Walking Through The ‘Kill Zone' For Food: The 800+ Deaths At Gaza Aid Centres Explained
Over 800 Palestinians die while seeking aid: How does the process of giving aid work in Gaza? What makes it dangerous? Explained
Twenty-eight countries including Britain, Japan and a host of European nations issued a joint statement on Monday saying the war in Gaza 'must end now". The foreign ministers of countries, including Australia and Canada, said 'the suffering of civilians in Gaza has reached new depths." They condemned 'the drip feeding of aid and the inhumane killing of civilians, including children, seeking to meet their most basic needs of water and food".
The statement described as 'horrifying" the recent deaths of over 800 Palestinians who were seeking aid, according to the figures released by Gaza's Health Ministry and the U.N. human rights office.
How does the process of giving aid work in Gaza? What are the dangers involved? Explained
The Israel-Hamas war
Hamas triggered the war when militants stormed into southern Israel on October 7, 2023, killing around 1,200 people and taking 251 others hostage. Fifty hostages remain in Gaza, but fewer than half are thought to be alive. Israel's military offensive has killed more than 59,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. The ministry is part of the Hamas government, but the U.N. and other international organisations see it as the most reliable source of data on casualties.
What is drip feeding of aid?
The term 'drip feeding" of aid in Gaza refers to the extremely limited, tightly controlled, and insufficient flow of humanitarian assistance into the territory since the escalation of conflict in October 2023. Aid deliveries have often fallen far below the daily minimum needed to sustain the population—at times dipping to just 10–20 trucks a day, compared to the pre-war average of 500. Humanitarian groups and UN officials describe this as a deliberate restriction, accusing Israel of using aid as a tool of political pressure, while Israel cites security concerns over aid diversion by Hamas. The result is a humanitarian system that delivers just enough to avoid total collapse, but not enough to prevent widespread hunger, disease, and death. This slow and inadequate supply—characterized as 'starvation by design" by some rights groups—forces desperate civilians to risk their lives to obtain even the most basic necessities.
How do Gazans get aid?
Most of the food supplies Israel has allowed into Gaza go to the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, an American group backed by Israel.
Arrival & First Halt: Aid seekers (on foot, by cart, or vehicle) travel up to a designated drop-off point, usually 1.5 km from the distribution site, where they must disembark and proceed on foot carrying supplies.
Wait at al‑Joura: From there, they walk to al‑Joura—a sandy pit where families wait, often for 12–24 hours, to receive a drone or military 'go" signal to move toward the aid point.
Final Approach to Aid Gate: Once the signal arrives (supposedly indicating safe passage), they proceed roughly another 1 km through lines of Israeli military checkpoints, sniper positions, drones, and barriers to reach the guarded gate of the distribution center.
At‑risk even when waiting: Witnesses have reported fire near or into al‑Joura—even before the signal is given—endangering crowds gathered for hours hoping for sustenance.
What Happens Immediately After the Signal
Thousands of people who have waited for hours (often overnight) in al‑Joura or nearby dunes begin sprinting toward the distribution gate to ensure they get aid before the supplies run out, often causing stampede.
To reach the gate, people must cross 500–1,000 meters of exposed terrain.
This area is often surveilled by Israeli drones, surrounded by sniper or observation posts and l ined with Israeli army checkpoints or trenches.
Despite the 'go signal," witnesses say that gunfire frequently breaks out, either to control the crowd or for unclear reasons. Many are killed or injured in the chaos — shot by live rounds, rubber bullets, or drone-fired projectiles; crushed in crowd surges or while trying to flee; trampled if they fall.
Reports from UN and journalists estimate dozens to hundreds have died during these rushes since GHF distribution began.
Israeli soldiers or GHF staff allow only a small number of people through the final gate. The rest are either turned back or forced to wait again until the next day.
Kill / No‑Go Zones in Gaza
1. Northern Gaza Governorate (Jabalia, Beit Hanoun, Beit Lahia, Gaza City)
2. Al‑Mawasi / Khan Yunis Area
3. Deir al‑Balah & Eastern Central Gaza Zone
4. Israeli Security / Buffer Corridors: Netzarim, Philadelphi, Morag
Gaza's aid-related deaths
According to the United Nations and humanitarian sources, at least 875 people have been killed while trying to access food, water, or medical assistance since late May. The vast majority—over 670 deaths—occurred near Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) distribution centers, primarily in Rafah and Khan Younis.
Another 200+ fatalities were recorded along aid convoy routes, often due to attacks, stampedes, or exposure. In some incidents, such as a deadly surge at a GHF site on July 16, more than 20 people were crushed or suffocated while scrambling for supplies.
Human rights organizations and UN officials have condemned these deaths as the direct result of a broken and dangerous aid system, describing the environment as 'inherently unsafe" and calling for urgent changes to ensure civilian protection.
What has Israel said?
Israel's 21 months of war with Hamas have pushed Gaza to the brink of famine, sparked worldwide protests and led to an International Criminal Court arrest warrant against Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. 'The Israeli government's aid delivery model is dangerous, fuels instability and deprives Gazans of human dignity," the countries said in their statement. 'The Israeli government's denial of essential humanitarian assistance to the civilian population is unacceptable. Israel must comply with its obligations under international humanitarian law."
Israel and U.S. have rejected the criticism. Israel's Foreign Ministry rejected the statement, saying it was 'disconnected from reality and sends the wrong message to Hamas." 'Hamas is the sole party responsible for the continuation of the war and the suffering on both sides," Foreign Ministry spokesperson Oren Marmorstein posted on X.
U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee also rejected the statement from many of America's closest allies, calling it 'disgusting" in a post on X and saying they should instead pressure the 'savages of Hamas." Germany was also notably absent from the statement.
top videos
View all
Israel and Hamas have been engaged in ceasefire talks but there appears to be no breakthrough, and it's not clear whether any truce would bring the war to a lasting halt. Netanyahu has vowed to continue the war until all the hostages are returned and Hamas is defeated or disarmed.
With Agency Inputs
About the Author
Manjiri Joshi
At the news desk for 17 years, the story of her life has revolved around finding pun, facts while reporting, on radio, heading a daily newspaper desk, teaching mass media students to now editing special copies ...Read More
Get Latest Updates on Movies, Breaking News On India, World, Live Cricket Scores, And Stock Market Updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
gaza Israel Hamas
view comments
Location :
Mumbai, India, India
First Published:
July 22, 2025, 13:34 IST
News explainers Walking Through The 'Kill Zone' For Food: The 800+ Deaths At Gaza Aid Centres Explained
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Rights Groups Warn Of Starvation In Gaza Amid Israeli Strikes That Killed 29
More than 100 charity and human rights groups said Wednesday that Israel's blockade and ongoing military offensive are pushing Palestinians in the Gaza Strip toward starvation, as Israeli strikes killed another 29 people overnight, according to local health officials. Meanwhile, the Trump administration's Mideast envoy, Steve Witkoff, was set to meet with a senior Israeli official about ceasefire talks, a sign that lower-level negotiations that have dragged on for weeks could be approaching a breakthrough. Experts say Gaza is at risk of famine because of Israel's blockade and the offensive launched in response to Hamas' October 7, 2023, attack. The head of the World Health Organisation said Gaza is 'witnessing a deadly surge' in malnutrition and related diseases, and that a 'large proportion' of its roughly 2 million people are starving. Israel says it allows enough aid into the territory and faults delivery efforts by UN agencies, which say they are hindered by Israeli restrictions and the breakdown of security. Hamas has said it will only release the remaining 50 hostages it holds, around 20 of them believed to be alive, in exchange for a lasting ceasefire and an Israeli withdrawal. Israel has vowed to recover all the captives and continue the war until Hamas has been defeated or disarmed. In an open letter, 115 organisations, including major international aid groups such as Doctors Without Borders, Mercy Corps and Save the Children, said they were watching their own colleagues, as well as the Palestinians they serve, 'waste away.' The letter blamed Israeli restrictions and 'massacres' at aid-distribution points. Witnesses, health officials and the UN human rights office say Israeli forces have repeatedly fired on crowds seeking aid, killing more than 1,000 people. Israel says its forces have only fired warning shots and that the death count is exaggerated. The Israeli government's 'restrictions, delays, and fragmentation under its total siege have created chaos, starvation, and death,' the letter said. WHO Director Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus echoed that criticism, telling reporters that acute malnutrition centers in Gaza are full of patients and lack adequate supplies. He said rates of acute malnutrition exceed 10% and that among pregnant and breastfeeding women, more than 20% are malnourished, often severely. The UN health agency's representative in the occupied Palestinian territories, Dr. Rik Peeperkorn, said there were more than 30,000 children under 5 with acute malnutrition in Gaza and that the WHO had reports that at least 21 children under 5 have died so far this year. The Israeli Foreign Ministry rejected the criticism in the open letter and accused the groups of 'echoing Hamas' propaganda.' It said it has allowed around 4,500 aid trucks into Gaza since lifting a complete blockade in May, and that more than 700 trucks are waiting to be picked up and distributed by the UN That's an average of around 70 trucks a day, the lowest rate of the war and far below the 500 to 600 trucks a day the UN says are needed, and which entered during a six-week ceasefire earlier this year. The UN says it has struggled to deliver aid inside Gaza because of Israeli military restrictions, ongoing fighting and a breakdown of law and order. An alternative system established by Israel and an American contractor has been marred by violence and controversy. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Witkoff was headed to Europe to meet with key leaders from the Middle East to discuss the latest ceasefire proposal and release of hostages. 'We want this ceasefire to happen as soon as possible, and we want these hostages to be released,' Leavitt said. An official familiar with the negotiations said Ron Dermer, a top adviser to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, was traveling to Rome to meet Witkoff on Thursday. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the sensitive negotiations. The evolving deal is expected to include a 60-day ceasefire in which Hamas would release 10 living hostages and the remains of 18 others in phases in exchange for Palestinians imprisoned by Israel. Aid supplies would be ramped up, and the two sides would hold negotiations on a lasting truce. Israel has continued to carry out waves of daily airstrikes against what it says are militant targets but which often kill women and children. Israel blames civilian deaths on Hamas because the militants operate in densely populated areas. One of the overnight strikes hit a house in Gaza City, killing at least 12 people, according to Shifa Hospital, which received the casualties. The dead included six children and two women, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. The Israeli military said it struck an Islamic Jihad militant, and that the incident was under review because of reports of civilian casualties. Shifa said another strike late Tuesday in Gaza City killed three children. A strike on an apartment in northern Gaza killed at least six people. Among the dead were three children and two women, including one who was pregnant, the ministry said. The military said it struck a Hamas operative. In central Gaza, a strike in a densely populated part of the built-up Nuseirat refugee camp killed eight people and wounded 57, according to Awda Hospital, which received the casualties. Hamas-led militants abducted 251 people in the October 7 attack and killed around 1,200 people, mostly civilians. More than 59,000 Palestinians have been killed during the war, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. Its count doesn't distinguish between militants and civilians, but the ministry says that more than half of the dead are women and children. The UN and other international organisations see it as the most reliable source of data on casualties. Goldenberg reported from Tel Aviv, Israel. Associated Press Writer Michelle Price in Washington contributed to this report.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Is soaking almonds beneficial? Know its benefits and potential drawbacks
Almonds are a nutritious and delicious snack enjoyed worldwide, known for their rich content of healthy fats, protein, vitamins, and minerals. Many people soak almonds overnight before eating them, believing this process enhances their health benefits and makes them easier to digest. But is soaking almonds truly beneficial, or is it just a traditional habit passed down through generations? Soaking almonds is said to reduce anti-nutrients like phytic acid, which can interfere with mineral absorption. Additionally, soaked almonds tend to be softer and gentler on the stomach, making them easier to chew and digest for some people. However, the overall impact on nutrition may vary depending on individual health needs and preferences. The benefits of soaking almonds Soaking almonds can have several benefits, including: 1. Boosts brain function Soaked almonds are rich in riboflavin and L-carnitine, nutrients that support healthy brain function and may help prevent age-related cognitive decline. 2. Supports heart health Almonds are rich in monounsaturated fats, which help to reduce LDL (bad cholesterol) and increase HDL (good cholesterol). They also contain potassium and magnesium, which support blood pressure control and overall cardiovascular health. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo 3. Regulates blood sugar levels The fiber and healthy fats in soaked almonds can contribute to stabilizing blood sugar levels. Including soaked almonds as a part of a balanced diet may be particularly helpful for individuals managing diabetes or insulin resistance. 4. Promotes glowing skin Thanks to their high vitamin E and antioxidant content, soaked almonds help protect the skin from oxidative stress and sun damage. They also aid in collagen production, which keeps the skin supple and youthful. 5. Strengthens bones and teeth Almonds are a good source of calcium, magnesium, and phosphorus—minerals essential for bone density and tooth health. Consuming them daily can help maintain strong bones and reduce the risk of osteoporosis, especially when paired with vitamin D. 6. Enhances digestive health Soaking almonds activates beneficial enzymes that aid in digestion, making almonds easier on the stomach. 7. Increases nutrient absorption Soaking almonds reduces phytic acid, an anti-nutrient that can hinder mineral absorption. This process enhances the bioavailability of nutrients such as vitamin E, magnesium, calcium, and B vitamins. 8. Aids in weight management Soaked almonds can be easier to chew and consume, promoting mindful eating. Additionally, the fiber content in almonds may contribute to a feeling of fullness, which can be beneficial for weight management when included in a balanced diet. 9. Supports immune function Almonds contribute to a more alkaline internal environment, which supports immune function. Their vitamin E and antioxidant content also protect cells from oxidative stress. 10. Natural detoxification Soaked almonds are rich in antioxidants like vitamin E, which help neutralize free radicals and support liver function. This aids in the natural detoxification processes of the body, helping flush out toxins and promoting better overall health The drawbacks of soaking almonds While soaking almonds can have several benefits, there are also some drawbacks to consider. These include: Loss of nutrients: Soaking almonds can lead to a loss of water-soluble nutrients like vitamin B and vitamin C. Texture and taste: Soaking almonds can affect their texture and taste, making them less crunchy and flavourful. Also read | Do flax seeds help with weight loss? Know its benefits and tips to use
Hans India
6 hours ago
- Hans India
Nutrition and lifestyle hold the key to overcoming obesity risk
Obesity is a growing concern in India, linked to a rising burden of diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular diseases. Yet, recent research by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research–Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology (CSIR-CCMB), Hyderabad, reveals that the genetic patterns associated with obesity in Europeans do not necessarily translate to Indians. The findings emphasize that lifestyle choices and targeted nutrition might be more effective than genetics-based interventions for Indian populations. Indians tend to exhibit more central or abdominal obesity—excess fat around the waist—even at lower body mass index (BMI) levels than Europeans. This pattern is more strongly linked to metabolic risks such as insulin resistance and cardiovascular disease. The research shows that polygenic risk scores (PRS), which use genetic data to predict obesity risk, work more accurately in people of European ancestry but are less predictive for those of South Asian ancestry, including Indians. This difference suggests that environmental and lifestyle factors play a greater role in influencing obesity in Indians. The role of lifestyle in weight management The study tracked individuals with varying glucose levels for nearly two decades, allowing researchers to observe how lifestyle interventions affect people with a high genetic risk of obesity. Interestingly, individuals genetically predisposed to obesity initially responded well to lifestyle modifications such as structured exercise and dietary changes. However, once these interventions stopped, weight regain occurred more rapidly than in people with lower genetic risk. This underlines an important point: while genetics may influence how easily one gains or loses weight, sustainable lifestyle habits are critical to long-term success. Nutrition: The first line of defense For Indians, where diets are often rich in refined carbohydrates and low in protein, dietary improvements can significantly alter obesity outcomes. Experts suggest focusing on nutrient-dense whole foods, increasing dietary fiber, and moderating simple carbohydrate intake. Traditional Indian diets already include pulses, vegetables, and spices with known metabolic benefits, but the growing popularity of processed foods and sugary drinks has shifted nutritional patterns in recent years. Adopting balanced meal plans that emphasize seasonal produce, whole grains, lean proteins, and healthy fats can help counteract genetic nutrient supplementation may also prove beneficial. For example, deficiencies in vitamin D and omega-3 fatty acids are prevalent in India and have been linked to metabolic disorders and weight gain. Addressing such deficiencies through diet or supplements can support metabolic health and weight management, especially for individuals at high genetic risk. Exercise and physical activity While nutrition forms the foundation, physical activity determines how effectively calories are utilized and stored. Regular aerobic exercise, resistance training, and even moderate-intensity daily activities like walking or cycling can improve insulin sensitivity and prevent fat accumulation around the abdomen. For genetically susceptible individuals, incorporating consistent physical activity into daily life is more effective than temporary workout plans that are abandoned after initial weight loss. Early interventions for lasting impact One of the most powerful findings of the global research effort, which included Indian genetic data, was the ability to predict future obesity risk in children as young as five years old. Early detection means lifestyle and nutritional interventions can start sooner, preventing excessive weight gain before it becomes a chronic issue. For children at risk, promoting outdoor play, limiting screen time, encouraging balanced diets, and educating families about healthy cooking can create lifelong healthy habits. A holistic approach The takeaway from the CSIR-CCMB study is clear: while genetics provides part of the picture, it is lifestyle and nutrition that ultimately determine outcomes. For Indians, whose genetic predisposition differs from Europeans, tailored lifestyle solutions—like nutrient-specific supplementation, diet quality improvement, and long-term fitness habits—may yield better results than relying solely on genetic predictions. As Dr. Giriraj Ratan Chandak of CSIR-CCMB notes, 'Lifestyle, diet, and nutrition might play an equal or even greater role than genetics in predicting obesity in Indians.' For individuals and healthcare policymakers alike, the focus should be on creating environments and programs that encourage sustainable nutrition and active lifestyles, rather than treating obesity as an unavoidable genetic destiny.
