The New York Islanders have the top pick in the NHL draft: Who will they choose?
The two-day NHL draft will be held at the Peacock Theater in Los Angeles this weekend, with the first round held on Friday night.
The New York Islanders have the No. 1 pick
after winning the draft lottery in May
. The San Jose Sharks, who finished last in the overall standings, pick second followed by Chicago and Utah. Six of the top prospects:
Matthew Schaefer, defenseman, OHL Erie
Hometown: Hamilton, Ontario.
Measurables: 6-foot-2, 183 pounds. Turns 18 on Sept. 5.
Expected to be selected: No. 1 by the New York Islanders.
Accomplishments/background:
Schaefer maintained the top spot in NHL Central Scouting rankings
despite missing start of the season with mononucleosis and the final three months after breaking his collarbone. Scouts believe he did enough to show off his offensive flair with 22 points (seven goals, 15 assists) in 17 games. That's a jump from the his rookie season (seven goals and 17 points in 56 games). Schaefer also had two goals and four assists in captaining Canada to win the Hlinka/Gretzky Cup in August. Schaefer has shown poise and maturity in dealing with tragedy. His mother died of cancer in February 2024. Two months earlier, the mother of his billet family was struck and killed by a train and last December Otters owner and Schaefer's mentor, Jim Waters, died of a heart attack. Would become first OHL player to go No. 1 since Erie star Connor McDavid went first in 2015.
NHL Central Scouting report: 'He does it all on the ice — defends well as an elite skater with good gap control and has the ability and smarts to consistently produce offensively. ... A special talent.'
Michael Misa, center, OHL Saginaw
Hometown: Oakville, Ontario.
Measurables: 6-foot-1, 184 pounds. Turned 18 in February.
Expected to be selected: No. 2 to San Jose, and shouldn't fall any lower than No. 4.
Accomplishments/background:
Misa led the CHL in scoring last season
with 134 points (62 goals, 72 assists), matching the most by an under-18 OHL player since 2009 No. 1 selection John Tavares in 2006-07. He was the eighth player granted CHL exceptional status, allowing him to play at 15. He was the OHL's rookie of the year in 2022 and helped Saginaw win the Memorial Cup championship the following year. After playing wing his first two seasons, he seamlessly made the switch to center this season.
NHL Central Scouting report: 'He's bigger, stronger and faster than previous seasons. ... A clever play-maker who makes plays at speed and knows how to put the puck in the net. ... His quickness, creativity and hockey sense are off the charts.'
Anton Frondell, center, Djurgarden, Sweden (Tier 2)
Hometown: Stockholm, Sweden.
Measurables: 6-feet, 198 pounds. Turned 18 in May.
Expected to be selected: Could go No. 2 to San Jose. Shouldn't drop lower than No. 5 (Nashville).
Accomplishments/background: Frondell finished the season as central scouting's top-ranked international skater. He's a puck-possession forward, with an outgoing personality. He joked about how much his English improved during team interviews at the draft combine. After playing 10 games in Sweden's junior league, he made the jump to the second division, where he had 11 goals and 25 points in 29 games. In 2023-24, Frondell led his junior team and finished tied for sixth in the league with 39 points (18 goals, 21 assists) in 29 games.
NHL Central Scouting report: 'Has perfect balance in his skating and makes it difficult for opponents to catch him. Wins most of the one-on-one battles.'
James Hagens, center, Boston College
Hometown: Hauppauge, New York.
Measurables: 5-foot-11, 177 pounds. Turned 18 in November.
Expected to be selected: A top-10 selection, who could prompt teams to trade up should he fall to No. 9 (Buffalo).
Accomplishments/background: Hagens is the top-ranked American-born player at No. 3 on central scouting's list. A high-scoring playmaker who grew up an Islanders fan on Long Island. With 11 goals and 26 assists, he finished fourth in points among college freshmen. He scored five goals for America's gold medal-winning team at the world juniors. A year earlier, Hagens earned world junior tournament MVP honors with nine goals and 22 points. In two years on the U.S. national development team, he finished fifth on the career list with 187 points and 115 assists.
NHL Central Scouting report: 'Always a scoring threat off the rush and can set up his teammates from anywhere. ... He wants the puck on his stick and has game-changer ability. The complete offensive package.'
Caleb Desnoyers, center, QMJHL Moncton
Hometown: Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec.
Measurables: 6-foot-2, 178 pounds. Turned 18 in April.
Expected to be selected: Chance to go 4th (Utah).
Accomplishments/background: Though ranked seventh on the central scouting list of North American skaters, Desnoyers has risen up the charts after leading Moncton to a Memorial Cup berth. He finished fifth in the Q with 84 points (35 goals, 49 assists) in 56 games. He followed up in earning QMJHL playoff MVP honors with nine goals and 30 points in 19 games. He's a three-time gold medalist in winning at the Under-17, Under-18 championship and the 2024 Hlinka/Gretzky Cup.
NHL Central Scouting report: 'He's willing to do most of the dirty work to retrieve 50-50 pucks, and will play a physical style when needed. His skating is good and will continue to get more powerful as he matures physically. ... Prospect who has lots of transferable pro elements in his game.'
Joshua Ravensbergen, goalie, WHL Prince George
Hometown: North Vancouver, British Columbia.
Measurables: 6-foot-5, 190 pounds. Turned 18 in November.
Expected to be selected: Has opportunity to be the ninth goalie taken in the first round since 2011. Both Philadelphia (No. 6, 22, 31) and Nashville (5, 23, 26) are potential landing spots, with each having three first-round selections.
Accomplishments/background: Ravensbergen is central scouting's top-ranked North American goalie and went 33-13-4, finishing tied for the WHL's second-most wins. He went 26-4-1 last year, with a rookie league record-tying six shutouts. In two WHL seasons, he has a 2.78 goals-against average and .904 save percentage.
NHL Central Scouting report: 'Has a huge pro presence and plays big even when down in the butterfly with excellent low-net coverage. ... A combination of size and ability, he has a good chance to become an NHL starter.'
___
AP NHL:
https://apnews.com/hub/nhl
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
10 hours ago
- Newsweek
Biggest Winners and Losers from the 2025 NHL Draft
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. With the 2025 NHL draft in the books, hockey fans have free agency on July 1 and their respective teams' development camps to hold them over for the next-two-and-a-half months as the NHL enters its dead period until rookie camp starts in early to mid-September. Several general managers took some big steps in setting up their franchises for future success, while others left scouts and analysts scratching their heads with some of their selections. Below are three teams that put together the worst draft classes, and three that put together the best. LOSERS St. Louis Blues While first-round pick Justin Carbonneau was a strong selection and a good addition to a farm system with just two wingers in its top 10 (some scouts believe he has 30-goal potential), both fifth-rounder Mikhail Fyodorov and sixth-rounder Love Harenstam likely won't make St. Louis' roster anytime in the next handful of years, and both project as bottom-of-the-roster type players. Tampa Bay Lightning Without a first-rounder, Tampa was going to have to get creative to find value and depth in this draft. Ethan Czata may have been a bit of a reach in the second round. Most scouts believe he's a future middle-six player but he doesn't have much scoring punch. Fourth-rounder Benjamin Rautiainen may have some upside as a bottom-six fixture down the road, but all of the Lightning's other picks are long shots to make any sort of NHL impact. Toronto Maple Leafs The Maple Leafs have one of the worst farm systems in the NHL, and without a first-round pick, it was crucial for them to nail the rest of their selections. The Tinus Luc Koblar selection in Round 2 was a head-scratcher for most scouts. He's not a great goal scorer, and he's likely destined for the bottom six in the NHL. Third-rounder Tyler Hopkins was a solid pick and he's someone scouts think could outplay where he was drafted. But aside from him, Toronto didn't do much to bolster the NHL's 28th-ranked pipeline. More NHL: Bruins End James Hagens' Stunning NHL Draft Slide Matthew Schaefer, center, NY Islanders number one overall pick, Michael Misa, San Jose Sharks number two pick and Anton Frondell, right, Chicago Blackhawks number three pick pose for a photo during the first round of... Matthew Schaefer, center, NY Islanders number one overall pick, Michael Misa, San Jose Sharks number two pick and Anton Frondell, right, Chicago Blackhawks number three pick pose for a photo during the first round of the 2025 Upper Deck NHL Draft at the Peacock Theater on June 27, 2025 in Los Angeles, California. MoreWINNERS Boston Bruins Boston may have had the steal of the draft with James Hagens falling into its lap with the seventh overall pick. A point-per-game player as a freshman at Boston College, Hagens is a future top-line center and he should've been a top-five pick. William Moore is a solid center prospect as well and a solid get in Round 2. He could be a low-end second-liner or high-end third-liner. Third-rounder Cooper Simpson was a little bit of gamble, but he logged 49 goals and 83 points in 31 games at Shakopee High last season, and if he reaches his offensive potential, he could be a really stolid 25-plus goal scorer in the NHL in a middle-six role. Montreal Canadiens Before the draft even started Montreal was already ahead of most teams after sending the No. 16 and 17 overall picks to the New York Islanders for star defenseman Noah Dobson. A perennial Norris Trophy contender, Dobson give the Canadiens a true No. 1 defenseman to pair with some solid up-and-comers in Calder Trophy winner Lane Huston and Kaiden Guhle. Montreal also pulled off a coup getting Alexander Zharovsky — a player it had ranked as a top-20 prospect — with the 34th overall pick. He's got top-six potential in the NHL, and the Canadiens added one of the top 15 defensemen in the league and still got a player it likely would've drafted with one of its first-round picks nearly 20 picks later. New York Islanders When you have the No. 1 overall pick, it's easy to come out of the draft a winner. Every scout has Matthew Schaefer pegged as a future No. 1-pairing, shutdown defenseman, so taking him was a no-brainer. But also getting Victor Eklund and Kashawn Aitcheson, who were both consensus top-12 prospects with the 16th and 17th picks, respectively, plus adding Daniil Prokhorov, who several scouts projected as a mid-to-late first-rounder, in the second and Luca Romano, who could've been a nearly second-rounder, in the third was just tremendous value. New York not only potentially drafted its future top pairing defensive tandem in Schaefer and Aitcheson, but it also may have come out of this draft with at least five future impact players at the NHL level.
New York Times
12 hours ago
- New York Times
NHL Draft 2025 grades for every team: Best picks, fits and analysis
With the 2025 NHL Draft concluded, we end our coverage of this draft by way of draft grades. These grades are based on how I think the clubs did, based on my knowledge of the players selected. The only way I can fairly and reasonably go about this exercise is to assign grades based on which team added the most by way of draft picks to the organization. I don't account for players acquired by trade, how well a player fits into the organization, or whether I think a team reached or got potential value on a pick. This is a ranking showing who got the most talent in the draft, divided by tiers represented by a letter grade. Teams are listed by their grade, but teams with the same grade are listed alphabetically. Advertisement I realize this basically becomes highly correlated to draft slot and the number of picks. Your method may vary, and I realize there are other ways to analyze a draft performance. This is how I do it. This is not a ranking of how good your favorite team's scouts are. I am just trying to explain whether the organization did, or didn't, make their farm system better this weekend. This file has a brief synopsis of the draft classes, but there are individual team files for all 32 clubs linked in this article for a more detailed breakdown of each draft haul. The Islanders brought the most clear, young talent into their organization this weekend. On top of getting the best player in Matthew Schaefer with the first pick, they proceeded to take potential top-six winger Victor Eklund and potential top-four defenseman Kashawn Aitcheson, both of whom are among the most competitive players in the draft. Daniil Prokhorov has a real chance to be a hard-to-play-against third-line winger with size. I think goalie Burke Hood in the late rounds has a real chance to play games, too. They could easily get two or three quality NHL regulars from this draft, including a potential star in Schaefer. Read the full analysis of the Islanders' draft class here. The Flyers got Porter Martone with their first pick. He was my third-rated player overall in the draft, and someone who I think, despite his subpar skating, has the makings of a potential first-line winger with size. They then proceeded to trade up to pick Jack Nesbitt. I'm a fan of Nesbitt's game. I agree with their assessment that he could be a second-line center, again with size, even if I wouldn't have traded up to get him; I do understand their pressing need for centers, though. Those were two premium pieces Philadelphia acquired early on Day 1. The Flyers added a lot of size in this draft overall, but they picked big guys who can legit play. Carter Amico and Matthew Gard are highly athletic. Shane Vansaghi is very skilled. Martone and Nesbitt project as important players for this team, but they have a really good chance to get a third useful NHL player from their Day 2 picks. Read the full analysis of the Flyers' draft class here. Advertisement In Round 1, the Sharks got a potential first-line center of the future in Michael Misa, and Joshua Ravensbergen, whom I project as a starting goalie in the NHL. On Day 2, they picked a huge, mobile, competitive defenseman in Simon Wang, and a solid all-around center in Cole McKinney. I could see one of those players ending up as an NHL regular. Ilyas Magomedsultanov was one of 'my guys' in this draft cycle, so I do like him at 115 for them as well. Read the full analysis of the Sharks' draft class here. I didn't agree with every decision Nashville made this weekend, but overall, I thought the Predators brought in a lot of talent to their farm system. Brady Martin at 5 was high for me. I get the appeal. He's a super likable player with a great backstory, but I thought they left talent on the board. Ryker Lee and Jacob Rombach were a bit early for me, too, but in fairness, I knew that's the range they were going in based on talks with other teams, so I may be the one off on them. I did like the ranges they got Cameron Reid, Jack Ivankovic and Alex Huang, though. Martin will be a top-six forward of the future with an elite compete level, and I would bet they get at least one other regular from this draft and possibly two, with Reid being the likeliest candidate. Read the full analysis of the Predators' draft class here. Utah started the draft at 4 and picked an outstanding two-way center in Caleb Desnoyers, who could be a top two line pivot on a winning team. The Mammoth didn't pick again until 46, but in Max Psenicka, Stepan Hoch and Yegor Borikov, I thought they got three quality NHL prospects with a lot of NHL traits. I could see one of those picks hitting and becoming a regular to join Desnoyers in this class. Read the full analysis of the Mammoth's draft class here. Advertisement It's hard to be definitive about Anaheim's draft given the uncertainty in projecting Roger McQueen, the No. 10 pick. If fully healthy, he has the potential to be a legit first-line center. He's an outstanding talent, but he's a lanky player with a history of back issues, so for all we know, things could flame up again in the near future. I rate the player highly, even when adjusting for the risks. I like Eric Nilson, who they drafted right away on Day 2, but the future of this class pretty much comes down to whether McQueen hits or not and particularly if he stays on the ice. Read the full analysis of the Ducks' draft class here. Chicago added a lot of speed and size to its prospect pool this weekend, going after some of the most athletic players in the draft, including two of the very best with late first-round picks. Mason West was the ultimate swing, because if he commits to hockey full-time, he has the tools to outproduce his draft slot. I was a little lower on Anton Frondell than the Blackhawks were, but I absolutely see a top two line center on a winning team or a potential first-line winger. They had a type, and I wish they would have gotten more skill, but Frondell is still a major piece for them to add, and between West and Vaclav Nestrasil, I think one of them can end up being a full-time NHL player with a massive frame. Read the full analysis of the Blackhawks' draft class here. The Penguins' draft assessment is a bit complicated. Benjamin Kindel at 11 was aggressive for me, even if I think he will score in the NHL. There wasn't one player whom I was super passionate about where they got him (William Horcoff was the closest), but in the aggregate, I think this is a solid draft class. They got their skill player in Kindel and added a lot of size and two-way play with their later picks. I could see two or potentially three NHL players come out of this class because there were so many Day 2 picks they made that I think have a chance to make it. Read the full analysis of the Penguins' draft class here. Jake O'Brien is a very talented center with the tools to be a high-quality top-six forward in the NHL, be it in the middle or on the wing. I then liked Seattle getting Blake Fiddler early on Day 2. Fiddler rubbed scouts the wrong way due to hockey IQ, hence his fall, but I still see a big, mobile right-shot who works hard and has enough skill to play in the league. Read the full analysis of the Kraken's draft class here. Advertisement James Hagens' landing spot at 7 to Boston reflects both his immense talent but also some of the risks in his game. He has legit first-line talent if he hits. I like the tools on William Moore, who Boston took at 51, but the draft class will be defined by Hagens. Does he bounce back and prove the haters wrong? If so, the B's could have a very nice class even if he's the only regular. Read the full analysis of the Bruins' draft class here. I'm a big fan of Cole Reschny's game, and think he has a real chance to be a top-six forward for the Flames down the line, potentially in the middle, even if he's not the most ideal profile for an NHL center. Cullen Potter isn't a clear bet to make it, but he absolutely has the tools to be a middle-six forward. Their Day 2 pick, Theo Stockselius, is a solid prospect who has a chance to play in the bottom six as well. Read the full analysis of the Flames' draft class here. I liked what Detroit did with its first few picks. Carter Bear projects as a top-six forward who brings legit skill and a high motor. Eddie Genborg won't point at a high level, but he can be a playoff-style bottom-six forward who wears down opponents. Michal Pradel was also a goalie I rated reasonably high, and I see a path for him to the league. Read the full analysis of the Red Wings' draft class here. Washington did a solid job with the picks it had. Lynden Lakovic was a divisive, yet highly talented prospect who was a worthy gamble at 27. I think Milton Gastrin, the pick at 37, has a real chance to be a third-line NHL center, and Maxim Schafer was one of my favorite prospects in this class. I could see one, and potentially two players, come out of this crop. Read the full analysis of the Capitals' draft class here. Advertisement Buffalo addressed the size issues in its pool by taking a lot of very athletic players. Each of its first three picks is huge and can move very well. The Sabres' top pick, Radim Mrtka, projects as a quality top-four defenseman. Outside of Mrtka, though, I don't see any other sure things in this group. David Bedkowski's profile is interesting, but his puck play will need to be more consistent. At the moment, I think this class will come down to exactly how good Mrtka becomes. Read the full analysis of the Sabres' draft class here. I think the first three Russians Carolina took in the draft all have real chances to play games in the NHL. Semyon Frolov was a top goalie prospect this year, Ivan Ryabkin fell after a tough year and character concerns, but he has legit middle-six forward talent and Kurban Limatov on his best days looked like an NHL defenseman. Where they took Charlie Cerrato was high for me. I respect the year he had, but I don't think his pure skill or athleticism warranted being picked at 49. There's no sure bet among this group, but I could see at least one of their picks becoming a full-time player. Read the full analysis of the Hurricanes' draft class here. I like Jackson Smith, and I think he can be a quality top-four defenseman of the future for Columbus. The Blue Jackets' pick at 20 of Pyotr Andreyanov, frankly, is one I have a hard time understanding, even giving them all the benefit of the doubt. He's very quick, intelligent and competitive, but at that size, at the 20th slot, I just thought it was too high. Time will tell; he has five more years to play in Russia, so we will see how he develops in the KHL. As of now, though, I think Smith is the only likely NHL player from this class, and he could be a really good one. Read the full analysis of the Blue Jackets' draft class here. Dallas didn't pick until 94, and it took a big swing with its top selection in Cameron Schmidt. He's very talented, but his size, sense and demeanor rubbed teams the wrong way in the pre-draft process. Where the Stars got him, though, I think they have to be happy with the shot that he represents, and he has several clear NHL characteristics. I have time for the goalie they took late in Mans Goos as well. He's huge and has a real chance to make it. Read the full analysis of the Stars' draft class here. Advertisement The Kings did some draft maneuvering to get more capital. In doing so, they added more depth to their system than I expected them to. Henry Brzustewicz has a good chance to be a regular NHL defenseman. I have time for quite a few of their Day 2 picks. I don't think any one of them for sure projects to play in the league, but I could see one of them finding a way to make it. Read the full analysis of the Kings' draft class here. After dealing its two top picks for Noah Dobson, Montreal wasn't expected to come out of this class with a top prospect. Still, in Alexander Zharovsky, Hayden Paupanekis and Bryce Pickford, the Canadiens' top three selections, I could see one of them becoming a full-time player. Zharovsky, in particular, is a fascinating high-upside prospect who some scouts felt was top-five in the draft in skill, even though I didn't agree with that assessment. Read the full analysis of the Canadiens' draft class here. The Canucks' first pick, Braeden Cootes, is a player I'm a fan of, and I think he has the potential to be a second-line center in the NHL who plays a desirable style. After that, I was lukewarm on their Day 2 picks. Alexei Medvedev is a talented goalie, but for his size and limited sample of ice time, 47 was a bit early for me. Prep kids from St. Andrews College are always a tough evaluation (see Dean Letourneau last season). I respect some of the things Kieren Dervin does, but 65 was also a bit early for me given the risks in his projection. Read the full analysis of the Canucks' draft class here. Malcolm Spence's stock faded hard this season with his performance in Erie after coming into the year as a potential top-20 pick. I still like him. The offense will likely never be noteworthy, but he skates well, plays hard and could have secondary production. He has a clear path to becoming a middle-six winger. I don't see any other pick in this group that excites me, although I am intrigued by Sean Barnhill, who they picked after Spence. He's very toolsy, and I wonder how he will do in an environment with more ice time. Read the full analysis of the Rangers' draft class here. Advertisement Logan Hensler is a talented defenseman and projects as a 4/5 D in the league. After Hensler, I'm not sure who in this class makes it for Ottawa. I like goalie Lucas Beckman, who they took as a college junior, and he has a chance to make it. Some scouts love or have no time for Blake Vanek, who they took in the third, so his path will be interesting to follow. Read the full analysis of the Senators' draft class here. The Blues didn't have many picks in this draft, so ultimately their class is likely going to be defined by Justin Carbonneau. He's a likable player who went right around where I rated him. He could be a heavy second-line winger for them in the future. Read the full analysis of the Blues' draft class here. Tampa Bay didn't pick until 56, but I think the player it selected, Ethan Czata, has a real chance to be a bottom-six forward in the NHL. That alone could be enough to make this a respectable class given the circumstances, even if his pure offensive upside isn't the highest. Read the full analysis of the Lightning's draft class here. After a tough draft season, more so with his international showings, Jakob Ihs-Wozniak fell to the middle of the second round, where Vegas traded up to get him. I'm not a big fan of the Golden Knights' third-round pick Mateo Nobert, so I largely think class comes down to Ihs-Wozniak. I like the player, but he will need to be more consistent to play in the NHL. Read the full analysis of the Golden Knights' draft class here. I like Sascha Boumedienne, and see a path to him becoming a top-four defenseman in the NHL despite his at times erratic play. I think Owen Martin, the Jets' pick at 93, is talented, but more of a good junior than an NHL player for me. Read the full analysis of the Jets' draft class here. Advertisement The Devils didn't select until 50 this year. I think their first two picks, Conrad Fondrk and Benjamin Kevan, are both highly talented forwards, but they were inconsistent this season and are not sure things. I can't be confident this class will produce an NHL regular, even though there was a decent amount of talent among their Day 2 picks. Read the full analysis of the Devils' draft class here. The first two picks for the Maple Leafs, Tinus Luc Koblar and Tyler Hopkins, are both forwards who I think have a chance to play in the NHL. They didn't have much draft capital, so while I don't mind what they did with what they had, realistically, this group is unlikely to produce a full-time player. Read the full analysis of the Maple Leafs' draft class here. Edmonton didn't have a selection until the 83rd spot, so it's understandable this isn't an overly impressive draft class. The Oilers' picks of Tommy Lafreniere, David Lewandowski and Asher Barnett are all fine prospects. I don't think any of them are realistic NHL players, though, even if I do have some time for where they got Lewandowski. Read the full analysis of the Oilers' draft class here. The back-to-back Stanley Cup champs had to wait a while to make a selection. When they did get their chance, they picked two forwards who fit the way they play. Mads Kongsbak Klyvo and Shea Busch both have size and play hard. They are not top prospects by any means, but I can see a plausible scenario where one of them becomes a bottom-six type. Read the full analysis of the Panthers' draft class here. Minnesota's first pick came at the end of the second round. The defenseman the Wild picked, Theodor Hallquisth, has a chance to make it. Adam Benak's star fell this season. I know some evaluators who like the player, but I have a hard time seeing his game translate to the NHL. Sneakily, I liked the Wild's fifth-round pick of Justin Kipkie a lot. A re-entry prospect, I see him with a path to NHL games, and he could be a value pick for them. Read the full analysis of the Wild's draft class here. Advertisement Colorado didn't do much for me this weekend. I know some scouts who like either Francesco Dell'Elce or Linus Funck, their first two picks, but neither moved the needle when I watched them to think they were legit NHL prospects. Their bare bones farm system, I think, stays that way. Read the full analysis of the Avalanche's draft class here. (Photo of Michael Misa, Matthew Schaefer and Anton Frondell: Jeff Vinnick / NHLI via Getty Images)
New York Times
13 hours ago
- New York Times
NHL Draft 2025 winners and losers: Islanders impress while Maple Leafs falls short
LOS ANGELES — Welcome to my complete review of the 2025 NHL Draft classes of all 32 teams, including thoughts on almost all of the 224 prospects selected. This annual year-end analysis follows a season of travel and countless viewings and conversations with coaches, managers, scouts, agents and players. It's meant to be your one-stop shop for a complete review of your team's picks. Advertisement It's my educated view of how all 32 clubs did with the selections they had, carefully considering both my own evaluations of the prospects and each player's consensus expected draft range. Note that this is not an evaluation of the total value each club got out of its picks, but rather an examination of each team's class relative to where they picked and the number of selections that they had. Teams with more picks (or higher picks on average) are not guaranteed high grades, just as teams with few picks (or lower picks on average) are not guaranteed poor ones. Trades are also not considered — the focus here is exclusively on the picks. The goal is for this to be the most comprehensive draft review available anywhere. As always, the team-by-team analysis is sorted into the following tiers for an added layer of context: And for more information on these players, here's my full 2025 NHL Draft package, which featured scouting reports on 145 prospects this year: The Islanders left Day 1 with the most impressive haul. Matthew Schaefer, Victor Eklund and Kashawn Aitcheson could transform that organization on and off the ice with their play, identity, competitiveness, talent and charisma. Though I'm a little lower than the league is on Daniil Prokhorov, who they took at No. 42, that was his range for a lot of people and he gives them another tough-to-play-against player, like Eklund and Aitcheson, who gets after it and does it with a big, strong, 6-5 frame and some dirty areas scoring punch. He could be a really solid third-line forward who adds some size and a different dimension to his line. Think Alexei Toropchenko. Though Luca Romano faced consistency criticisms in Kitchener this year, he's got top-two-round talent and skating and I think could be good value at No. 74 as well (he was No. 48 on my board). He could take a step production wise in the OHL next year, for sure. I even liked Tomas Poletin at No. 106 and Sam Laurila at No. 138. Advertisement Poletin's a big, heavy kid who has had some good showings internationally and domestically in my viewings. There's a chance he tops out as a middle-six AHLer but he's going to have a long pro career. And Laurila was a breakout star in the USHL this season after being a depth D at the program, making a ton of plays and really blossoming into a draft pick as an overager. I could go on, too. Burke Hood was my last cut at goalie and is exactly the kind of goalie you take in the sixth round. He was excellent for Vancouver this year and as Canada's third-stringer at U18 worlds. It was a phenomenal two days for the Islanders and a great start for Mathieu Darche at the helm. And 202nd overall pick Jacob Kvasnicka is a dog who charmed me into putting him in my top 100. The Flames have shown a willingness over the last few years to take some swings on talent, and after finding some on the wing and particularly on defense, they needed to find a couple of centers this year and really leaned into that with the selections of Cole Reschny and Cullen Potter, my No. 15 and No. 16 prospects, in the first round. Reschny is a committed three-zone player with real playmaking sense who was one of the best players in junior hockey in the second half, and Potter is the best skater in the draft for me and has real puck skill. If one of them can become a 2C and a second-line winger for them, they'll be thrilled with their Round 1 in 2025. Swedish center Theo Stocksellius was a second-round pick for me. He needs to improve his pace and skating but he knows that and he's a very well-rounded player in every other area. I think he's got bottom-six forward potential if he can take some steps. Ethan Wyttenbach is another sign tha they're not particularly worried about size on draft day. Wyttenbach, a Quinnipiac commit, is a late bloomer who was one of the USHL's most productive players as a rookie this season. He can play the game at different paces and I think he was a fine late-round flier. Advertisement The Mace'o Phillips selection at No. 80 was a head-scratcher for me. I'm sure they see a towering physical menace and special athlete who can move and think he could become a fearsome third-pairing option for them someday. But he really struggles to handle and move the puck and I've seen him have too many bad games and moments over the last couple of years to see it. He's definitely different from the other D they have! My favourite Day 2 Flames pick was the selection of St. Andrew's College forward Aidan Lane at No. 176. They found good value in Aydar Suniev, another SAC kid who had legit skill and scoring but needed to improve his skating. Suniev scored 20 goals as a sophomore at UMass last year and has already been signed. I think Lane, No. 74 on my board, could follow a similar path at Harvard. He just needs the skating to improve. The Phillips pick felt out of place for me but I liked what they did a lot. I think Michael Misa's going to be a top-of-the-lineup star in the league and gives the Sharks arguably three of the 10 best under-21 forwards in the game with Macklin Celebrini and Will Smith. And while I thought they'd take a defenseman with their second first, Joshua Ravensbergen belonged in that range and gives them a second high-end young goalie with Yaroslav Askarov. Then they kicked off Day 2 by taking a defenseman in Simon Wang who has a ton of untapped potential and is already a high-end skater at nearly 6-foot-6. Wang's one of the most interesting prospects and stories in this draft and becomes the highest-drafted Chinese-born player in NHL history. If he makes it, he's alright signed with WME in China and could become one of their first major team sport athletes since Yao Ming. His career is bigger than him for the growth of Chinese hockey. Sharks fans are going to love cheering him on. I liked the Cole McKinney selection at No. 53 as well. McKinney's a hockey player. He's a strongly built center who excels in the faceoff circle, cares about detail and checking off of the puck, and was productive on an NTDP team that didn't have a star or a first-round pick. I think he's got a very clear path to becoming a 3C for them behind Celebrini and one of Misa/Smith. Overager Zack Sharp showed enough on the NCAA-champion Western Michigan University Broncos to warrant getting drafted where he did as well. And I've got a ton of time for the small but consistent in work ethic and impact Richard Gallant, even if he's a long shot. He'll go as far as his career can take him. Advertisement The only Sharks pick that left me scratching my head was the selection of Teddy Mutryn in the third round. I didn't view him as a draft pick. Otherwise, I thought they did really well. I've really liked what the Capitals have done at the last three drafts. In Lynden Lakovic, they added some size to a pool that skewed a little smaller, while still prioritizing the skill they've consistently targeted. He's 6-4 with legit skill, scoring and skating. With a little more consistency to his game, he's got legit NHL potential. I really liked the selection of center Milton Gastrin early in the second round as well. He's a well-rounded, complete player at an early age who gets a ton of respect from the other players in this class. I think they drafted their 3C of the future there. And though German Maxim Schafer didn't quite make my top 100, he was an honorable mention and No. 96 was an appropriate range. He looked quite impressive at U18 worlds, where the Capitals had the largest contingent of scouts, and he has size and some skill. The Predators chased identity, physicality and competitiveness by taking Martin — a player I love but who gives back some production upside to guys like James Hagens and Porter Martone — at No. 5, but they crushed their next two picks, taking two of my favorites in defenseman Cameron Reid (who fans will love on and off the ice) and Ryker Lee (who has the best hands in the draft for me). After taking Reid with their second first, I wondered if they'd prioritize getting a bigger D early in the second (Reid and Molendyk are both 5-foot-11/6-feet). And that's exactly what they did at No. 35, taking Jacob Rombach, who I viewed as more of a late-second but was an early-second for most in the league. Rombach's a huge defender with some other pro attributes. He's another lefty (as Reid and Molendyk are), but I think there's a world where those three become their three lefties at some point. I had heard a few days ago that the Preds were high on Jack Ivankovic, which prompted me to mention that I wasn't convinced they'd take a goalie in the first and could target him in the second. And that's exactly what they did. If you followed my work this year, you already know I'm a big believer in the undersized Canadian goalie. His compete, talent and anticipation are all high-end for me. Advertisement They got a right-shot defenseman I'm higher on than the consensus in Alex Huang (my No. 55-ranked prospect) at No. 122 as well. Wang is average-sized and needs to be firmer on both sides of the puck at times, but he's got skill, vision, smarts, and good skating that has areas for executable improvement. I expect him to break out offensively in the QMJHL next season and to become a productive D at Harvard who gives himself a chance to get an entry-level contract as a fourth-round pick. I think he's probably an offensively inclined AHL D at minimum. They got another highly mobile defender in smooth-skating overager Daniel Nieminen, who was on my board last year, in Round 6. If they'd taken Hagens or Martone at No. 5, they would have been winners here. I liked the rest of their draft a lot and thought about slotting them as winners regardless because I really do like Martin as well. I'm very confident James Hagens will be a riser in a re-draft when we start doing those for this class years from now, and I think people are going to come to that realization as early as next year when he's one of the best players in college hockey and stars (again) at the World Juniors. The Bruins needed a premium, potential top-of-the-lineup forward and preferably a center at that pick, and I think it could and should sail over the wall for a home run. They went back to the Boston College well with William Moore (remember Dean Letourneau a year ago and Oskar Jellvik before that as well, etc.) at No. 51, which was one of my favourite picks of Round 2. Moore's skating needs to improve and he needs to fill out his frame and play a little harder at times, but he has made progress on the former and the latter and the muscle should eventually come. He's also a talented, smart player and great kid who I know is going to put in the work. I think he's capable of becoming a high-end college player as an upperclassman if he hits some development checkpoints. Those two picks made the draft for the Bruins, even if I didn't love the rest of what they did and felt Liam Pettersson, their second second-rounder, was a round or two to high. Minnesota high school goal-scoring dynamo Cooper Simpson is a really solid third-round swing, too. He showed he could do it in the USHL in his time there as well. Advertisement The Red Wings got two Red Wings and two players I'd mocked to them at different points in Carter Bear and Eddie Genborg. They're both competitive, hard-working, committed, pro-style players. Bear has top-six talent and potential and Genborg's profile is a bottom-six one, but nobody will ever be able to question future teams in Detroit for their work ethic. I'll never fault a team for taking a goalie in the middle rounds, either. Once the top goalies in the draft were gone, and they were by No. 75, the big Michal Pradel was in that next tier and was a fine third-round pick. The Red Wings aren't a team that's desperate for young goalies either, so they must really like him. My favourite pick of the Red Wings' was Slovak forward Michal Svrcek in the fourth round. He was No. 70 on my board; they got him at No. 119 and I've yet to see him play a bad game. He attacks and scores against his peers and I think they could look back on that pick like the Dmitri Buchelnikov one because I think he's got legit skill and he's an SHL/AHL top-sixer for sure. Also in the fourth round, Minnesota high schooler Brent Solomon's an interest dice roll. He's got a long way to go but he can rip the puck. Theodor Hallquisth, who was the Wild's first pick of the draft at No. 52, was my mock for them and someone who always felt like their type as a competitive, physical, effective, efficient defenseman who makes the smart play consistently. He projects as a solid depth defenseman in the NHL and while I viewed him as more of a third-rounder than a second-rounder, the Wild weren't alone in their assessment. I love the swing on Adam Benak, another played I tied to them, too. Benak is one of the smartest players in this class and one of its best skaters. He's extremely tiny and that's going to make it hard, but in the fourth-round I don't think you can go wrong with that bet. He's fearless, too. I think he could surprise some people and I know there were a few other teams that were pretty high on him and were prepared to pick him shortly after the Wild did at No. 102. I liked the Lirim Amidovski pick at No. 121 as well. He really grabbed me at the OHL Top Prospects Game and I spent a good amount of time on him after that before ranking him in my final top 100. Amidovski has a pro frame, pro skating, and can play in straight lines. I could see him take a big step next season. Advertisement Carter Klippenstein, their third fourth-rounder, has a path to becoming a fourth-line if he develops well because of his athleticism, skating, size, strength, and unending work ethic. And in Victoria Royals captain and overager Justin Kipkie, the Wild get one of the WHL's better D last season. He may top out as an AHLer but he's going to play pro. I thought the Wild did well with what they had. The Kraken have used all of their premium draft capital on forwards since they entered the league but I still liked the decision to take Jake O'Brien at No. 8. He was the consensus No. 8 prospect in this class. They then went out and traded up to draft Blake Fiddler when he slipped out of the first round and was available on Day 2, and drafted a second D at No. 68 in Will Reynolds and a third one at No. 134 in Russian Maxim Agafonov to begin to add some blue line depth. Fiddler's puck game is pretty vanilla but he's a 6-foot-4/5 right-shot D who should have a long career in the league. Reynolds is a player I highlighted earlier this week as a late riser. He's a big, strong, highly mobile D who took some major steps in the second half of this season to emerge as a late-second/early-third candidate for multiple teams. He could become a depth option for them in time. Agafonov's game comes with some highs and lows but he made enough plays for a 6-foot-2 defenseman in the MHL this season that I ranked him at No. 91 on my board. Even seventh-rounder Karl Annborn, another D, makes a lot of sense for them. Annborn was once viewed as a top prospect in the Swedish age group and that's probably enough to warrant a late-round selection even if he hasn't met expectations. I liked the Kraken's draft. Porter Martone has star potential and gives the Flyers pool some of the size it needed. Jack Nesbitt has middle-six potential and gives the Flyers some more of that size. I love the Martone pick. I was less enthused about the Nesbitt selection at No. 12 and think there's some risk there if his feet don't take some real steps that they left some upside on the board (especially after moving up to do it). Advertisement They tripled down on adding size with Carter Amico at No. 38. Amico was viewed as a potential first-rounder entering the year but comes with some risk now after losing almost the entirety of his draft year. He is huge and can move and defend, though. I liked the Jack Murtagh pick two spots later and the Shane Vansaghi and Matthew Gard picks a little behind that in the second round as well. Murtagh's a strong, physically mature goal-scoring winger who loves to put the puck in the net and adds a potential middle-six scorer to their pool. Vansaghi is one of the strongest, heaviest forwards in the class and projects safely as a future bottom-sixer. Gard's a 6-5 forward who skates really well as well. He needs to show more offence but has a pretty translatable bottom-six profile to work with. Though fifth-rounder Max Westergard didn't quite make my list, he was one of my honorable mentions. He's small and his skill level isn't dynamic but he was productive at the J20 level this year, he can skate, and he works. They clearly set out with a plan with their six picks in Rounds 1-2 and accomplished it by adding size/strength at each of them. I didn't love the Nesbitt and Amico picks, which I think come with some risk, but I liked the other four and Martone's a big deal. I thought the Ducks had a nice draft. McQueen was a swing worth taking exactly where they took him and while he comes with some risk, there's serious upside there and he's a unique player and talent. I viewed Eric Nilson as one of the top prospects available on Day 2 and where they took him at No. 45 as well. He's got to fill out his frame but he's a very intelligent player who can skate, make plays and understands the game, and I expect them to be developed well at Michigan State. Lasse Boelius, the first Finn taken in the draft all the way at No. 60, was a little high there for me. He's a plus-level skater who has average to above average tools everywhere else. I actually thought he should have gone closer to the range they took Drew Schock in at No. 101. They're very comparable prospects for me in a lot of ways. I liked the Shock pick in the fourth. He's going to be a very good college player by the time he's a junior or senior and then you go from there. All of Swiss goalie Elihjah Neuenschwander, big Baie-Comeau D Alexis Mathieu, talented low-pace shooter Emile Guite, and the hard-working Anthony Allain-Samake have something that makes them at least relevant/worth following as well. The only pick they made that I felt was out-of-range was London forward Noah Read in the third round. I don't see much there. They had a decent draft though. As I reported prior to the draft, Zharovsky's name was hot coming out of Gold Star's camp in Florida and it looked like he was trending to be a late-first/early-second. The Habs pounced, moving up to take him at No. 34. Zharovsky is one of the most physically immature prospects in the draft and some were scared off by just how much physical development he has in front of him. When you've got a long way to go, it can be viewed as a plus. When you've got a long, long way to go, some start to wonder if you'll get there. Zharovsky is one of the most skilled players on the puck in the draft though and if he hits he's got top-six talent/point production upside. Advertisement I've got a lot of time for third-rounder Hayden Paupanekis (taken No. 69, ranked No. 81 on my board). He's a big player with a lot of pro attributes who still feels very early in his development. I expect him to be a big part of the Memorial Cup hosts in Kelowna next year and to take a real step forward. He's very interesting. After the top overagers started to go in the late-second and into the third, I liked their decision to take Medicine Hat's Bryce Pickford as well. He's got an NHL shot, had a huge year in huge minutes on the best team in the WHL, and plays firmly on both sides of the puck. I think he plays NHL games someday. Belarusian goalie Arseni Radkov was the first player of the draft that I hadn't watched with the very next pick at No. 82, so I won't comment on him (I typically don't watch more than the top dozen or so goalies, because there will never be that amount in my top 100, and nobody ever told me I had to watch him). I love that the Habs were the team to take a chance on L.J. Mooney as well. I'm a big believer in this kid, as tiny as he might be and as hard as the climb may be because of it. He is going to be a tremendous college hockey player and grades near the top of this draft in skating, skill, smarts and work ethic. I hope he beats the odds and won't be surprised if he plays NHL games. German D Carlos Handel, their first of two sixth-round picks, was a mid-to-late-round pick for me as well. His game lacks a standout quality but he's a good player in this age group and should become AHL depth at minimum. The Devils didn't pick until No. 50 and they took a cut — which I always respect — by drafting Conrad Fondrk, who I had ranked just one spot in front of where they took him at No. 49 on my list. Fondrk, like Amico, missed most of this season due to injury and was missed at the program when he wasn't in the lineup. His skill is first-round level but the production hasn't aligned with it. I have no issue with them taking a chance there. I liked the roll of the dice on Ben Kevan at the end of the second round as well. He's got to finish off more plays but he's one of the better skaters in the draft, was a second-rounder for me, and should become a very good college player. Advertisement I think Mason Moe is an interesting pick in the late-third as well (he ranked seven spots ahead of where they took him on my list and that was right in his range). He was overshadowed by Ryker Lee in Madison this year but he played off of him well as well and has some pro tools. I could see him becoming a really solid college player who earns a pro deal coming out of the University of Minnesota. Patience will be important there though. The Devils opened Round 6 by taking Czech forward David Rozsival, who I think plays pro hockey and was an honorable mention for my board, even if the NHL is a bit of a long shot. He's strong over pucks and plays with drive. Fourth-rounder Gustav Hillstrom worked his way onto my list this year and has some quality as well. I didn't spend time on 6-foot-8 CCHL goalie and Owen Sound third-stringer Trenton Bennett, a St. Lawrence commit, but big goalie tends to equal relevancy and his numbers were really good in a small sample with the Attack. The Canes did what the Canes do and, to the surprise of no one, moved out of the first round and then back again from there before making their first three picks at No. 41, No. 49 and No. 62 with three selections in the second round. Then they picked three very Canes prospects. They selected Russian goalie Semyon Frolov with the first pick, adding a high-end goalie prospect to their pool and filling an area of need. Frolov was viewed as a late-first/early second and one of the top goalie prospects in the draft by a good portion of the league. There are camps of people who believe he's got legit starter upside. It shouldn't surprise anyone that the Canes were the first team to take an overager, either. Charlie Cerrato was a top-six center for a Frozen Four team last year at Penn State and I believe the Penguins were going to target him with one of their third-round picks if the Canes didn't get out in front of them. He plays hard and has secondary skill. Advertisement And of all of the teams to take a swing on the skill and question marks of Ivan Ryabkin, I could have told you the Canes were likely the most likely. The concerns about his fitness, and his attitude, and his on-ice decision-making, are very real. But on talent he's a first-round talent. If they can whip him into shape and get him back on track a little, there's some potential reward there. It's not without risk, to be sure, but late in the second round you can afford to take that risk. Sixth-rounder Viggo Nordlund always had Canes pick all over him as a sub-6-foot winger who plays fast, produces, and works. I liked him there. And certainly seventh-rounder Filip Ekberg, this year's U18 worlds MVP, who has looked like a dynamic offensive zone player with the Swedish national team but is undersized and didn't pop in Ottawa (after dealing with an illness throughout the fall), is my kind of seventh-round pick. I liked the Canes' draft on the whole, as I tend to. The Sabres are going to challenge the Mammoth for the biggest blue line in the NHL. Rasmus Dahlin. Owen Power. Mattias Samuelsson. Adam Kleber in the second round a year ago. And now Radim Mrtka at No. 9 and David Bedkowski at No. 71. Mrtka's my second-ranked D and has legit skating and poise in his nearly 6-foot-6 profile. Bedkowski, who ranked No. 100 in my top 100, is nearly 6-foot-5 and can also skate. Bedkowski's one of the most physical players in this age group as well and while his offence is limited he can make the simple play. Czech forward Matous Jan Kucharcik, Rouyn-Noranda goalie Samuel Meloche, and Acadie-Bathurst Titan D Noah Laberge were fine picks in Round 4 and 5 even if I wouldn't have been banging the table for any of them (I'm actually slightly higher on Laberge, the fifth-rounder, than the two fourth-rounders and expect him to take a step with the relocated Newfoundland Regiment next season). I thought they had a fine draft. I thought Jackson Smith was the right pick for the Blue Jackets at No. 14 and while I thought No. 20 was a little early to take Pyotr Andreyanov, I'm still very high on Andreyanov and the Blue Jackets clearly filled two needs with their two first-rounders. Advertisement I've got time for rugged and physical defenseman Malte Vass as a mid-round pick even if I wouldn't have taken him at No. 76 as well. He's got a path to becoming a hard-to-play-against third-pairing D and the real believers in him see a little Radko Gudas. My favourite of their Day 2 picks was the Owen Griffin selection at No. 160, though. Griffin became an excellent junior hockey player this year and while he was one of the final cuts for my top 100, I've seen him play a ton in Oshawa and he's got skill, drive, skating and a lot of what you should be betting on in an undersized late-rounder. The Blackhawks walked away from Round 1 with what they were looking for: More size and a second top young forward to play with or behind Bedard in Anton Frondell. Vaclav Nestrasil is more second-rounder than late-first for me and he's going to have to continue to develop down the steep trajectory he started on this year, but he could become a really solid third-line checking winger with size and some sneaky skill. West is a complete wild card and felt a little cute to me as a trade-up chase, but there's no denying he has some real attributes. I've got a lot of time for Nathan Behm as an early third-rounder and viewed him as a mid-to-late-second this year. His game lacks a dynamic trait but he's a solid, projectable player who could become a contributing bottom-sixer. I've got a lot of time for overager Julius Sumpf, who was one of the best players in the QMJHL this year, as well. I do wonder with Sumpf whether he just becomes a really good second-line AHLer but he's going to have a long pro career and I wouldn't be surprised if he plays NHL games. I don't see it with giant Brantford forward Parker Holmes, who wasn't listed by NHL Central Scouting and scored one goal with the Bulldogs last year, especially in the fourth round, but they would be familiar with Nick Lardis and Marek Vanacker there. The Blackhawks' draft doesn't get me excited like some of their recent ones have but I thought they addressed some needs. Advertisement I'm lower on first-rounder Henry Brzustewicz than the Kings appear to be and felt he was more of a late-second than a late-first, but I thought the draft's hosts did well on the whole and either ranked or nearly ranked every one of their picks. Vojtech Cihar is already a pro and is going to have a long pro career, though there is some question as to his ultimate upside. Overager Kristian Epperson was one of the more talented prospects taken in the third round and can get after it when he's playing his best. Jimmy Lombardi, who they got No. 125, was No. 97 on my list and gets credit for his smarts even if he doesn't have a standout pro attribute. Overager Caeden Herrington probably plays pro after he's done at the University of Vermont, though I haven't seen NHL upside. And if you tuned into the 2025 World Juniors you'll remember the standout performance of fifth-round goalie and overager Petteri Rimpinen, who is undersized but had a good year in Liiga and obviously internationally. I've got time for Slovak forward Jan Chovan and overager Brendan McMorrow as late-round selections as well. McMorrow's a super competitive player. I liked the Kings' Day 2 fine. Defenseman Will Sharpe, who they took in the seventh-round, is a bit of a chicken with his head cut off out there but has enough tools that I ranked him in my top 100. I expect him to take a big step next year. The Rangers didn't pick until No. 43 but they got a player in Malcolm Spence that I view as a pretty clear late-first quality player in this age group. Spence didn't pop this year but I'm very confident he's going to have a long career in the NHL as an up-and-down-the-lineup top-nine winger who skates, works, and can contribute offensively. He's a hockey player. Norwegian forward Mikkel Eriksen, who they took at No. 111, was one of my favourite late-round picks as well and ranked No. 69 on my board. He has made plays every time I've watched him domestically or internationally and while there's a chance he just becomes a second-line AHLer, I like the roll of the dice. Advertisement Outside of those two picks, I was a little uninspired though. Sean Barnhill's a big man with real athletic attributes but No. 70 was early for me. So is Evan Passmore. And the rest is a mix of long shots and longer shots. The Spence and Eriksen picks carried this rating for me though. The Senators did well to move back a couple of spots and draft Logan Hensler where they did in the first round. His game lacks a bit of identity but he has the tools to be a top-four two-way five-on-five D in the NHL who could contribute on both second special teams. Between Jake Sanderson, Carter Yakemchuk and Hensler, they've got a good mix of D to build around. I thought the decision to take a swing on Minnesota high school standout Blake Vanek in the third round was a little early. He's a big, north-south winger with some definite pro attributes and an NHL shot but he's going to have to take a lot of steps to get signed. They likely saw enough from his brief but strong showing with the Chicago Steel to believe he's going to keep taking steps in Wenatchee in the WHL next season. I really liked the selection of goalie Lucas Beckman with the first pick of the fourth round though. Beckman was one of six goalies in my top 100 and was excellent for Baie-Comeau in the Q this year. He's a technically sound goalie and decently-mobile goalie who just makes saves. Croatian Bruno Idzan's a nice story. He's an overager who was very good after coming over to the USHL this year. They clearly trust the Mike Hastings and the University of Wisconsin staff, too, because that's now Blake Montgomery, Hensler and Idzan all there or going there. The Blues were one of my winners of Day 1 with the Justin Carbonneau selection at No. 19. I'm a big believe in Carbonneau, gave him high grades in this class for his hands and shot, and believe he has 30-goal upside in the NHL. Both of their Day 2 picks are long shots but were draft picks in this class. Russian Mikhail Fyodorov is a small but crafty player (the kind you draft late and then wait on and find out). I'm not a big believer in Swedish goalie Love Harenstam but he's been a go-to for their national team. Advertisement Caleb Desnoyers was the right pick on Day 1 and profiles perfectly to slot in as their 2C of the future behind Logan Cooley. They drafted a Mammoth with their first pick of Day 2 at No. 46 in the 6-foot-5 Max Psenicka, who I know was going to go right there in that range if the Mammoth didn't grab him. He adds more length to an organization that really covets it in their D prospects. He can also skate and has some sneaky offence to his game. There's some upside there. Stepan Hoch's a big, pro-built, pro-style forward who is probably a really solid AHLer/depth at minimum. Their four picks in Round 4-6 aren't prospects for me, but Desnoyers should be a central piece of the future and Psenicka should be a solid NHL D. The Golden Knights didn't make their first pick on the draft until late in the second round but they moved up to do it got a player with first-round talent in Jakob Ihs-Wozniak. He's a winger and teams wanted to see him play harder and be more consistent at times this year but I thought he made good progress on both fronts and he can score, which, in case you haven't heard, is the hardest thing to do. He's also 6-foot-2. If he hits, he could be a middle-six scorer with PP2 upside, which isn't often found on Day 2. Mateo Nobert was taken exactly where I thought he belonged at No. 85 as well. He had a quietly very good year alongside Justin Carboneau with the Armada. He needs to get stronger but there's some smarts/feel/playmaking there. I don't view overeager Alex Weiermair as a prospect, though he did seem to figure it out a little after leaving Denver to go to Portland. The Jets didn't have quantity but I thought they did well with what they did have over the two days. They needed to add a D prospect to their pool, which outside of Elias Salomonsson, had arguably nothing else before Friday night to project onto an NHL blue line. They got another Salomonsson-calibre prospect in countryman Sascha Boumedienne, a 6-foot-2 D who can really skate and has physical development and decision-making development in front of him. Advertisement Owen Martin was a third-round pick all day for me as well. He's a pro-style player who has some real believers and I expect him to take a step next season in the WHL production-wise. Viktor Klingsell is exactly the type of player I think you target late in the draft, too. He's sub-6-foot but I wouldn't say he's got some muscle on him and the skill level on the puck is legit. There's a chance he's just an AHL/SHL scorer but you can live with that if that's the outcome in the fifth round. Sixth-rounder Edison Engle would have to take a lot of steps in Brantford and then at OSU to get signed someday, but has some coveted attributes as a good-sized D with some average attributes. I don't view seventh-rounder Jacob Cloutier as an NHL prospect but he works for a 5-10 guy. The Avalanche were one of the last teams to make their first pick of the draft, waiting until the middle of the third-round to take UMass defenseman Francesco Dell'Elce, one of the top overagers in the class. I've got a lot of time for Dell'Elce, who has appeared in my honorable mentions in two different drafts and is a plus-skater and athlete with good instincts. Fourth-rounder Linus Funck is a good-sized right-shot D with some pro attributes even if he's a bit of a long shot. I don't really know how to slot a team that makes three picks but I didn't hate any of them so we'll go with overtime losers. I wouldn't read too much into the slotting here. The Lightning had to wait until No. 56 to make their first pick and targeted a very Lightning-type player in Ethan Czata. He's a competitive, hard-working, good-skating center who projects as a potential two-way third-line forward. I haven't seen a lot of natural offence there but he should be able to contribute and he's a very well-rounded young player. Advertisement I think Benjamin Rautiainen, who they took at No. 108 with their first of two fourth-rounders, is one of the top overagers in this class, too. He's quite skilled on the puck and while some think he may just be a AAAA AHL playmaker, that's probably a guarantee and not a bad guarantee to target where they did. The rest were late-round long shots but fine ones. Fourth-rounder Aiden Foster is a fearsome competitor. Fifth-round D Everett Baldwin was a standout in the pre school circuit the last two years and plays a busy style. Caleb Heil hasn't quite met expectations after he was once viewed as one of the better goalie prospects in a weaker American goalie class but there are some who still think he's a better goalie than his numbers indicate. Overager Roman Luttsev absolutely lit up the MHL this season and has legit skill on the puck. There's not a lot to get excited about in the Lightning's class though. The Stars didn't make their first pick until No. 94, but in typical Stars fashion they didn't shy away from targeting a talent that others couldn't quite get there on in Cameron Schmidt. Schmidt is one of the best skaters and shooters in this class and guys who get top grades in two different attributes in an age group are almost never available in the third round. Schmidt, who is listed at 5-foot-7.25 and can frustrate with his shot selection and body language at times, was available, and the team that took Logan Stankoven took him. Despite the challenges players his size face, I think he's more likely to become an NHLer than a number of the other players who were taken in the third-round. He might score 50 in the WHL next year. The rest of their picks in Rounds 4-7 aren't anything, in my opinion, though. Mans Goos is a huge goalie, which makes him relevant, but I've seen him let in a lot of bad goals. Advertisement I've viewed Tommy Lafreniere, the Oilers' first pick of the draft, as more of an AHL prospect than an NHL prospect when I've watched Kamloops. He's an average-at-everything player for me, unless there's something I'm missing. The Oilers' second pick of the draft, though, German forward David Lewandowski, belonged in that range and turned the staff in Saskatoon into real believers (not just in the he's-our-guy way, either). He's a very, very smart player. There's some average-at-everything worries with him as well, but the smarts might be enough to give him a chance. Fifth-rounder Asher Barnett was one of the last cuts on D for my top-100 as well. He's a solid, reliable defender who wore the 'C' at the program. A lack of a defining trait raises questions about whether he just becomes a solid college and then AHL D, but I don't think you can go wrong having him be a part of your organization. He's a good player and by all accounts a good kid. This Oilers class probably doesn't produce an NHLer, though. I thought the Penguins, despite getting three good prospects in the first round and two I quite like in Ben Kindel and Bill Zonnon, got a little cute in the first-round with where they took their three guys. The prospect I'm lowest on was actually the one who went in the range the league expected him to go in William Horcoff, ironically. Peyton Kettles, who they took with their first pick of Day 2, is more of a late-second than an early-second for me, but was also viewed by the league in the range they took him. He's a big, strong D who defends and skates well and has more of a puck game than his statistical profile suggests but won't ever be a producer in the NHL. He's got some projectable attributes and the game is trending towards his type. I liked the swing on Charlie Trethewey early in the third round. He was viewed as a potential first-round talent coming out of his U17 year at the program and then really struggled with the decision-making side of the game this year. He's a standout athlete with a big shot and several pro attributes. If the reads on both sides of the puck can improve, there could be a player there. Advertisement I was pretty surprised to see them take former QMJHL No. 1 pick Gabriel D'Aigle in the third-round though. D'Aigle has really struggled in the QMJHL and there are people in Quebec who've completely written him off as a goalie prospect. I'm pretty confident he would have been there later for them. Brady Peddle's an interesting dice roll at No. 91, even if that was a little high for me as well. He's a big, physical D who is a standout athlete not dissimilar to Kettles. He's a high-floor, low-ceiling bet and should be a solid depth AHL D at minimum with proper development. Travis Hayes is a Kyle Dubas/Wes Clark type and was a worthy fourth-round pick for me. He's a hard-working pest with a nose for the dirty areas and teams didn't like playing him and his pal Brady Martin in the Soo this year. Though Quinn Beauchesne didn't quite make my top 100, there are some profile similarities between him and Ben Danford, who Clark took in the first round in Toronto last year. He's a Hockey Canada favourite who prides himself on defending hard, blocking shots, and playing a coachable game. There are some who argue injuries got in the way of him being a Round 2 or Round 3 pick instead of a Round 5 one. The small but crafty Kale Dach is exactly the kind of player I'd look at in the seventh round and is interesting in the same way Penn State leading scorer and Preds prospect Aiden Fink was in last year's draft. A lot of volume and a huge mixed bag for me though. Braeden Cootes is a legit prospect at a premium position but I thought the Canucks played it a little safe taking him at No. 15 and would have encouraged them to really chase some skill and take a cut, because they need more of it. Though Kieren Dervin was one of the final cuts for my top 100, I actually liked them taking him at No. 65 because it represented a bit more of cut. Dervin's a really impressive skater and athlete who also has some skill. I and others wanted to see him play with more intensity at times this year but he's got the tools to follow the college path at Penn State and come out the other side as something interesting. Advertisement The same goes for the decision to go after overager Wilson Bjorck, the older brother of top 2026 prospect Viggo Bjorck, who lit up the J20 level this season and flashed some skill and feel for the game. And likewise for Alexei Medvedev, who is one of the best goalie prospects in this class for me and has tandem upside. Matthew Lansing is a likeable player type but not an NHL prospect for me. We'll see. I'm largely uninspired by what they did on the whole. I thought the Panthers' fourth-rounders, Dane Mad Kongsbak Klyvø and Everett's Shea Busch, were late-rounders more than fourth-rounders whenever I watched Frolunda and the Silvertips this year. You're hoping both take steps next year after playing on deeper teams in their draft year. Shamar Moses, my No. 98-ranked prospect, is a strong, heavy, hardworking winger with some power forward elements that I thought was taken in exactly the right range in the fifth round. He may end up as AHL depth but he's a coach's type and that can sometimes take you a little further than that. Swedish sixth-rounder Arvid Drott can really skate, which makes him worth following. His peers think he's underrated, which I think is always noteworthy as well. The Panthers will be lucky to get NHL games out of any of the kids they picked though. The Leafs aren't going to be making very many picks over the next few years and it's going to be really important for them to find players and value in the ones that they do. So Leafs fans probably won't love to hear that the decision to take Norwegian center Tinus Luc Koblar was the first of Day 2 that I really didn't understand. He's a big, strong, sturdy center who can skate but he scored eight goals at Sweden's J20 level this year and has a long way to go to have a chance to become a bottom-six option someday. He's a summer birthday who already has some pro attributes, so I'm sure they're counting on a steep progression moving forward, but I'm confident they could have got him later and he was ranked No. 56 on NHL Central Scouting's list of international skaters when they took him at No. 64 among all skaters. Advertisement I've got a lot of time for Tyler Hopkins, who they took No. 86 and was No. 80 on my board, and think he's much more likely to become a bottom-six forward in the NHL than Luc Koblar. Hopkins is one of the most detail-oriented forwards in the draft. He needs to show he can make more plays in the OHL next year but he works, and tracks, and supports, and really understands how to play the game. I think we're going to see some more picks like the William Belle one from the Leafs in coming years as well. Belle's one of the biggest, strongest, meanest, most physical players in the draft but he barely played for the NTDP at times this year and he's a bit of a one-trick pony. The Leafs likely see a potential fourth-liner. I don't think he's got the smarts to get there, personally. Owen Sound's Harry Nansi showed me very little skill in my viewings as well but he's one of the youngest players in the draft and his defining quality is his work ethic, so they're likely betting on development being in front of him and a potential depth projection. He's a long shot who will have to take some big steps though. Sixth-rounder Ryan Fellinger's a big D with a lot of limitations. I don't see what the vision/end goal is.
