'Martin Lewis tip helped me get back £31,674 from HMRC - others are owed money too'
A fan of Martin Lewis has explained how she managed to reclaim more than £31,000 from HMRC after following his advice.
The MoneySavingExpert.com reader, known only as Cilla, had unknowingly been underpaid her state pension for 15 years. The issue relates to an old version of National Insurance credits, known as Home Responsibilities Protection (HRP).
HRP reduced the number of qualifying years you need on your National Insurance record to claim the state pension - however, an investigation found thousands of people, mainly women who had to take time off work to look after children or other family members, did not have the correct level of HRP applied to their National Insurance record.
It was revealed that Child Benefit claim forms submitted before 2000 did not include a National Insurance number - and this led to HRP not being correctly applied to National Insurance records.
You could be impacted by this error if you made a claim for Child Benefit between 1978 and 2000. Your National Insurance record is used to determine if you receive the full amount of state pension in later life.
As HRP was designed to reduce the number of years you need, missing out on this protection means you may have gaps in your National Insurance record and may not be getting the full amount of state pension that you're entitled to.
HRP was replaced by National Insurance credits from 2010 onwards. MSE reader Cilla wrote into the money-saving website to explain her success at claiming backpay.
Her story was published in the latest MSE newsletter. She said: " I've just received 15yrs' back pay from HMRC of £31,674 for underpayment of my pension. Thank you."
Latest figures from HMRC shows 370,000 women have been contacted regarding potential underpayments, with the Department for Work and Pensions ( DWP) paying back £7,859 on average per person, so far.
Of those who responded to the letters, HMRC identified 5,344 cases of underpayments between January 8 and September 30, 2024, totalling approximately £42million in arrears.
It's believed 43,000 of those who are estimated to be affected by the historic error are now deceased, but their families can claim on their behalf. Those over pension age are being prioritised and contacted first by HMRC.
If you suspect you have missed out, you should first check your state pension and your National Insurance record. If there are gaps in your National Insurance record between 1978 to 2010, and you took time off work to care for someone during this time, then you may be missing HRP.
You can make a claim for missing HRP by using the online service on GOV.UK, or by filling out this form and posting it back to HMRC.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
‘I took a lump sum from my late wife's pension. Why have I been taxed?'
Write to Pensions Doctor with your pension problem: pensionsdoctor@ Columns are published weekly. Dear Charlene, My wife died on February 1 this year. She was the recipient of a small pension paid from her former employer. I was aware that I had an entitlement to half her pension. However, when the offer letter arrived, it stated that I was entitled to take a lump sum, which I have done. I've sent you copies of the letters from the scheme. When payment was made by the pension fund, income tax was deducted at 20pc on the whole amount. This is my correct tax rate for other income. Although this was my wife's pension fund, am I entitled to any of it tax-free? I've read that some pensions can be paid tax-free when someone dies. Would that be the whole amount tax-free, or just the 25pc allowance, or nothing at all? When we retired in 2001, our pension funds did not come anywhere close to the new maximum allowance of £268,275. Sincerely yours, – Gary Dear Gary, Please accept my condolences on the death of your wife. I've had a look at the documentation you've sent, and I'm afraid you are unlikely to be due any tax-free payments from your wife's former scheme, for reasons I will explain. I also think HMRC has probably applied the correct tax rate to the lump sum you've been paid. Your late wife was receiving a 'scheme pension' from her former employer's scheme, which is a type of secure pension, payable directly from an employer's defined benefit scheme. The exact details vary, as they depend on the rules for each scheme, but benefits can be paid to a spouse or dependants when the original pension member passes away. Where retirement benefits have already started, and have been in payment for some time, the option is usually a reduced pension to a surviving spouse or other dependant. As you mention, your wife's scheme would have paid you 50pc of her ongoing pension. Some dependant's pensions can be commuted and taken as a lump sum if worth £30,000 or less. In pensions jargon, this is known as a 'trivial commutation lump sum death benefit', but put simply, involves exchanging the ongoing small pension for a lump sum that ends your rights to ongoing payments from the scheme. This is the option you chose. Taxation A spouse's pension (including one commuted as a lump sum) from a defined benefit scheme will be taxable as income for whoever receives it – even if the original pension holder died before age 75. This is different to the death benefits that can be paid from other types of pensions, like self-invested personal pensions (Sipps). For defined contribution schemes where there is an unused pension pot, a beneficiary will not pay income tax on what they receive if the member passed away before reaching age 75. Income tax is payable on withdrawals paid to beneficiaries of a pension holder who died after reaching age 75, and unused pots will be included in estates for inheritance tax from April 6 2027. As you've mentioned, the scheme administrator has deducted 20pc income tax from the whole of the lump sum payable to you. Based on what you've told me, and that you've mentioned you're already a basic (20pc) taxpayer, I think this was the correct way to tax the payment. You'd already be a basic-rate taxpayer if you are receiving your state pension and this, together with any other pensions or taxable income, is worth more than the tax-free personal allowance of £12,570 each year, but less than £50,270. Anyone who thinks they have been overtaxed on a lump sum payment paid when someone has died can contact HMRC. It has different forms depending on the situation, and will usually process any repayments within 30 days. Tax-free cash allowance When someone accesses their own pension, they can usually take up to 25pc of the value as a tax-free lump sum. But there is also an overall cap on the value of the tax-free lump sums someone can receive from their pensions in their lifetime. This is the lump sum allowance of £268,275 that you've referred to. Unfortunately, you do not inherit unused lump sum allowance from other people. As I've mentioned above, some death benefits can be paid entirely tax-free if the pension holder died before age 75, but for defined benefit pensions, any spouse's or dependant's pension will always be taxable. I hope I've explained how and why you've paid tax on the lump sum. If you do think you might have paid too much tax, then please do get in contact with HMRC. Yours sincerely, – Charlene Charlene Young is a pensions and savings expert at online investment platform AJ Bell. Her columns should not be taken as advice or as a personal recommendation, but as a starting point for readers to undertake their own further research.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
HMRC could reclaim money saved using schemes to avoid VAT on school fees, experts say
Money saved using schemes to avoid paying VAT on private school fees could be clawed back by the government, tax experts have said, after it was revealed that the schemes had raised more than £500m. Analysis by the Daily Telegraph found that UK's wealthiest private schools took in £500m last year through 'fee in advance' schemes. Parents who paid before the official announcement that VAT would be added to school fees hoped to avoid paying the extra 20% applied from January this year. But tax experts who spoke to the Guardian said HMRC would scrutinise the schemes to check whether they included specific details such as set prices, without which parents could be vulnerable to VAT being demanded in years to come. It could result in some of England's most well-known schools, such as Winchester and Eton, locked in legal battles with the government. Dan Neidle, a tax lawyer and the founder of Tax Policy Associates, said many schools used fee in advance schemes like a deposit, meaning parents deposited a lump sum with the school which then deducted each year's fees. 'We reckoned [there's] a high chance that didn't work from a VAT perspective, because VAT then applies at the point each year's fees are invoiced. The question is whether HMRC will be challenging these,' Neidle said. The impact on VAT revenue was likely to be short-term, he added, with most parents paying only a year in advance. Even if the full £500m in pre-payments was allowed, it would represent only 5-6% in lost revenue for one year. A government spokesperson said: 'The Office for Budget Responsibility has already factored in the increased use of pre-payment schemes in its revenue forecasts. Removing tax breaks for private schools is expected to raise £1.8bn a year by 2029-30. 'This funding will help us recruit 6,500 new teachers and improve standards in state schools, which educate 94% of children.' The government said it could not comment on individual schools but confirmed that the fee in advance schemes could be liable to VAT based on how they operated. The key is how each scheme's 'tax point' – billing for each term's fees – is defined. Government sources said that if the schemes failed to give details of what the money was buying at the time it was paid, then VAT is likely to be due. Many private schools began prompting parents to use the schemes when it was clear Labour would win the 2024 election and it had pledged in its manifesto to introduce VAT on school fees. In the past, the schemes were a way of parents receiving a discount for fees paid upfront or as part of divorce settlements. But the levying of VAT created a one-off opportunity for parents to avoid the tax. Tax lawyers said that any pre-payments made after 29 July 2024 – the date of the Treasury's formal announcement adding VAT – were unlikely to avoid HMRC's attention. HMRC has no deadline to begin an investigation, although it usually takes between one and four years to do so, meaning that parents and schools could face a lengthy period of legal jeopardy. The accounts for Brighton College show that it received £50m in fees in advance last year, compared with annual fee income of £60m. Eton received nearly £53m in advanced fees. Both schools charge about £63,000 a year for boarding school pupils, including VAT.
South Wales Guardian
2 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
HMRC offering up to £4,000 free to households with children
Tax-Free Childcare means working families can save up to £2,000 annually for each child up to the age of 11, and £4,000 for a disabled child up to the age of 16, when they're paying for their childcare. There are now 75,000 childcare settings accepting Tax-Free Childcare as payment including nurseries, registered childminders, holiday activity clubs and, for when school starts back in September, before and after school clubs. Are you missing out on childcare savings? 👋 Sign up for Tax-Free Childcare scheme and save up to £2,000 a year per child on approved childcare costs, including wraparound childcare. 💸 Find out more. 👇 Myrtle Lloyd, HMRC's Chief Customer Officer, says: 'Whether your child is interested in football, climbing, crafting or dance, there's a huge variety of childcare settings accepting Tax-Free Childcare. Children can learn something new and have fun with their friends while their parents save on their childcare bills. Visit to sign up today.' Families yet to sign up for Tax-Free Childcare can do it now to pay for their summer activities or start paying into it ready for breakfast and after-school clubs when the new term starts. Once families have opened a Tax-Free Childcare account, they can deposit money and use it straight away or keep it in the account to use it whenever it's needed. Any unused payments can be withdrawn at any time. For every £8 deposited in a Tax-Free Childcare account, the government tops it up by £2, which means parents can receive up to £500 (or £1,000 if their child is disabled) every 3 months towards their childcare costs. Families could be eligible for Tax-Free Childcare if they: Visit to check eligibility and register for Tax-Free Childcare. Recommended reading Tax-Free Childcare can be used alongside the free childcare hours, subject to eligibility. Account holders must confirm their details are up to date every 3 months to continue receiving the government top-up. Childcare providers can also sign up for a childcare provider account via to receive payments from parents and carers via the scheme.
