Tariffs Will Make TVs Even More Expensive. Buy These 2024 Models Instead
There are some great deals on last year's top TVs and soundbars. Photograph: Ryan Waniata, Parker Hall; Getty Images
If you buy something using links in our stories, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
Donald Trump's new tariffs have put a strange pall on the US economy. Uncertainty abounds, but prices seem likely to rise on all kinds of goods, from food to construction materials. Big-ticket electronics like TVs and soundbars may be at the front of the line. Pricing for Sony's new flagship Bravia 8 Mk II OLED TV, expected to launch at the same price or lower than 2023's A95L, instead came in at a significantly higher cost, and it appears other brands are following suit.
With so many unknowns, it's no wonder I'm getting questions from friends considering a new TV or soundbar. My advice on getting ahead of the tariffs is the same advice I give about saving cash in nearly every review I write: Buy last year's models. Sure, you'll miss out on a new feature or two, but you're still getting great gear at a better price. With that in mind, here are some top suggestions on the best TVs and soundbars from last year or earlier that can save you big money right now.
Power up with unlimited access to WIRED . Get best-in-class reporting that's too important to ignore for just $2.50 $1 per month for 1 year. Includes unlimited digital access and exclusive subscriber-only content. Subscribe Today. WIRED's Featured Deals
Photograph: Roku
Roku's Plus Series is a great buy for those looking to spend very little on a shiny new screen that keeps things simple. Controlled by Roku's intuitive smart system, this TV is easy to use and easy on the eyes thanks to features like local dimming for solid black levels and contrast, and punchy quantum dot colors. Voice control makes it easy to find your favorite shows, and extras like simplified Bluetooth connection and a lost remote-finder (my personal favorite) keep daily frustrations at bay.
Photograph: Parker Hall
For videophiles who haven't jumped on OLED yet, you won't find a better mix of staggering picture quality and value than this. Considering I spent $500 more on an LG C1 at the smaller 55-inch size a few years back, this feels like a serious steal. The C4 (9/10, WIRED Recommends) adds nearly double the brightness of my older model, advanced gaming features like a 120-Hz refresh rate and HDMI 2.1 connection across all inputs, and LG's signature Magic remote that works like a Wii controller for point-and-click control. This is one of the best OLED TVs we've ever tested and would be a hot pick without tariffs. Considering the state of things, it's a no-brainer buy.
Looking for a TV that will look great on even the brightest summer afternoons? Hisense's U8N (8/10, WIRED Recommends) is a master blaster, getting nearly twice as bright as the same model last year, and its skills don't end there. You'll get great contrast and black levels with minimal light bloom, vivid colors, and advanced gaming features, along with an intuitive Google TV interface to run the show.
Not every deal requires going back a year. TCL jumped ahead of the line with the early release of the value-packed QM6K (8/10, WIRED Recommends), which we named the best TV for most people, and it's on sale now. It's not the brightest TV in its price class, but this display wins on balance, providing excellent black levels with very little light bloom, rich and natural colors, and an impressively clear screen. It's got great gaming features, it's light and easy to set up, and TCL's version of Google TV makes streaming a breeze. I've got no idea how long this sale will last, but now's a great time to get it before it's gone.
Another fantastic OLED TV, this time from Samsung, the S90 (9/10, WIRED Recommends) was easily one of my favorite TVs for the money in 2024. Now 'the money' is a lot less thanks to a sale price that, at time of writing, matches LG's excellent C4. This TV is stylish, provides fabulous contrast with OLED's perfect black levels, and its quantum dot colors make it bright and showy yet sophisticated. The only real downside to this TV is Samsung's lack of Dolby Vision support, but I didn't miss it much, as the TV lit up everything I watched with its beautiful OLED glow.
Photograph: Sony
This isn't exactly a bargain-basement deal, but considering the cost of Sony's latest OLED (if that stands), I figured I'd throw it in as a bonus. This may be your last chance for some time to get a Sony OLED that isn't shockingly expensive. Premiering in 2023, the A95L (9/10, WIRED Recommends) isn't as bright as the latest models, but there's a reason it won 'King of TV' at the prestigious Value Electronics TV Shoutout. Loaded with a Samsung QD-OLED display and Sony's fantastic processing, this TV is a crystal clear marvel, with some of the best picture quality I've experienced. This TV could fall back to its MSRP by the time you see this, but if you've been hoping for a premium Sony OLED and it's still on sale, now is your moment.
Vizio has cracked the code on affordable audio performance, and this nearly free soundbar is the latest proof. The AIO bar (8/10, WIRED Recommends) won't get you much in the way of extras—there's no Wi-Fi support, no analog inputs, or even a remote—but what you will get is clear and dynamic sound that blows away your TV speakers in a singular tube that looks good on your console. The bar is easy to set up and simple to control with your TV remote or the Vizio app, and you can even wake it from your phone for Bluetooth streaming.
Photograph: Ryan Waniata
If you're looking for a serious sonic upgrade in a system that lets you grow as you go, Klipsch's Flexus Core 200 (8/10, WIRED Recommends) is a smooth criminal. Made with real MDF rather than just the thin plastic of most bars, the Flexus is built around performance, including up-firing speakers for immersive Dolby Atmos 3D audio. The bar alone offers plenty of punch, but you can upgrade it with Klipsch's Flexus surround speakers and subwoofer, or even add your own sub, thanks to its rare inclusion of a traditional subwoofer output. It doesn't include Wi-Fi but does provide Bluetooth streaming and an app for settings adjustments.
We've been going back in time with Samsung's flagship soundbar since long before the tariff worries arose. The Q990 series is the pinnacle of Dolby Atmos soundbars, comprising multiple speakers, 11.1.4 channels, and an intuitive interface for clear, full, and powerful immersion. Even in a booming economy, it rarely makes sense to buy the latest iteration of the Q990 when you can usually get similar performance for several hundred dollars less. One thing you won't get with the Q990C (now two models back) is pass-through for VRR or ALLM when you connect a game console to its spare HDMI inputs, which the new models include. Otherwise, this is the bargain buy for those after knock-out surround in an all-in-one package.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Should You Buy Roku Stock After Its Partnership With Amazon?
Roku's recent partnership with Amazon makes the streaming specialist more attractive. Although it still faces some headwinds, Roku's long-term prospects remain bright. The stock doesn't look too expensive at current levels, either. 10 stocks we like better than Roku › On June 16, Roku (NASDAQ: ROKU) announced a partnership with Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) that will allow advertisers access to the streaming specialist's ecosystem through Amazon's advertising platform. This agreement represents a significant move forward for Roku. Although the stock has encountered some headwinds over the past year, this new development once again highlights why Roku stock is worth investing in for those focused on the long game. Let's dig deeper into this partnership between Roku and Amazon -- as well as the rest of the former's business -- to understand why. Amazon is a notable player in the connected TV (CTV) market. However, Roku continues to reign supreme -- it holds a leading market share in the U.S. Amazon's size advantage has not allowed it to take over the top spot, and it's now partnering with its longtime rival. Amazon and Roku will combine their respective audiences, comprising 80 million households and more than 80% of CTV accounts in the U.S., and grant advertisers exclusive access to this large ecosystem through Amazon's demand-side ad platform. This is a win for Roku too. Here's why. One significant long-term opportunity for the company is the continued switch from cable to streaming for viewers and advertisers. However, a highly fragmented CTV landscape presented advertisers with several challenges, including difficulties in reaching targeted audiences across various platforms and effectively managing ad frequency. Roku noted in a recent press release: Early tests of this integration have shown significant results. Advertisers using this new solution reached 40% more unique viewers with the same budget and reduced how often the same person saw an ad by nearly 30%, enabling advertisers to benefit from three times more value from their ad spend. In other words, advertisers should get greater returns from the same amount of spending. The deal helps address some pain points they had and helps sell even more companies on the benefits of pouring ad dollars into the kind of platform that Roku offers. It's worth highlighting again that this deal is valuable to every party involved, largely because of Roku's leading CTV ecosystem. It also points to the strength of its network effect. Since the value of Roku's platform only increases as its audience numbers grow, partnerships of this kind could become more common. Roku has encountered some issues in recent years. Its average revenue per user (ARPU) has stalled, while it remains unprofitable. Though the company no longer reports the ARPU metric, management previously attributed poor ARPU growth to the company's expansion efforts in markets outside the U.S., where it is focusing on scale first, rather than monetization. That's the same blueprint it followed in its more mature markets when it sometimes sold its namesake devices at a loss to onboard enough households within its ecosystem. Investors have seen the results of this strategy in the U.S., where Roku already holds a leading market share. This should give investors confidence that it can achieve similar results in other regions. What about the persistent red ink on the bottom line? Investors vastly prefer profitable companies, especially in this uncertain economic and geopolitical environment. But Roku is making strides in this department too. In the company's first quarter, revenue came in at $1.03 billion, up 16% year over year. The company's net loss per share was $0.19, an improvement from the $0.35 per share loss it reported in the prior-year quarter. Roku might not be consistently profitable, but the company is growing its top line at a good clip and making progress on the bottom line. And overall, the company is still in a great position to cash in on the massive long-term shift from cable to streaming. And here's one more thing that makes the stock attractive. Roku's forward price-to-sales ratio is 2.6 as of this writing. In a stock market at all-time highs and valuations reaching unsustainable levels, Roku's modest valuation is especially rare for a growth stock in a leading industry position. For this and all the other reasons, it's worth purchasing the company's shares. Before you buy stock in Roku, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Roku wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $713,547!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $966,931!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,062% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 177% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Prosper Junior Bakiny has positions in Amazon. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon and Roku. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Should You Buy Roku Stock After Its Partnership With Amazon? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Buzz Feed
40 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
28 Years Later Was Actually Filmed Using iPhones – Danny Boyle Explains Why
28 Years Later director Danny Boyle has opened up about his decision to shoot much of the film using an iPhone camera. The horror sequel was released last week, and has already proven to be a big success with both critics and cinemagoers. Danny previously helmed the original movie 28 Days Later, shot on hand-held cameras, giving the film the effect of looking like found footage, and his new offering used similarly lo-fi techniques. In a new interview with YouTuber Matti Haapoja's How They Filmed That series, Danny explained his motivations for using iPhone cameras (although it's worth pointing out he didn't just rifle in his pocket for his phone and start shooting, these were souped-up iPhones with impressive enhancements, with some shots requiring as many as 20 at a time to film) to record 28 Years Later. '[Using iPhones] allowed us to be very light, in our footprint, in areas of the country that we wanted to suggest hadn't been touched for 28 years,' Danny said. 'Now, a crew coming in with the normal equipment level, it's going to make a big footprint. 'We used drones a lot, as well, so we could film sequences that cameras couldn't possibly [achieve] without terribly disrupting the landscape, and making it look like a herd of elephants had gone through.' Danny added that the use of multiple iPhones and drones in 'arrays' allowed 'certain visceral moments of the film' to be even more impactful, allowing viewers to 'push inside' the two-dimensional shot in front of them before being 'thrown back out again'. Similarly, he told Wired: 'Filming with iPhones allowed us to move without huge amounts of equipment. 'A lot of Northumbria [where 28 Years Later was shot] looks like it would have looked 1,000 years ago. So we were able to move quickly and lightly to areas of the countryside that we wanted to retain their lack of human imprint.' During a separate interview with IGN, he also conceded that the iPhone-quality filming felt like something of a callback to 28 Days Later's shooting techniques. 'We decided to carry it as an influence,' he explained. Sony It's not just the use of iPhones as filming equipment that has generated conversation around 28 Years Later, though. The movie's dramatic climax has also raised plenty of eyebrows – with Danny having recently explained the meaning behind those perplexing final scenes.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Water expert warns Americans of ‘chemical cocktail' in dangerous chemically-tainted tap water
Amid unbearable temperatures and seasonal changes, children and adults should increase their water intake, but are advised to avoid unfiltered tap and bottled water as much as possible, according to a water technology and sustainability expert. 'The whole reason our company exists is because we have a fundamental crisis in our drinking water in the United States today, and not a lot of people are talking about it,' Rich 'Raz' Razgaitis, CEO of FloWater, told FOX Business. Advertisement Raz, formerly of Fortune 500 companies and global pharmaceutical leaders Johnson & Johnson and Eli Lilly, co-founded FloWater 12 years ago to restore America's drinking water. America's water infrastructure is underfunded and outdated. In 2023, the EPA determined that the U.S.'s water infrastructure requires $625 billion over a 20-year period to address the issues, according to the Infrastructure Report Card. 'From the governmental side, whether it's federal or municipal, nobody can solve our infrastructure issues in one or two terms,' Raz said. 'So, it's a hot potato. Nobody wants to talk about this and amplify what the problem is.' 'A lot of companies are profiting off of a really broken water infrastructure.' Advertisement 5 Amid unbearable temperatures and seasonal changes, children and adults should increase their water intake, but are advised to avoid unfiltered tap and bottled water, according to experts. MediaNews Group via Getty Images Raz told FOX Business that consumer packaged goods companies, especially big beverage brands and energy drink companies, are capitalizing on impressionable young adults and fighting for kids' mindshare. 'I got personally passionate about this, watching my daughters at a young age get, what I would say is, programmed in the same way that I got programmed growing up by becoming really fixated on sugary, caffeinated drinks,' Raz said. 'This is a real problem because it creates lifelong behaviors, addictions, and dependencies that ultimately lead to cataclysmic choices downstream.' Advertisement 5 America's water infrastructure is underfunded and outdated, according to reports. Bloomberg via Getty Images Raz said choosing between unfiltered tap water and bottled drinking water is like comparing cigarettes. 'Seventy thousand to eighty thousand chemicals have been submitted to the toxicology division of the EPA over the last many decades,' Raz said. 'There are an estimated 50,000 chemicals in use in the United States today. Those chemicals are used for things like pharmaceutical manufacturing, textile manufacturing, agricultural use, and ultimately, fewer than 100 of those roughly 50,000 chemicals in use in the United States today are regulated by the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, which has hardly been updated since 1974.' 'We're literally drinking a chemical cocktail,' Raz said. Advertisement 5 'From the governmental side, whether it's federal or municipal, nobody can solve our infrastructure issues in one or two terms,' Rich 'Raz' Razgaitis, CEO of FloWater, said. 'So, it's a hot potato. Nobody wants to talk about this and amplify what the problem is.' luchschenF – In summary, the SDWA was established to protect water quality from common contaminants and was later amended and reauthorized in 1986 and 1996, according to the EPA website. Raz, however, told FOX Business that roughly 70% of Americans don't like or don't trust tap water, so they resort to bottled water, which is riddled with micro- and nanoplastic contaminants. 'Our job is really to stop that cycle,' he said of FloWater. FloWater, a purified drinking water system, is used to enhance both the taste and effects of drinking water. Raz founded the brand to get adults and children to fall in love with water again. Start and end your day informed with our newsletters Morning Report and Evening Update: Your source for today's top stories Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters 'The way that we do that is by taking the water that municipal systems deliver, which they do the best job they can possibly do given the decades of contamination that have happened in our drinking water,' Raz said. 'Then, we add a purification device onto that that radically changes that tap water. It reduces the bad stuff and puts good things in there, delivering what people say is the world's best-tasting water.' While Raz encourages offices, gyms, school districts, and other public places to provide people with FloWater systems that cost around $5 per month, he isn't particular about what system is used, as long as one is offered to consumers. Advertisement The FloWater website offers a water analysis feature for all zip codes in the U.S. to determine what exactly is in their tap water. 5 Raz said that roughly 70% of Americans don't like or don't trust tap water, so they resort to bottled water, which is riddled with micro- and nanoplastic contaminants. NurPhoto via Getty Images 'There are over 200 million Americans estimated to be drinking water from the tap with PFAS in it,' Raz said. PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are widely used, long-lasting chemicals, components of which break down very slowly over time. There are thousands of them found in commercial, consumer and industrial products, according to the EPA website. Advertisement 'Over 56% of Americans have been drinking tap water with lead in it,' Raz said. He added that microplastics found in bottled water become nanoplastics because they don't biodegrade, and individuals consume about one credit card's worth of plastic every week. 5 Raz continued to say that consumer packaged goods companies, especially big beverage brands and energy drink companies, are capitalizing on impressionable young adults and fighting for kids' mindshare. Education Images/Universal Images Group via Getty Images 'The people that don't like that problem solved are people selling consumer packaged goods that are wrapped in plastic and distributed,' Raz told FOX Business. Advertisement For homeowners who don't have access to FloWater, Raz recommends a system with a triple filter and reverse osmosis, a membrane that is impervious to contaminants and removes them down to .0001 microns, according to Raz. Homeowners should have a system with a mineral filter that includes calcium, potassium, magnesium and sodium for the countertop or under the sink. Systems for the home can cost anywhere from a few hundred dollars to $2,000.
