Wisconsin Supreme Court declines to hear case challenging Elon Musk's $1 million payments to voters
Musk said he'd issue the checks at a Sunday town hall ahead of a pivotal state Supreme Court race.
Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul said Musk's offer violated state law.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court, in a unanimous ruling on Sunday, declined to block Elon Musk from giving away $1 million checks to voters at a town hall in Green Bay — in advance of a pivotal race for one of the court's seats on April 1.
Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul, a Democrat, had asked the Wisconsin Supreme Court early Sunday to prevent Musk from issuing the funds to voters, hours before the high-profile event.
"This case involves an issue of great public importance that requires urgent and authoritative resolution," Kaul wrote in his filing. He requested that the court issue an injunction "as soon as possible but no later than the planned event on Sunday evening."
The ruling comes after the Wisconsin Court of Appeals on Saturday denied Kaul's bid to stop Musk from making the payments. Kaul had previously been denied a request for an emergency injunction by a county court judge.
Kaul argued that Musk's planned giveaway violated a state law that makes it a felony to offer voters "anything of value" to influence their vote.
"Wisconsin law prohibits offering anything of value to induce anyone to vote," Kaul wrote in his filing. "Yet, Elon Musk did just that."
Last week, Musk deleted a post on X where he said he'd issue two separate $1 million checks "in appreciation for you taking the time to vote." In a new post, he wrote that entry to the town hall would be limited to individuals who sign a petition "in opposition to activist judges," adding that the two recipients of the $1 million checks would be spokesmen for the petition.
The Wisconsin high court now has a 4-3 liberal majority. Tuesday's contest between liberal Dane County Judge Susan Crawford and conservative Waukesha County Judge Brad Schimel will decide the court's ideological direction moving forward. Musk has lined up behind Schimel.
Schimel previously served as Wisconsin's attorney general for one term and was narrowly defeated in his 2018 reelection bid by Kaul.
Musk's America PAC has spent over $12 million on the race, which is officially nonpartisan. However, as has been the case in recent years, the two parties have both lined up behind candidates in the state's Supreme Court contests. President Donald Trump endorsed Schimel, while Crawford has been backed by an array of Democrats, including former President Barack Obama.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Trump rails against Democrats as Senate takes up his nominees
President Trump blasted Democrats again for delaying the process of getting his nominees confirmed by the upper chamber and praised Senate Republicans for staying in Washington and working on getting the president's picks approved. 'Very proud of our great Republican Senators for fighting, over the Weekend and far beyond, if necessary, in order to get my great Appointments approved, and on their way to helping us MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN,' Trump wrote in a Saturday post on Truth Social. The president then hammered Senate Democrats, arguing they are doing 'everything possible to DELAY these wonderful and talented people from being' confirmed. 'If George Washington or Abraham Lincoln were up for approval, the Dems would delay, as long as possible, then vote them out. The Democrats want our Country to fail, because they have failed,' the president said, thanking Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and 'our Republican Warriors in the Senate. Fight and WIN. I am with you all the way!!!' Thune told reporters on Thursday that recess appointments, to help tackle the backlog of over 160 nominees, mostly for lower-level positions, are 'on the table.' 'I think everything is on the table,' Thune said, adding that changes to rules would 'make more sense.' 'Fixing the rules, not just for now, but for the long term, would be a better solution for it. But at this point right now, I wouldn't say we're taking any options off the table,' the South Dakota Republican said. GOP senators have expressed openness to forging an agreement with Democrats to help confirm a tranche of Trump's nominees, but they are open to pivoting to other options if the deal does not go through. 'If we can't then we will have to resort to other options and we've got a lot of support for doing that,' Thune said in a Saturday interview with Politico. Republicans would need virtually all of their conference to vote for changing the rules. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has backed the party's approach to the president's nominees, saying Saturday that 'historically bad nominees deserve historic levels of scrutiny.' 'We have never seen nominees as flawed, as compromised, as unqualified as Trump's,' Schumer said in a post on social media platform X. 'And they know that.' Thune and Schumer's offices have been in contact this week and the New York senator had sent a counterproposal on Friday, according to Politico.
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Senate GOP eyes recess appointments as stalemate drags on
Fed-up Senate Republicans are starting to whisper about recess appointments again as Democrats stonewall them on nominees, cutting into the start of August recess. Why it matters: Senate leaders and the White House are still negotiating on a deal to end the standoff. But skipping town and letting President Trump speed-run his nomination list is an increasingly attractive option, some GOP senators told Axios. "The Senate should immediately adjourn and let President Trump use recess appointments to enact the agenda 77M Americans voted for," Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kansas) posted on Saturday. Recess appointments, as well as using the nuclear option to change chamber rules with a simple majority to expedite the confirmation process, are becoming real possibilities as talks drag into the evening. The Senate is in session on an August weekend voting on nominations, as Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.), Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and the White House struggle to find a compromise. How it works: Recess appointments would give Trump leeway to jam through numerous nominees without having to go through the usual Senate confirmation process. The Senate would have to agree to adjourn with a majority vote, and the House also would have to come back into town and agree to adjourn and cancel scheduled pro-forma days. Those nominees would only be able to serve through the end of 2026 — and without payment. Zoom in: Schumer wants the White House to release withheld federal funding in exchange for passing a small batch of uncontroversial nominees, per a source familiar. Democrats are also willing to commit to another batch later in the year — but only if it is formally written into an agreement that the deal is off if the White House so much as sends over another rescissions package. Republicans continue to point out that Democratic stonewalling is unprecedented. Typically, even the minority party ultimately allows some level of deference to the party in power and allows lower-level nominations to move more quickly.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
High ranking Democrat calls for release of Epstein files after Maxwell moved to new prison
The transfer of convicted Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell to a minimum security prison sent shockwaves around the U.S. as it came just a week after her meetings with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA) joins Erielle Reshef to share his perspective on the move and explain why he and other Democrats filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration for access to ICE detention facilities.
