MSP urges councillors who greenlit controversial battery storage site to resign
Two Conservative councillors, Jim McLean and Andrew Morrison, will ask the council's planning committee to back a U-turn at a meeting next week.
Initially, councillors rejected a plan from GPC 1337 Ltd, a subsidiary of Apatura, for a 40MW battery energy storage facility on an agricultural site on the east side of Glasgow Road.
But the firm's second bid was approved last month, despite over 300 objections, on the casting vote of the chair, Cllr Betty Cunningham, Labour, after a 3-3 vote. Both applications had been recommended for approval by planners.
Since the second plan got the green light, a Scottish Government reporter has announced his decision to uphold the original refusal of the first application. He had been considering an appeal by the applicants.
More than 3,000 people have signed a petition calling for the planning approval to be overturned. It states: 'Our voices have been ignored and the decision does not reflect the best interest of those who call this area home.'
Cllr McLean and Cllr Morrison opposed both proposals when they were presented to the planning committee. They raised concerns over the appropriateness of the site.
The aim of the scheme is to store surplus energy from the national grid in the batteries, which would then be returned when required. It has been described as a 'temporary' installation, with the site returned to its previous condition after 40 years.
The first application was refused after councillors raised concerns over the risk of fire from lithium-ion batteries. Local MSP Jackson Carlaw, Conservative, has said the greenbelt should be protected and the proposal is 'intrusive and inappropriate'.
He also said there were 'very serious concerns and real-life examples of fires that have erupted at battery plants because of the lithium-ion batteries'.
Keith Bray, the independent reporter appointed by Scottish Ministers, refused the appeal over the original application earlier this month.
He found that 'while the proposal could make a small-scale and indirect contribution to renewable energy and greenhouse gas emission reduction targets, it would entail development that has adverse visual effects in a greenbelt location where strict control over new development is to be exercised'.
Mr Bray added: 'When completing my decision, the council approved a revised scheme on the site and the appellant asked to submit it. Given it was late in the appeal process, I did not accept it.'
He also said the company had asked to submit drawings which showed the 'installation of two further above-ground water tanks' to align with the proposal's fire safety plan. These weren't accepted as they 'constituted a change to the proposal'.
Council officials had reported the second application differed from the original as more information has been submitted on fire safety, and a water tank is now proposed to be underground.
They added that the development includes specialised container units for the batteries and fire suppression equipment.
Following the reporter's decision, Mr Carlaw added it 'highlights with even greater clarity that people in Eaglesham and Waterfoot have been utterly ignored and failed by the council'.
He called on councillors who backed the development to 'consider their position and resign'.
GPC 1337 Ltd has said the development will 'support the decarbonisation of the energy industry in the UK' and 28 other sites had been considered, but this is 'the only deliverable, viable' one.
The plans were 'accompanied by a suite of technical documents which demonstrate the proposal will not lead to significant adverse harm,' the applicants added.
East Renfrewshire's planning applications committee will meet on Wednesday, June 4. The motion asks for planning officials to issue a revocation order under the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997.
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Chronicle
25 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
UK Government must explain how it aims to cut energy bills, says minister
Energy Secretary Ed Miliband announced on Thursday that the Government would not segment the UK into zones where bills would depend on local supply and demand. Such an initiative was expected to benefit Scots due to the high level of power generation in the country. Instead, Mr Miliband promised a 'reformed system of national pricing', which he said was 'the best way to deliver an electricity system that is fairer, more affordable, and more secure, at less risk to vital investment in clean energy than other alternatives'. Zonal pricing had been opposed by major energy firms – excluding Octopus Energy, whose boss was in favour of the move – which raised concerns about the impact on investment in renewable energy. Responding to the announcement, Scotland's Energy Secretary, Gillian Martin, urged the UK Government to urgently lay out plans to cut bills, citing a Labour manifesto pledge from last year's general election. 'The UK Government promised to cut bills – instead, they have increased,' she said. 'They need to set out immediately how they will sort out the high energy bills faced by the people of Scotland – in an energy-rich country like Scotland, people should not be struggling to pay their bills. 'They promised that bills would fall by £300, but bills are higher than they were this time last year. 'The UK Government have set out what they will not do; they now need to set out what they will do to bring bills down. 'Given the significance of Scotland's renewables sector, the Scottish Government must be fully involved in decisions on reforming the national energy market in a way that brings down bills and delivers a level playing field for renewables in Scotland.' But Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said the announcement was 'great news' for Scottish jobs. 'We have listened to Scottish industry and made a positive decision to reform our energy market, ensuring consumers feel the benefit of our clean energy mission,' he said. 'Bills are already falling in Scotland and we'll bring them down for good by getting off the rollercoaster of foreign gas, and winning the race to clean power. 'This decision will safeguard the investment required to win that race and secure thousands of good Scottish jobs for decades to come. 'This package of measures will create a predictable climate for Scottish industry and ensure the whole of Scotland benefits from our clean energy future.'
Rhyl Journal
27 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Reform UK supports ‘one in, one out' among its ranks, Commons leader claims
Lucy Powell said she did not expect Nigel Farage's party to 'welcome' efforts to set up a one in, one out English Channel migration deal with France during Emmanuel Macron's state visit to the UK. 'But when it comes to their own party, they're already really enthusiastically implementing a policy of one in, one out,' Ms Powell told the Commons. Mr McMurdock left Reform UK after the Sunday Times published a story on Saturday which alleged two businesses connected to the South Basildon and East Thurrock MP took out Covid-19 loans totalling £70,000 during the pandemic, one of which had no employees. The now-independent MP has insisted that all of his business dealings 'had always been conducted fully within the law and in compliance with all regulations and that appropriately qualified professionals had reviewed all activity confirming the same'. Since last year's general election, Reform has also lost Great Yarmouth MP Rupert Lowe from among its ranks but gained Runcorn and Helsby constituency from Labour in a by-election. Ms Powell, who did not name Mr McMurdock, told the Commons: 'Even though they've only got a group of a handful of MPs, their chief whip seems to have had a busier week than ours. I mean, that's kind of saying something.' Turning to the wider party, she said: 'The bigger story for Reform this week is they really are becoming the party of sleaze and scandal, and dud and dodgy personnel. 'It's not really the right moment, I don't think, to start ditching your vetting procedures, don't you think?' The Cabinet minister also criticised Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch, who is set to outline her party's welfare policy on Thursday. 'I did notice, though, that the leader of the Opposition today is giving a speech, talking about the ticking time bomb that's been left,' Ms Powell said. 'Too right it's a ticking time bomb – it's their ticking time bomb and we all know that they left mines all over the place, and we're coming along having to sweep them out.' Conservative shadow Commons leader Jesse Norman had earlier said Labour had lost the backing on 'even supportive British newspapers', and told MPs: 'For this Government, of course, the past week marks an anniversary of a somewhat less glorious and happy kind – its first full year in office.' Referring to a resident doctors walkout led by the British Medical Association (BMA) over a bid for 'pay restoration', he told MPs: 'As the wildly overrated Aneurin Bevan said he had done in 1948, the present Secretary of State (Wes Streeting) – and I'm quoting Bevan's words in relation to the GPs in 1948 – that he had 'stuffed their mouths with gold and they are already coming back for more'.' Ms Powell said the Government had already 'delivered a very generous pay settlement', but warned plans for a walkout were 'of course extremely disappointing and strike action that we don't think is at all necessary, because when the NHS is finally moving in the right direction, these strikes will put that recovery at risk, affecting patients and letting down our collective obligations to those that we're here to serve'.
Scotsman
32 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Scottish drivers in the EV switch fast lane
Scottish drivers look set to be in the fast lane for the switch to Electric Vehicles, according to a CTEK survey of more than 1,000 UK drivers by Find Out Now. Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Asked what type of car they imagine they would be driving in 2035, more than three out of five (41%) of the country's drivers envisage themselves behind the wheel of a fully battery electric vehicle (BEV) or a plug-in hybrid (PHEV). The national average was 36%. The three in ten (30%) of Scottish drivers who anticipate they will be driving a fully electric car by 2035 makes the region a joint national leader, alongside the North West and Yorkshire and Humber. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Even by 2030, the survey found that almost one in three (28%) of Scottish drivers think they will be behind the wheel of a BEV or PHEV. A CTEK EV charging installation Scottish drivers expecting to buy a second hand car next are also in the fast lane for the switch to electric. Some 7% expect to buy a used BEV and an even larger 16% a used PHEV. Daniel Forsberg, Marketing Manager EVSE at the EV chargepoint manufacturer CTEK, said: 'Scottish drivers look set to be in the fast lane for switching within a decade from now. 'The UK Governments and the regional mayors and councils can do more to entice drivers to move from petrol or diesel to electricity, including by massively expanding the availability of public charging so ICE drivers feel confident that if they do switch to an EV they can charge easily and conveniently.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Nationally, the survey found drivers in their 30s look set to spearhead the switch to EVs. The survey reveals 30 to 39-year-olds are the generation most primed to buy EV and ditch petrol and diesel first. The survey found almost two thirds (61%) of drivers currently in their 30s foresee they will be driving an EV in the year 2035, when they will be in their 40s. Only one in six (17%) thirty-somethings think they will still be driving an ICE (purely petrol or diesel) vehicle in a decade's time. The rest don't know. Even by 2030, a majority (59%) of what CTEK is terming 'Generation E' will be driving a Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV) or a hybrid. Just over a fifth (21%) think they will be driving an ICE car. Daniel Forsberg said: 'We're calling UK drivers in their 30s 'Generation E' because they are leading the way in practically every question we asked in our nationally representative survey. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'We suspect there are several factors at play in this. People in their 30s are likely to have both the financial means to be able to choose electric and the environmental and climate awareness to want to do so. Not far behind them are the 18 to 29-year-olds, who are the second age group most set to go EV. 'In contrast, it is the older generations aged 55 and above who are least likely to switch, in spite of probably being financially able to. They are, we suspect, more wedded to fossil fuels after decades of driving ICE cars.
