logo
City looking at Chestnut, Spruce for 'streetscape' improvements

City looking at Chestnut, Spruce for 'streetscape' improvements

Dominion Post6 days ago
MORGANTOWN — High Street received a streetscape makeover in 2013.
Pleasant Street got spruced up in 2023.
Walnut Street – at least a block of it – will, presumably, have a new look to show off at some point this year.
So, what's next?
Based on the Department of Transportation TAP (Transportation Alternatives Program) Grant applications approved this week by Morgantown City Council, likely Chestnut Street, then Spruce.
In October, the city learned it was the recipient of a $180,000 TAP Grant to design pedestrian improvements for Chestnut Street.
Now, the city is going back to the well, seeking $1.55 million to construct at least a portion of the project. If awarded, the city would be required to provide a 20% match, totalling $310,000.
The street runs roughly 2,100 feet between Foundry and Willey streets. It's one of five streets that make up the one-way grid in the city's downtown.
While the city concedes the work will likely need to be approached in phases, the ultimate goal is to address the entirety of Chestnut Street with new sidewalks/ADA infrastructure, lighting and appropriate landscaping.
According to information provided in council's latest agenda packet, 'The project will also consider the addition of adding road markings or sharrows on Chestnut Street, which will enable cars and bicycles to share the street.'
Moving up a couple blocks, the city is once again seeking assistance kicking off a revisioning of Spruce Street — this time in the form of a $450,000 TAP Grant.
The city notes, 'The design concept will include all new sidewalks, improvement for ADA infrastructure, new lighting, and appropriate landscaping as well. The city will conduct research on an optimal streetscape plan for the possibility of converting one of the lanes for strict bicycle usage.'
Like all TAP Grants, the city would be on the hook for a 20% local match, totaling $90,000, if awarded.
Assistant City Manager Emily Muzzarelli previously said that once streetscape enhancements on Pleasant, Walnut and Chestnut streets were complete, it would likely be time to circle back to High Street once again.
Lastly, the city is continuing to push for pedestrian enhancements serving the Morgantown Municipal Airport, requesting a $380,000 TAP Grant to design the Morgantown Municipal Airport Bike Path and Walking Trail Connector — a five-foot-wide pedestrian and bike path from the Sabraton Baptist Church on Sabraton Avenue to the West Virginia Land Trust walking trails off Hartman Run Road. That, in turn, would make way for a future connection to Hart Field Road.
If fully awarded, the grant would require a $76,000 match.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mercato Vending Machines Compared: 3000 vs 4000 vs 5000
Mercato Vending Machines Compared: 3000 vs 4000 vs 5000

Time Business News

time16 hours ago

  • Time Business News

Mercato Vending Machines Compared: 3000 vs 4000 vs 5000

Looking for a snack vending machine that combines sleek design, high capacity, and smart features? The Mercato Vending line by USI offers three standout models—Mercato 3000, Mercato 4000, and Mercato 5000—each tailored for different location sizes and product needs. Whether you manage a high-traffic corporate building or a university campus, there's a Mercato unit that meets your vending goals. Below, we'll break down what sets each model apart, highlight core features, and help you choose the best fit. Why Choose Mercato Vending Machines? Mercato Vending machines are engineered for performance, flexibility, and user experience. Designed with ADA compliance, energy-efficient LED lighting, optional touchscreen interfaces, and robust security, these machines aren't just vending units—they're smart business tools. Here are three models that define the Mercato line: 🔹 Mercato 3000: Compact Powerhouse for Medium-Traffic Locations View Full Product Details » Price: CAD $7,590 CAD $7,590 Width: 3-wide configuration 3-wide configuration Capacity: Up to 36 selections / 360 items Up to 36 selections / 360 items Use Case: Mid-size offices, small retail lobbies Mid-size offices, small retail lobbies Smart Features: iVend® sensor, MDB payment compatibility, backlit braille keypad iVend® sensor, MDB payment compatibility, backlit braille keypad Optional Add-ons: 7' touchscreen, Delivery Assist, custom graphics This model shines where space is limited but reliability and flexibility are still non-negotiable. Read : Tips for Choosing the Right Hollow Fiber Spinning Machine 🔹 Mercato 4000: High-Volume Vending with Smart Upgrades Explore Mercato 4000 Specs » Price: CAD $8,229 CAD $8,229 Width: 4-wide 4-wide Capacity: Up to 52 selections / 423 items Up to 52 selections / 423 items Use Case: Corporate campuses, hospitals, busy retail zones Corporate campuses, hospitals, busy retail zones Smart Features: Enhanced LED display, motor pairing, full sales tracking Enhanced LED display, motor pairing, full sales tracking Optional Add-ons: Touchscreen interface, satellite pairing With the perfect balance of style and functionality, the 4000 brings power and polish to your vending fleet. 🔹 Mercato 5000: Maximum Capacity Meets Maximum Performance Compare with Mercato 5000 » Price: CAD $8,699 CAD $8,699 Width: 5-wide 5-wide Capacity: Up to 65 selections / 528 items Up to 65 selections / 528 items Use Case: Airports, large venues, industrial sites Airports, large venues, industrial sites Smart Features: Advanced accounting tools, satellite unit pairing, ADA delivery assist Advanced accounting tools, satellite unit pairing, ADA delivery assist Optional Add-ons:iCart FLEX touchscreen, inDEX Tool, custom colors The 5000 is your go-to model for maximum throughput and a modern buying experience. 🔍 Mercato Vending Machine Comparison Table Feature Mercato 3000 Mercato 4000 Mercato 5000 Price (CAD) $7,590 $8,229 $8,699 Width 3-wide 4-wide 5-wide Selections Up to 36 Up to 52 Up to 65 Total Capacity 360 items 423 items 528 items Touchscreen Option Yes Yes Yes (FLEX Controller) Satellite Capable Yes Yes Yes Best For Midsize Offices Busy Buildings High-Traffic Locations 📍 Availability Across the Greater Toronto Area Red Seal Vending proudly serves businesses across the GTA, including Toronto, Mississauga, Brampton, Vaughan, Scarborough, and surrounding regions. Our expert technicians also offer custom configuration, delivery, and ongoing service support for all Mercato vending units. Looking to place an order or request a quote? Contact us today at 1-800-334-6289. ❓ Frequently Asked Questions About Mercato Vending Machines Q: Which Mercato model is best for a high school or college campus? A: The Mercato 4000 offers an ideal balance of capacity and footprint for busy student environments. Q: Can I customize the machine's exterior with my branding? A: Yes. All Mercato vending units offer optional custom graphics and color options. Q: Do these machines support cashless payments? A: Absolutely. All three models support MDB-compatible devices, including debit/credit cards and mobile wallets. Q: What warranty is included? A: Each machine includes a 2-year manufacturer's warranty through USI. Q: Do you offer installation and setup support? A: Yes, Red Seal Vending offers full setup and service throughout the GTA. 📢 Ready to Upgrade Your Vending Setup? Whether you're replacing an aging machine or starting fresh, the Mercato vending line delivers the capacity, technology, and reliability your location needs. 👉Explore Our Full Product Range Now 📞Call 1-800-334-6289 or contact us online to speak with a vending specialist. TIME BUSINESS NEWS

Aon fired employee with ADHD who wanted to work in the office full time, lawsuit alleges
Aon fired employee with ADHD who wanted to work in the office full time, lawsuit alleges

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Aon fired employee with ADHD who wanted to work in the office full time, lawsuit alleges

This story was originally published on HR Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily HR Dive newsletter. Dive Brief: Professional services firm Aon allegedly fired an employee because she has attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder, after she requested and received an accommodation to work in the office, according to a July 23 lawsuit. Per the complaint in Gomez v. Aon Private Risk Management Insurance Agency, Inc., the employee worked as an account specialist. She alleged that a recruiter told her she could work in the office full time to accommodate her ADHD, but after she was hired, she was allegedly informed the role was mostly remote and full-time in-office work wasn't possible. Because of her ADHD, the employee had trouble performing and learning effectively, she alleged. She emailed her manager, who allegedly told her this may not be a 'fit environment' for her, and placed her on a performance improvement plan. She formally requested an accommodation but was fired shortly after the request was approved and she began working in the office, the lawsuit said. Dive Insight: The employee filed her claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act, alleging she experienced discrimination and harassment and was ultimately fired due to her ADHD. She also claimed she was initially denied a reasonable accommodation and retaliated against because she asked for one. Aon did not respond to a request for a comment. Compliance issues surrounding reasonable accommodation are always evolving, even as the ADA marks its 35th anniversary. Remote work, or 'telework,' stands out as an example, although the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has long recognized it as a reasonable accommodation, according to an EEOC guidance. While the Aon lawsuit offers a twist — the employee alleged she was discriminated against because she requested an accommodation to work in the office, not remotely — the best practices for staying ADA compliant are the same. One critical step is for the employer and the employee to engage in an 'interactive process,' so the employer can understand why an accommodation is needed and what alternatives are possible if the request poses an undue hardship, the EEOC explains. A $22.1 million jury award in July 2024 against Wells Fargo shows how costly it can be to deny a request without engaging in an interactive process or fully exploring the issues. In the Wells Fargo case, a director asked for an accommodation to work from home because his impairment required frequent and quick access to a restroom. His managers allegedly eliminated his role before the matter was resolved. The judge determined there was a dispute over whether Wells Fargo engaged in 'genuine discourse' about the employee's request and said it would have to be resolved by a jury. Employers should also keep in mind that, while allowing an employee to change work locations can be a reasonable accommodation, they may have to modify a work rule or policy for this to happen, EEOC's guidance points out. This issue arose a few years ago, when three City of Berkeley, California, commission members asked to attend meetings remotely from their homes to accommodate their disabilities. The city said they could, but allegedly only if they publicly listed their home address as a meeting place and let the public inside to attend, ostensibly because of a state rule. The U.S. Department of Justice sued Berkeley for violating the ADA. Under the settlement, the city changed its policy to allow the requirements to be waived for disability-related concerns. In the Aon case, the employee said she explained to her manager that her ADHD kept her from performing to her full potential because she was working from home. She twice asked for an accommodation to work in the office full time, but the requests were denied, and she was allegedly told the policy only allowed her to work in the office one day a week. She then submitted a formal request and submitted medical documentation. Although the request was approved, and her performance allegedly improved, she was still fired, the lawsuit said. Recommended Reading The ADA at 30: A landmark civil rights law that still has room to grow Sign in to access your portfolio

JetBlue, United partnership gets go-ahead from U.S. Transportation Department
JetBlue, United partnership gets go-ahead from U.S. Transportation Department

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

JetBlue, United partnership gets go-ahead from U.S. Transportation Department

(Reuters) -JetBlue and United Airlines have cleared a review of their planned Blue Sky partnership by the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) allowing them to proceed with the implementation, the companies said on Tuesday. The two companies in May unveiled a partnership that would allow travelers to book flights on both carriers' websites, while interchangeably earning and using points in their frequent flyer programs. Spirit Airlines in June had urged the U.S. transportation body to reject the collaboration between the two carriers, saying it was anticompetitive and would prompt other large carriers to pursue similar deals. JetBlue and United said that Blue Sky would begin introducing new customer benefits starting in fall 2025, rolling them out in phases. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store