Iran expands dog-walking ban, citing 'public health, peace and comfort' concerns
The ban echoes a 2019 police order which barred walking dogs in Tehran, and has been expanded to at least 18 other cities in the past week, according to local media.
This included Isfahan in the centre and Kerman in the south.
Owning and walking dogs has been a contentious issue in Iran since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, though there is no law completely banning dog ownership.
Many religious scholars consider petting dogs or coming into contact with their saliva as "najis" — ritually impure.
Some officials view them as a symbol of Western cultural influence.
Local authorities have periodically introduced bans on walking dogs in public spaces or carrying them in vehicles as part of a wider campaign to discourage their ownership.
However, enforcing the restrictions has been largely inconsistent, with many owners continuing to walk their dogs in Tehran and elsewhere across the country.
On Sunday, local time, the reformist Etemad newspaper quoted an official from Ilam city as saying that "legal action will be taken against violators", without elaborating.
The day before, the state newspaper Iran said the latest measures were aimed at "maintaining public order, ensuring safety and protecting public health".
"Dog walking is a threat to public health, peace and comfort," Abbas Najafi, prosecutor of the western city of Hamedan, was quoted as saying.
In 2021, about 75 lawmakers condemned pet ownership as a "destructive social problem", saying it could "gradually change the Iranian and Islamic way of life".
Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has previously said that keeping dogs for reasons other than herding, hunting and guarding is "reprehensible".
"If this practise resembles that of non-Muslims, promotes their culture or causes harm and disturbance to neighbours, it is deemed forbidden," he said, according to local media.
AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
2 days ago
- ABC News
Iran meets E3 in Istanbul to discuss nuclear program
Iranian representatives have met with European powers in Istanbul to discuss the Islamic republic's nuclear program - the first discussions since the 12 day war between Iran and Israel in June.
News.com.au
2 days ago
- News.com.au
Iran says it held 'frank' nuclear talks with European powers
Iranian diplomats said they held "frank and detailed" nuclear talks on Friday with counterparts from Germany, Britain and France, who have threatened to trigger sanctions if Tehran fails to agree a deal on uranium enrichment and cooperation with UN inspectors. The meeting in Istanbul was the first since Israel launched an attack on Iran last month targeting key nuclear and military sites, sparking a 12-day war and leading Tehran to pull away from working with the UN watchdog. The European diplomats were seen leaving the Iranian consulate shortly before 1100 GMT after spending several hours inside. Israel's offensive -- which killed top commanders, nuclear scientists and hundreds of others and in which residential areas and military sites were struck -- also derailed US-Iran nuclear talks that began in April. Since then, the European powers, known as the E3, have threatened to trigger a so-called "snapback mechanism" under a moribund 2015 nuclear deal that would reinstate UN sanctions on Iran by the end of August. The sanctions trigger expires in October, and Tehran has warned of consequences should the E3 opt to activate it. Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi, who attended the talks alongside senior Iranian diplomat Majid Takht-Ravanchi, wrote on X he had used the meeting to criticise the European stance on the 12-day conflict with Israel. He said the snapback mechanism had also been discussed, adding: "It was agreed that consultations on this matter will continue." Before the talks, a European source said the three countries were preparing to trigger the mechanism "in the absence of a negotiated solution". The source urged Iran to make "clear gestures" on uranium enrichment and the resumption of cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog. - 'Common ground' - Gharibabadi warned earlier in the week that triggering sanctions -- which would deepen Iran's international isolation and place further pressure on its already strained economy -- would be "completely illegal". He accused European powers of "halting their commitments" under the 2015 deal, which the United States unilaterally withdrew from in 2018 during President Donald Trump's first term. "We have warned them of the risks, but we are still seeking common ground to manage the situation," said Gharibabadi. Iranian diplomats have previously warned that Tehran could withdraw from the global nuclear non-proliferation treaty if sanctions were reimposed. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar has urged European powers to trigger the mechanism. Israel's June 13 attack on Iran came two days before Tehran and Washington were scheduled to meet for a sixth round of nuclear negotiations. On June 22, the US joined Israel's offensive by striking Iranian nuclear facilities at Fordo, Isfahan, and Natanz. Before the war, the US and Iran were divided over uranium enrichment -- Tehran describing it as a "non-negotiable" right, Washington calling it a "red line". The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) says Iran is enriching uranium to 60 percent purity -- far above the 3.67 percent cap under the 2015 deal and close to weapons-grade levels. Tehran has said it is open to discussing the rate and level of enrichment, but not the right to enrich uranium. A year after the US withdrew from the nuclear deal, Iran began rolling back its commitments, which had placed restrictions on its nuclear activities in exchange for sanctions relief. Israel and Western powers accuse Iran of pursuing nuclear weapons, a charge Tehran has repeatedly denied. - 'New form' - Iran insists it will not abandon its nuclear programme, with Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi describing the position as "unshakable". Though he claimed enrichment had come to a halt because of "serious and severe" damage to nuclear sites caused by US and Israeli strikes. The full extent of the damage sustained in the US bombing remains unclear. Trump claimed at the time the sites had been "completely destroyed", but US media reports based on Pentagon assessments cast doubt on the scale of destruction. Since the 12-day war, Iran has suspended cooperation with the IAEA, accusing it of bias and failing to condemn the attacks. Inspectors have since left the country but a technical team is expected to return in the coming weeks after Iran said future cooperation would take a "new form". Israel has warned it may resume strikes if Iran rebuilds facilities or moves toward weapons capability. Iran has pledged a "harsh response" to any future attacks. bur-jxb/rmb
SBS Australia
6 days ago
- SBS Australia
'National pride': Iran says it will not halt nuclear enrichment ahead of European talks
Iran has no plans to abandon its nuclear program, including uranium enrichment, despite the "severe" damage caused by United States strikes to its facilities, the country's foreign minister said ahead of renewed talks with European powers. Iran is scheduled to meet the United Kingdom, France and Germany in Istanbul on Friday, to discuss its nuclear program, with Iran accusing European countries of scuppering a landmark 2015 nuclear deal. Before the conflict, Iran and the US held five rounds of nuclear talks mediated by Oman but could not agree on the extent to which Iran should be allowed to enrich uranium. Israel and US say Iran was close to enriching to levels that would allow it to quickly produce a nuclear weapon, while Iran says its enrichment program is for civilian purposes only. Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi told Fox News' Special Report with Bret Baier on Tuesday AEST: "It is stopped because, yes, damages are serious and severe. But obviously, we cannot give up enrichment because it is an achievement of our own scientists." "And now, more than that, it is a question of national pride," he said. US President Donald Trump responded to the comments on his platform Truth Social, saying the US would carry out strikes again "if necessary". The 2015 agreement, reached between Iran and United Nations Security Council permanent members — UK, China, France, Russia and the US —plus Germany, imposed curbs on Iran's nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. But it unravelled in 2018 when the US, during Trump's first term, unilaterally withdrew and reimposed sweeping sanctions. Though Europe pledged continued support, a mechanism intended to offset US sanctions never effectively materialised, forcing many Western firms to exit Iran and deepening its economic crisis. "Iran holds the European parties responsible for negligence in implementing the agreement," said foreign ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baqaei ahead of Friday's talks in Istanbul on the deal's future. Iran will also host a trilateral meeting on Tuesday with representatives from China and Russia to discuss the nuclear issue and potential sanctions. The Chinese foreign ministry said China would "continue to play a constructive role in pushing relevant sides to restart dialogue and negotiations, and reach a solution that takes in account the legitimate concerns of all parties". In recent weeks, the three European powers have threatened to reimpose international sanctions on Iran, accusing it of breaching its nuclear commitments. Germany said the Istanbul talks would be at the expert level, with the European trio, or E3, working "flat out" to find a sustainable and verifiable diplomatic solution. "If no solution is reached by the end of August ... the snapback also remains an option for the E3," said its foreign ministry spokesperson, Martin Giese. A clause in the 2015 agreement allows for UN sanctions on Iran to be reimposed through a "snapback" mechanism in the event of non-compliance. But the agreement expires in October, leaving a tight deadline. 'No intention of speaking with America' The UN nuclear watchdog, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), says Iran is the only non-nuclear-armed country currently enriching uranium to 60 per cent — far beyond the 3.67 per cent cap set by the 2015 accord. That is a short step from the 90 per cent enrichment required for a nuclear weapon. Using the snapback clause was "meaningless, unjustifiable and immoral", Baqaei told a news conference, arguing that Iran only started distancing itself from the agreement in response to Western non-compliance. "Iran's reduction of its commitments was carried out in accordance with the provisions outlined in the agreement," he said. "At this stage, we have no intention of speaking with America." Iran is a party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, while Israel is not. The IAEA says it has "no credible indication" of an active, coordinated weapons program in Iran. Iran maintains its nuclear program is solely meant for civilian purposes. Israel is the only Middle Eastern country believed to have nuclear weapons and said its attack against Iran was aimed at preventing Iran from developing its own nuclear weapons.
