Kartal proud in defeat at Wimbledon women's singles
Her 7–6, 6–4 defeat to Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova will mainly be remembered for a high-profile failure of the new automatic line-calling system, but that should be only a footnote to Kartal's achievements in recent days.
Taking down the seeded Jelena Ostapenko, making a first appearance on Centre Court, leaving the All England Club with a ranking inside the world's top 50 and swelling her bank account by £240,000 — it has been an honest week's work in SW19.
'I've proved to myself I can go deep into Slams and beat some of the best players on tour,' said Kartal, who took to the court with her knee heavily strapped but insisted it was not a major issue.
'I'll take a little rest for a week or two, but this gives me a lot of motivation. It's not easy coming out on Centre Court as a British player, but I think I handled that well.
'I'm pretty devastated not to get the win. People were saying the draw had opened up, but she played like a seed from the very first point. I made a few mistakes at not ideal times and that was the only difference.
'It's my first fourth round at a Slam, so I can be super proud about that when I take some time to reflect — because I'm playing some of my best tennis.'
The mentality that fuels Sonay Kartal 👊#BackTheBrits 🇬🇧 | #Wimbledon pic.twitter.com/9QcJugb9EJ
Wimbledon's decision to scrap the 147-year-old tradition of line judges in favour of Hawk-Eye technology has raised plenty of eyebrows, with British number ones Jack Draper and Emma Raducanu both questioning its reliability.
Pavlyuchenkova was serving at 4–4, advantage, when a Kartal shot landed well beyond the baseline. However, umpire Nico Helwerth refused to overrule the clearly incorrect call, insisting the point be replayed as the technology had failed.
Kartal went on to break her opponent's serve.
'You took the game away from me,' fumed the former French Open finalist at the changeover. 'You've stolen it.'
How's that for a first time Centre Court entrance?! 🌩️
A thunderous atmosphere for Sonay Kartal's fourth round showdown
🎥 @Wimbledonpic.twitter.com/WUhd0d2tMD
To her credit, Pavlyuchenkova showed remarkable restraint, ultimately winning the set — rightly hers — on a tie-break, her British rival paying the price for converting only three of ten break-point opportunities.
There are certainly questions to answer about how Hawk-Eye is being implemented. If an umpire cannot overrule a clearly bad call, they might as well be replaced too.
'I just thought also the chair umpire could take initiative. That's why he's sitting on the chair. He also saw it out — he told me after the match.
'They said the system was down, it was a human error and I understand that. It's such a big match, a big event. I think since we already have automatic line calling and so much invested into this, we should probably look into something else to make it better.'
In the end, it was all immaterial. Pavlyuchenkova, a former world No 11 who has slipped outside the top 50, drew on her decade-plus of experience to end the home women's singles challenge for another year.
For the latest action on the British summer grass court season, check out the LTA website.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
Sport minister rejects calls to consult on alcohol ban in football stands
Stephanie Peacock said moves to reverse the prohibition, which has been in place since 1985, do not fall within the scope of the Football Governance Bill. MPs will have a say on the Tories' amendment to the Bill on Tuesday, if the party chooses to push it to a vote. Sport minister Stephanie Peacock (Chris McAndrew/PA) The minister also stopped short of agreeing to financial support for ex-players who have suffered brain conditions caused by heading footballs, but said the Government is 'committed' to looking further at player welfare. Speaking in the Commons, Ms Peacock said the Bill's focus is on the 'financial sustainability of football clubs up and down the country'. The Bill would introduce an independent regulator for the top five tiers of the men's game to ensure clubs are run sustainably and are accountable to their fans. The regulator will also have 'backstop' powers to impose a financial settlement between the English Football League (EFL) and the Premier League if they cannot agree one themselves. David Kogan, a media rights expert, has been named as the Government's preferred candidate to chair the Independent Football Regulator in April, and his appointment was endorsed by a cross-party committee of MPs. But Mr Kogan faces an inquiry into his appointment following the revelation that he had donated money to both Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy, as well as other Labour figures. During the Bill's report stage, shadow sport minister Louie French accused the Government of 'appointing a Labour crony to be the new sheriff of football'. Intervening, Ms Nandy said then-minister Stuart Andrew had 'actively headhunted the individual in question and added him to the shortlist'. Mr French also urged the Government to scrap the 'legacy ban which sees fans rushing to drink their beer before kick-off and at half-time'. On new clause one, he said: 'The alcohol ban, which has been in place since 1985, was introduced to help curb hooliganism on the terraces during the problematic era of British football. 'But 40 years on, and with the modern game enjoying a more family-friendly atmosphere in stadiums across the country, clubs, fans and the Conservatives are urging the Government to consult on lifting the ban on alcohol. 'As football fans know, we have this legacy ban which sees fans rushing to drink their beer before kick-off and at half-time, this often leads to the fans being delayed entering the stadiums and overcrowding on the concourses. 'This is why we have listened to clubs and fans, especially those lower down the football pyramid, and are urging the Government to end the two-tier approach to football plans as part of their Football Governance Bill.' Responding, Ms Peacock said: 'This is outside the scope of the Bill, which is focused on sustainability of clubs and game overall. I've raised the issue with the Home Office, as I committed to do during the Bill committee, as it is their policy lead.' Labour MP for Caerphilly Chris Evans (Andrew Matthews/PA) A number of MPs, including Labour's Chris Evans (Caerphilly) had tabled amendments to the Bill calling for greater support of past players who have developed neurodegenerative diseases as a result of heading footballs. Referring to the Liberal Democrats' amendment which called for a financial scheme to provide care, Ms Peacock said it is 'not within the tight regulatory scope of the Bill'. She told MPs: 'The Secretary of State and I recently met with a small group of affected families and ex-footballers, including individuals associated with Football Families for Justice (FFJ), to discuss player safety and welfare for those suffering with dementia. 'The Government is committed to looking further at this issue and supporting the families and football authorities to come together to address issues of lifelong consequences from concussion as well as post-career mental health and financial crises. 'I'm afraid this amendment is not within the tight regulatory scope of the Bill, although that does not mean the Government is not aware and very sympathetic to the calls that are being made on this issue, both in this House and for many former players and their families. 'This Bill is focused on the financial sustainability of football clubs up and down the country.' The Liberal Democrats had also tabled an amendment which proposed that at least 10 Premier League football matches should be made available on free-to-air television channels such as the BBC or ITV. The party's culture spokesperson Max Wilkinson said: 'If we are to get the next generation of fans involved, the easiest way to make sure that they are entertained and that they're engaging is by making football free-to-air.' Ms Peacock said: 'The Government believes that the current list of events works well, and it strikes an appropriate balance between access to sporting events and allowing sports to maximise broadcasting revenue. 'In domestic football, the present arrangements under the listed events regime have protected key moments such as the FA Cup final, while ensuring that the Premier League, the EFL, and the FA, are able to raise billions of pounds annually, which is invested back into the pyramid. 'We all want to see more matches being televised, free-to-air, but that must be balanced against investment and not risk it.'
Powys County Times
an hour ago
- Powys County Times
Wimbledon diary: Sir Ian McKellen takes in the tennis and fans pack Henman Hill
Gandalf witnessed some Centre Court wizardry on day nine of Wimbledon. Actor Sir Ian McKellen, who starred as The Lord of the Rings character, watched Aryna Sabalenka battle back to reach the women's semi-finals before taking in Cameron Norrie's quarter-final defeat to defending men's champion Carlos Alcaraz. The 86-year-old was joined in the Royal Box by fellow thespians Sir Mark Rylance, Sienna Miller, Jodie Foster and Richard E. Grant, singer Katherine Jenkins and coffee magnate Giuseppe Lavazza. Former cricketer David Gower was among those representing the world of sport, while Scotland and Napoli midfielder Scott McTominay and Arsenal duo Bukayo Saka and Jurrien Timber enjoyed the action from less exclusive seats. *** American 13th seed Amanda Anisimova celebrated progression to the semi-finals with a special guest. The 23-year-old was accompanied by nephew Jaxon for her post-match interview on Court One following a 6-1 7-6 (9) win over Russia's Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova. Jaxon, who turns four on Thursday, only arrived in the UK on Tuesday morning. An early birthday present for Amanda's nephew, Jackson #Wimbledon — Wimbledon (@Wimbledon) July 8, 2025 After ensuring his long trip was worthwhile, Anisimova said: 'My sister and her husband are also here and I'm super grateful that they flew in and got to experience this with me – it doesn't happen often.' *** The tension on Centre Court during Sabalenka's match against Laura Siegemund was broken when a mobile phone began to ring. The usual accompanying tuts and moans from other spectators grew louder when it became apparent no one could turn off the annoying ring tone. One unfortunate spectator was rifling through her bag trying to find the offending item. But it turned out to have been left behind by someone else and they were trying to locate it remotely. The phone was eventually found under a seat and handed to a member of security. *** Henman Hill was rammed late on Tuesday afternoon. Fans were glued to the big screen, with the majority cheering on British number three Norrie in his efforts to pull of a major upset against world number two Alcaraz. Barely a spare blade of grass was available as other spectators queued to join them. Quote of the day 'I'm more for line umpires, to be honest. Sometimes it's scary to let machines do what they want, you know (smiling)?' – Russian 17th seed Karen Khachanov joined the growing list of players to question Wimbledon's electronic line calling system following a malfunction during his quarter-final loss to Taylor Fritz. Picture of the day Wednesday's match of the day Teenage Russian Mirra Andreeva has been one of the standout performers in the women's draw. The 18-year-old, who is coached by 1994 Wimbledon champion Conchita Martinez, is bidding to reach a second grand slam semi-final and has been given another Centre Court slot after shining in front of Roger Federer on Monday during her fourth-round defeat of Emma Navarro. Standing in her way is 2021 Olympic champion Belinda Bencic. The 28-year-old Swiss player is also enjoying her best run at SW19, having missed last year's tournament after giving birth to daughter Bella in April 2024. Wednesday weather watch
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Cameron Norrie's meek exit leaves Centre Court pining for the days of Murray
When this quarter-final was definitively wrapped up after only one hour and 39 minutes, the noise on Centre Court was a subdued mixture of applause and the odd whoop. The applause was polite, acknowledging a sporting contest had taken place, even if it had not been competitive. The whoops were a little performative. Britain's last remaining singles hope at these Championships, Cameron Norrie, had been outclassed by a purring Carlos Alcaraz 6-2, 6-3, 6-3. Alcaraz, the reigning men's champion, had whipped through the match, whipped forehand winner after forehand winner, and whipped his opponent into meek submission. It had been so tough for Norrie that he had felt the need to fist pump simply for holding points on his serve. This is where the whoops came in; the crowd's own attempt to find encouragement where it could. Quarter-finals with a British interest are far from a given at Wimbledon. The decade between 2008 and 2017, when Andy Murray never went home before the final eight, is a glaring anomaly in the men's game. Equally exceptional were the successes of Virginia Wade in the 1970s. This was only the fifth quarter-final to feature a home competitor in the past decade and the unspectacular Norrie, born in South Africa and raised in New Zealand, is not someone who can easily be described as a fan favourite. So it was a big match, but not as big as it could have been and this perhaps was reflected around the showpiece court. Half empty as the match got under way, albeit with British theatrical titans Sir Ian McKellen, Mark Rylance and Richard E Grant in their seats throughout, the ground filled up but the atmosphere never took off. Were the crowd cheering for an underdog victory or applauding the effort of an emerging titan of the modern game? In the end it was a bit of both and neither. A raucous home crowd would probably have had no effect on the outcome of the match, unless it was to inspire Alcaraz to higher levels than those he deemed necessary to win. Even in the first game of the match, in which Norrie valiantly held serve, the No 2 seed pummelled the Briton with power and placement. One of Norrie's key strengths are on the defensive, with a tigerish ability to chase down angles and take the speed out of dangerous play. But it was clear from the off that these tools, effective in the tournament to this point and in his run to the semi-finals in 2022, were not going to work here. Alcaraz was typically considerate in his post-match remarks on court, declaring Norrie a 'really difficult' opponent. 'I am really happy,' the 22-year-old said. 'To be able to play another semi-final here at Wimbledon is really special. I want to go as far as I can and I am really happy with the level I played today against a really difficult player like Cam. He is an amazing guy. No one works harder than him and it is nice to see him fighting for great things.' Alcaraz was right, there was no doubting Norrie's work ethic, at least in the first two sets when the writing was only being daubed on the wall. But the limits of his ability against the top players was clear. This was more like a British Wimbledon encounter in the years pre-Murray, such was the imbalance on court, but this is 2025 and expectations have long been revised upwards. Jack Draper, the British No 1 and another player to have exited meekly from the tournament this year, wondered out loud 'How did Andy Murray do it?' after his second-round loss. This question will surely come into sharper focus by the time next year's Championship comes around. Sign up to The Recap The best of our sports journalism from the past seven days and a heads-up on the weekend's action after newsletter promotion On the other hand, at least everyone got to see Alcaraz. The Spaniard does not yet have his supporter army, like the omnipresent and slightly unsettling Nole-fam that stand foursquare behind the 24-time major winner Novak Djokovic. But the 22-year-old does have the game to win the hearts of neutrals. Yes he has the 135mph aces, and the bludgeoning strokes from the back of the court that are the pre-requisites for success in the hard court age. But his love of the drop shot is something that is shared by Wimbledon aficionados too, and he also found time for some exquisite lobs in the few moments Norrie could be tempted into the net. His roar of celebration upon victory seemed pretty genuine too, and this crowd loves a fighter. Norrie will now try to take the momentum he has generated and turn it into a run at the US Open later this summer. For Alcaraz, it's the American Taylor Fritz in the semis and the ongoing shot at a threepeat. That match is scheduled for Friday, and in between Alcaraz plans to take in some sights. 'I will make the most of the time with my team and family in London,' he said, further endearing himself to the crowd. 'I might try to go to the city centre if I have time. What I have been doing so far has worked so we will try to switch off together.'
