logo
Here's how a $1,000 ‘Trump account' could swell to $100,000 by age 21—and $2 million by 60—even with modest contributions from families

Here's how a $1,000 ‘Trump account' could swell to $100,000 by age 21—and $2 million by 60—even with modest contributions from families

Yahoo3 days ago
The One Big Beautiful Bill that was signed into law last week includes a provision for so-called Trump accounts that provide a one-time contribution of $1,000 from the federal government for U.S. babies born from 2025 to 2028. Depending on how much is invested and how well the stock market performs, the accounts could grow substantially over time.
Parents are getting a new option to build wealth for their kids under the new tax-and-spending law signed by President Donald Trump last week.
The so-called Trump accounts, which are expected to be available next July, are open to babies who are U.S. citizens born from 2025 through 2028 and have Social Security numbers.
The federal government will make a one-time contribution of $1,000. Families can also contribute up to $5,000 a year, with employers allowed to chip in up to $2,500 of that amount. The money must sit in low-cost stock mutual funds or ETFs tracking a U.S. stock index, such as the S&P 500.
Key details have yet to be spelled out as federal agencies must begin the rule-writing process to implement the program. But the investment community is already touting the potential benefits.
'It can help Americans build financial security earlier and more confidently and, over time, ease the pressure on both the safety net and the federal budget,' Russell Investments Chairman and CEO Zach Buchwald wrote in the Washington Post on Thursday. 'This kind of long-term investment in people addresses a deep, persistent challenge: Most Americans don't save or invest nearly enough during their working years.'
The ability for employers to make contributions, which wouldn't count as taxable income, is key because it can allow the accounts to grow significantly, even with modest sums from families, he added.
Buchwald laid out a hypothetical scenario where a family contributes just $20 a week into a Trump account, or about $1,000 a year, with an employer adding another $2,500 a year.
Assuming a 7% rate of return, the account could top $100,000 by the time the child turns 21, he estimated. It's a relatively conservative figure considering the S&P 500's annual return has averaged above 10% since 1957, albeit with some big swings in the process.
If contributions keep rolling in, the magic of compounding could swell the Trump account to more than $2 million by the time the holder is 60, Buchwald added.
'That early start doesn't just help with paying for college or buying a first home—it sets the foundation for lifelong financial security through to retirement,' he said.
Of course, more aggressive contributions and a stronger stock market would result in fatter accounts. A family that maxes out the $5,000 annual contribution limit could see the account jump to more than $190,000 after 18 years and an 8% annual return.
Trump accounts represent another investment tool for families looking to establish some financial resources for their children.
Parents can already open Roth IRAs and 529 education accounts for their kids. But they can only start IRAs when their kids are earning income, and withdrawals for 529s are largely limited to education-related expenses (though unused funds can be rolled into a Roth IRA with certain limits).
In addition, other families may not have the financial means to set up IRAs, while many Americans don't open their own retirement accounts until they've landed their first jobs in their 20s, or later.
A key advantage of Trump accounts is that contributions can start very early in a child's life, allowing for more years to build wealth.
'To me, it's a supercharged IRA,' Cheryl Costa, a financial adviser in Framingham, Mass., told the New York Times.
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Baltimore City Council hosting public hearing on police accountability
Baltimore City Council hosting public hearing on police accountability

CBS News

time8 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Baltimore City Council hosting public hearing on police accountability

The Baltimore City Council Public Safety Committee is hosting a public hearing on police accountability on Tuesday afternoon. The hearing comes after the transition of the Baltimore Police Department to local control and the dissolution of Baltimore's Civilian Review Board (CRB). In the hearing, the committee will examine how the number and outcomes of complaints against Baltimore police changed after Maryland's Police Accountability Act was passed. "Since the federal consent decree was signed, Baltimore has made strides in reform, but there is still a great deal of work to do," Mark Conway, Safety Committee Chair, said. "The Council must ensure that the City's new police accountability structures are fulfilling their promise to the public. We will be asking hard questions and demanding detailed answers about transparency, timelines, and impact." The hearing will take place at Baltimore City Hall at 1 p.m. What is the Maryland Police Accountability Act? In 2021, Maryland passed the Police Accountability Act, mandating the creation of police accountability boards in each county and Baltimore City. In 2022, Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott signed into law a bill that established a police accountability board to restore trust between the community and the Baltimore Police Department. The legislation established a 17-member board that reviews police complaints and appoints civilians to serve on an administrative charging committee, which recommends discipline for officers formally accused of misconduct. Baltimore's shift to local control For years, residents and lawmakers pushed for local control over the Baltimore Police Department. The state initially held legislative control until Nov. 2023, when 80% of voters supported Ballot Question H to make BPD a city agency first time in more than 150 years. But Question H had limitations. It did not give the city the power to write laws that govern BPD. For a period, neither the city nor the state had legislative control over the department. Another vote in Nov. 2024 finally gave legislative control to the city. The restructuring disbanded Baltimore's Civilian Review Board, which was the city's original police oversight entity, founded in 1999.

Mark Cuban says Elon Musk's new political party is 'really smart' in a key way
Mark Cuban says Elon Musk's new political party is 'really smart' in a key way

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Mark Cuban says Elon Musk's new political party is 'really smart' in a key way

Mark Cuban said that Elon Musk's new political party is smart to focus on a few congressional races. Cuban doesn't trust Musk is forming it because he's a "good guy," but said it could still be useful. Politicians and everyday Americans alike aren't dismissing Musk's plan. Mark Cuban isn't happy with the current political stalemate — and thinks Elon Musk could help the country get out of it. Cuban addressed his decision to try to help get Musk's America Party on the ballot on an episode of the podcast "Pod Save America" that aired on July 13, saying the current two-party system does not serve Americans. Musk has said that the America Party will focus on a few key House and Senate seats that could serve as the "deciding vote" on "contentious laws." "That's how Elon thinks. He looks for leverage. And there's absolute leverage in making sure that the two incumbent parties don't have enough power to pass anything," Cuban said on the podcast. "And so that's smart. That is really smart." He said the move could enable politicians to "evaluate" bills more thoughtfully. Cuban backed former Vice President Kamala Harris during the 2024 election, but criticized Democrats' political messaging on the podcast. "Does it mean just because it's Elon, it must be wrong or right? No. But until we find out details, why are we jumping to conclusions?" Cuban said. He also said he doesn't believe Musk is forming the party just because he's a "good guy." It's not the first time Cuban has tepidly supported Musk's effort at a third party, even though the two billionaires more typically spar online. When Musk first floated the idea for the party in a poll on X in June, Cuban responded with three check marks. He got blowback from some social media users for saying he'd help the America Party get on the ballot. Musk has said that the America Party will serve the "80% in the middle" and break the deadlock that largely defines the current two-party system. Cuban isn't the only person taking the world's richest man seriously — the chair of the Democratic National Committee said it shouldn't be "taken lightly," and Tesla shares fell sharply after he launched the party. Read the original article on Business Insider

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store