High Court rules UK can continue supplying F-35 components to 'Israel'
The case, brought by Palestinian rights organization Al-Haq and the Global Legal Action Network, sought to force the UK to withdraw from a multilateral defense program with the United States, which manufactures the F-35 jets. The UK provides around 15 percent of every jet's components, many of which are pooled and accessible to 'Israel' through the international program.
The government had previously suspended about 30 arms export licenses to 'Israel' in September 2023 over concerns that British-made weapons might be used in violations of international humanitarian law. However, it argued that fully exiting the F-35 program could jeopardize international security cooperation and damage relations with key allies such as the US and NATO.
The two presiding judges ruled that decisions of such political and diplomatic sensitivity rest with the executive branch, not the courts. 'That acutely sensitive and political issue is a matter for the executive which is democratically accountable to parliament and ultimately to the electorate, not for the courts,' they said.
Human rights organizations reacted with strong disappointment. Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, which intervened in the case, criticized the ruling as a failure to uphold the UK's international legal obligations.
'The horrifying reality in Gaza is unfolding in full view of the world: entire families obliterated, civilians killed in so-called safe zones, hospitals reduced to rubble, and a population driven into starvation by a cruel blockade and forced displacement,' said Sacha Deshmukh, CEO of Amnesty International UK. 'This judgment does not change the facts on the ground, nor does it absolve the UK government of its responsibilities under international law.'
Oxfam, which also submitted evidence, condemned the UK's ongoing participation in the F-35 program. 'It is unconscionable that the government would continue to license the sale of components for F-35 jets knowing that they are used to deliberately attack civilians in Gaza and destroy their means of survival, including vital water supplies,' the organization said in a statement.
The government responded by saying it will continue to review defense export licenses, adding, 'The court has upheld this government's thorough and lawful decision-making on this matter.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Roya News
2 hours ago
- Roya News
Hamas orders Gaza clan leader 'Yasser Abu Shabab' to surrender, accuses him of treason
Gaza's Revolutionary Court has issued a 10-day deadline for a man accused of serious national security offenses to turn himself in, warning that failure to do so will result in a trial in absentia. The court identified the suspect as Yasser Jihad Mansour Abu Shabab, born February 27, 1990, and residing in Rafah. In a formal statement released Wednesday, the court announced that Abu Shabab faces the following charges: Treason and collaboration with hostile entities, in violation of Article 131 Forming an armed gang, under Article 176 Armed insurrection, as per Article 168 The ruling stated that the accused has until July 12, 2025, to surrender to the competent authorities for prosecution. If he fails to comply, he will be declared a fugitive and tried in absentia, the court stated. Authorities also warned that anyone found harboring or concealing Abu Shabab would be considered complicit in aiding a fugitive and subject to legal consequences. Shortly after the court's announcement, a statement was released by Abu Shabab's supporters in a post on the Facebook page that usually carried the group's announcements, denouncing the charges as politically motivated and rejecting the authority of Hamas' judiciary. 'Brother Yasser Abu Shabab is safe and will return soon with major national projects aimed at justice, dignity, and service to our people,' the statement said. It dismissed the court as a 'theatrical farce issuing orders from hideouts in hospitals and schools,' accusing Hamas of using the judiciary to suppress dissent. 'These illegitimate courts are tools of repression with no popular legitimacy,' the statement continued. 'They should prosecute those responsible for dragging our people into the catastrophe of October 7, leading to famine and the attempted erasure of our cause.' The message also called on Hamas to hold its own members accountable for corruption and abuses since its 2007 takeover of Gaza, pointing to exploitative financial practices, mismanagement of aid, and sheltering of armed gangs. Hamas has not responded publicly to the statement. Broader controversy: Alleged coordination with 'Israel' The charges come amid heightened controversy following a rare public admission by 'Israeli' Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who previously claimed that 'Israel' has 'activated' certain Palestinian clans in Gaza to counter Hamas. While Netanyahu offered few details, an 'Israeli' official later confirmed the move was directed at supporting the Popular Forces, the very group led by Abu Shabab. According to reports, the Popular Forces have been active in 'Israeli'-controlled zones of Rafah, helping secure food convoys run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a body tied to the ongoing humanitarian aid efforts in southern Gaza. However, the group has also been accused by aid workers and Palestinian officials of attacking and looting those very shipments. Nahed Sheheiber, head of Gaza's private transport union, previously accused Abu Shabab's supporters of repeated attacks on aid trucks. 'The ones who looted aid are now the ones protecting it,' he said. As a response to these allegations, the Abu Shabab family itself has previously disavowed Yasser Abu Shabab, saying he and his followers no longer represent them and denouncing his alleged ties with the 'Israeli' military.
Ammon
3 hours ago
- Ammon
Can Israel survive without the West? The answer reveals our collective power
The Israeli genocide in Gaza, along with the escalating regional wars it has ignited, has brought two chilling truths into our focus: first, Israel is deliberately and aggressively undermining the security and stability of the entire Middle East and, second, Israel is utterly incapable of surviving on its own. These two assertions, though seemingly distinct, are inextricably linked. For if those who relentlessly sustain Israel, militarily, politically, and economically, were to finally withdraw their support, the Middle East would not be the powder keg it has been for decades, a situation that has catastrophically worsened since October 7, 2023. Though no oversimplification is intended, the brutal reality is that all it would take is for Israel to withdraw from Gaza, allowing the devastated, genocide-stricken Strip the faintest chance to heal. Over 56,000 Palestinians, including more than 17,000 children and 28,000 women, have been brutally slaughtered since the commencement of this war, a horrifying tally expected to surge dramatically when comprehensive investigations into the missing are finally conducted. Only then could the process of returning to some semblance of normalcy begin, where the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people must be fiercely championed within an international system built, at least theoretically, upon unwavering respect for basic human rights and international law. The abhorrent "might makes right" maxim would have to be utterly expunged from any future political equation. Middle Eastern countries, both Arab and Muslim, must finally rise to the occasion, stepping up decisively to aid their brethren and to ensure that Israel is powerless to divide their ranks. For Israel, this demand is simply impossible, a non-starter and, understandably so, from its colonial perspective. Why? "Invasion is a structure, not an event," the influential scholar Patrick Wolfe has famously asserted. This profound statement unequivocally means that Israel's wars, commencing with the ethnic cleansing of Palestine, the Nakba, of 1948, and all subsequent wars and military occupations, were not random historical coincidences, but rather integral components of an enduring structure of power designed to eliminate the indigenous population. This renders as simply false the notion that Israel's behavior after October 7 was solely driven by revenge and devoid of strategy. We are perhaps excused for failing to initially grasp this distinction, given the grisly, unspeakable nature of the Israeli actions in Gaza and the palpable sense of perverse pleasure Israel seems to derive from the daily murder of innocent people. Yet, the language emanating from Israel was chillingly clear about its true motives. As Benjamin Netanyahu declared on October 7, 2023, 'we will turn Gaza into a deserted island'. That has always been an intrinsic, unchanging part of Israel's colonial structure, and it will remain so unless it is decisively reined in. But who possesses the will and power to rein in Israel? Israel operates through a network of enablers, benefactors who have long viewed Israel's existence as an indispensable colonial fortress serving the interests of Western colonialism. 'The connection between the Israeli people and the American people is bone deep. (...) We're united in our shared values,' Joe Biden declared with striking conviction in July 2022. Without even bothering to question those "shared values" that somehow permit Israel to perpetrate a genocide while the US actively sustains it, Biden was undeniably honest in his stark depiction that the relationship between both countries transcends mere politics. Other Western leaders blindly parrot the same perception. The unfolding genocide, however, has spurred some Western, and a multitude of non-Western, governments to courageously speak out against the Israeli war, Netanyahu, and his extremist ideology in ways unprecedented since Israel's very establishment. For some of these countries, notably Spain, Norway, Ireland, and Slovenia, among others, the proverbial 'bond' is demonstrably 'breakable' and their support is most certainly not 'unequivocal'. There are various theories as to why some Western governments dare to challenge Israel, while others stubbornly refuse. That important discussion aside, shattering the bond between Israel and the West is absolutely critical, not only for a just peace to finally prevail, but for the very survival of the Palestinian people. The nearly 21 agonizing months of unrelenting Israeli genocide have taught us a brutal lesson: Israel is, after all, a vassal state, utterly unable to fight its own wars, to defend itself or even to sustain its own economy without the direct, massive support of the US and others. Prior to the war, there were occasional outbursts from Israeli officials proclaiming that Israel is an independent country, not 'another star on the US flag'. These voices have since been largely silenced, replaced by a constant stream of begging and pleading for the US to come to Israel's rescue. While Palestinians continue to stand with legendary courage to resist the Israeli military occupation and apartheid, those who genuinely care about international law, justice, and peace must take decisive action by directly confronting governments that persist in helping Israel sustain the genocide in Gaza and the destabilization of the Middle East. Governments like Spain and others are doing what many had not expected only years ago: Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez is powerfully advocating for the suspension of the EU-Israel Association Agreement, an extensive trade deal in place since 2000, due to "the catastrophic situation of genocide." If more such governments were to adopt a similar, uncompromising stance, Israel would be choked off, at least from acquiring the very murder weapons it uses to carry out its barbaric genocide. It is our collective responsibility to march in lockstep behind such courageous voices and demand uncompromising accountability, not only from Israel, but from those who are actively sustaining its Israeli settler colonial structure. Ramzy Baroud is a journalist, author and the Editor of The Palestine Chronicle. He is the author of six books. His latest book, co-edited with Ilan Pappé, is 'Our Vision for Liberation: Engaged Palestinian Leaders and Intellectuals Speak Out'. His other books include 'My Father was a Freedom Fighter' and 'The Last Earth'. Baroud is a Non-resident Senior Research Fellow at the Center for Islam and Global Affairs (CIGA).
Jordan News
6 hours ago
- Jordan News
PM: National economic indicators are encouraging - Jordan News
Prime Minister Jafar Hassan said on Tuesday that figures on national economic indicators are encouraging, reflecting improved performance in growth, trade and investment. اضافة اعلان During a meeting with the Progress Party's parliamentary bloc, attended by Acting Speaker of the House of Representatives Mustafa Khasawneh, the Prime Minister expressed hope that the momentum will continue and that the positive indicators will strengthen further. He noted that despite challenges in the mining sector caused by global conditions and fluctuating prices, the overall economic indicators would have reached record levels if not for these external factors. Hassan highlighted government efforts to support the tourism sector, which was significantly affected by regional tensions. He indicated positive signs of recovery, with increased activity expected during the upcoming tourism season in September. Emphasising that economic stability remains a top priority, he outlined plans aimed at achieving sustainable growth, creating jobs and supporting private sector development. He discussed major strategic projects across transport, water, infrastructure and energy sectors, stressing their importance in attracting foreign investment and achieving economic goals. He underlined the government's focus on economic modernisation through supporting the private sector, expanding its role and incentivising investment in industrial cities and development zones across governorates. Regarding public sector modernisation, he emphasised enhancing efficiency through digital transformation, institutional development and training programmes to improve citizen services. He reaffirmed the government's commitment to political modernisation, including the development of the Local Administration Law, aimed at strengthening municipal governance and addressing issues such as debt and service quality. The goal is to balance improved performance with governance reforms while maintaining democratic processes. Acting House of Representatives Speaker Mustafa Khasawneh highlighted the constitutional framework governing the relationship between the legislature and the executive, emphasising the importance of oversight in serving national interests. He praised the government's outreach to governorates and efforts to ease people's burdens amid economic challenges. Khasawneh noted that political modernisation has reshaped parliamentary work, reflecting Jordan's progress toward sustainable development and reform. Head of the Progress Party's parliamentary bloc MP Raed Dhahrawi commended King Abdullah II's efforts to promote regional peace and stability, especially regarding the Palestinian cause. He referenced the King's speech in Strasbourg, which outlined a roadmap emphasising a two-state solution and the need to resolve regional conflicts. Dhahrawi called for enhanced oversight in vital sectors such as health to safeguard people's well-being. The meeting included an extensive discussion, with members raising questions and proposals, addressed by the Prime Minister and relevant ministers. Attending the session were Minister of State for Economic Affairs Muhannad Shehadeh; Minister of Political and Parliamentary Affairs Abdul Moneim Al Odat; and Minister of Labor Khaled Bakkar.
