practice 'divides people unnecessarily'.
' I'm very strongly of the belief that we are a country united under one flag and if we're asking people to identify with different flags, no other country does that, and we are dividing our country unnecessarily,' he told Sky News.
'We should have respect for the Indigenous flag and the Torres Strait Islander flag, but they are not our national flags.'
Mr Dutton has already adopted the practice of not standing in front of the Torres Strait Islander flag.
'The fact is that we should stand up for who we are, for our values, what we believe in,' he said.
'We are united as a country when we gather under one flag, which is what we should do on Australia Day.'
PM's view on flags
Three years ago, in his first press conference as prime minister, Anthony Albanese made a quiet statement by installing both the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island flags next to the Australian flag before embarking on the ill-fated referendum.
'We didn't make a fuss, we didn't put out a media release ... we just did it,' Mr Albanese said.
'We have flags that represent our entire nation. It's an opportunity to speak about our full history.'
Labor frontbencher Patrick Gorman, the assistant minister to the Prime Minister, had previously explained the significance of the change under Mr Albanese.
'To some, this change may have appeared insignificant,' Mr Gorman said.
'To others it instantly represented another step towards greater inclusion.'
On seeing all three flags behind the Prime Minister of Australia, the former minister for Indigenous Australians, Linda Burney, said she got a lump in her throat.
'The thoughtfulness, the nod to respect (and) the inclusivity of the gesture was something everyone noticed and really appreciated,' she reflected.
'But they do. Because symbols, however small, always represent something bigger.
'In this case, they represented renewal, a fresh start, and the Albanese Government's deep desire to build stronger foundations with First Nations people.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
29 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Jacinta Price says she could be forced out of Senate due to court fight
Firebrand Liberal senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price has warned she could be bankrupted and removed from parliament if she loses a defamation case brought against her by the head of the Northern Territory's Central Land Council. 'I was really hoping it wouldn't come to this,' Price, who controversially defected from the Nationals to run for the Liberal deputy leadership in May, wrote in a message to a mailing list this week ahead of a trial in October. 'If it goes well for them – defamation cases can go either way, after all – they might even bankrupt me and cost me my seat in parliament. But I will not go down without a fight. I will never back down on my principles.' Under section 44 of the Australian Constitution, members who are undischarged bankrupts or insolvent are ineligible to sit in parliament. A stumble in Price's political career would deal a blow to the federal Coalition's right-wing star power. The Northern Territory senator's profile skyrocketed after she played a key role in defeating the 2023 Voice referendum and was elevated to opposition Indigenous affairs minister. Price, whose divisive views on Indigenous issues have troubled other Indigenous leaders, has used her time in parliament to fight for free speech and resist 'political correctness'. She has also called for a wide-ranging inquiry into land councils, which negotiate with governments and corporations on behalf of Aboriginal landholders. She is being sued in the Federal Court over a press release she sent last July about the Central Land Council in which she claimed that a vote of no confidence had been moved against its chief executive, Les Turner. 'Through last week's vote, a majority of Central Land Council members showed their support for the dismissal of the CEO due to unprofessional conduct,' the release said. It claimed the no confidence motion was unsuccessful but had been backed by the then-chair of the land council, Matthew Palmer.
Sydney Morning Herald
29 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
In the current climate, the Coalition looks cooked
'We are in that situation with the Liberals,' with the electoral changeover to new generations of Australian voters, says Samaras. 'The Libs are extra vulnerable to takeover at the ballot box. If the teals can form a network or coalition or whatever you want to call it, they could be it. They could push the Liberals completely off the electoral map.' While there are fewer than 10 Liberal-held seats in the cities available for possible teal takeover, there are country seats that could be open to challenge by community independents like Helen Haines, who represents the predominantly rural Victorian seat of Indi. Rather than rage against climate realities and renewables investment, Haines is preoccupied with making the transition work for her constituents. She's proposed a 20 per cent share in the profits from big renewable projects for regional communities, for instance. Climate wasn't always a losing argument for the Coalition. It won some of the critical early battles of the climate wars. Barnaby Joyce was the original Coalition climate warrior. From the Nationals backbench, he illuminated the political pathway for Tony Abbott to follow. Climate scepticism worked for Tony 'climate change is crap' Abbott. It worked for Scott 'lump of coal' Morrison, until it did not. It did not work for Peter 'nuke 'em' Dutton. And it won't work for Sussan 'moderniser' Ley. If she goes there. But, thanks to the Nationals, it might not much matter. Because Barnaby, once again, is leading the Coalition into the rejection of climate change policy in all its manifestations. His current campaign is to abolish the Nationals' commitment to net zero. Which seems odd. Because he was the party's leader who signed on to net zero in a deal with then-prime minister Scott Morrison only four years ago. Even 'lump of coal' Morrison could see that Australia would be marooned, missing out on the global $US200 trillion ($311 trillion) renewables investment boom, unless it could commit to the bare minimum of plausible climate policy – net zero emissions by 2050. Such national responsibilities mean nothing to the rabble-rousing Joyce and company. The populist obscurantists in the Nats are more interested in incendiaries than investments. They only agreed to Morrison's net zero plan because he bribed them with some $30 billion in government spending promises plus an extra seat in the cabinet. But today there are no bribes on offer. Opposition parties have no access to the Treasury or seats in the cabinet. So Joyce is unchecked. He's been joined by his former rival for the Nationals leadership, Michael McCormack. They have enough internal support and momentum to succeed. The man supposed to be leading them, David Littleproud, is meekly following them. Not formally, not yet, but it seems inevitable that he will. His job is on the line otherwise. 'The Nats will be great,' says Samaras. 'They're not losing anything out of this. Their rural constituencies are older and their seats are safe.' Joyce & Co are fomenting a country-versus-city resentment – the countryside is being destroyed by toxic solar farms and fascist new power lines so that rich city investors can make money from them. But the Liberals? What do they do? They don't have a formal position at the moment. It's under review, and the party is divided. One argument is that they adopted net zero and lost anyway. So why not ditch it? The counter is that they didn't lose because of net zero, that it was overshadowed by an unpopular nuclear reactor plan. And that a party that aspires to government must have a credible climate and energy policy as a prerequisite to power. Loading But the Liberals face a wicked dilemma. With their junior Coalition partner exuberantly trampling climate change for the next three years, the Libs will have three options. One, join the Nats and suffer more electoral damage. The Liberals were all but driven out of the cities in the May election. Of the 88 seats classified by the Electoral Commission as metropolitan, Labor holds 71. The Liberals hold just nine. They can't aspire to government without a recovery in the cities. And if they embrace Barnaby's climate policy, they can pretty much forget about that. Two, the Libs can outline a separate policy and spend three years arguing with the Nats over it, which would be divisive and ugly. And how do you take two conflicting policies to an election? Three, the Libs can terminate the Coalition and go solo, much as Littleproud did by splitting with the Libs in the Eight-Day War in May. But that would be likely to mean being sentenced to permanent opposition – or oblivion – for both. The Libs don't have enough seats in their own right, and the Nationals don't have enough votes and rely on Liberal preferences. When Barnaby first launched the climate wars over a dozen years ago, they were directed against Labor. Today, the Nats' climate war is waged against the Liberals just as much. A war against the enemy has turned into a war against the supposed ally. It's not that Labor's renewables plan is rolling out smoothly. One of the gurus, Ross Garnaut, gave a damning speech this week calling the energy transition 'sick'. The entire national enterprise was 'on a path to comprehensive failure'. There is a big and rich political fight to be had. Not in raging against the reality of climate change or the advantages of energy transition, but in interrogating the government's execution of it. The smart course for the Coalition is not to attack Labor's goals but its incompetence in reaching them. A colleague of Kos Samaras, fellow Redbridge director and former Liberal campaign chief Tony Barry, sees the opportunity cost of the Nats' climate crusade: 'There are massive problems with the rollout for [Minister for Climate Change and Energy] Chris Bowen, and if Barnaby Joyce retired tomorrow he'd be beside himself. Barnaby keeps giving him a 'get out of jail' card.' Loading As the pollster for this masthead, Jim Reed of Resolve Strategic, puts it: 'The public debate about climate change is largely over, but the conversation about what to do about it, how urgently and at what cost still rages.' But a Coalition lost in delusion and distraction can't prosecute these real problems while it's caught up in ideological and irrelevant ones. 'The Liberals,' concludes Samaras, 'are in the killing zone'. It's just that, like the Black Knight, the Coalition seems unable to grasp the reality of its situation. As the victorious Arthur goes on his way, the Black Knight, now legless as well as armless, demands that the king come back and keep fighting. 'What are you going to do, bleed on me?' retorts Arthur.
The Age
29 minutes ago
- The Age
Jacinta Price says she could be forced out of Senate due to court fight
Firebrand Liberal senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price has warned she could be bankrupted and removed from parliament if she loses a defamation case brought against her by the head of the Northern Territory's Central Land Council. 'I was really hoping it wouldn't come to this,' Price, who controversially defected from the Nationals to run for the Liberal deputy leadership in May, wrote in a message to a mailing list this week ahead of a trial in October. 'If it goes well for them – defamation cases can go either way, after all – they might even bankrupt me and cost me my seat in parliament. But I will not go down without a fight. I will never back down on my principles.' Under section 44 of the Australian Constitution, members who are undischarged bankrupts or insolvent are ineligible to sit in parliament. A stumble in Price's political career would deal a blow to the federal Coalition's right-wing star power. The Northern Territory senator's profile skyrocketed after she played a key role in defeating the 2023 Voice referendum and was elevated to opposition Indigenous affairs minister. Price, whose divisive views on Indigenous issues have troubled other Indigenous leaders, has used her time in parliament to fight for free speech and resist 'political correctness'. She has also called for a wide-ranging inquiry into land councils, which negotiate with governments and corporations on behalf of Aboriginal landholders. She is being sued in the Federal Court over a press release she sent last July about the Central Land Council in which she claimed that a vote of no confidence had been moved against its chief executive, Les Turner. 'Through last week's vote, a majority of Central Land Council members showed their support for the dismissal of the CEO due to unprofessional conduct,' the release said. It claimed the no confidence motion was unsuccessful but had been backed by the then-chair of the land council, Matthew Palmer.
