How to watch HFL grad Quinn Gleason in Wimbledon women's doubles tennis: Time, streaming
Unfortunately for the fans, the broadcast will not be available on traditional cable and will once again be broadcasted early on in the morning of Independence Day.
Advertisement
More: Former Section V tennis star to compete at Wimbledon: What to know about the Mendon native
When is Quinn Gleason's second-round women's doubles match?
Date: Friday, July 4
Time: 6:00 a.m.
More: Mendon native advances to second round at Wimbledon: Here's how
How to watch Quinn Gleason's second-round women's doubles match
TV: Early round matches are digital only
Streaming: ESPN+ ESPN is the primary network for early-round coverage. Courts 2-18 will be broadcasted on the ESPN+ and Disney+ services while court 1 will be shown at 8:00 a.m. Gleason's court assignment is number 6. Fans can check www.wimbledon.com for updated court assignments and results.
This article originally appeared on Rochester Democrat and Chronicle: Where to watch Quinn Gleason in Wimbledon women's doubles: Streaming
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Wimbledon's seeds keep going out, and what it means for tennis
Wimbledon started like it does every year, with 64 seeds across the men's and women's singles draw. As the third round begins, just 27 remain — 14 women and 13 men. It's the fewest at a Grand Slam since the 32-seed format was first adopted in 2001. On the women's side, four of the top five are out. Coco Gauff (2) fell to Dayana Yastremska's all-out aggression, while Jessica Pegula (3) ran into an inspired Elisabetta Cocciaretto, both in the first round. Zheng Qinwen (5) left at that stage too, before last year's finalist Jasmine Paolini (4) exited in the second round. Only Aryna Sabalenka, the world No. 1, remains. Advertisement On the men's side, three of the top five remain: Jannik Sinner (1), defending champion Carlos Alcaraz (2) and Taylor Fritz (5). Britain's Jack Draper (4) exited in the second round, while world No. 3 Alexander Zverev went out in the first. Is the seeds falling a trend? Why is it happening? And where does it leave the tournament? 's tennis writers, Charlie Eccleshare and Matt Futterman, attempt to explain. Charlie Eccleshare: There have been some huge shocks, as well as some that are surprising in theory but not actually so much in practice. Gauff's loss felt seismic, but all the signs were there that Wimbledon would be her toughest Grand Slam to win, and Draper's early exit came about because he drew someone with serious grass-court pedigree while he is still figuring it out. Advertisement There are others that were big shocks, but none of the people sent home felt like they were ultimately going to win the tournament. No. 3 seeds Zverev and Pegula fall into that category. Matt Futterman: I would say 'stuff happens,' but I would probably use a different word to 'stuff.' That's the most consistent thing coming out from players and coaches. No matter how good a player is, and no matter what the number is next to their name, it's really hard to win tennis matches and very easy to lose them. Is there a sense there is a wider delta between being 'good' and being 'good on grass' than there was not that long ago? Eccleshare: A lot of it comes from the fact that the lead-in period is so much shorter, and so much more divergent, than the lead-in to an event like the French Open. 'Grass season' is only three weeks before Wimbledon, and while basically all the top players play the same two combined ATP and WTA 1,000 events on clay, their routes to Wimbledon can vary wildly. Some won't play on the grass at all, and some will try and max out their reps, but whatever they do, it's a brief, chaotic period trying to adjust to tennis' most singular surface. Advertisement Futterman: It seems like there are so few players who are actually good on grass. I think what is most important is being able to come to Wimbledon without having a glaring weakness on the surface. Coco Gauff is the prime example. She has three. Her forehand doesn't really work when the ball is low because her grip doesn't allow her to get under it very well. She hates to be rushed, and prefers to stay back a little bit and extend points, but everybody gets rushed on grass because the ball slides through. And then her serve, which is sometimes unbreakable, can get shaky quickly. No one can survive on grass without serving well. She's the perfect grass storm. Other players who struggle have some version of those weaknesses or, more generally, haven't yet figured out how to move well on grass, which is a skill all of its own. The ones who do well either have enough experience to know what to do or have mastered putting their feet in the right places on the turf. Everything flows from that. Advertisement Emma Raducanu's win over Markéta Vondroušová was a prime example. She read the spins, got low and took the ball early. It was a masterclass from someone who clearly knows her way round a grass court against someone else who does, too. It was my favorite match of the tournament to watch so far. Eccleshare: Perhaps the most interesting thing about these upsets is the absence of a defining trend beyond their existence. At the last Grand Slam, the No. 1 and No. 2 seeds were in both singles finals for the first time at a major in 12 years. The depth on both tours has gotten stronger and stronger in the last 10 to 20 years; add in the variance of a surface like grass, which can emphasize hand skills and dexterity over physicality and baseline prowess, and it's not hard to see why there would be more results that go against rankings calculated over a season that is mostly played on different courts. Futterman: To me the defining trend is that tennis is really hard these days and there are a lot of good players. Taylor Fritz, the No. 5 seed, drew Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard and Gabriel Diallo in the first two rounds. Both took him to five sets. Both have nightmare serves. He easily could have lost. He should have lost against Mpetshi Perricard, really. Gauff, the No. 2 seed, drew Dayana Yastremska, who has been a Grand Slam semifinalist. When she's on, she's very hard to beat, and on a fast surface in two out of three sets, she doesn't have to be on for very long to win. Advertisement That's tennis in 2025. Sabalenka has scrapped through plenty of ropey performances this year. So too Alcaraz in round one here. Who has most benefited and who should fans keep an eye on? Eccleshare: In the bottom half of the women's draw, Amanda Anisimova, the No. 13 seed, is now seeded to reach the semifinals. On the men's side, Karen Khachanov, the No. 17 seed, is slated to reach the last eight, with no other seed in his quarter. Just below them in the bottom half, there's a quarter with no seeded players, creating a land of opportunity for qualifier Nicolás Jarry, 18-year-old sensation João Fonseca, flairy Italian Mattia Bellucci and former semifinalist Cameron Norrie. All will fancy their chances. In the top half of the women's draw, there's another unseeded quarter, with four-time Grand Slam champion Naomi Osaka and home player Sonay Kartal the standout names. Advertisement Futterman: Too early to say, but maybe Iga Świątek, or 2022 champion Elena Rybakina. Or possibly Sabalenka, depending on who might be left standing to play her if she makes the final. The thing about upsets is that there is the principle of delayed gratification at work. It can be exciting early on, but also completely shifts the usual dynamic of later rounds at Grand Slams, where the biggest stars are supposed to meet. Eccleshare: It's kind of like a great night out followed by a hangover. In the moment all the upsets are exhilarating, but then reality sets in and you realise that you could be left with some less than thrilling matchups. Futterman: I don't see a downside as long as some of the big names survive into the quarters. If we get to the semifinals and there is no Sinner or Alcaraz or Djokovic, or Sabalenka or Świątek or Keys, then there could be problems. For now, there are some great stories cooking. But a star-driven sport needs to have some stars at the end. Eccleshare: It'll surely (?) settle down, and it could well be that it's the middle rounds, rather than the final stages, that feel the oddest. In spite of all the shocks, the three biggest favorites on the men's side are still here, and the same could be said of the women's draw, with Sabalenka, Keys, Rybakina and, looking at how the draw has shaken out, Świątek. Advertisement Futterman: Wimbledon has long been the tournament where the cream rises. It's the tournament where the greatest players in the game have won a lot. The Big Four. Pete Sampras. Andre Agassi. John McEnroe. Björn Borg. Serena Williams. Venus Williams. Martina Navratilova. Steffi Graf. And on and on. That doesn't mean that a great player doesn't end up beating Milos Raonic or Eugenie Bouchard in the final (sorry for picking on Canada), but I'm betting on getting to a damn good champion in the end. This article originally appeared in The Athletic. Sports Business, Tennis, Women's Tennis 2025 The Athletic Media Company
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NASCAR Through the Gears: Chase Elliott is back! Amazon Prime is gone. So is your bracket
It wasn't Barney Hall, Mike Joy or even Ken Squier, but Jerry Ford who once said, 'Our long national nightmare is over.' He was speaking, you know, about an actual nation, not NASCAR Nation. But in a way, the sentiment holds. Advertisement That's right, Chase Elliott once again smells of champagne. His 44-race winless nightmare ended Saturday night at Atlanta Motor Speedway, which isn't Atlanta Motor Speedway anymore and, frankly, not in Atlanta. And it's not necessarily Chase's home track, but we'll get to all that in a bit. Look who returned to Victory Lane! 'I've never in my life … This is unbelievable,' Chase said in the immediate aftermath of his late-race pass for the victory. Really, had it gotten so bad he felt it was unbelievable that he finished first? Not to downplay the long-awaited Victory Lane visit by the sport's most popular driver, but guess what: Somebody had to win that thing. And roughly half the contenders were halfway back to Charlotte when time came to settle things. Advertisement Most others were wondering how to repair their brackets — work they could begin during a commercial break. What? More on all that to come as we attack the gearbox. Chase Elliott crosses the stripe while Alex Bowman and Brad Keselowski battle side-by-side for second. First Gear: Several strangers in the top 10 at Atlanta Yes, that was Brad Keselowski and Alex Bowman, side by side, following Chase to the stripe to end a thrilling final few laps. On most occasions over the past several years or more, that trifecta would sound plausible. But Bowman has been in a funk and Kez's season has been downright dismal — even when he runs well, something bad usually happens to knee-cap his finish. But we all knew, entering Atlanta, it was a week for the Have Nots to snag a quality finish and maybe even win and earn a playoff berth. Damn near happened for Kez, who sure isn't gonna make the playoffs on points (he vaulted all the way to 27th!). The "Big One" erupted on Lap 69. That would've been true even with a relatively clean race, but was particularly true after more than half the field, including several weekly favorites, got all or part of that Lap 69 pileup. And that's why, as usual at a 'restrictor-plate' race, a handful of drivers booked a rare top 10. Advertisement Among them: Erik Jones (5th), Ricky Stenhouse Jr. (6th), Zane Smith (7th) and Ty Dillon (8th). For many, the next good chance won't come until the regular-season finale, Aug. 23 at Daytona. Second Gear: In-Season Challenge bracket busting courtesy of Big One A lot of you were already ignoring the inaugural in-season bracket challenge, featuring a 32-car field, whittled in half after each of four races before it's down to just two drivers in four weeks at Indy. After Atlanta, a whole lot more of you are ignoring it. The favorites took a beating, largely due to that Lap 69 Big One. This is like the NCAA basketball tournament in just one way: brackets. But instead of traditional head-to-head matchups, like you get in team sports or, say, Wimbledon over the current fortnight, the drivers are racing their race and then comparing finishes with this week's bracket opponent. Advertisement And that's how 32-seed Ty Dillon ousted 1-seed Denny Hamlin, who joined that 22-car mayhem on Lap 69. And look at these other departures: Kyle Larson, Christopher Bell, William Byron, Ross Chastain, Ryan Blaney and Chase Briscoe. There's a million bucks waiting for the eventual winner, and given the nature of this beast, don't be shocked if it comes down to something like Ryan Preece vs. John Hunter Nemechek. Yee-ha. Third Gear: Plenty of Atlanta tracks not in Atlanta Welcome to Geography class, where we explain that Atlanta Motor Speedway, Road Atlanta and Atlanta Motorsports Park are varying day-trip distances from the heart of Georgia's state capital. Advertisement If we're being literal, Chase Elliott's actual home track is Atlanta Motorsports Park, a renowned but private road course literally located in Chase's Dawsonville hometown. Measuring from Atlanta's world famous Varsity burger-and-dog joint at the corner of North Avenue and Spring Street, Dawsonville's road course is 60 miles away. Road Atlanta, the beautiful layout that's host to IMSA's season finale, is located in Braselton, 53 miles from The Varsity. Atlanta Motor Speedway, or EchoPark as its now known, is south of town in Hampton, and it's the closest — just 30 miles away. But Chase's EchoPark 'home track' is actually 85 miles from the famous Dawsonville Pool Room, a drive of 1 hour and 45 minutes according to MapQuest, though Chase can probably get there a tad quicker. Advertisement Fourth Gear: TNT takes over NASCAR TV coverage, Dale Earnhardt Jr. sticks around Good news nearly all around for the anti-Amazon Prime crowd. The Cup Series concluded its five-week Prime run and moved back to basic cable this past weekend — TNT began its own five-week slate of Cup fare. And along with that, you still get Junior Earnhardt in the booth. He's been signed to do the five weeks for both Prime and TNT, and that's a good thing because he's a genuine pleasure due to his knowledge of current affairs, NASCAR history, and his excitement level. What's that? You need some bad news to balance things out? Advertisement Here you go: Full commercial breaks are back. Let's compare the final Prime race at Pocono with the first TNT race this past Saturday, courtesy of the folks. Prime at Pocono: 205 total minutes of racing, five minutes of traditional breakaway commercials, 39 minutes of side-by-side featuring both a commercial and live racing. TNT at Atlanta: 214 minutes of racing, 35 minutes of commercial breaks, 16 minutes of side-by-side. For the anti-streaming crowd, commercials never looked so good. — Email Ken Willis a This article originally appeared on The Daytona Beach News-Journal: NASCAR: Chase Elliott lives! So do commercials. How's your bracket?
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NASCAR Power Rankings: Chase Elliott makes a leap; Denny Hamlin burns a mulligan
Denny Hamlin retains his top spot in our weekly power rankings despite a finish of 31st last Saturday night in the Quaker State 400 at Atlanta. For starters, he had a fairly strong grip on the top spot last week. At least as strong as anyone had been gripping it in the past few months. And while he finished 31st, it was due to the Big One at a "plate race," and we rarely hold that against anyone. Advertisement Actually, we never hold that against anyone, because there's really no way to avoid it. Chase Elliott gets a win, gets the winner's sticker above his door, and gets the third spot in our power rankings this week. Conversely, should Chase Elliott vault all the way from seventh to third this week after winning one of those crapshoot races? Maybe not, but we also keep an eye on the futures market here, and the next two weeks bring road courses, which remain Chase's favorite type of playground. Or at least his most productive. 1. Denny Hamlin Burned a mulligan at Atlanta but fought for a 31st. 2. Kyle Larson Won the pole at Chicago last year, then finished 39th. 3. Chase Elliott After an 0-for-44 slide, might actually win a second straight this coming week. 4. Christopher Bell Here's a guy who'll welcome the next two weeks on road courses. Advertisement 5. Chase Briscoe Atlanta's Big One ended his good work of late. No fan of road courses, btw. 6. Ryan Blaney Can't get any worse than the 40th at Atlanta. 7. Chris Buescher Not yet receiving his mail in the Top 10, but he's getting close. 8. William Byron 27th or worse in three of last four, so yes, dangerously flirting with the dreaded mini-slump. 9. Ross Chastain Speaking of which, his last three finishes: 16th, 26th, 33rd. 10. Ryan Preece Doesn't spend much time in our Top 10, so he may not put down roots. This article originally appeared on The Daytona Beach News-Journal: NASCAR Power Rankings: Chase Elliott makes move, but who's top driver?
