logo
Why every city has a ‘startup week' now — and whether they should

Why every city has a ‘startup week' now — and whether they should

Technical.ly06-05-2025
When Technical.ly first launched Philly Tech Week 15 years ago, the logic was straightforward: gather scattered entrepreneurs and technologists together, put the city on the map, and throw a few great parties along the way.
A decade and a half later, nearly every US city with entrepreneurial aspirations seems to host a version of a 'startup week.' But as economic conditions, work habits and generational preferences shift, some are reevaluating whether the week-long event model is still effective — or necessary.
'The 'week' was proof that a city had arrived,' said Brian Brackeen, general partner at Lightship Capital and co-organizer of Black Tech Week, a national conference hosted since 2014. 'You had enough happening to fill multiple days.'
The model flourished because it allowed cities to showcase a critical mass of entrepreneurial activity while providing flexible attendance options.
'If someone couldn't make Thursday or Friday, they could still attend events earlier in the week,' said Maria Underwood, a veteran ecosystem builder based in Birmingham, Alabama, which hosts the multi-day Sloss.Tech, founded in 2015.
Victor Hwang, founder of entrepreneur advocacy network Right to Start, believes a full week's slate of events encourages more local partnerships. Multiple groups could host their own gatherings under the larger banner, he said, relieving pressure from a single organizer and fostering greater community participation.
Yet some old-school supporters — including Technical.ly CEO Chris Wink, who was instrumental in creating the original Philadelphia model — are skeptical the format still fits.
'Funding isn't there anymore to sponsor beer-soaked warehouse parties,' Wink said. He described the era of 'throwing 300-person parties subsidized by private equity firms' as 'insane by today's standards.'
Instead, Wink said, founders now emphasize business value, intentional connections and efficiency in events — priorities that seem to clash with sprawling multi-day schedules.
'Happy hours are a dime a dozen'
Brackeen, of Lightship Capital, echoed this shift toward intentionality. Black Tech Week, for example, has evolved to include highly structured investor-founder matchmaking sessions and corporate 'biz-dev days,'maximizing direct business outcomes rather than casual networking.
Birmingham's Underwood agreed. 'Happy hours are a dime a dozen,' She said. 'The events that will sustain are ones creating intentional, strategic connections for founders.'
Economic realities have also changed. Technical.ly CEO Wink cited the post-pandemic reevaluation of work-life balance and tighter capital environments as reasons why the sprawling event model might no longer be economically sustainable — or desirable.
Still, 'weeks' remain valuable to emerging ecosystems. 'There's still a 26-year-old who was 12 when you first threw those parties,' Brackeen reminded Wink. 'They deserve their chance to experience it, too.'
Though some places are still launching 'week'-themed editions — DC Tech Week was new on the scene last year, offering two dozen events across several days in the nation's capital — a rising trend is the startup 'weekend' instead. That's the branding for a program offered by Techstars, which partners on the three-day events in cities from Pittsburgh to New Orleans to Rome and Sao Paulo..
Ultimately, ecosystem leaders agree that while the week model once signaled vibrancy and ambition, its future might lie in hybrid, focused programming emphasizing specific business outcomes over sheer volume of activity.
'The vibe has shifted from 'cool and fun' to practical resilience,' Hwang said. 'People still care, but they care differently.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pittsburgh weekly roundup: Skild opens San Francisco office; Ansys acquisition complete; Forge AI Pitch Challenge
Pittsburgh weekly roundup: Skild opens San Francisco office; Ansys acquisition complete; Forge AI Pitch Challenge

Technical.ly

timea day ago

  • Technical.ly

Pittsburgh weekly roundup: Skild opens San Francisco office; Ansys acquisition complete; Forge AI Pitch Challenge

This week in Pittsburgh, the data center gold rush, advice from angel investors on raising capital and more. Read on for weekly roundup of top news in the region. 📰 News Incubator: What else to know • What happens when a data center comes to town? PA's Dorrance Township doesn't want to find out. With real estate developers sniffing around for potential, this rural community is setting up protections before applications start rolling in. [ ] • Skild AI is expanding to San Francisco, a controversial move in the Pittsburgh startup scene. When Abridge announced its intention for a similar move in March, it sparked a debate about why the local talent scene isn't enough for these hypergrowth firms. [ Pittsburgh Biz Times / ] • Synopsys finally completed its $35 billion acquisition of Cannonsburg-based Ansys, after more than a year checking all the legal boxes. [ Synopsys / ] • Protestors surrounded the Energy and Innovation Summit, as Pittsburghers spoke up against Carnegie Mellon University's decision to host President Donald Trump and the impact of AI development on climate change. [ / Pittsburgh City Paper / WESA] • Apply by Aug. 8 for a chance to be recognized as one of the region's top AI startups — and win $50,000 — at the Forge AI Pitch Challenge. [ AI Horizons ] • People aren't moving for jobs, but instead to places they want to live and then finding jobs there, Chris Wink writes in his latest column. In Pittsburgh, telling its unique stories of relative cost of living and quirky culture can be the thing that pulls talent in. [ ] • It just got easier for union workers to report employer violations. Allegheny County launched the confidential Right to Organize Incident Report Form to document the errs, but you should still file a formal complaint, too. [ Allegheny County ] • ICYMI: Catch up on the top takeaways from local startup CEOs Shiv Rao, John Thornton, Jake Loosararian and more at the AI Horizons kickoff event earlier this week. [ Pittsburgh Slack channel ] • If your startup exit strategies rely on M&A, start by finding the right advisor to guide you through it. Here are 10 tips to sift through the candidates. [ ] 🗓️ On the Calendar • Fix your gaming keyboard and get back to gameplay at a $25 electronics repair class hosted by Hackers Guild PGH on July 19. [ Sign up ] • Get access to 3D printers at Prototype PGH at a training session for beginners on July 19. The event costs $10 to attend, but no one will be turned away due to lack of funds. [ Register ] • Level up your woodworking skills at HackPGH's picture frame design class. The July 20 event costs $185 and is recommended for folks with beginner woodworking knowledge. [ Attend ] • Head to the University of Pittsburgh for JuliaCon from July 22 to 25. Prices vary, but for an additional fee, you can attend a Pirates game with fellow enthusiasts of the coding language. [ Get tickets ] • Learn how to access your Bitcoin on the Solana blockchain, followed by a Federal Galley hangout, with BitDevs Pittsburgh on July 23. [ More info ] • Brush up on your sketching skills and meet new people at Ascender's Pictionary Happy Hour on July 24. [ Details here ] • Procrastinate on your latest project by catching up with friends or finally make time for that deadline you've been putting off at Avenu: Meyran's coworking summer Fridays on July 25. [ Learn more ]

DC accrues $514.6M of VC in Q2 — a drop from the start of 2025
DC accrues $514.6M of VC in Q2 — a drop from the start of 2025

Technical.ly

time2 days ago

  • Technical.ly

DC accrues $514.6M of VC in Q2 — a drop from the start of 2025

Venture capital investment in the DC region slowed in the second quarter of the year, and the White House's lack of clarity on regulation and policy could be to blame. Companies nabbed $514.6 million across 64 deals in the DMV, according to the latest Venture Monitor report released quarterly by PitchBook and the National Venture Capital Association. That's a sharp decline from the first quarter of the year, with its reported $1.3 billion across 60 deals — meaning this most recent quarter saw lower deal values. The region isn't alone in venture capitalists writing smaller checks, per the Venture Monitor report. This is part of a broader, 'more cautious investment climate' across the nation, said Tahira Dosani, cofounder and managing partner at ResilienceVC. 'We're no longer in this 'growth at all cost' mentality,' Dosani, who announced a new $56 million fund earlier this year, told 'We're in an era where there's a focus on capital efficiency, on sustainable pathways to profitability and the broader tightening of fewer companies successfully raising rounds because investors are being more selective.' This has been the mindset for the last couple of years, per Dosani. DC has had a handful of blowout quarters, but they're often led by major raises from established companies. Rockville nuclear power company X Energy nabbed about half of the funds at the beginning of the year, as did the e-cigarette giant Juul to close 2024. This is why looking at data quarter-to-quarter can be difficult, explained Les Alexander, a professor at the University of Virginia Darden School of Business. In 2024, companies in the DMV collectively raised $4.3 billion — the highest amount since 2021. 'I often find that in some markets like the DMV, quarter to quarter activity can be impacted by a few larger deals,' Alexander wrote in a statement to 'so you need to be careful to not draw broad conclusions without longer data trends.' Unstable regulations could lead to lower activity ResilienceVC's Dosani noted that uncertainty around policies like tariffs are making investors more cautious. There's generally a tendency toward deregulation under the Trump administration, which can benefit business, but there needs to be clarity, she said. 'Regulatory uncertainty always makes it harder to make decisions,' she said. Because of this precariousness, it's more difficult for investors to vet startups adequately, said Elena Loutskina, a professor at the Darden School of Business. 'The global economic uncertainty, including one about tariffs, hampers VCs' ability to properly evaluate the prospects of given startups,' Loutskina wrote to in an email. 'This makes investments exceptionally risky and unattractive.' Alexander agrees. Inconsistent trade policy is causing investors to be wary, he said. The economic picture also depends on industry, he noted. He's already seen climate technology companies nab less funding because of policy changes. 'On the other hand, defense tech and cybersecurity, which are attractive investment areas for companies and investors in the DMV region, is seeing increased deal activity with the favorable support from policymakers,' he said. What startups — and investors — should know Securing investments will continue to be challenging for startups, especially for those in early stages, Alexander said. But AI companies will likely continue to see funding, he said. Fundraising for the capital to invest is slowing, too, Alexander said. That's because limited partners aren't getting liquidity back from prior funds they've invested in and a lack of exits, ResilienceVC's Dosani explained. Because of all of this, founders need to be capital-efficient, she said. They also need to demonstrate clear traction to investors and show profitability. 'It's not necessarily a bad thing,' Dosani said. 'It just is the reality of this market, and I think what it will translate into is that … the best founders are the ones getting the cap[ital].' This constriction also requires investors to be more supportive of founders outside the money, she said. That means being more hands-on in business strategies, for example. 'Founders have to think about how they tell their story, how they execute and operate their businesses,' Dosani said, 'and I think investors have to do the same.'

Chatbot safety stills fall short, per a new tool
Chatbot safety stills fall short, per a new tool

Technical.ly

time5 days ago

  • Technical.ly

Chatbot safety stills fall short, per a new tool

The most popular large language models still peddle misinformation, spread hate speech, impersonate public figures and pose many other safety issues, according to a quantitative analysis from a DC startup. The findings are mapped out in a risk and responsibility matrix developed by Aymara, which also has headquarters in New York and helps Fortune 500 companies scale generative AI development quickly and safely. To develop the tool, Aymara tested 20 different large language models, also known as LLMs. Popular chatbots like Claude, ChatGPT, Grok and Gemini were among those tested. The goal is to display that even the most advanced models still produce unsafe responses — and not to discredit companies, according to cofounder Caraline Pellatt. 'We intentionally didn't call it something like a leaderboard, because we didn't want it to be a naming and shaming of the big providers,' Pellatt told 'but more about just visibility that helps everyone.' No model received an overall perfect score, and the matrix's percentages range from Anthropic's Claude Haiku 3.5 at 86% safe to Cohere's Command R at 52%. The analysis found impersonation persists across most models, but many models are improving at avoiding misinformation and hate speech. Using automation to test chatbots Pellatt and cofounder Juan Manuel Contreras identified 10 categories — including child and animal abuse, copyright violation and illegal activities — to measure the safety of models. 'We wanted to come up with a set that was broadly applicable to different kinds of models, many different kinds of applications,' Contreras told 'The kinds of risks that people using this technology, both as consumers but also as enterprises, would potentially be really concerned with.' This was nearly an entirely automated process, per Contreras, besides identifying the 10 categories, selection of the models to test and human review of the LLM's responses. The cofounders used existing Aymara software for this project, which Contreras credits for a quick 4-week turnaround of analysis. Each category came with 25 prompts, totalling to 250 responses per LLM. That's an initial 5,000 model responses, and a human reviewed 10% of those responses, Contreras explained. Some of the prompts were not consistently evaluated across the different models, so those were taken out of the analysis. Plans to keep updating, adding to the matrix Aymara's customers, mostly Fortune 500 companies that the cofounders declined to name, are using this tool to apply to their own use cases, Pellatt explained. The purpose is to help the customers carry out internal evaluations of how they use and develop these LLMs, she said. The cofounders plan to add to the public-facing matrix as new LLMs get released, they said. The code is built in a way that makes these additions relatively easy, Contreras said. They've so far been hearing interest in the tool from AI governance professionals and people working in education, they said. There are also conversations with the companies behind the LLMs, per Contreras. Pellatt emphasized this is a way to give technical teams visibility and control. Contreras is also adamant this isn't a tool to purely show error, but instead show areas that can be improved. 'It's probably impossible to expect these companies to be able to make their models 100% safe,' Contreras said, adding: 'It's really more just rather to show that off the shelf, for broadly defined risk areas, there are ways in which these models respond that not all of users would want them to respond that way.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store