logo
EU condemns arrest of former Macau pro-democracy lawmaker

EU condemns arrest of former Macau pro-democracy lawmaker

HKFP2 days ago
The European Union on Saturday condemned Macau's arrest of former pro-democracy lawmaker Au Kam-san, saying it only heightened concerns about the 'erosion of political pluralism' in the Chinese territory. This photo taken on December 12, 2024 shows Au Kam-san, a primary school teacher who became one of Macau's longest-serving pro-democracy legislators, posing for a portrait in Macau. Photo: Eduardo Leal/AFP.
Au is the first person to be arrested under the city's national security law.
Authorities alleged on Thursday that the 68-year-old primary school teacher had ties to foreign groups endangering China.
'This development adds to the existing concerns about the ongoing erosion of political pluralism and freedom of speech in the Macao Special Administrative Region,' said European Union spokesperson Anitta Hipper in a statement.
'The EU recalls that the respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms is a central element of the Macao Basic Law and 'one country, two systems',' set up in the former Portuguese colony.
The territory near Hong Kong and known for its casinos, has retained its own legal system since China took it back from Portugal in 1999.
The security law, which restricts political activity, was passed in 2009 but broadened in 2023.
Au, a legislator up to 2021, has campaigned on social welfare, corruption and electoral reform.
Support HKFP | Policies & Ethics | Error/typo? | Contact Us | Newsletter | Transparency & Annual Report | Apps
Safeguard press freedom; keep HKFP free for all readers by supporting our team
Produced externally by an organization we trust to adhere to high journalistic standards.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘We are workers, we are not slaves': Hong Kong migrant domestic workers protest for ‘living wage'
‘We are workers, we are not slaves': Hong Kong migrant domestic workers protest for ‘living wage'

HKFP

timean hour ago

  • HKFP

‘We are workers, we are not slaves': Hong Kong migrant domestic workers protest for ‘living wage'

Dozens of Hong Kong migrant domestic workers have staged a protest calling for a 'living wage' of HK$6,172, among other demands. The rally was held in front of the Harbour Building in Sheung Wan on Sunday, ahead of the Labour Department's annual dialogue with migrant workers' groups. A total of 49 people joined the protest and chanted slogans, such as 'We are workers, we are not slaves,' and '$6,172 living wage for all,' within a cordoned-off space. Shiela Tebia-Bonifacio, a spokesperson for the Asian Migrants Coordinating Body (AMCB), said that the rally sought to highlight the long-standing demands of migrant domestic workers, especially regarding the living wage. 'It's been quite a while… our demand is still the same, but it's still unresolved, it's still unsettled,' Tebia-Bonifacio told HKFP. Advocates made similar demands in August last year, calling for a 'living wage' of HK$6,300 per month, plus a food allowance of HK$2,700. The Hong Kong government raised the minimum monthly wage for foreign domestic workers by 2.5 per cent in September, from HK$4,870 to HK$4,990 per month. The HK$1,236 monthly food allowance did not change. The 'living wage' refers to a salary that not only allows for an employee and their family to meet their basic needs but also to live a decent life. The current standard for living wage in Hong Kong is HK$62.8 per hour. At the Sunday protest, Baneng Mendez, deputy secretary general of the Filipino Migrant Workers' Union, spoke of dire working conditions and excessively long working hours faced by some migrant domestic workers in Hong Kong. 'For the past six months, our workers' unions and the Mission for Migrant Workers documented 916 complaints from migrant domestic workers,' Mendez said. Around 41 per cent of the workers said they worked for 11 to 16 hours per day, while another 11 per cent reported they worked more than 16 hours per day. 'These figures [tell] us that modern-day slavery is real,' added Mendez. Standard employment contracts in Hong Kong stipulate that foreign domestic workers are entitled to a rest day of at least 24 continuous hours every seven days. However, there is no statutory limit on working hours for them. During the protest, police were seen taking headcounts and restricting protesters' movements in and out of the designated zone. Protesters wearing masks were also asked by police to remove them. The police told HKFP on Monday that officers at the scene reminded the protest organisers 'as usual,' to ensure the entire activity complied with the national security law and other relevant laws. First Sunday dialogue The latest meeting was also the first time that the annual dialogue between the Labour Department and migrant labour groups was held on a Sunday. While leaders of migrant workers' organisations appreciated that the meeting took place on Sunday, they also expressed disappointment that only a select number of groups in the community were able to attend the dialogue with the department. According to a press release from the AMCB, around 50 migrant domestic worker organisations were refused permission to participate in the dialogue by the Labour Department. Tebia-Bonifacio told HKFP that the AMCB knew around 70 organisations that had registered to join the meeting. However, only 'around 20 that got accepted,' she said, adding that the 20 groups had already joined the weekday dialogues in previous years. 'So that's why we didn't get the point of doing it on Sunday,' said Tebia-Bonifacio. Mendez concurred, also pointing out that the same organisations and leaders who were invited to past meetings were able to attend the dialogue on Sunday. 'There are more leaders in the community like me,' said Mendez, who was not invited to the Sunday meeting. While the Labour Department did not directly respond to HKFP's enquiry about some migrant organisations being refused permission to participate in the dialogue, it said by email on Monday that invitations for the dialogue were sent to a 'wide range of organisations.' It also said that 'all the invited organisations which confirmed their attendance were accommodated. As per practice, we will review and adjust the invitation list for future review exercises as appropriate.'

Trump's tariffs to hurt the US more than most others
Trump's tariffs to hurt the US more than most others

AllAfrica

time8 hours ago

  • AllAfrica

Trump's tariffs to hurt the US more than most others

The global rollercoaster ride of United States trade tariffs has now entered its latest phase. President Donald Trump's April 2 'Liberation Day' announcement placed reciprocal tariffs on all countries. A week later, amid financial market turmoil, these tariffs were paused and replaced by a 10% baseline tariff on most goods. On July 31, however, the Trump administration reinstated and expanded the reciprocal tariff policy. Most of these updated tariffs are scheduled to take effect on August 7. To evaluate the impact of these latest tariffs, we also need to take into account recently negotiated free trade agreements (such as the US-European Union deal), the 50% tariffs imposed on steel and aluminium imports, and tariff exemptions for imports of smartphones, computers and other electronics. For selected countries, the reciprocal tariffs announced on April 2 and the revised values of these tariffs are shown in the table below. The revised additional tariffs are highest for Brazil (50%) and Switzerland (39%), and lowest for Australia and the United Kingdom (10%). For most countries, the revised tariffs are lower than the original ones. But Brazil, Switzerland and New Zealand are subject to higher tariffs than those announced in April. In addition to the tariffs displayed above, Canadian and Mexican goods not registered as compliant with the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement are subject to tariffs of 35% and 25% respectively. The economic impacts of the revised tariffs are examined using a global model of goods and services markets, covering production, trade and consumption. A similar model was used to assess the impacts of the original reciprocal tariffs and the outcome of a US-China trade war. GDP impacts of the tariffs are displayed in the table below. The impacts of the additional tariffs are evaluated relative to trade measures in place before Trump's second term. Retaliatory tariffs are not considered in the analysis. The tariffs reduce US annual GDP by 0.36%. This equates to US$108.2 billion or $861 per household per year (all amounts in this article are in US dollars). The change in US GDP is an aggregate of impacts involving several factors. The tariffs will compel foreign producers to lower their prices. But these price decreases only partially offset the cost of the tariffs, so US consumers pay higher prices. Businesses also pay more for parts and materials. Ultimately, these higher prices hurt the US economy. The tariffs decrease US merchandise imports by $486.7 billion. But as they drive up the cost of US supply chains and shift more workers and resources into industries that compete with imports, away from other parts of the economy, they also decrease US merchandise exports by $451.1 billion. For most other countries, the additional tariffs reduce GDP. Switzerland's GDP decreases by 0.47%, equivalent to $1,215 per household per year. Proportional GDP decreases are also relatively large for Thailand (0.44%) and Taiwan (0.38%). In dollar terms, GDP decreases are relatively large for China ($66.9 billion) and the European Union ($26.6 billion). Australia and the United Kingdom gain from the tariffs ($0.1 billion and $0.07 billion respectively), primarily due to the relatively low tariffs levied on these countries. Despite facing relatively low additional tariffs, New Zealand's GDP decreases by 0.15% ($204 per household) as many of its agricultural exports compete with Australian commodities, which are subject to an even lower tariff. Although the revised reciprocal tariffs are, on average, lower than those announced on April 2, they are still a substantial shock to the global trading system. Financial markets have been buoyant since Trump paused reciprocal tariffs on April 9, partly on the hope that the tariffs would never be imposed. US tariffs of at least 10% to 15% now appear to be the new norm. As US warehouses run down inventories and stockpiles, there could be a rocky road ahead. Niven Winchester is professor of economics, Auckland University of Technology This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store