Lansing City Council Fourth Ward Candidate: Heath Lowry
Website: www.LowryForLansing.com
Heath Lowry is a community advocate, attorney, and neighborhood leader running for Lansing City Council's 4th Ward. A lifelong public servant driven by justice and equity, Heath is committed to bringing a new perspective for a new future. A perspective that prioritizes transparency, inclusivity, and bold leadership to meet Lansing's evolving challenges head-on.
Heath's roots in community engagement run deep. As President of the Westside Neighborhood Association, he has worked closely with neighbors to address public safety concerns, promote responsible development, and enhance quality of life through beautification efforts and civic events. He believes that real change starts block by block with people who care deeply about their city and are willing to roll up their sleeves and lead by example.
Professionally, Heath brings years of legal and policy experience to the table. As an attorney, he has represented marginalized communities, worked on issues of Indigenous sovereignty, and supported survivors of domestic violence navigating complex legal systems. His background in law gives him the tools to understand and shape city policy, while his passion for service grounds his approach in empathy and equity.
Heath's priorities for Lansing include expanding affordable housing through zoning reform and mixed-income developments, investing in sustainable infrastructure like sidewalks and clean energy, and supporting local workers through pro-labor contracting policies. He is a strong advocate for smart growth—development that builds up neighborhoods without displacing long-time residents. Whether it's addressing outdated zoning rules or ensuring city funds are spent responsibly, Heath brings a thoughtful, solutions-oriented mindset to public policy.
One of the defining moments of his time in Lansing came in 2024, when Heath attended the Annual Dance by the River Powwow at Adado Park with his newborn daughter. It was the first public event he brought her to, and it marked a powerful personal and cultural moment, honoring his heritage while standing in community on Lansing's public land. For Heath, it served as a reminder that public service isn't just about policy; it's about people, belonging, and the future we leave for the next generation.
Heath has also been a consistent presence at City Council meetings, advocating for neighborhood priorities and pressing for greater transparency in city governance. He believes residents deserve elected leaders who are accessible, accountable, and deeply rooted in their communities.
Now, Heath is ready to take that work to City Hall. He's running for City Council to build a Lansing where people don't just live, they thrive. Where housing is affordable, streets are walkable, jobs are strong, and the government works for everyone. Heath Lowry for 4th Ward: a steady voice, a fresh perspective, and a fierce advocate for Lansing's future.
City Council members play a vital role in shaping the direction of Lansing. As elected representatives of their wards, they are responsible for legislating city policy, approving the municipal budget, and setting priorities that reflect the values and needs of the community. Council members oversee how public dollars are spent and provide a check on the administrative functions of city government, including decisions made by the mayor's office. They also pass ordinances that influence everything from housing and transportation to public safety, environmental sustainability, and economic development.Equally important is their role as community advocates and conduits for public engagement. Councilmembers listen to the concerns of their constituents and elevate those voices in policymaking discussions. The most effective councilmembers are those who can build consensus while holding true to their values and commitments to the people they serve.To me, serving the City Council means being deeply accessible, regularly present in the community, and committed to transparent and inclusive decision-making. It's more than attending meetings and casting votes, it's about shaping a city that reflects the diversity, resilience, and vision of its residents. It's a role I would carry with humility, urgency, and integrity.
Lansing's housing crisis is real and urgent. We are seeing increasing demand and rising costs that are putting pressure on residents and straining our housing market. As a council member, I will make tackling this crisis a top priority, not just by increasing the number of housing units, but by doing so in a way that promotes equity, sustainability, and neighborhood health.We need zoning reform that encourages responsible density, especially in areas close to transit, jobs, and services. This includes allowing for duplexes, triplexes, and small-scale multi-family housing in previously restricted areas. I will push to streamline the approval process for affordable and workforce housing developments and explore land-use incentives to encourage development on vacant or underutilized lots.Beyond physical development, we must also address the systems that shape affordability. That includes advocating for tenant protections, funding home repair programs for legacy homeowners, and ensuring that city incentives are tied to long-term affordability goals.Addressing the housing crisis isn't just about units, it's about people. We need policies that make it possible for everyone, from young professionals to retirees to working families, to call Lansing home and thrive here.
Disagreements are inevitable in public service, especially when working with a diverse group of leaders committed to their own principles and constituencies. What matters most is how we engage with those differences. If I find myself at odds with a colleague or the Mayor, I will approach the situation with honesty, professionalism, and a commitment to dialogue. I believe the best decisions come from respectful debate grounded in facts, values, and community input.My approach will be to listen first, understand opposing perspectives, and work to find common ground where possible. If consensus isn't achievable, I'll stand firm in my position while being transparent about why. I will clearly explain to the public the rationale behind my vote or stance. Residents deserve to know not only how their representatives vote, but why they vote that way.I also think it's important to demonstrate maturity and collaboration in public service. Lansing needs leaders who can disagree without dividing the community. Leaders who see opposition not as a threat, but as a necessary part of thoughtful policymaking. That's the kind of leadership I bring: principled, clear-headed, and always rooted in service.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen If the Upper Class Paid Taxes at the Same Rate as the Lower Class — Here's What it Said
America's progressive tax system is based on graduated brackets that require higher earners to pay a larger percentage of their income than lower earners — at least on paper. I asked ChatGPT what would happen if the upper class paid taxes at the same rate as the lower class, and it explained that the rich would pay more, not less, if the law were changed to even the rates. In fact, it wrote that 'the U.S. economy and society would experience major shifts.' Here's what it told me. Find Out: Read Next: The Effective Rate Looks Nothing Like the Progressive Brackets ChatGPT explained that, thanks to loopholes and deductions, the effective tax rate — what people actually pay — looks more like the following table than the familiar IRS brackets that levy a 10% income tax on the lowest earners and 37% on the highest. Income Group Average Effective Tax Rate Bottom 20% (low income) 10% to 14% Middle 20% 15% to 18% Top 1% 25% to 27% Top 0.01% 23% or lower due to loopholes and capital gains ChatGPT summed it up with this: 'Despite progressive tax brackets, effective tax rates (what people actually pay after deductions) show that the wealthiest often pay less than their tax bracket — especially if their income comes from investments taxed at lower rates (e.g., capital gains, dividends, carried interest).' Discover More: What Would Change If Everyone Paid the Same Rate? The AI platform created a hypothetical scenario where all Americans paid the same effective rate of 20%. It came up with four dramatic changes that could result. The following is a verbatim recounting of its synopsis. 1. Massive Revenue Increase The ultra-wealthy would pay dramatically more. The top 1% currently hold over 20% of total income and over 40% of wealth. Equalizing their rates with lower earners could generate $500 billion to $1 trillion per year in added federal revenue. This alone could fully fund universal pre-K, child care and perhaps even universal health coverage — without raising anyone else's taxes. 2. Reduced Deficit and Debt The U.S. deficit would shrink significantly. Interest on debt could fall over time, freeing up more government funds for infrastructure, education or emergency reserves. 3. Simpler, Fairer Tax Code With fewer loopholes and income-type preferences (like lower capital gains rates), the tax code would become simpler and more equitable. 4. Behavioral and Economic Reactions Wealthy individuals and corporations might: Shift income offshore, increase tax avoidance Reduce investment (if capital gains are taxed higher) Lobby aggressively to reinstate preferential treatment It's Much Better To Be Rich Today Than 50 Years Ago The platform then provided historical context that puts today's tax framework in perspective with this verbatim response. In the 1950s-'60s, the top marginal tax rate in the U.S. was over 90%, and the economy grew rapidly. Today, the top 1% pay a smaller share of their wealth and income than they did 40 to 50 years ago. So the real impact is less about 'raising the rich to poor's rate' and more about closing loopholes that let the rich pay less than their tax bracket. Summary ChatGPT closed by summarizing its report with the following word-for-word synopsis. If the rich paid the same effective rate as the poor: Massive new federal revenue Potential for big public investments or deficit reduction Greater tax fairness Possible economic tradeoffs from investment shifts or tax planning More From GOBankingRates 7 Tax Loopholes the Rich Use To Pay Less and Build More Wealth This article originally appeared on I Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen If the Upper Class Paid Taxes at the Same Rate as the Lower Class — Here's What it Said Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Fox News
26 minutes ago
- Fox News
Mamdani's ideas already backfired in another major US city
Rep. Mark Alford, R-Mo. joins 'Fox & Friends' to explain the problems with Zohran Mamdani's campaign promises.


CNN
26 minutes ago
- CNN
Top DOJ official to meet with Ghislaine Maxwell on Thursday
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche is expected to meet with Ghislaine Maxwell on Thursday, two people familiar with the meeting tell CNN, as President Donald Trump continues to face backlash over the Jeffrey Epstein saga. The meeting comes after the Department of Justice said earlier this week it had reached out to Epstein's former associate, with Blanche saying in a statement on Tuesday that if 'Ghislane Maxwell has information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims, the FBI and the DOJ will hear what she has to say.' It comes as many of Trump's supporters have demanded the release of more information about the accused sex trafficker alongside growing concerns for transparency among Republicans on Capitol Hill. The House Oversight subcommittee voted Wednesday to subpoena the DOJ for files related to Epstein in a surprise move amounting to a show of defiance by some House Republicans against Speaker Mike Johnson. Johnson has attempted to tamp down on efforts to push the release of the so-called Epstein files and shut the door on the possibility of a House vote on releasing information on Epstein before the August recess. The subpoena calls for the Epstein files in the Justice Department's possession to be provided to Congress, but for the names of the victims to be redacted. It also calls for communications between former Biden officials and the Justice Department related to the Epstein matter, in addition to depositions among some major figures, including Bill and Hillary Clinton and former FBI Director James Comey. Last week, the Justice Department asked a federal judge to make public years-old grand jury testimony against Epstein, though a Florida federal judge on Wednesday declined to release additional grand jury documents from the criminal investigation into Epstein. Maxwell was sentenced in 2022 to 20 years in federal prison for carrying out a years-long scheme with Epstein to groom and sexually abuse underage girls. She has continued to appeal her conviction.