logo
Patriot: "A memoir of courage, truth, and the fight against oppression"

Patriot: "A memoir of courage, truth, and the fight against oppression"

IOL News2 days ago

I've never written a review halfway through a book. But this one hit so hard, I had to get it off my chest.
Reading Patriot by Alexei Navalny doesn't feel like flipping through pages—it feels like sitting across from someone who's been to hell and back, scarred but unshaken, somehow still able to crack a joke.
It's not just political. It's personal!
He's not posturing for attention or playing the hero. He's just telling the truth. And he makes you feel like he's telling it to you.
The book opens with Navalny being poisoned, and it's brutal. He doesn't sugar-coat the experience. 'I was drowning in my own body, unable to breathe or think,' he writes. His brain is slipping, his body is collapsing, and you're right there with him in the haze, the panic. He wakes up in a Berlin hospital. Alive, barely. And that's when the writing begins.
What gets me is that even in this chaos, he keeps his sense of humor. 'In Russia, you don't just pay to pass, you pay to survive.' That line made me laugh and ache at the same time. The absurdity of it all. The courage it takes to joke in the face of that kind of terror.
He survives. Barely. He's flown to Germany. What follows is five long months of recovery. And not just physical recovery. Psychological, emotional, spiritual. He's rebuilding from the inside out.
During this time, he meets with German Chancellor Angela Merkel. There's something surreal about it. This man, who nearly died now standing across from one of the most powerful leaders in the world. But even then, he's not basking in the moment. He's planning his return.
And this is where the tension rises again. He knows what's waiting for him in Russia. Prison. Retaliation. Maybe worse. But he decides to go anyway.
Before leaving Berlin, he observes an old Russian tradition. He pauses for a moment of silence before the journey. 'I don't believe in God,' he says plainly, 'but I stood silently, honoring the moment.' That hit me. The contradiction. The reverence. It's not religion. It's something older, deeper. And I felt like I was standing right there with him.
And then. God. The part that made me so angry I could barely keep reading. He landed in Moscow. And just like that, they arrest him. Right there in the airport. After everything. After he was poisoned, after months of recovery, after walking back into danger with eyes wide open, they're waiting to throw him in prison like it's nothing.
I wanted to punch the officers. Literally. I was furious. And he knew this would happen. He chose it anyway.
What follows is brutal. His descriptions of prison life are bleak. Solitary confinement. Hunger strikes. Psychological torment. Endless humiliation. But he doesn't write them to gain sympathy. There's no begging. No performance. He just tells it straight. Sometimes almost too straight. And that's what makes it so powerful. The restraint. The refusal to collapse into victimhood. That's resistance.
The line that keeps echoing in my mind, is this: 'Silence is complicity. I choose to stand.' It's not just a slogan. It's a commitment. A way of being. A choice you make again and again, even when no one's watching.
That sentence cracked something open in me. Where am I staying silent? Where should I be standing? Navalny's story doesn't let you look away from that question. It dares you to answer it honestly.
Then, just when you think you've seen the full picture, he takes us back. Way back. To a memory that completely caught me off guard. His secret baptism. His grandmother took him, as a boy, to a small church in a Soviet village and had him baptised quietly, away from the eyes of the regime. I was struck by how gentle that memory was. Tender. Almost sacred. In a world that tried to erase identity and faith, she gave him both. It reminded me that quiet acts of love and resistance are sometimes the most powerful.
He writes about his childhood in Soviet military towns, the impact of Chernobyl, and the eerie, controlled monotony of those years. I learned so much I didn't know about life under Soviet rule. It's not just history. It's lived experience.
What stood out most to me was how all of that shaped his mind. The way he saw injustice early. How he started noticing the cracks. And when he talks about leaders like Gorbachev and Yeltsin, it's so clear-eyed. Respectful. But unromantic. He helps you understand how power shifted, how Putin slipped in through those cracks, and what changed when he did. It's the kind of clarity I wish more people had.
He joins the liberal opposition party Yabloko because, as he puts it, 'I wanted to be part of something that stood for change, for honesty, for a better Russia.' There's no big speech. No grandstanding. Just a young man making a choice.
That's what keeps hitting me with this book. It's full of big courage that starts with small decisions. A conversation. A meeting. A yes.
Then Yulia. He meets her on a trip to Turkey, and he just knows. 'This is the girl I will marry.' It's funny. A little wild. And somehow deeply him. That decisiveness. That instinct to move boldly when something matters. It shows up everywhere in his life. In love. In politics. In prison.
When their daughter is born, something shifts. 'When my daughter was born, I suddenly felt something change in me. I found myself praying, even though I didn't know to whom.' That line wrecked me. In the best way. It's so honest. He's not pretending to suddenly be religious. He's just opening himself to the mystery of it all.
That vulnerability. That depth. That's what makes this memoir feel like more than a book. It feels like a conversation you keep having with yourself.
This book has challenged me. Not just intellectually. Emotionally. Spiritually. Ethically. I've learned so much. About the Soviet Union. About post-Soviet Russia. About corruption and courage and consequence.
But more than anything, I've felt this book. It got under my skin.
Here's what I'm taking with me:
Learn.
Read widely.
Reflect deeply.
Act. Even when it's risky. Especially then.
Support people who speak the truth. Even when it's uncomfortable.
Laugh. Humor is a form of resistance.
Pause. Find meaning in the quiet moments, like Navalny did before boarding that flight.
Don't simplify. Life is layered. Be okay with not having all the answers.
Patriot doesn't just make me admire Navalny. It makes me ask who I want to be when things get hard. And that's the kind of book that matters.
So, if you read this, I hope you'll ask yourself too: What would you risk for the truth? And when the moment comes, will you choose to stand?
Stay tuned for part two...

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Germany scraps funding for sea rescues of migrants
Germany scraps funding for sea rescues of migrants

TimesLIVE

timea day ago

  • TimesLIVE

Germany scraps funding for sea rescues of migrants

Germany is cutting financial support for charities that rescue migrants at risk of drowning in the Mediterranean, saying it will redirect resources to addressing conditions in source countries that spur people to leave. For decades, migrants driven by war and poverty have made perilous crossings to reach Europe's southern borders, with thousands estimated to die every year in their bid to reach a continent grown increasingly hostile to migration. "Germany is committed to being humane and will help where people suffer but I don't think it's the foreign office's job to finance this kind of sea rescue," foreign minister Johann Wadephul told a news conference. "We need to be active where the need is greatest," he added, mentioning the humanitarian emergency in war-shattered Sudan. Under the previous left-leaning government, Germany began paying around €2m (R41.87m) annually to non-governmental organisations carrying out rescues of migrant-laden boats in trouble at sea. For them, it has been a key source of funds: Germany's Sea-Eye, which said rescue charities have saved 175,000 lives since 2015, received around 10% of its total income of around €3.2m (R67m) from the German government.

Protest as Jeff Bezos wedding party arrives in Venice, and more from around the world
Protest as Jeff Bezos wedding party arrives in Venice, and more from around the world

Daily Maverick

timea day ago

  • Daily Maverick

Protest as Jeff Bezos wedding party arrives in Venice, and more from around the world

Moving, tragic, surprising, inspiring, terrifying, shocking... This is a selection of images from our planet, over the past week. MA handout picture made available by the State Emergency Service shows Ukrainian rescuers evacuating a resident at the site of a rocket strike on a five-storey residential building, after a massive overnight attack on Kyiv, Ukraine, 23 June 2025, amid the ongoing Russian invasion. Russian strikes targeted residential buildings, educational institutions, sports facilities, a business center, and cars in the six districts of Kyiv. At least six people died and more than 15 were injured in Kyiv after Russia launched a large-scale combined attack with at least 16 missiles and 352 drones across Ukraine, according to the State Emergency Service. EPA-EFE/SECURITY SERVICE OF UKRAINE HANDOUT

White House wants deep cut in US funding for war crimes investigations, sources say
White House wants deep cut in US funding for war crimes investigations, sources say

Daily Maverick

time2 days ago

  • Daily Maverick

White House wants deep cut in US funding for war crimes investigations, sources say

By Humeyra Pamuk and Anthony Deutsch The recommendation from the Office of Management and Budget, which was made on Wednesday and has not been previously reported, is not the final decision to end the programs since it gives the State Department the option to appeal. But it sets up a potential back-and-forth between the OMB and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and his aides, who will reply to OMB with their suggestions on which programs deserve to continue. The programs also include work in Iraq, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Colombia, Belarus, Sudan, South Sudan, Afghanistan and the Gambia, according to the sources and a list seen by Reuters. The State Department declined to comment. OMB did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The expectation that Rubio would argue for many of the programs to be continued is slim, according to three U.S. officials. However, the top U.S. diplomat could make a case to keep crucial programs, such as aiding potential war crimes prosecutions in Ukraine, according to one source familiar with the matter. Several of the programs earmarked for termination operate war crimes accountability projects in Ukraine, three sources familiar with the matter said, including Global Rights Compliance, which is helping to collect evidence of war crimes and crimes against humanity across Ukraine, such as sexual violence and torture. Another is Legal Action Worldwide, a legal aid group which supports local efforts to bring cases against Russian suspects of war crimes in Ukraine, the sources said. Requests seeking comment from the groups were not immediately answered. State Department bureaus that would like to preserve any war crimes and accountability programs should send their justifications by close of business day on July 11, said an internal State Department email seen by Reuters. CHANGING PRIORITIES Many of the programs recommended for termination are dedicated to empowering local organizations seeking to advance justice in societies that have faced atrocities, one of the sources said, adding that some programs have been going on for decades across Democratic and Republican administrations. 'Even if Secretary Rubio intervenes to save these programs, many of which he supported as a senator, there will be no one left to manage these programs,' the source said. The administration of President Donald Trump has frozen and then cut back billions of dollars of foreign aid since taking office on January 20 to ensure American-taxpayer money funds programs that are aligned with his 'America First' policies. The unprecedented cutbacks have effectively shut down its premier aid arm U.S. Agency for International Development, jeopardized the delivery of life-saving food and medical aid and thrown global humanitarian relief operations into chaos. The OMB recommendation is yet another sign that the administration is increasingly de-prioritizing advocacy for human rights and rule of law globally, an objective that previous U.S. administrations have pursued. While U.S. foreign aid freezes had already started hampering an international effort to hold Russia responsible for alleged war crimes in Ukraine, Wednesday's recommendations raise the risk of U.S. completely abandoning those efforts. Among the programs that are recommended for termination is a $18 million State Department grant for Ukraine's Prosecutor General's Office that is implemented by Georgetown University's International Criminal Justice Initiative, two sources said. An official at Georgetown declined to comment. While the programs do not directly impact Ukraine's frontline efforts to fend off Russia's invasion, supporters say they represent the best chance of extensively documenting reported battlefield atrocities in Europe's biggest conflict since World War Two, now grinding toward a fourth year. Ukraine has opened more than 140,000 war crime cases since Moscow's February 2022 invasion, which has killed tens of thousands, ravaged vast swathes of the country and left behind mental and physical scars from occupation. Russia consistently denies war crimes have been committed by its forces in the conflict. PATH TO APPEAL Other programs include one that does accountability work on Myanmar army's atrocities against Rohingya minorities as well as on the persecution of Christians and other minorities by Syria's ousted former president Bashar al-Assad, two sources said. While the OMB recommendations could face State Department push-back, the criteria to appeal are set very strictly. In an internal State Department email, the administration cautioned that any effort to preserve programs that were recommended to be terminated should be thoroughly argued and directly aligned with Washington's priorities. 'Bureaus must clearly and succinctly identify direct alignment to administration priorities,' the email, reviewed by Reuters said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store