Bay 'still recovering' from bottom trawling
Part of the seabed off the Jurassic Coast is "still recovering" from the effects of bottom trawling 17 years after it was banned there, marine researchers have said.
A consultation is being held on government proposals to extend the ban on the practice of dragging large nets along the seafloor.
Some fishing organisations have criticised the plans and questioned the environmental impact of bottom trawling.
Dr Emma Sheehan, associate professor of marine ecology at Plymouth University said, ending bottom trawling when Lyme Bay, off the Dorset and Devon coast, became a Marine Protected Area in 2008 has made a "positive change".
The government proposal would expand the ban on bottom trawling from 18,000km2 to 48,000km2 (about 18,500 sq miles) of the UK's offshore areas that are already designated as protected.
A UN Ocean Conference is taking place in France amid warnings from Sir David Attenborough that bottom trawling is destroying areas of the seabed and marine life.
Researchers have studied the impact of ending bottom trawling in Lyme Bay since the introduction of the MPA.
Dr Sheehan said large areas of the bay had already been "heavily degraded" by 2008.
"[MPAs] tried to prevent the most destructive fishing methods so the seabed habitats that are so important for conservation and fisheries can be protected," she continued.
Dr Sheehan said species including scallops, conga eel and black sea bream and appeared to have benefited from the ban.
"We keep seeing positive change, year on year.
"We still haven't go a plateau in the recovery. We're nowhere near there - it's still recovering, year on year."
The government's plan would see similar protections extended to 41 of England's 181 MPAs.
"It needs to happen - I'm in full support of this and it will have huge positive benefits for our marine environment," Dr Sheehan said.
The UK's National Federation of Fishermen's Organisations has opposed the move to ban bottom trawling.
Chief executive Mike Cohen previously said: "Trawling does not damage most of the seabed.
"Trawls penetrate the sediment very little, if at all, in most areas and trawling has been carried out for well over 100 years," he said.
A 12-week consultation will run until 1 September and will seek the views of the marine and fishing industry.
You can follow BBC Dorset on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
UK proposes wider ban on destructive ocean bottom trawling
Reef species increase in whole site management
University of Plymouth
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
a day ago
- USA Today
Massive rockfish, of world-record size, finally meets its match
The catch of a giant shortraker rockfish this month off Alaska is a pending world record. The brightly colored fish, landed by Glenn Krieger out of Elfin Cove, weighed 44.8 pounds on a digital scale. The current world record, set in Cross Sound, Alaska, in 2017, stands at 44 pounds, 1 ounce. News of the recent catch, announced by Tanaku Lodge via Instagram, garnered mixed reactions. 'You probably killed something older than any human on the planet,' one follower noted. 'There's a chance this fish is over 150 years old,' another person observed. Such remarks stem from the fact that shortraker rockfish boast an extraordinary lifespan. According to NOAA Fisheries, shortraker rockfish are 'believed to be one of the longest-lived of all fish in the northeast Pacific, and some individuals may reach a maximum age of [more than] 120 years.' ALSO: Florida man jailed for spearing protected grouper, trying to 'hide evidence' All of this aside, fishing for rockfish is legal in Alaska. Anglers can keep one per day and have two in possession. Krieger was also congratulated by Tanaku Lodge followers, and once the International Game Fish Assn. reviews his catch details he could be granted a world record. That process, however, can take months.
Newsweek
2 days ago
- Newsweek
Dog Has Accident on White Rug, What Husband Does Leaves Wife Speechless
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. A mom of two has told Newsweek about her husband's unconventional approach to dealing with the mess their dog left on a rug. Becoming a father to a young child can change a man. One study published in the scientific journal Cerebral Cortex even suggested the experience changes the shape of the male human brain. That was the conclusion reached following an experiment in which the brains of 20 expectant fathers were scanned before and after the birth of a baby, and then compared with the brains of 17 childless men. Researchers identified changes to the cortex of the fathers' brains after the births, while the childless men experienced no such shift. The scientists behind the study theorized the change was likely part of an attempt in the brain to restructure thinking to better support fatherhood. However, it could also be linked to the added stress and sleep disruption that comes with being a dad. Fatherhood certainly appeared to change the way Justin Lehman from Ohio's brain worked, if the story shared to Instagram under the handle @twomuchtosay by his wife, Chelsea Lehman, is anything to go by. It recalls a time, just after the birth of their first child, when both mom and dad were feeling the strain of being new parents. "We were living in a one-bedroom apartment while waiting for our house to be built," Chelsea told Newsweek. "We had just had our first child. He was 4 months old and never ever slept. We were so sleep-deprived, we couldn't even form sentences." It was around this time that Chelsea went back to work, with Justin picking up shifts later in the day to be with their son for the first part. "His 82-year-old grandpa would come sit at the house with our son for an hour or two in the gap of time where Justin was gone to work and I wasn't home yet," Chelsea said. That arrangement worked well for everyone except their dog, Brutus, of course. Matters came to a head on one particular day when Justin's grandpa found himself with his grandson fast asleep on him and no way of getting up to let Brutus out for a walk without disturbing the 4-month-old's much-needed rest. Brutus was getting antsy. "He needed to go outside, but the baby was asleep," Chelsea said. "So, grandpa was nap-trapped and had to watch Brutus poop right on the shaggy, white rug." Justin returned from work an hour or two later to find his son still fast asleep on grandpa and a large pile of dog mess nearby. In that kind of situation, most would have started the arduous process of removing the dog poop and cleaning the rug. Justin wasn't most people, though, as Chelsea would later discover. "He pulled out his pocketknife and cut the rug and called it a day," she said. Chelsea was left speechless when she returned home later to find a chunk of the rug missing. "My mouth dropped open because it was so unlike my husband to do something like this that I couldn't believe my eyes," she said. "Then I just laughed, probably from the lack of sleep. I kept trying to figure out how he did it without cutting the floor underneath, I still don't understand that." When Chelsea asked Justin to explain his logic, her husband told her: "I don't know why. The rug was shaggy, and we didn't like it anyways, and I was just overwhelmed with trying to get the new house done and didn't want to spend an hour trying to clean sick dog poop out of a shaggy rug." To Justin's way of thinking at the time, he was better off just trying to "cut it out and be done with it." Though it took her by surprise, the fact is Chelsea was inclined to agree with her husband's assessment of the rug. "We both hated it. It was a cheap, itchy thing we bought from Walmart just so Brutus didn't slip all over the hardwood when he walked," Chelsea said. It may have been a strange thing to witness at the time, but it is also an amusing memory and hilarious reminder of how the arrival of a new baby can do strange things to a man.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
‘Super corals' and supplements: Inside the lab trying to save the Great Barrier Reef
Editor's Note: Call to Earth is a CNN editorial series committed to reporting on the environmental challenges facing our planet, together with the solutions. Rolex's Perpetual Planet Initiative has partnered with CNN to drive awareness and education around key sustainability issues and to inspire positive action. Australia's iconic Great Barrier Reef is the largest living structure on the planet and home to a vast array of species. But in recent years it has been hit by a series of devastating mass bleaching events, turning the vibrant colors of parts of the reef a bright white. Across the world, corals are suffering a similar fate, with more than 80% of the ocean's reefs hit by an ongoing global bleaching event that began in 2023, due to record high marine temperatures. Bleaching can be deadly, as the corals are depleted of the algae that live inside them and act as a food source. The effects can be catastrophic; while coral reefs occupy just 0.01% of the ocean floor, they support a quarter of all marine life, as well as providing people with food and livelihoods, and helping to reduce storm surge and protect against erosion. At the UN Ocean Conference this month, 11 countries signed a pledge to protect climate-resilient reefs, and, separately, governments and partners pledged $25 million to a global fund for coral reefs. Ultimately, if coral reefs are to be saved, efforts to curb ocean warming by reducing carbon emissions need to be stepped up, but scientists are also searching for other solutions to keep coral reefs alive in a warming world. At the University of Technology Sydney, scientists from the Future Reefs team are searching for 'super corals' — species that are naturally more resilient to environmental changes, such as high temperatures, acidity or low oxygen levels. One of the program's goals is to identify these corals, discover what methods they are using to survive, and use them as a blueprint to support other corals in the harsher environments of the future. 'We have a focus on trying to understand reef resilience in a changing environment,' says Dr. Emma Camp, marine biologist and leader of the Future Reefs team. 'How do we build coral resilience to survive the stresses they're going to inevitably face? But also, how can we as humans use technology and science to support corals to make them more resilient?' Camp first discovered 'super coral' species growing in mangrove lagoons, which are naturally hot and acidic. Since then, she says the team has found up to 40 of these hardy species growing in different environments across the globe. Now, their focus is on finding them within the Great Barrier Reef. '(We want) to identify coral species with greater heat tolerance, but that are still able to maintain other traits that are really critical: we want them to be fast growers, we want them to provide good habitat for other organisms living on the reef,' says Christine Roper, a postdoctoral researcher on the team. During expeditions to the Great Barrier Reef, the team collects and analyzes specific coral species. They carry out real-time heat tolerance testing on the samples using a special phenotyping machine that helps to predict which coral has the best chance of survival as water temperatures rise. They also take fragments of coral back to the lab, where they can extract DNA and conduct more extensive tests. Once they've identified a stress-tolerant species, the Coral Nurture Program — a project co-founded by Camp that works with local tourism operators and indigenous communities to replant corals at scale — propagates it on coral nurseries which they have established at different locations across the Great Barrier Reef, before 'outplanting' them on the reef to help restore areas that have been affected by bleaching. Since the program's inception in 2018, over 125,000 corals have been outplanted across the Great Barrier Reef — off Cairns, Port Douglas and the Whitsundays — with a survival rate of 85%. But restoring areas of the Great Barrier Reef is no easy task. It has almost 3,000 individual reefs and covers 344,400 square kilometers (133,000 square miles), and as of April 2024, as much as 60% of its reefs had recently been exposed to potential bleaching. The team is hopeful that areas where outplanting has taken place are already showing visible signs of recovery. Other labs around the world are developing similar solutions, also with promising results. The Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) has been using artificial selection and selective breeding to grow heat-tolerant corals, reporting that genetic interventions can work, but with varying success between species. The UK's University of Newcastle has also selectively bred corals that it says can better survive marine heatwaves, although it is yet to conduct large-scale trials in the wild. Studies have shown that traditional coral restoration efforts can be undone within a few years if there is a bleaching event, but by planting heat-resilient corals the Coral Nurture Program hopes the restoration will be able to withstand future events. 'By focusing our efforts on identifying and increasing the abundance of heat-tolerant corals in the population, we optimize our efforts by ensuring those populations will be more resilient to future heat stress events,' says Roper. The major challenge — be it with naturally or selectively bred corals — is how to scale up the process of planting, which is labor-intensive and costly, requiring people to dive down to the reef and plant the corals by hand. That's why the focus of the Coral Nurture Program has been to engage tourism operators and local communities. 'We can build scale by having pockets of communities undertaking these actions,' says Camp. It collaborates with seven tourism operators on the Great Barrier Reef, including Wavelength Reef Cruises, so that snorkelling trips to the reef paid for by tourists double up as outplanting expeditions. On these trips, members of the crew — who are all trained divers and marine biologists — outplant coral, tend to nurseries and conduct surveys of the area. The team at Wavelength helped to establish the program with Camp and has also been integral in operating coral nurseries along the reef and collecting data on coral health. Even so, there is a limit to how much can be achieved just through outplanting tough coral species. The Future Reefs team is also exploring other solutions, including whether feeding corals different food or vitamins could change their heat tolerance. Corals feed by extending tentacles out from their body to catch microscopic food particles. Past research has shown that feeding corals zooplankton — tiny animals that float near the surface of the water — after a bleaching event can help to boost resilience, as can growing corals on substrates infused with metal nutrients such as manganese and zinc. But such methods have not yet been tried on a large scale. 'Despite knowing a lot about corals, we know relatively little about coral nutrition,' says Camp. 'This, to me, is an area where research and science can really help us advance restoration practice by understanding more about what the corals fundamentally need to survive through stress.' Though in its early stages, the team back in the laboratory in Sydney has experimented with feeding corals foods such as microscopic brine shrimp fed with different types of algae, and adding certain metals or vitamins to the water that the corals will absorb. The goal is to develop a supplement that could give corals extra nutrients when stressed, helping them survive or recover from mass bleaching events. 'It's like us as humans: when we are run down, we might take a supplement to give us a boost. It's the same with the corals,' says Camp, adding that this kind of solution would potentially be easy to scale and apply to reefs globally. 'It's these sorts of new ideas that we have to explore, and nothing can be off the table, because if we don't do something, the end result is going to be a loss of reefs around the world,' she says. While hopeful that scientific innovation and scalable solutions can provide some sort of stopgap for coral reefs, Camp warns that protecting them long-term comes down to tackling the cause of mass coral bleaching, which means reducing greenhouse gas emissions and mitigating global warming. 'There's only so much we can do to buy time for the reef,' she says. 'We have to tackle climate change, because if the temperatures keep increasing, we're going to be asking too much of the corals to survive through the environment that they're being faced with.'
