
Benefits reforms would decimate my £14k handouts, without PIP my luxuries like fags & posh pet accessories would be gone
PIP HOORAY Benefits reforms would decimate my £14k handouts, without PIP my luxuries like fags & posh pet accessories would be gone
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
A SENSE of ease comes over me, as I read the news on the sun-trap terrace which overlooks my sprawling garden as I realise my benefits aren't going anywhere.
Until Tuesday a guillotine was hanging above me, threatening to cut off my monthly PIP payments, but thanks to a retreat from Keir Starmer they're safe… for now.
5
Erica Crompton says she depends on her £295 PIP she receives a month
Credit: SUPPLIED
5
She believes should be able to spend her stipend on little luxuries
Reforms would have seen disabled Brits like me face stricter tests to qualify for support the changes have now been shelved entirely — with no set date for when, or if, they will happen
How long my comfortable life will last remains to be seen as it seems my £14,400 income from Universal Credit and PIP are always up for grabs, no matter the party in power.
I've come to see the majority of political parties as the real thugs.
Whoever is in power, you can guarantee they'll have threatened - or have already implemented - major cuts to my income.
Had Labour's suggested cuts come into play I may have lost £600 of the total sum of £1200 I receive in benefits a month.
It might seem like a lot but I implore you to bear in mind that minimum wages, full-time, meets £2,000 a month. So, my total benefits aren't exactly a footballer's salary or an heir's trust fund.
For Universal Credit, I now get £381 housing benefit; £201 for caring over 24 hours a week and £400 for being unemployed due to my schizophrenia (it seems to change month-by-month and is constantly under review meaning this could also be up for grabs).
PIP is a standard, monthly payment of £295 I always get. It helps with costs associated with my illness - regardless of whether or not I'm in work.
The proposal of a points system for PIP meant I would lose it completely as I only score 2 points for a few concerns over 12 questions (in total mine was 11 points).
For example: communication can be hard in groups and I often fall out with friends and family - especially on the internet, phone or Whatsapp.
Disability benefit explained - what you can claim
Or I might need prompting for my weekly bath, simply because I'm getting smelly.
These side effects all only score 2 points, not the proposed 4 to keep PIP.
This week Reeve's plans were watered down by Starmer, thanks to some more moral Labour backbenchers (with backbones?)
Given the hateful responses I receive when I speak publicly about claiming benefits, I doubt I've heard the last of any of our 'disability benefits being axed.'
As I casually scroll through the comments I received on social media, I get more angry faces and hateful comments than murderers, child killers and rapists.
I have to disagree with all of them and believe I - we - deserve support from the state for a severe mental illness, mine is schizo-affective disorder, and for putting in 50 hours a week caring for my partner, a wheelchair user.
I also believe without the cost of children, I should be able to spend my stipend on little luxuries like my 60 fags a day habit and hand-painted cat food bowls which I imported for £75 from India.
I'm aware that many countries' welfare states don't exist, like India where my cat bowls hail from, so I'm still grateful for any support I do receive.
What is PIP?
HOUSEHOLDS suffering from a long-term illness, disability or mental health condition can get extra help through personal independence payments (PIP).
The maximum you can receive from the Government benefit is £172.75 a week.
PIP is for those over 16 and under the state pension age, currently 66.
Crucially, you must also have a health condition or disability where you either have had difficulties with daily living or getting around - or both- for three months, and you expect these difficulties to continue for at least nine months (unless you're terminally ill with less than 12 months to live).
You can also claim PIP if you're in or out of work and if you're already getting limited capability for work and work-related activity (LCWRA) payments if you claim Universal Credit.
PIP is made up of two parts and whether you get one or both of these depends on how severely your condition affects you.
You may get the mobility part of PIP if you need help going out or moving around. The weekly rate for this is either £26.90 or £71.
While on the daily living part of PIP, the weekly rate is either £68.10 or £101.75 - and you could get both elements, so up to £172.75 in total.
You can claim PIP at the same time as other benefits, except the armed forces independence payment.
Make a claim by calling the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) on 0800 917 2222.
5
Erica qualifies for PIP due to her schizo-affective disorder but she would have lost it had Labour's proposed reforms come into place
Credit: Supplied
5
As well as Universal Credit she receives a carers allowance for acting as her partner Paul's carer
Credit: Erica Crompton
It's not just trolls saying I'm a 'leech' or 'scrounger' who I face criticism from though - even doctors can't agree on what schizophrenia is and many naysayers even go as far as to say "it's only in the mind & there's nothing wrong at all" or that it's just a 'human response to traumatic life events'.
But what they don't factor in is the major physical toll my mental health takes on my body.
I'd like to offer these negative Nellys a day's worth of my medication and see how they get on.
My boyfriend Paul was mostly in bed asleep for three days after just one dose he mistook for a paracetamol which I've taken three times a day for over two decades.
This tiredness is real.
Paranoia is real, it's hard to be around more than one person when you're trying to read code behind everyone's speech (a typical schizo-spectrum symptom known as 'thought broadcasting').
The poor personal hygiene is real, I might only bathe once a week. My anxiety is crippling, too, but I've learned to put on a brave face and try to remain calm and positive. Still, even a brave face doesn't erase a churning stomach.
But Reeve's 'four point' system didn't take these things into account. You may well have needed to prove that you have an actual carer come in to wash your bottom twice a day to get 4 points on PIP benefits.
WHAT WERE THE PROPOSED CHANGED TO PIP?
DISABLED Brits would have faced stricter tests to qualify for support under the original benefits crackdown.
They would have needed to score at least four points in one activity like washing, dressing, or preparing food.
Currently, people can qualify by scoring eight points across multiple tasks, making it easier to access the benefit.
Last week, Labour agreed to limit the crackdown to new claimants only after a backlash from MPs.
But under the latest retreat, the changes have now been shelved entirely — with no set date for when, or if, they will happen.
Sir Keir Starmer suffered a major rebellion this week by 49 of his own MPs tonight as his welfare reforms scraped through after another round of last-minute concessions.
But after more fury from the backbenches, he shelved controversial disability benefit reforms to stave off a Labour revolt.
Ministers have now scrapped plans to tighten rules for Personal Independence Payments (PIP) after furious backbenchers warned they would sink the controversial Bill.
In the end, MPs voted the legislation through by a majority of 75, with 335 in favour and 260 against.
Any proposed changes to Personal Independence Payments now won't kick in until after a review has taken place.
The PIP benefits - the main disability welfare payment for those with a disability - is subject to a review by Welfare Minister Sir Stephen Timms.
The benefit payments are in place to help those affected with daily tasks such as mobility.
Payments currently start at £1,500 but rise to £9,600 which are paid out even if someone is still working.
The daily living rate comes in at £73.90 for the lower rate and £110.40 for the higher rate.
Figures show that the mobility rate is worth £29.20 and rises to £77.05 for the higher rate.
Ministers have revealed that 1,000 people per day are claiming PIP - which is the equivalent of the size of Leicester every year.
Following a major rebellion, those who are now claiming PIP be able to claim the same amount of money.
But for new claimants from November 2026, there will be a set of stricter measures set out as the government aims to reduce spending on the benefits and get people back to work.
Never mind reeking too much to leave the house and be in public - let alone in an office.
This idea that work might make us better - which Reeves drove home and used to justify her cruel cuts - felt like gaslighting. 'We believe if you can work, you should work.' she stated.
But PIP is a benefit you can also claim while working.
Like me, many need their benefits - both PIP and Universal Credit - to 'top-up' part-time work wages and that allows them to manage their disability, to care for a loved one, or both.
For ten years in my twenties I worked two-three jobs to make ends meet. I always ended up on the mental health crisis phoneline, with a duty nurse telling me I needed to take substantial time off or quit my job.
Eventually I quit working full-time for good, and my mental health has improved markedly.
I now care full-time and put in 10-16 hours of writing a week.
I know first hand, poverty doesn't cure mental illness (or any disability) - it exasperates them, and only makes them worse - putting even more strain on an already underfunded NHS.
Therefore any kind of cuts to disability benefits, particularly those that penalise people with mental health issues will only cost us more in the long run, both in budgets and lives.
And while I appreciate that reforms may be on hold for now I dread to think what could come out in Sir Stephen Timms' PIP review at the end of 2026.
But I beg Labour not to cast people like me aside. We're not scroungers and for us PIP is a lifeline.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Powys County Times
28 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Labour policies ‘obscured' by rows over welfare and winter fuel
Labour policies are 'barely being noticed' and have been 'obscured' by rows over welfare and winter fuel, former leader Lord Neil Kinnock has said. Lord Kinnock – who led the party from 1983 to 1992 – told Sky News that a 'cloud hangs over the accomplishments of the Government', as Sir Keir Starmer marked a year in office this weekend. He said that the party have 'a series of really commendable and absolutely essential policies' and also suggested a wealth tax as a change that could 'commend' them to the general public. The week of Sir Keir's first anniversary in Number 10 saw the Prime Minister scrap a raft of the Government's proposed welfare reforms in the face of a backbench revolt. Asked what has gone wrong in Government, Lord Kinnock told the Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips programme: 'What's gone wrong is really the lack of a narrative, a story of the objectives of the Government and where they're working towards it and how they're working towards it. 'They are working towards it with a series of really commendable and absolutely essential policies. 'They are barely noticed because they're obscured by all the song and dance and noise, drums banging and cymbals clashing of the winter fuel payment… the welfare programme, the two-child benefit cap, the cuts in development aid, all those negative things that really are heartily disliked across the Labour movement and more widely, much more widely.' He said that a 'cloud hangs over the accomplishments of the Government, which are substantial and will become greater, and people are not getting the message'. Lord Kinnock said there are things the party could do that 'would commend themselves to the great majority of the general public' and that these included 'asset taxes'. 'By going for an imposition of 2% on asset values above £10 million, say, which is a very big fortune, the Government would be in a position to collect £10 billion or £11 billion,' he said. Shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride said he thought a wealth tax would be 'the worst thing to do' and opposed the idea of 'piling further taxes on the wealth creators'. He also told the same Sky News programme that it had been a 'year of utter underperformance' from Labour. 'Whether you look at illegal boats, migrants coming across the Channel, that's now at record levels, far from smashing the gangs, they're smashing all the records as to the numbers coming into our country. If you look at the chaotic U-turns that we've just had in the last few weeks,' he added. Analysis by the PA news agency found that Labour has seen a double-digit drop in support in the opinion polls since last year's general election. According to figures collated this week, the party has averaged 24% in polls in the past month, down 10 points from 34% in the weeks following the 2024 election. It is common for political parties to experience a slide in the polls after taking power – it has happened to every UK government bar one in the past 40 years – but a drop of this size is unusual. The last time it was in double digits was 1992/93, when the Tory administration led by former prime minister John Major saw its poll numbers fall 12 points, from an average of 43% in the weeks after the April 1992 election to 31% a year later.


The Guardian
40 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Scrapping two-child benefit cap may be harder after welfare U-turn, minister says
Downing Street's U-turn on welfare reforms last week will make it harder to implement other policies such as potentially scrapping the two-child benefit cap, Bridget Phillipson has said. The education minister said Labour was still committed to tackling child poverty but, when asked if the backbench rebellion that resulted in about £5bn of annual savings on welfare being scrapped had diminished the chances of the cap being removed, she said there was an impact. 'The decisions that have been taken in the last week do make future decisions harder,' she told BBC1's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg. 'But all of that said, we will look at this collectively in terms of all of the ways that we can lift children out of poverty.' She added on: 'The mission that we're driving across government is about making sure that background doesn't determine success, because for far too many children in our country, the family that they're born into, the town that they're born into, will absolutely determine their life chances.' Asked the same question on Sky's Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips, Phillipson said: 'The changes in the last week, of course, have come at a cost, and we have been upfront about that.' She added that a child poverty taskforce she was leading with the work and pensions secretary, Liz Kendall, was 'looking at every way that we can lift more children out of poverty'. Measures already taken included an expansion of the eligibility for free school meals, plus the plan announced on Sunday for one-stop family hubs across England to offer parents advice and support, intended to in part replace the Sure Start system introduced under the previous Labour government and then hugely cut back by the Conservatives. Phillipson said she had heard the views of the many Labour backbenchers and child poverty charities who want the two-child benefit cap removed. The cap, which limits families claiming many means-tested benefits to their first two children, apart from in very limited circumstances, was introduced under the Conservatives. Experts say scrapping it would be the single most effective way of reducing child poverty. They say about 100 children are pulled into poverty every day by the limit. Phillipson said: 'But they will appreciate, as we all do, that any change we set out in this area or in any other area, we've got to be clear about what the cost is and how we make sure that the numbers add up.' The taskforce, she said, was 'considering all of the ways in which we can make sure that we have a fairer and more equal society and a country where children are not scarred by child poverty'. She added: 'My message to my colleagues, to parents, to campaigners and to everybody watching this morning, is that this Labour government is serious about tackling child poverty.'


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Keir Starmer risks infuriating Labour's Left-wing MPs AGAIN with plans to scrap two-child benefit cap now 'dead in the water'
Sir Keir Starmer is risking another fight with the Labour Left after plans to scrap the two-child benefits cap were described as being 'dead in the water'. The Prime Minister this week caved to rebel MPs over proposed welfare cuts as he performed yet another U-turn following his previous reversal on winter fuel payments. The Government's original plans to restrict access to Personal Independence Payment (PIP) had been part of a package that ministers expected would save up to £5billion a year. But, following the chaotic shelving of the PIP plans in the face of a major Labour revolt, Chancellor Rachel Reeves now faces having to plug another huge hole in the public finances. Economists are warning that fresh tax rises are likely when Ms Reeves announces her next Budget in the autumn. And a Cabinet minister this morning said that future spending decisions - such as axing the two-child benefits cap at a cost of £3.4billion a year - were now 'harder'. Education Secretary Bridget Phllipson told the BBC: 'The decisions that have been taken in the last week do make decisions, future decisions harder.' It came after a No10 source told the Sunday Times that plans to axe the benefits limit are 'now dead in the water'. Chancellor Rachel Reeves faces having to plug another huge hole in the public finances following the chaotic shelving of benefits cuts in the face of a major Labour revolt Ms Reeves this weekend said it is impossible for her to rule out tax rises in the autumn, as she warned 'there are costs' to the watering down of the welfare bill. And a No 11 source told the newspaper: 'MPs will need to acknowledge that there is a financial cost to not approving the welfare changes, whether that's tax rises or not scrapping the two-child benefit cap. 'They need to understand the trade-offs.' The two-child benefit cap, introduced by Tory chancellor George Osborne, prevents parents from claiming Universal Credit or child tax credit for a third or additional child born after April 2017. Soon after Labour's general election victory last year, Sir Keir suspended seven Labour MPs who supported an amendment to scrap the two-child limit in a show of force to his party. But Downing Street did not rule out axing the cap at a later date, as part of a strategy to tackle child poverty. Ms Phillipson told the BBC on Sunday that ministers are 'looking at every lever and we'll continue to look at every lever to lift children out of poverty'. Pushed on whether the chances of the benefit cap going are now slimmer, following the U-turn on PIP, the Education Secretary said: 'The decisions that have been taken in the last week do make decisions, future decisions harder. 'But all of that said, we will look at this collectively in terms of all of the ways that we can lift children out of poverty.'