logo
Aviation safety under strain as missiles, spoofing and airspace bans reshape global routes

Aviation safety under strain as missiles, spoofing and airspace bans reshape global routes

Malay Mail04-06-2025
NEW DELHI, June 5 — Proliferating conflict zones are an increasing burden on airline operations and profitability, executives say, as carriers grapple with missiles and drones, airspace closures, location spoofing and the shoot-down of another passenger flight.
Airlines are racking up costs and losing market share from cancelled flights and expensive re-routings, often at short notice. The aviation industry, which prides itself on its safety performance, is investing more in data and security planning.
'Flight planning in this kind of environment is extremely difficult ... The airline industry thrives on predictability, and the absence of this will always drive greater cost,' said Guy Murray, who leads aviation security at European carrier TUI Airline.
With increasing airspace closures around Russia and Ukraine, throughout the Middle East, between India and Pakistan and in parts of Africa, airlines are left with fewer route options.
'Compared to five years ago, more than half of the countries being overflown on a typical Europe-Asia flight would now need to be carefully reviewed before each flight,' said Mark Zee, founder of OPSGROUP, a membership-based organisation that shares flight risk information.
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict in the Middle East since October 2023 led to commercial aviation sharing the skies with short-notice barrages of drones and missiles across major flight paths — some of which were reportedly close enough to be seen by pilots and passengers.
Russian airports, including in Moscow, are now regularly shut down for brief periods due to drone activity, while interference with navigation systems, known as GPS spoofing or jamming, is surging around political fault lines worldwide.
When hostilities broke out between India and Pakistan last month, the neighbours blocked each other's aircraft from their respective airspace.
'Airspace should not be used as a retaliatory tool, but it is,' Nick Careen, International Air Transport Association (IATA) senior vice president for operations, safety and security, told reporters at the airline body's annual meeting in New Delhi on Tuesday.
Isidre Porqueras, chief operating officer at Indian carrier IndiGo, said the recent diversions were undoing efforts to reduce emissions and increase airline efficiencies.
Worst-case scenario
Finances aside, civil aviation's worst-case scenario is a plane being hit, accidentally or intentionally, by weaponry.
In December, an Azerbaijan Airlines flight crashed in Kazakhstan, killing 38 people. The plane was accidentally shot down by Russian air defences, according to Azerbaijan's president and Reuters sources.
In October, a cargo plane was shot down in Sudan, killing five people.
In December, an Azerbaijan Airlines flight crashed in Kazakhstan, killing 38 people. The plane was accidentally shot down by Russian air defences, according to Azerbaijan's president and Reuters sources. — Reuters pic
Six commercial aircraft have been shot down, with three near-misses since 2001, according to aviation risk consultancy Osprey Flight Solutions.
Governments need to share information more effectively to keep civil aviation secure as conflict zones proliferate, IATA Director General Willie Walsh said this week.
Safety statistics used by the commercial aviation industry show a steady decline in accidents over the past two decades, but these do not include security-related incidents such as being hit by weaponry.
IATA said in February that accidents and incidents related to conflict zones were a top concern for aviation safety requiring urgent global coordination.
Tough choices
Each airline decides where to travel based on a patchwork of government notices, security advisers, and information-sharing between carriers and states, leading to divergent policies.
The closure of Russian airspace to most Western carriers since the outbreak of war in Ukraine in 2022 put them at a cost disadvantage compared to airlines from places like China, India and the Middle East that continue to take shorter northern routes that need less fuel and fewer crew.
Shifting risk calculations mean Singapore Airlines' flight SQ326 from Singapore to Amsterdam has used three different routes into Europe in just over a year, Flightradar24 tracking data shows.
When reciprocal missile and drone attacks broke out between Iran and Israel in April 2024, it started crossing previously avoided Afghanistan instead of Iran.
Last month, its route shifted again to avoid Pakistan's airspace as conflict escalated between India and Pakistan. Flight SQ326 now reaches Europe via the Persian Gulf and Iraq. Singapore Airlines did not respond immediately to a request for comment.
Pilots and flight attendants are also worried about how the patchwork of shifting risk might impact their safety.
IATA said in February that accidents and incidents related to conflict zones were a top concern for aviation safety requiring urgent global coordination. — Reuters pic
'IATA says airlines should decide if it's safe to fly over conflict zones, not regulators. But history shows commercial pressures can cloud those decisions,' said Paul Reuter, vice president of the European Cockpit Association, which represents pilots.
Flight crew typically have the right to refuse a trip due to concerns about airspace, whether over weather or conflict zones, IATA security head Careen said.
'Most airlines, in fact, I would say the vast majority of them, do not want crew on an aircraft if they don't feel comfortable flying,' he said. — Reuters
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US says differences with India cannot be resolved overnight for deal
US says differences with India cannot be resolved overnight for deal

Free Malaysia Today

time3 hours ago

  • Free Malaysia Today

US says differences with India cannot be resolved overnight for deal

India faced Western pressure to distance itself from longstanding ties with Russia and the BRICS group of developing nations. (Reuters pic) WASHINGTON : Differences between the US and India cannot be resolved overnight to arrive at a trade deal, a senior US official told reporters late on Thursday, citing geopolitical disagreements. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday Washington was still negotiating with India on trade after announcing earlier that day the US would impose a 25% tariff on goods imported from the country starting on Friday. The 25% figure would single out India more severely than other major trading partners, and threaten to unravel months of talks between the two countries, undermining a strategic partner of Washington's and a counterbalance to China. 'Our challenges with India, they've always been a pretty closed market… there are a host of other kind of geopolitical issues,' the US official said. 'You've seen the president express concern about, you know, membership in BRICS, purchases of Russian oil and that kind of thing.' While saying there were constructive discussions with India, the official added: 'These are complex relationships and complex issues, and so I don't think things can be resolved overnight with India.' India has faced pressure from the West, including the US, to distance itself from Moscow after Russia invaded Ukraine in early 2022. New Delhi resisted that pressure, citing its longstanding ties with Russia and its economic needs. Trump has cast the BRICS group of developing nations – of which India is a key part – as hostile to the US. Those nations have dismissed that accusation and the group says it promotes the interests of its members and of developing countries at large. Trump has also drawn India's frustration by repeatedly taking credit for an India-Pakistan ceasefire that he announced on social media on May 10. The ceasefire halted days of hostilities between the nuclear armed Asian neighbours. India's position has been that New Delhi and Islamabad must resolve their issues directly without outside involvement. Trump has reached a trade deal with India's rival Pakistan.

India will buy Russian oil despite Trump's threats
India will buy Russian oil despite Trump's threats

Free Malaysia Today

time3 hours ago

  • Free Malaysia Today

India will buy Russian oil despite Trump's threats

Russia is the top oil supplier to India, responsible for about 35% of India's overall supplies. (EPA Images pic) BENGALURU : Indian officials have said they would keep purchasing oil from Russia despite the threat of penalties that US President Donald Trump said he would impose, the New York Times reported on Saturday. Reuters could not immediately verify the report. The White House, India's ministry of external affairs and the ministry of petroleum and natural gas did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Trump last month indicated in a Truth Social post that India would face additional penalties for the purchase of Russian arms and oil. However, he later said that he did not care what India does with Russia. On Friday, Trump told reporters that he had heard that India would no longer be buying oil from Russia. Two senior Indian officials said there had been no change in policy, according to the NYT report, which added that one official said the government had 'not given any direction to oil companies' to cut back imports from Russia. Reuters had earlier reported that Indian state refiners stopped buying Russian oil in the past week as discounts narrowed in July. On July 14, Trump threatened 100% tariffs on countries that buy Russian oil unless Moscow reaches a major peace deal with Ukraine. Russia is the top supplier to India, responsible for about 35% of India's overall supplies.

Washington trade talks with India have stalled, sources say
Washington trade talks with India have stalled, sources say

The Star

time6 hours ago

  • The Star

Washington trade talks with India have stalled, sources say

US-India trade talks appear to have stalled, according to two sources familiar with the matter, as both sides remain unwilling to compromise on opening India's agriculture and dairy markets to US products. Before US President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that he would impose 25 per cent tariffs on imports from the country, the Indian side was expected to visit. However, Indian negotiators will not be coming to Washington in mid-August as a planned follow-up to their previous meeting about two weeks ago, according to one person familiar with the issue. A scheduled trip by the US Trade Representative Jameison Greer to New Delhi later in the month also appears unlikely if the two sides do not reach a consensus on market access. The apparent setback follows five rounds of negotiations between April and July after Trump threatened India with 26 per cent so-called reciprocal tariffs on April 2. Adopting a harsh tone on India in a social media post on Thursday, Trump called the Indian economy 'dead', saying, 'we have done very little business' with the South Asian country because of 'too high' tariffs. 'I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care,' he wrote, referring to India's import of Russian oil and defence equipment. On Wednesday, he threatened a 'penalty' on India for buying Russian oil and defence equipment without making it clear what that penalty could be. India's agricultural sector supports the livelihoods of roughly 42 per cent of the country's population, making Trump's demand for access politically risky for Prime Minister Narendra Modi and ratcheting up tension between Washington and the world's most populous country. One of the sources said the mood in New Delhi felt 'bitter', while both sources said the US negotiators have remained firm in demanding a 'complete' opening of the Indian market, an approach India has rejected to protect its domestic industries and farmers. Last week, another person familiar with the matter had described the talks as a 'total mess' behind the scenes, adding that agriculture was a political no-go zone for Modi's government. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Thursday told CNBC that 'the whole trade team has been frustrated' with India, saying the country has not been a 'great global actor'. 'India's red lines on agriculture and dairy are probably inviolable,' according to Rick Rossow, chair in US-India Policy Studies at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington think tank. If the US demands that these areas be opened as part of any deal, he said, 'we may never conclude an agreement'. According to Rossow, Greer will only make the trip to New Delhi 'if there is a realistic chance of resolving any pending issues in the deal". 'If it looks like an empty trip – circling the drain on the last issues without hope of a breakthrough – the visit might be cancelled,' he said. One source said India wants its recent free trade agreement with Britain, which opened British markets to Indian agricultural and textile products, among others, to serve as a model for a deal with the US. Meanwhile, the US side views its recent trade agreement with South Korea, which Trump claimed opened Korean agricultural markets to American goods, as the kind of access it expects from New Delhi. Another source familiar with the thinking on the US side said that Trump has also been keen on some headline-worthy announcements that include big investments or significant energy and defense purchases. Rossow said he suspects that a Phase 1 deal will 'not vary dramatically from the other deals India has signed.' He added that India seemed 'willing to commit to some big announcements in terms of investment and government-directed purchases in areas like hydrocarbons.' 'With President Trump's characterisation of Prime Minister Modi as the 'tariff king' paired with the enormous size of the Indian market, the deal itself will be big news – if and when it's concluded,' Rossow said. India's membership in Brics, a bloc of emerging Global South economies, and Trump's closeness with Pakistan have also become irritants in the US-India relationship. Hours after announcing new tariffs on India, the US president said his team had reached a deal with Islamabad and criticised New Delhi's active role in Brics. 'Brics, which is basically a group of countries that are anti-the United States, and India is a member of that if you can believe it ... It is an attack on the dollar and we are not going to let anybody attack the dollar. So it's partially Brics and it's partially trade,' Trump told reporters on Wednesday. On the other hand, the deal with Pakistan, according to Trump, allows the two countries to 'work together on developing their massive oil reserves'. As per an executive order signed by Trump on Thursday, a 19 per cent tariff will be imposed on imports from Pakistan. The US is one of Pakistan's top export destinations. India's arch-rival sold over US$5 billion worth of goods to the US last year and imported about US$2.1 billion. In June, Pakistan's army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, met with Trump at the White House. He offered Pakistan's support in such sectors as crypto and critical minerals. 'India is still an important partner for the United States and vice versa; a success on the trade talks would have been a strategic win, especially under the complex regional circumstances, but all is not lost yet,' according to Farwa Aamer, director of South Asia Initiatives at the Asia Society Policy Institute. New Delhi is 'cautious but committed', she said. 'As deals come through with its neighbours and competitors, it may just provide it enough impetus to make bold moves and accelerate progress on negotiations on a more comprehensive deal while weathering the temporary storm,' she said. - SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store