How the global trade in donkey skins threatens the lives of women and girls
Despite its scale, this cruel trade remains largely unregulated and invisible, and it is women and girls who suffer most. For many, donkeys are much more than animals – they are co-workers and companions. When a donkey is stolen, household income can fall by 73%. In one Kenyan region, over 90% of women have experienced donkey theft. Children – especially girls – are taken out of school to do the 'donkey work'.
Every shocking statistic and voice of anguish in our report Stolen Donkeys, Stolen Futures is evidence that the donkey skin trade is undermining progress towards UN sustainable development goals of gender equality and poverty reduction.
It is not only African donkeys that face an existential threat from the skin trade. In Brazil, the donkey population has dropped by 94% in the past 30 years, from 1.37 million in 1996 to around 78,000 in 2025. But there is hope. Legislators in Brazil have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to protect their donkeys when a bill banning their slaughter goes to its national congress.
At the Pan-African Donkey Conference in Côte d'Ivoire last month, leaders across the continent called for coordinated action to protect donkeys and the communities they support. We must remember that this isn't just about banning the skin trade for the sake of livelihoods – it's about creating a better world for donkeys. These intelligent, sentient beings deserve respect, compassion and protection.Marianne SteeleCEO, The Donkey Sanctuary, Sidmouth, Devon
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Macron branded 'naive' and accused of risking UK lives after 'botched' Iran call
Emmanuel Macron has been branded 'naive' after holding a phone call with Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian - the first time the two leaders have spoken since the end of the 12-day war with Israel Emmanuel Macron has been slammed for his "naive', after holding talks with Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian. The French President spoke with his Iranian counterpart on Sunday, the first time since the end of the " approach following discussions with Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian. The French President engaged in talks with his Iranian counterpart on Sunday, marking the first interaction since the conclusion of the "12-day war" with Israel. In a subsequent social media post, Macron implored Iran to "maintain the ceasefire, in order to help restore peace to the Middle East." He also urged Tehran "to return to the negotiating table to discuss and address nuclear and ballistic missile issues". Despite Macron's appeals, Iran announced it was severing all ties with the UN nuclear inspectorate, including prohibiting its members from visiting any nuclear sites. Ellie Borhan, a British-Iranian activist, delivered a blistering critique of Macron's failed diplomacy, arguing that attempts to placate Tehran would result in further fatalities - including those of British nationals. "A Government that kills their own people is not trustworthy," she stated, reports the Express. "When they are not a democratic regime, you cannot expect a democratic solution. You cannot be so naïve to say 'Let's talk'. If you do, you will only witness more people losing their lives. "This will not just be innocent people in Iran - this will be innocent people in the UK, Europe and the US if Iran is emboldened." Iran's ruthless mullah regime has presided over a broad campaign of terror and suppression of internal opposition. The United Nations has reported that a staggering 901 people were put to death in 2024, with around 40 executions occurring in just one week of December. According to the Norway-based Iran Human Rights group (IHRNGO), there's been a shocking 75% surge in executions within the first four months of 2025 compared to the same timeframe last year. French President Macron, spearheading Europe's diplomatic initiatives on Iran, has openly criticised the Israeli and US bombings of Iranian nuclear sites, arguing that only through political dialogue can enduring peace be achieved. Ms Borhan, however, has outright rejected the notion that Iran would honour any potential deal, stating, "This dictatorship has never stayed true or respected any negotiation or diplomacy. Every time we have an uprising they kill their own people. Where is Macron then? How can he trust this government?". She has urged Western powers to show their strength and exert "maximum pressure" on the Iranian regime. "We've seen sanctions but that is not enough, we need to put more pressure on the Islamic Republic," she insisted. Ms Borhan's activism in the UK has had personal repercussions, as her mother and brother in Iran face accusations of espionage for Israel. Macron previously directed criticism at former US President Donald Trump following American strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, cautioning that such actions would only escalate Tehran's nuclear threat.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Supreme Court clears way for deportation to South Sudan of several immigrants with no ties there
The Supreme Court on Thursday cleared the way for the deportation of several immigrants who were put on a flight in May bound for South Sudan, a war-ravaged country where they have no ties. The decision comes after the court's conservative majority found that immigration officials can quickly deport people to third countries. The majority halted an order that had allowed immigrants to challenge any removals to countries outside their homeland where they could be in danger. The court's latest decision makes clear that the South Sudan flight can complete the trip, weeks after it was detoured to a naval base in Djibouti. There, the migrants who had previously been convicted of serious crimes were held in a converted shipping container. It reverses findings from federal Judge Brian Murphy in Massachusetts, who said his order on those migrants still stands even after the high court lifted his broader decision. Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said federal authorities would complete the trip to South Sudan by the next day. The Supreme Court majority wrote that their decision on June 23 completely halted Murphy's ruling and also rendered his decision on the South Sudan flight 'unenforceable.' The court did not fully detail its legal reasoning on the underlying case, as is common on its emergency docket. Two liberal justices, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, dissented, saying the ruling gives the government special treatment. 'Other litigants must follow the rules, but the administration has the Supreme Court on speed dial,' Sotomayor wrote. Justice Elena Kagan wrote that while she disagreed with the original order, it does countermand Murphy's findings on the South Sudan flight. The eight migrants could face 'imprisonment, torture and even death' in South Sudan, where escalating political tensions have threatened to devolve into another civil war. 'We know they'll face perilous conditions, and potentially immediate detention, upon arrival,' Trina Realmuto, executive director of the National Immigration Litigation Alliance, said Thursday. The push comes amid a sweeping immigration crackdown by Trump's Republican administration, which has pledged to deport millions of people who are living in the United States illegally. The Trump administration has called Murphy's finding 'a lawless act of defiance.' McLaughlin said the Supreme Court's intervention is 'a win for the rule of law, safety and security of the American people.' Attorney General Pam Bondi called Murphy a 'rogue district court judge' and said the justices had rebuked him. Authorities have reached agreements with other countries to house immigrants if authorities can't quickly send them back to their homelands. The eight men sent to South Sudan in May had been convicted of crimes in the U.S. and had final orders of removal, Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials have said. Murphy, who was nominated by Democratic President Joe Biden, didn't prohibit deportations to third countries. But he found migrants must have a real chance to argue they could be in danger of torture if sent to another country, even if they've already exhausted their legal appeals. The men and their guards have faced rough conditions on the naval base in Djibouti, where authorities detoured the flight after Murphy found the administration had violated his order by failing to allow them a chance to challenge the removal. They have since said they're afraid of being sent to South Sudan, Realmuto said.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
US supreme court clears way for deportation of migrants to South Sudan
The supreme court on Thursday cleared the way for the deportation of several immigrants who were put on a flight in May bound for South Sudan, a war-ravaged country where they have no ties. The decision comes after the court's conservative majority found that immigration officials can quickly deport people to third countries. The majority halted an order that had allowed immigrants to challenge any removals to countries outside their homeland where they could be in danger. The court's latest order makes clear that the South Sudan flight detoured weeks ago can now complete the trip. It reverses findings from federal Judge Brian Murphy in Massachusetts, who said his order on those migrants still stands even after the high court lifted his broader decision. The majority wrote that their decision on 23 June completely halted Murphy's ruling and also rendered his decision on the South Sudan flight 'unenforceable'. The court did not fully detail its legal reasoning on the underlying case, as is common on its emergency docket. Two liberal justices, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, dissented, saying the ruling gives the government special treatment. 'Other litigants must follow the rules, but the administration has the supreme court on speed dial,' Sotomayor wrote. Attorneys for the eight migrants have said they could face 'imprisonment, torture and even death' if sent to South Sudan, where escalating political tensions have threatened to devolve into another civil war. 'We know they'll face perilous conditions, and potentially immediate detention, upon arrival,' Trina Realmuto, executive director of the National Immigration Litigation Alliance, said Thursday. The push comes amid a sweeping immigration crackdown by Trump's Republican administration, which has pledged to deport millions of people who are living in the United States illegally. The Trump administration has called Murphy's finding 'a lawless act of defiance.' The White House and Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment. Authorities have reached agreements with other countries to house immigrants if authorities cannot quickly send them back to their homelands. The eight men sent to South Sudan in May had been convicted of serious crimes in the US. Murphy, who was nominated by Democratic president Joe Biden, did not prohibit deportations to third countries. But he found migrants must have a real chance to argue they could be in danger of torture if sent to another country.
