logo
AI Act: 38 global creators' organizations condemn 'betrayal' of Europe's stated goals

AI Act: 38 global creators' organizations condemn 'betrayal' of Europe's stated goals

LeMonde2 days ago
A bitter taste and deep disappointment are being felt among authors, performers, publishers, producers and other rights holders across Europe and around the world. In a joint statement signed on Thursday, July 31, 38 leading global rights holders' organizations expressed their "dissatisfaction" with the implementation of the European Union's regulation on artificial intelligence (AI).
Their discontent applies to the "Code of Practice, the GPAI Guidelines, and the Template for disclosure of a sufficiently detailed summary of training data under Article 53 of the EU AI Act." This legislation regulating AI within the European Union partially takes effect on Saturday, August 2.
Despite their extensive engagments made "throughout this process, the final outcomes fail to address the core concerns which our sectors [...] have consistently raised," the organizations state. The coalition went further: "The result is not a balanced compromise." They call it "a missed opportunity to provide meaningful protection of intellectual property rights in the context of GenAI [generative AI]." Worse still, the AI Act "does not deliver on the promise of the EU AI Act itself."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Diplomatic downfall: When ambassadors cross the line
Diplomatic downfall: When ambassadors cross the line

Euronews

time9 hours ago

  • Euronews

Diplomatic downfall: When ambassadors cross the line

The shock resignation of Austria's Ambassador to the EU, Thomas Oberreiter, made jaws drop in Brussels just as officials and diplomats were preparing for their much-anticipated summer break. While his case may be the latest to hit headlines, it's far from the only time an ambassador's behaviour that has cut a diplomatic career short. From internal harassment complaints to political sackings and even public naps, here are some of the lesser-known stories of diplomats who were quietly, or dramatically, sidelined. Thomas Oberreiter, the erotic blogger Austrian Ambassador to the European Union (2023-2025) Thomas Oberreiter, Austria's Ambassador to the European Union, resigned last week amid allegations that he anonymously authored a sexually explicit blog featuring misogynistic content and described sexual assault under a female monicker. Despite Oberreiter's denying writing the sadomasochism blog, media investigations linked the blog's posts to Austrian Foreign Ministry IP addresses and devices. The blog, active for several years and containing sadomasochistic fantasies written from a woman's perspective, reportedly originated during office hours and within an official building. After being a diplomat for over 30 years in Europe and Mexico, Oberreiter resigned as the polemic swirled in Brussels. He has not responded to requests for comment. Marta Kos, a comeback under scrutiny Ambassador of Slovenia to Switzerland (2017-2020) Marta Kos, Slovenia's Commissioner for Enlargement since 2024, left her diplomatic post in Bern under a cloud back in 2020, when she resigned as ambassador to Switzerland following accusations of workplace harassment. She cited 'differences in views' on foreign policy and embassy leadership as the cause. An internal audit, triggered by staff complaints, painted a picture of a toxic work environment under her watch. Though she managed a political comeback four years later, Kos's nomination to the European Commission wasn't without turbulence. Her appointment sparked criticism in Slovenia and Brussels, with opponents questioning both her leadership style and suitability for a top EU role. Some even resurfaced long-standing rumours about past links to Yugoslavia's former secret police, claims Kos has firmly denied. Spanish controversial sackings Alberto Antón, Spain's Ambassador to Belgium (2022-2025) & Juan González‑Barba Spain's ambassador to Croatia (2022-2025) Alberto Antón, Spain's ambassador to Belgium, was dismissed in June 2025, five months after being filmed nodding off during a major diplomatic event in Madrid. The incident, caught on camera at the annual ambassadors' conference, showed Antón yawning and slipping into a light doze while Foreign Minister José Manuel Albares delivered a lengthy keynote. The clip quickly became viral on social media and, according to several Spanish media outlets, caused his dismissal. Meanwhile, Antón insisted he was unwell and was simply under the effect of antihistamines at the time. In an open letter, Antón accused Albares of turning a harmless 'siesta' into a pretext for a purge. Critics of the minister say Antón's dismissal fitted a broader pattern of politically motivated sackings. Just months earlier, Juan González-Barba, the ambassador to Croatia and a former secretary of state for EU affairs, was also removed from his post, reportedly for publishing an opinion piece defending Spain's parliamentary monarchy and praising King Felipe VI. Misconduct in Finland's diplomatic corps Jarmo Viinanen, Ambassador of Finland to Sweden (2014-2016) & Jari Vilén, Ambassador of Finland to Canada (2023-2024) Finland's ambassador to Sweden, Jarmo Viinanen, was recalled in 2016 following internal investigations and media reports of alleged sexual harassment involving embassy staff and guests. Viinanen denied publicly criticised the Foreign Ministry's handling of the process, calling it unfair and poorly managed. He claimed he was never given a clear explanation of what he had done wrong and described the months-long ordeal as a personal injustice. Jari Vilén, Finland's ambassador to Canada since September 2023, stepped down a year after, when allegations of inappropriate conduct, including unwanted physical contact. Although not formally dismissed, Vilén returned to Helsinki to work within the Ministry of foreign affairs following an internal investigation that reportedly concluded his behaviour amounted to sexual harassment. He denied any wrongdoings.

Ukraine's commendable democratic pushback against corruption
Ukraine's commendable democratic pushback against corruption

LeMonde

time11 hours ago

  • LeMonde

Ukraine's commendable democratic pushback against corruption

The war Ukrainians are waging to repel the Russian invasion is not only about the freedom of a people to choose their place in Europe, but also about defending democracy itself. That is why Volodymyr Zelensky's reversal on the issue of the fight against corruption deserves recognition. On Thursday, July 31, lawmakers overwhelmingly passed a bill restoring the independence of the two bodies responsible for combating this scourge. Just nine days earlier, the Ukrainian president had signed another piece of legislation, following a parliamentary vote, placing the two agencies in question under the authority of the prosecutor general, a position appointed by the president himself. This move would have allowed the government to interfere in investigations. Lawmakers from the governing coalition were instructed to approve the decision, which was presented as a measure to protect Ukraine from Russian interference. In reality, however, it would have set the country back in terms of transparency. By correcting this misstep, Zelensky showed his ability to acknowledge his mistakes. It must be said that the Ukrainian leader was confronted with an unprecedented surge of civic mobilization in the three and a half years since the conflict began. Thousands of young people took to the streets in Kyiv and other major cities, driven by a wave of national indignation. For them, retreating from the fight against corruption would mean betraying the sacrifices of those on the front lines, as well as undermining Ukraine's credibility in its bid to join the European Union and risking the loss of critical support. The fact that these protests were possible under martial law and were heard by those in power was a remarkable demonstration of democratic vitality. However, Zelensky's change of heart was not only a response to public anger. It also stemmed from pressure exerted by the EU, which considers weakening anti-corruption mechanisms in a candidate country aspiring to join its 27 member states unacceptable. The threat of suspending some EU assistance, coupled with warnings from European leaders, convinced the Ukrainian president that he was on the wrong path. Rejection of Russian control The strength of the European protests highlighted the connection between closer ties with the EU and fighting corruption. Much of Ukrainian civil society welcomed this renewed vigilance from Kyiv's allies, which reflected a dual imperative: Defending the country and strengthening the institutions that will allow Ukraine to secure a democratic future within the EU. The two goals are closely linked. Admittedly, implementing structural reforms while fending off an invading army is an unprecedented challenge. However, Ukraine's difficult military situation, characterized by a slow Russian advance and increasingly deadly bombardments, does not justify abandoning the fight against corruption. Vladimir Putin's refusal to accept the Ukrainian people's choice to turn toward the West triggered his aggressive actions. For Ukrainians, this battle is about resisting Russian domination, advancing democracy and pursuing EU membership. Ukrainian society has made its position clear to its leaders. The state of war and its constraints on democratic life must not be used as an excuse to lower the standards of honesty and accountability among those in power. Ukrainians are also fighting for that.

US trade advisor says Trump tariff rates unlikely to change
US trade advisor says Trump tariff rates unlikely to change

France 24

timea day ago

  • France 24

US trade advisor says Trump tariff rates unlikely to change

Trump, who has wielded tariffs as a tool of American economic might, has set tariff rates for dozens of economies including the European Union at between 10 and 41 percent come August 7, his new hard deadline for the duties. In a pre-taped interview broadcast Sunday on CBS's "Face the Nation," US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said "the coming days" are not likely to see changes in the tariff rates. "A lot of these are set rates pursuant to deals. Some of these deals are announced, some are not, others depend on the level of the trade deficit or surplus we may have with the country," Greer said. "These tariff rates are pretty much set." Undoubtedly some trade ministers "want to talk more and see how they can work in a different way with the United States," he added. But "we're seeing truly the contours of the president's tariff plan right now with these rates." Last Thursday, the former real estate developer announced hiked tariff rates on dozens of US trade partners. They will kick in on August 7 instead of August 1, which had previously been touted as a hard deadline. Among the countries facing steep new levies is Brazil. South America's largest economy is being hit with 50 percent tariffs on exports to the United States -- albeit with significant exemptions for key products such as aircraft and orange juice. Trump has openly admitted he is punishing Brazil for prosecuting his political ally Jair Bolsonaro, the ex-president accused of plotting a coup in a bid to cling to power. The US president has described the case as a "witch hunt." Greer said it was not unusual for Trump to use tariff tools for geopolitical purposes. "The president has seen in Brazil, like he's seen in other countries, a misuse of law, a misuse of democracy," Greer told CBS. "It is normal to use these tools for geopolitical issues." Trump was "elected to assess the foreign affairs situation... and take appropriate action," he added. Meanwhile White House economic advisor Kevin Hassett said that while talks are expected to continue over the next week with some US trade partners, he concurred with Greer's tariffs assessment in that the bulk of the rates "are more or less locked in." Asked by the host of NBC's Sunday talk show "Meet the Press with Kristen Welker" if Trump could change tariff rates should financial markets react negatively, Hassett said: "I would rule it out, because these are the final deals." Legal challenges have been filed against some of Trump's tariffs arguing he overstepped his authority. An appeals court panel on Thursday appeared skeptical of the government's arguments, though the case may be ultimately decided at the Supreme Court.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store