logo
How Kier Starmer's government is scoring with the public one year since the North East turned red

How Kier Starmer's government is scoring with the public one year since the North East turned red

ITV News13 hours ago
It was just a year after his landslide election victory, but following a high-profile humiliation, Sir Keir Starmer seriously considered quitting.
I'm actually talking about how he won the Labour leadership in April 2020, and has admitted he thought about stepping down after defeat at the Hartlepool by-election the following May - rather than any indication that he's considering his future as Prime Minister, following the mess made of welfare reforms this week.
It is a reminder that he's succeeded in turning things around before.
Then, surely more than anything, he benefited from Conservative implosion.
But the late spring of 2021 is also seen as a turning point, when he moved away from a message of unity following Jeremy Corbyn's leadership, and took on the left of his party, moving it to the centre ground - from where he won a thumping majority of MPs at last summer's general election.
However, any impression that he had the backing of a 400-strong army of loyal 'Starmtroopers' has now been well and truly shattered, with a rebellion against the government's plans for the benefits system leading to the low point of his premiership so far.
Labour MPs from the North East and North Yorkshire were at the heart of some extraordinary scenes in the Commons on Tuesday 1 July.
York Central's Rachael Maskell, author of the final amendment trying to block the bill, claimed it would lead to "Dickensian cuts" to support for some of the most vulnerable people in society.
Shortly before the vote, Disability Minister Stephen Timms then announced a final huge concession - changes to eligibility for Personal Independence Payment would not take effect until after the conclusions of a review he's leading.
Blyth and Ashington MP Ian Lavery angrily declared, "This is crazy, man. This is outrageous, man," about the handling of the situation.
City of Durham MP Mary Kelly Foy said: "I popped out for a banana earlier on, and when I came back in, things had changed again, so I'm even more unclear on what I'm voting on."
That prompted laughter from colleagues in the Commons, but there's been little reason for ministers to be amused, even if Rachel Reeves' tears at PMQs the following day were due to a "personal issue."
Despite the capitulation on the contents of the welfare bill, eight Labour MPs from our region still voted against it.
Most of them are firmly left-wing, part of a relatively small caucus that remains within Labour's parliamentary ranks.
And, with some timing, we've now seen the announcement of plans to form a new left-wing party, involving Mr Corbyn.
It's not wise, though, to get too carried away at this stage - who remembers Change UK?
The biggest threat to Labour surely remains Reform UK, as evidenced in May's local elections in our region, and with opinion polls suggesting they would make huge gains across the North East and North Yorkshire if a general election was held now.
Chris Eynon, who came second in Sunderland Central last year, told us: "the Red Wall is very, very prime for the taking for the Reform party."
They won their first seat on North Tyneside Council this week, though also lost one to the Liberal Democrats in County Durham.
That came after one of Reform's councillors resigned within days of being elected, because he also worked for the council and you're not allowed to do both.
It's the kind of mishap that opponents will hope to see repeated in the coming months and years, as Reform are really tested for the first time, running Durham County Council and nine others around the country.
Of course the final years of Conservative rule at Westminster became defined by a certain level of chaos.Former Berwick MP Anne-Marie Trevelyan was moved between six different cabinet or ministerial roles within five years.
She told me this week that the Tories need to gradually rebuild confidence, trying to re-assert themselves as "the sensible party".
Of course Labour pledged to bring stability, when they all but swept the board in the North East on their way into government last summer.
Bridget Phillipson was the country's first confirmed MP that night, thanks to the speedy Sunderland counting system.
She became one of the Prime Minister's key lieutenants as Education Secretary, and we spoke to her today (4 July) after she made a speech to teachers in the North East about making sure children are ready to start school.
On the election anniversary, she told us, "We haven't got everything right and I think we'd be the first to acknowledge that, but I'm really proud of the achievements of the last year," pointing to investment in schools, free breakfast clubs, and childcare places within her remit.
On room for improvement, she seemed to agree with analysis that ministers haven't been good enough at setting out a real narrative and vision, saying the government should be "clearer in communicating what we're doing".
That surely applies to any focus on supporting regions like the North East to tackle regional inequalities - what the Conservatives used to call "levelling up".
More quietly, Labour have looked to work closely with regional mayors, and tweaked borrowing and value-for-money rules to allow longer-term investment.
We've seen the announcement of the Tyne and Wear Metro being extended to Washington, but also the cancellation of plans to upgrade the A1 in Northumberland.
The recent spending review promised investment in 350 deprived areas around the UK, which it's expected will mean funding for things like youth clubs, libraries and community-run grocers, in an effort to bring visible change.
That does feel similar to the last government's various funding pots for local regeneration schemes.
More widely, Labour ministers argue they have set their own direction by making "tough decisions."
It's too early for much data to show whether they've set the country on the right course.
But, for example, the future of the two-child benefit cap was a controversial topic when I interviewed Bridget Phillipson a week into her new government role last July, and it's an issue that remains to be resolved now.
Another fight with Labour MPs looks likely - particularly with expected welfare savings now lost, the Chancellor having pledged not to raise taxes on "working people", and little sign of roaring economic growth materialising.
The next year doesn't look much easier.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Banning Orange marches would be bad idea
Banning Orange marches would be bad idea

The National

time44 minutes ago

  • The National

Banning Orange marches would be bad idea

As a republican socialist from an Irish Catholic tradition who supports Celtic FC, Scottish independence and a united Ireland, it should go without saying that I fundamentally disagree with the pro-Union, pro-monarchy ideology of the Orange Order. But I also fundamentally disagree with the notion of banning the Orange Order, for both practical and principled reasons. Practically, it would not diminish sectarianism. It would have the opposite effect. Numbers attending these annual rituals have declined steeply during my lifetime. Until recently, most people were unaware of the existence of Kneecap and Bob Vylan. Today, thanks to the ham-fisted authoritarianism of Keir Starmer, the BBC and the police, their popularity has soared along with their notoriety. READ MORE: Court bid to block Palestine Action terrorist ban fails There are also broader principles at stake. By demanding that the state use its powers against organisations we find offensive, we legitimise the accelerating trend towards repression sweeping the globe. The overwhelming vote in the House of Commons this week to ban Palestine Action is a chilling warning of what we are up against. Those of us who support an independent Scotland should not mimic the right. Authoritarianism is a hallmark not of strength and confidence but offweakness. The green, white and orange tricolour was adopted as the national flag of Ireland by the insurgent republican movement in 1919 to symbolise peace and unity across the religious and cultural divide. Like it or loathe it, Orangeism is part of the identity of a significant minority of Scots. A confident, modern nation should be prepared to live with that. It should guarantee protection of the rights of minority groups irrespective of whether they meet with our approval. Yes, many people are offended by Orange marches. No doubt I will be deluged with objections that those involved in the Orange Order are bigots and knuckle-draggers who don't belong in a forward-looking Scotland. The behaviour of some who turn out to support marches – invariably intoxicated – has contributed to the stereotype. The truth is many Orange Order members are embarrassed by the conduct of those they call the 'hangers-on' because it undermines their quest for respectability. To tar everyone with the same brush because of the moronic behaviour of some is unfair – and the same point applies to all organisations, from football clubs to political parties. It also fails to understand the complexities of identity, community, friendship, loyalty and tradition. I grew up and spent most of my adult life in some of the poorest parts of Glasgow where Irish republicanism and Orange loyalism have long co-existed side by side. I've attended Orange funerals. I stood on Poll Tax human barricades alongside staunch loyalists and ardent Irish republicans. I raised money outside Celtic Park with striking miners from Ayrshire who were careful to conceal their King Billy tattoos. I had members of the Orange Order, along with Irish republican activists, display posters in support of my socialist candidacy in a council by-election in Govan years before the peace process in Northern Ireland. (Image: David Wardle) Yes, there is a core of anti-Catholicism in the Orange tradition. Importantly, for the official Orange Order, it is directed at the institution and the doctrines of the church, rather towards individual Catholics And even then its criticisms are mild in tone and content compared, for example, to the views expressed by Richard Dawkins, and many others of an atheist persuasion. Ten years ago, there was a great outpouring of support among liberals and leftists for the Paris-based magazine Charlie Hebdo after 12 of its employees were massacred by two Muslim gunmen. The cartoons that provoked the atrocity were more brutally offensive by far in their depiction of Islam than any criticism of Catholicism ever made by the Orange Order. But the 'Je Suis Charlie' upsurge was not an expression of agreement with the vile cartoons. It was a defence of the right of free expression. There are more insidious and dangerous forces to be concerned about than the dwindling and ageing membership of the Orange Order. Who do we proscribe next? Nigel Farage and Reform UK? Or is Nigel, with his millions of voters and huge public profile, too big to ban? So, like Keir Starmer, do we just concentrate on the easier targets? These are just the questions we need to address before playing with fire. Much of the wisdom of the ancient Greeks is still highly relevant today, so be very careful what you wish for, as they warned.

Readers' letters: Labour rebels were elected with a welfare reform mandate
Readers' letters: Labour rebels were elected with a welfare reform mandate

Scotsman

timean hour ago

  • Scotsman

Readers' letters: Labour rebels were elected with a welfare reform mandate

A reader says Rachel Reeves' tears would be understandable if they were about Labour rebels wrecking her work to reform the benefits system Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... If Rachel Reeves had said she was crying because a large section of Labour MPs comprehensively destroyed her and Work and Pension Secretary Liz Kendall's hard, vital work and plans to make a few small steps to reform the benefits system and booted it into the long grass I doubt there'd be so much puerile fuss, including the undertones on BBC Scotland's Morning Call that narrowly avoided diagnosing it as a girlie thing. The truth is these rebels were elected on a manifesto that included welfare reform, so the basics of it were well known – as were the dire financial implications of the current torrent of claims and claimants. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Perhaps these two ministers should just have resigned, explained why, precipitated the increasingly inevitable Greece 2009 collapse facing this country and trigger the brutal policies that entails. Rachel Reeves looked visibly tearful as Keir Starmer spoke during Prime Minister's Questions in the House of Commons on Wednesday (Picture: House of Commons/UK Parliament/PA Wire) The world has moved on from the draconian undertones of the 1834 Poor Law's 'deserving and undeserving poor' but surely few could disagree with the argument put forward by former Labour MP Tom Harris in the media this week that the objectives of reform should be aimed 'squarely at those who have given up trying to get a job and have decided they would prefer to rely on benefits long-term'. Allan Sutherland, Stonehaven, Aberdeenshire Reform imperative Wednesday's backbench rebellion has undermined the Prime Minister's reputation and that of his Chancellor. In effect it has driven a coach and horses through planned savings on welfare of £5 billion and has imperilled the sanctity of the Chancellor's 'fiscal rules'. Politically sensitive tax rises in the Autumn Budget are now a virtual lock-in. Ouch! It's enough to bring tears to the Chancellor's eyes. However, none of this should be allowed to obscure the challenges of welfare reform that remain. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Institute of Fiscal Studies has reported that more than four million people of working age currently receive some kind of health benefit (ten per cent of the workforce). This is expected to rise to around 5.5 million by the end of the Parliament. This is unsustainable! We have a system unfit for purpose, and one which can be easily gamed. The failure of Labour (soft and hard) to acknowledge the consensus around these shortcomings perhaps says more about ideological desires to pursue redistribution policies – albeit by the back door – regardless of the wider social and economic consequences. The inefficiency of the present system is an obvious misuse of scarce public resources. The real injustice here is the diversion of these resources away from those who are most in need of genuine welfare support. Moreover, cost-cutting can never be the primary justification for fundamental change in this sensitive policy area: fundamental reform remains an urgent imperative in and for its own sake! Ewen Peters, Newton Mearns, East Renfrewshire Head over heels The Labour government has made so many U-turns that Keir Starmer doesn't know whether he is standing on his head or his heels, but he has a number of options. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He could resign, which is unlikely, or he could threaten to call a snap election, which would frighten many of his MPs who have got used to their £90k salary, index-linked pension and other freebies, but have Reform UK snapping at their heels. Many welfare recipients have got used to their easy life and in fact have become institutionalised, as the balance between work and welfare is quite narrow and many just don't want the bother of having to work. One easy solution which would not come into force immediately would be to freeze welfare payments just as the the personal tax allowance has been frozen. James Macintyre, Linlithgow, West Lothian Dig deeper Perhaps, the highly gutted Welfare Reform Bill will turn out to be a benefit in disguise for a beleaguered Labour government. With the loathsome moves withdrawn, we're left with a reasonably decent Bill at some cost. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Welfare is not the only aspect of government that is broken. The NHS and education are also stretched to breaking point, and I would suggest that the tax system is broken too. Only defence seems exempt. Rachel Reeves is constrained by her own self-imposed fiscal limits. If they were removed, as the German equivalent was recently, so much that is broken could begin to be repaired. Quite frankly, all of us who can afford it should be paying more tax, and those who can't, less. The Patriotic Millionaires, for example, are desperate to increase their share. For far too long, raising taxes has been the elephant in the room, which has never been a vote winner. Perhaps, just perhaps, it is now. If we could be assured that our increased taxes went towards the urgent repair of our NHS, education and welfare, we'd be prepared, I'm quite sure, to delve deeper into our financial pockets. All three deserve nothing less. Ian Petrie, Edinburgh Forced laughter Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad We have all been to that family wedding where unpopular members of the extended family attend whom, normally, we avoid. We engage in the forced laughter, the exaggerated smiles and back slapping to ensure the day is not ruined. Equally risible was that wonderfully over the top public show of support as Rachel Reeves unexpectedly turned up to join Sir Keir Starmer and Wes Streeting at the launch of the ten-year plan for England's NHS in East London. It surely gave 'fake news' new meaning. John V Lloyd, Inverkeithing, Fife Turn back time The election of Keir Starmer with a near-landslide majority last year I considered great news. I confess freely that was mainly because he deflated the SNP. To say I have been disappointed since would be a gross understatement. The trouble is, if I abandon Labour, where could I possibly turn? The Tories are in as bad if not worse a mess; the Lib Dems are wishy-washy and the Greens in Scotland a gender-obsessed joke; the SNP unthinkable. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Can we turn the clock back please to the halcyon days of pre-devolution? Alexander McKay, Edinburgh Critical thinking I was disappointed to read Jenny Lindsay's latest opinion piece: 'Self-righteous zealots driven by hate decided I was a 'genocidal Terf'' (Scotsman, 3 July). Surely Scottish feminism is not this myopic? Without a doubt, the ongoing genocide in Gaza is one of the world's most pressing feminist concerns. Tens of thousands of Palestinian women and girls are being killed, maimed, displaced, bereaved and subjected to sexual violence by Israel's military forces, according to the UN. War is always a feminist issue. Palestinian women at the forefront of their nation's cause are supported by an international network of feminists that stretches all the way to Scotland. In the last few years, I have met so many incredible women from all over the country who are marching, writing, fundraising and speaking out for peace. This is the reality of the pro-Palestinian movement. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad I know many women are bruised by Scotland's shockingly toxic debate on gender reform in recent years. Like Jenny, I took my fair share of misogynistic abuse as a candidate at the last Scottish Parliament election. I don't doubt people are still saying appalling things to gender critical women on the internet. But social media doesn't represent real people or real movements. Its profit-seeking algorithms feed on and amplify hate and abuse. It's time for Scottish feminists to pull themselves out of the maelstrom. There is so much real work to do. Catriona MacDonald, Glasgow Publicity seekers I don't understand some of the comments amongst readers about Kneecap and Bob Vylan's controversial outbursts during performances at Glastonbury, the latest being Lewis Finnie (Letters, 3 July). The real reason for the behavior of these so-called artists is to draw attention to themselves and seek publicity. They have little interest in the people of Gaza. If they did, they would be actively helping them rather than mouthing off about the IDF. Benjamin Netanyahu and his despotic regime control the IDF and it is they that should be condemned. The BBC should ban airing 'high risk' labelled acts such as Bob Vylan, not just live feeds. With all the publicity, these acts portray themselves as martyrs and gain sympathy amongst the weak-minded. Prancing on a stage and getting fans wound up through hate speech is one thing, it's another to donate their fee to help the Gaza victims or be called out as hypocrites. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mr Finnie suggests that the war will end with the elimination of Hamas, I would beg to differ. Leaving Netanyahu in power risks a wider conflict in the Middle East and tens of thousands more innocent civilians deaths in another bloodbath. By stating 'yes innocents die' he dismisses the current apocalypse as collateral damage. Really? Neil Anderson, Edinburgh Seating plan On a recent visit to Haymarket station in Edinburgh I was dismayed that the large waiting hall before the ticket barriers had seats for coffee concessions – but not a single public seat for the travelling public or those meeting them. That simply isn't good enough. Christopher Ruane, Lanark, South Lanarkshire Write to The Scotsman

Tell us what you think of Starmer's Labour party after one year in UK government
Tell us what you think of Starmer's Labour party after one year in UK government

Wales Online

timean hour ago

  • Wales Online

Tell us what you think of Starmer's Labour party after one year in UK government

Tell us what you think of Starmer's Labour party after one year in UK government One year has passed since Keir Starmer was elected to power on July 5, 2024 Today marks a year since Sir Keir Starmer became UK prime minister (Image: PA ) Labour may have ruled Wales for 26 years in the Senedd, but when the UK party won the 2024 General Election, it marked their return to power in Westminster for the first time since 2010. It was a landslide victory, Keir Starmer's party securing one of its biggest ever majorities in the House of Commons. In Wales, they won the majority of seats but saw its vote share fall in many areas and the party lost key target seats to Plaid Cymru. A year on there are many causes for concern in the party, dividing party members and politicians both in the UK and Welsh branch. You can read our political editor Ruth Mosalski's report of the Welsh Labour conference this week here: Fear and loathing in Labour: A party on the edge, angry at Drakeford, Morgan and Starmer. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here . Add to the debate in our comments secton below. Article continues below Tell us how you feel in our poll below or you can open it here:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store