Tulsi Gabbard details damning allegations against Hillary Clinton
'This report shows Putin held back from leaking compromising material on Hillary Clinton prior to the election, instead planning to release it after the election,' Gabbard said. The declassified report also claims that Clinton suffered from severe health ailments like type 2 diabetes and ischemic heart disease. It also claimed that Clinton - who then was serving as Obama's secretary of state -had her government aides hold secret meetings with religious leaders where they were offered 'significant increases in funding' from the State Department in return for their political support in the election.
'The intelligence community intentionally suppressed intelligence that showed Putin was saving the most damaging material that he had in his possession about Hillary Clinton until after her potential and likely victory,' Gabbard said. 'There were high-level DNC emails that detailed evidence of Hillary's, quote, psycho emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression and cheerfulness, and that then Secretary Clinton was allegedly on a daily regimen of heavy tranquilizers,' she added. Clinton did have a public health scare during the 2016 contest.
She swooned and stumbled at a Sept. 11 commemoration in New York in an incident captured on cell phone video. It showed Clinton wobbling and being lifted into the vehicle by her aides after leaving a memorial service at the site of the 2001 World Trade Center attack. The Clinton campaign later said she was diagnosed with pneumonia. And her doctor, a few days later, declared Clinton 'healthy and fit to serve' as president. She had other health scares. In January 2011, when on an official trip to Yemen, Clinton tripped and fell on the plane stairs as she was departing the country.
The declassified House report made a slew of charges about Clinton, including: As of September 2016, the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) had Democratic National Committee (DNC) information that President Obama and party leaders found the state of Secretary Clinton's health to be 'extraordinarily alarming' and felt it could have 'serious negative impact' on her election prospects. Her health information was being kept in 'strictest secrecy' and even close advisors were not being fully informed.
The SVR possessed DNC communications that Clinton was suffering from 'intensified psychoemotional problems, including uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression. and cheerfulness.' Clinton was placed on a daily regimen of 'heavy tranquilizers' and while afraid of losing, she remained 'obsessed with a thirst for power.' The SVR also had information that Clinton suffered from 'Type 2 diabetes, Ischemic heart disease, deep vein thrombosis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.'
The SVR possessed a campaign email discussing a plan approved by Secretary Clinton to link Putin and Russian hackers to candidate Trump in order to 'distract the [American] public' from the Clinton email server scandal. The Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) in August had details of secret meetings with multiple named US religious organizations, in which US State Department representatives offered-in exchange for supporting Secretary Clinton- 'significant increases in financing' from Department funds and 'the patronage' of State in dealing with 'post-Soviet' countries. Clinton has not publicly responded to the charges.
And Gabbard charged former President Barack Obama with driving a 'false' narrative that Russia wanted Trump to win the election. Obama has denied this. 'The evidence that we have found and that we have released directly points to President Obama leading the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment. There are multiple pieces of evidence and intelligence that confirm that fact,' Gabbard said. She declined, when asked, to say if Obama was guilty of treason, noting she would leave decisions on criminal charges to the Department of Justice.
Gabbard has been releasing a slew of reports that claim former President Barack Obama and his administration were part of a 'treasonous conspiracy' to allege Russia interfered in the 2016 election on Trump's behalf. She claims Obama was behind a smear campaign to sew doubt about Trump's 2016 victory. 'President Obama directed an intelligence community assessment to be created to further this contrived false narrative that ultimately led to a years long coup to try to undermine President Trump's presidency,' Gabbard said.
Gabbard specifically charged Obama's CIA director John Brennan as the leading figure behind the 'conspiracy' to undermine Trump's first term. She repeatedly claimed Russia was preparing for a Clinton victory in 2016 and were preparing to release it after she won. 'They specifically withheld what they had on her, the most damning information, because they thought she would win he election. They had plans to release it, just prior to her inauguration ... to discord and chaos in America,' she said. President Trump has seized on the new information and accused his Democratic rivals of organizing a failed 'coup' in 2016. 'They tried to rig the election and they got caught and there should be really severe consequences,' he said on Tuesday.
Trump has long argued that the FBI counterintelligence probe that began during the 2016 election was the start of a 'coup' to prevent him from taking office. He also issued an extraordinary call to investigate the former president – accusing his predecessor of 'treason.' 'After what they did to me, whether it's right or wrong, it's time to go after people,' Trump said in the Oval Office on Tuesday. Obama fired back at the 'bizarre allegations' coming from Trump. His office dismissed the claims as another example of the constant 'nonsense and misinformation' that emanates out of the White House. 'Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes,' his post-presidency office said in a statement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘Stop demonizing us': Judges beg White House to dial down ‘irresponsible rhetoric' over fears of political violence
A group of federal judges has pleaded with U.S. leaders to cool off with attacks on members of the judicial system, following a rise in the number and severity of intimidation and death threats. In a judicial forum hosted by the group Speak Up for Justice, several judges spoke about their personal experiences of receiving hatred and harassment and urged those at the top to stop using 'irresponsible rhetoric.' It comes after President Donald Trump 's consistent attacks on the legal system, which have intensified since returning to office. The president has claimed the justice system has been 'weaponized' against him and blamed the Democrats for using what he calls 'lawfare.' Recently Trump and his allies have lashed out against judges including James Boasberg who had blocked the administration's efforts to deport Venezuelan nationals to El Salvador. Attorney General Pam Bondi announced Monday that her office had filed a misconduct complaint against Boasberg. Though Trump was not mentioned specifically by name, attacks were being led from the 'top down' by White House spokespeople, according to Esther Salas, a District Court judge in New Jersey. Salas noted that state-level judges, as well as federal judges, were now being targeted. 'The fix check is so easy in some ways, right, because what we need is our political leaders from the top down to stop fanning these flames, to stop using irresponsible rhetoric, to stop referring to judges as corrupt and biased and monsters that hate America. We need our leaders to lead responsibly,' Salas said at the virtual forum on Thursday. 'Stop demonizing us, stop villainizing us, because what they're doing when they do that irresponsible rhetoric is they are inviting people to do us harm… because our leaders are calling us idiots and deranged, and monsters.' Salas gave an emotional address to the forum, noting that this month had marked the fifth anniversary of her son Daniel's death. The 20-year-old was killed while celebrating his birthday in 2020 shooting by a gunman who had intended to kill his mother. 'So we just need civility,' Salas said. 'If you're a leader in this country. Lead responsibly. That's all we're asking.' She also thanked the other judges, on behalf of her son and family, for speaking out about their experiences. 'I know it wasn't something you wanted to do,' she said. Paul R. Kiesel, who moderated Thursday's forum, added that such attacks from higher-ups was 'unprecedented.' 'This has never happened before… this isn't just another cycle of criticism,' he said. 'This is unprecedented. We're coming out here today because this has never happened in this country before.' The Independent has contacted the White House for comment. In a statement shared with Politico a White House spokesperson said: 'Attacks against public officials, including judges, have no place in our society and President Trump knows all too well the impact of callous attacks having faced two assassination attempts.'
The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
Obama beats Trump by double-digit margin in hypothetical election poll
A hypothetical poll conducted by Daily Mail and J.L. Partners suggests Barack Obama would significantly defeat Donald Trump in a 2028 presidential election. The survey of 1,013 registered voters found Obama leading Donald Trump by a double-digit margin, with 52 percent favoring Obama and 41 percent backing Donald Trump. Obama demonstrated strong support among Hispanic, Black, and Independent voters in the hypothetical matchup. Trump has repeatedly mused over the possibility of a third presidential term, despite being barred by the 22nd Amendment of the Constitution – which prohibits anyone from being elected president more than twice. While Obama comfortably beat Trump, the poll indicated Trump would narrowly defeat other potential Democratic challengers such as Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden in hypothetical matchups.
BBC News
23 minutes ago
- BBC News
Trump's global tariffs 'victory' may come at a high price
In April Donald Trump stunned the world by announcing sweeping new import tariffs – only to put most on hold amid the resulting global financial months later, the US president is touting what he claims are a series of victories, having unveiled a handful of deals with trading partners and unilaterally imposed tariffs on others, all without the kind of massive disruptions to the financial markets that his spring attempt least, so worked to reorder America's place in the global economy, Trump is now promising that the US will reap the benefits of new revenue, rekindle domestic manufacturing, and generate hundreds of billions of dollars in foreign investment and that turns out to be the case – and whether these actions will have negative consequences – is still very much in is clear so far, however, is that a tide that was (gently) turning on free trade, even ahead of Trump's second term, has become a wave crashing across the globe. And while it is reshaping the economic landscape, it hasn't left the kind of wreckage in its wake that some might have predicted - though of course there is often a lag before impact is fully seen. What's more, for many countries, this has all served as a wake up call - a need to remain alive to fresh so, whilst the short term result might be - as Trump sees it - a victory, the impact on his overarching goals is far less certain. As are the long-term repercussions, which could well pan out rather differently for Trump - or the America he leaves behind after his current term. The '90 deals in 90 days' deadline For all the wrong reasons, 1 August had been ringed on international policymakers' calendars. Agree new trading terms with the US by then, they'd been warned – or face potentially ruinous White House trade adviser Peter Navarro predicted "90 deals in 90 days" and Trump offered an optimistic outlook on reaching agreements, the deadline always appeared to be a tall order. And it the time the end of July rolled around, Trump had only announced about a dozen trade deals – some no more than a page or two long, without the kind of detailed provisions standard in past negotiations. The UK was first off the blocks, perhaps inevitably. Trump's biggest bugbear is, after all, America's trade deficit, and trade is in broad balance when it comes to the the baseline 10% applied to most British goods may initially have raised eyebrows, it provided a hint of what was to follow – and in the end came as a relief compared to the 15% rate applied to other trading partners such as the EU and Japan, with whom the US has larger deficits; $240bn and $70bn respectively last year even those agreements came with strings attached. Those countries that weren't able to commit to, say, buying more American goods, often faced higher Korea, Cambodia, Pakistan - as the list grew, and tariff letters were fired off elsewhere, the bulk of American imports are now covered by either an agreement or a presidential decree concluded with a curt "thank you for your attention to this matter". Capacity to 'damage' the global economy Much has been revealed as a result of the good news. The wrangling of the last few months means the most painful of tariffs, and recession warnings, have been dodged. The worst fears – in terms of tariff levels and potential economic fallout (for the US and elsewhere) - have not been realised. Second, the agreement of tariff terms, however unpalatable, reduced much of the uncertainty (itself wielded by Trump as a powerful economic weapon) for better - and for better, in the sense that businesses are able to make plans, investment and hiring decisions that had been paused may now be resumed. Most exporters know what size tariffs their goods face – and can figure out how to accommodate or pass on the cost to growing sense of certainty underpins a more relaxed mood in financial markets, with shares in the US notably gaining. But it's for the worse, in the sense that the typical tariff for selling into the US is higher than before – and more extreme than analysts predicted just six months may have hailed the size of the agreement of the US with the EU – but these are not the tariff-busting deals we equated with tearing down trade barriers in previous greatest fears, the warnings of potential disaster, have receded. But Ben May, Director of global macro forecasting at Oxford Economics, says that US tariffs had the capacity to "damage" the global economy in several ways."They are obviously raising prices in the US and squeezing household incomes," he says, adding that the policies would also reduce demand around the world if the world's largest economy ends up importing fewer goods. Winners and losers: Germany, India and China It's not just about the size of tariff, but the scale of trading relationship with the US. So while India potentially faces tariffs of over 25% on its exports to the US, economists at Capital Economics reckon that, with US demand accounting for just 2% of that nation's gross domestic product, the immediate impact on growth could be news is not so good for Germany, though, where the 15% tariffs could knock more than half a percentage point off growth this year, compared to what was expected earlier in the due to the size of its automotive sector - unhelpful for an economy that may be teetering on the brink of recession. Meanwhile, India became the top source of smartphones sold in the US in the last few months, after fears of what may lie in store for China prompted Apple to shift the other hand, India will be mindful that the likes of Vietnam and the Philippines – which face lower tariffs when selling to the US – may become relatively more attractive suppliers in other the board, however, there's relief that the blow, at least, is likely to be less extensive than might have been. But what has been decided already points to longer-term ramifications for global trading patterns and alliances the element of jeopardy introduced into a long-established major relationship with the US, lent added momentum to the UK's pursuit of closer ties with the EU – and getting a trade deal with India over the many countries, this has served as a wake up call - a need to remain alive to fresh alliances. A very real political threat for Trump? As details are nailed down, the implications for the US economy become clearer in the late spring there actually benefitted from a flurry of export sales, as businesses rushed to beat any higher tariffs imposed on American goods. Economists expect that growth to lose momentum over the rest of the year. Tariffs that have increased from an average of 2% at the beginning of the year to around 17% now have had a notable impact on US government revenue – one of the stated goals of Trump's trade policy. Import duties have brought in more than $100bn so far this year - about 5% of US federal revenue, compared to around 2% in past years. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said he expected tariff revenue this year to total about $300bn. By comparison, federal income taxes bring in around $2.5tn a shoppers remain in the front line, and have yet to see higher prices passed on in full. But as consumer goods giants such as Unilever and Adidas start to put numbers on the cost increases involved, some sticker shock, price rises, loom – potentially enough to delay Trump's desired rate cut – and possibly a dent to consumer spending. Forecasts are always uncertain, of course, but this represents a very real political threat for a president who promised to lower consumer prices, not take actions that would raise and other White House officials have floated the idea of providing rebate checks to lower-income Americans – the kinds of blue-collar voters who have fuelled the president's political success – that would offset some of the pocketbook an effort could be unwieldy, and it would require congressional also a tacit acknowledgment that simply boasting of new federal revenue to offset current spending and tax cuts, and holding out the prospect of future domestic job and wealth creation is politically perilous for a Republican party that will have to face voters in next year's midterm state and congressional midterm elections. The deals yet to be hammered out Complicating all this is the fact that there are many countries where a deal is yet to be hammered out – most notably Canada and Taiwan. The US administration has yet to pronounce its decisions for the pharmaceuticals and steel industry. The colossal issue of China, subject to a different deadline, remains agreed to a negotiating extension with Mexico, another major US trading partner, on Thursday of the deals that have been struck have been verbal, as yet unsigned. Moreover it is uncertain if and how the strings attached to Trump's agreements – more money to be spent purchasing American energy or invested in America – will actually be delivered some cases, foreign leaders have denied the existence of provisions touted by the president. When it comes to assessing tariff agreements between the White House and various countries, says Mr May, the "devil is in the detail" – and the details are clear, however, that the world has shifted back from the brink of a ruinous trade war. Now, as nations grapple with a new set of trade barriers, Trump aims to call the history tells us that his overarching aim - to return production and jobs to America – may meet with very limited success. And America's long-time trading partners, like Canada and the EU, could start looking to form economic and political connections that bypass what they no longer view as a reliable economic may be benefitting from the leverage afforded by America's unique position at the centre of a global trading order that it spent more than half a century establishing. If the current tariffs trigger a foundational realignment, however, the results may not ultimately break in favour of the questions will be answered over years, not weeks or months. In the meantime, Trump's own voters may still have to pick up the tab – through higher prices, less choice and slower reporting: Michael Race. Top image credit: Getty Images BBC InDepth is the home on the website and app for the best analysis, with fresh perspectives that challenge assumptions and deep reporting on the biggest issues of the day. And we showcase thought-provoking content from across BBC Sounds and iPlayer too. You can send us your feedback on the InDepth section by clicking on the button below.
