logo
Federal judge blocks Trump administration from barring foreign student enrolment at Harvard

Federal judge blocks Trump administration from barring foreign student enrolment at Harvard

CTV News23-05-2025
John Gobin, a Canadian law student at Harvard University, says it's been a stressful time as the process plays out in the legal system.
WASHINGTON -- A federal judge on Friday blocked the Trump administration from cutting off Harvard's enrolment of foreign students, an action the Ivy League school decried as unconstitutional retaliation for defying the White House's political demands.
In its lawsuit filed earlier Friday in federal court in Boston, Harvard said the government's action violates the First Amendment and will have an 'immediate and devastating effect for Harvard and more than 7,000 visa holders.'
'With the stroke of a pen, the government has sought to erase a quarter of Harvard's student body, international students who contribute significantly to the University and its mission,' Harvard said in its suit. 'Without its international students, Harvard is not Harvard.'
The temporary restraining order was granted by U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs.
The Trump administration move has thrown campus into disarray days before graduation. Harvard said in the suit. International students who run labs, teach courses, assist professors and participate in Harvard sports are now left deciding whether to transfer or risk losing legal status to stay in the country, according to the filing.
The impact is heaviest at graduate schools such as the Harvard Kennedy School, where almost half the student body comes from abroad, and Harvard Business School, which is about one-third international.
Along with its impact on current students, the move blocks thousands of students who were planning to come for summer and fall classes.
Harvard said it immediately puts the school at a disadvantage as it competes for the world's top students. Even if it regains the ability to host students, 'future applicants may shy away from applying out of fear of further reprisals from the government,' the suit said.
If the government's action stands, Harvard said, the university would be unable to offer admission to new international students for at least the next two academic years. Schools that have that certification withdrawn by the federal government are ineligible to reapply until one year afterward, Harvard said.
Harvard enrolls almost 6,800 foreign students at its campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Most are graduate students and they come from more than 100 countries.
The Department of Homeland Security announced the action Thursday, accusing Harvard of creating an unsafe campus environment by allowing 'anti-American, pro-terrorist agitators' to assault Jewish students on campus. It also accused Harvard of coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party, contending the school had hosted and trained members of a Chinese paramilitary group as recently as 2024.
Harvard President Alan Garber earlier this month said the university has made changes to its governance over the past year and a half, including a broad strategy to combat antisemitism, He said Harvard would not budge on its 'its core, legally-protected principles' over fears of retaliation. Harvard has said it will respond at a later time to allegations first raised by House Republicans about coordination with the Chinese Communist Party.
The threat to Harvard's international enrolment stems from an April 16 request from U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, who demanded that Harvard provide information about foreign students that might implicate them in violence or protests that could lead to their deportation.
Harvard says it provided 'thousands of data points' in response to Noem's April 16 demand. Her letter on Thursday said Harvard failed to satisfy her request, but the school said she failed to provide any further explanation.
'It makes generalized statements about campus environment and 'anti-Americanism,' again without articulating any rational link between those statements and the decision to retaliate against international students,' the suit said.
Harvard's lawsuit said the administration violated the government's own regulations for withdrawing a school's certification.
The government can and does remove colleges from the Student Exchange and Visitor Program, making them ineligible to host foreign students on their campus. However, it's usually for administrative reasons outlined in law, such as failing to maintain accreditation, lacking proper facilities for classes, or failing to employ qualified professional personnel.
Noem said Harvard can regain its ability to host foreign students if it produces a trove of records on foreign students within 72 hours. Her updated request demands all records, including audio or video footage, of foreign students participating in protests or dangerous activity on campus.
The lawsuit is separate from the university's earlier one challenging more than US$2 billion in federal cuts imposed by the Republican administration.
------
By Collin Binkley
Associated Press writer Annie Ma contributed to this report.
The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Using 'go' to cheer on sports teams is now OK, says Quebec language watchdog
Using 'go' to cheer on sports teams is now OK, says Quebec language watchdog

CBC

time28 minutes ago

  • CBC

Using 'go' to cheer on sports teams is now OK, says Quebec language watchdog

Quebec's language watchdog has changed its tune on whether it's acceptable to use the word "go" to cheer on sports teams. In a new guideline posted in its online dictionary, the Office québécois de la langue française says that while "allez" is the preferred term, it's now "partially legitimized" to use the English word to show encouragement. The flip-flop comes after the office took a hard line with Montreal's transit agency, pressing it for months in 2024 to scrub the word "go" from the electronic signs on more than 1,000 city buses. The watchdog confirmed it had changed its position after The Canadian Press obtained a series of emails through access to information legislation, revealing it gave the transit agency a green light to use "go" in June. The reversal followed a public outcry on the eve of the Montreal Canadiens' first playoff home game in April, when the Montreal Gazette reported how the transit agency had replaced "Go! Canadiens Go!" with "Allez! Canadiens Allez!" to stay on the watchdog's good side. The revelations prompted French-language Minister Jean-François Roberge to intervene, declaring that the expression "Go Habs Go" is part of Quebec culture, and that any future complaints about the slogan would be dismissed. That statement verged on political interference and placed the watchdog in a difficult position, according to one expert. "The office had to respond to a political order," said Benoît Melançon, emeritus professor of French literature at Université de Montréal. "The minister said, 'You will accept this,' so the office had to find a way to accept it." The transit agency says it hasn't decided whether it will put the word "go" back on its bus displays. On Wednesday, a spokesperson said the agency is now "beginning its reflection on the subject." 'Go' is a 'partially legitimized' word: OQLF In an April statement, Dominique Malack, the president of the language office, agreed that the slogan "Go Habs Go" is anchored in Quebec's history. Still, she went on to say that the word "go" is an Anglicism, and that public bodies have an obligation to use "exemplary" French, which includes using only French words in their signage. Emails released to The Canadian Press show the transit agency asked the watchdog in May, following the uproar, for authorization to start using "go" again. A month later, on June 6, the language office directed transit officials to its new entry for the word "allez" in its online dictionary of terminology, a reference guide for the proper use of French in Quebec. The page notes how the Anglicism "go" has been used in Quebec since at least the 1980s and is "well-established" in common parlance. "It is considered to be partially legitimized," the entry says. When asked by The Canadian Press to comment on the newly released email correspondence, the watchdog confirmed it had updated its position. "The office now considers that a public body can use the interjection go in a context of encouragement without this compromising the duty of exemplarity incumbent upon it under the Charter of the French Language," spokesperson Gilles Payer told The Canadian Press in an email. Payer confirmed the entry was newly published on May 30. "The media coverage of the case concerning the use of the borrowed word 'go' in a sports context led the office to officially assess the acceptability" of the word, he said. Melançon, the French literature professor, said the new rationale — especially the term "partially legitimized" — suggests the office was uneasy with the change. "This must have given rise to some pretty intense internal debates," he said. "'Do we take into account what the minister is telling us or do we not take it into account? If we don't take it into account, what are the consequences? If we do, how do we justify changing our minds?''' At least one transit agency official felt dubious about the original complaint, which related to a bus displaying the words "Go! CF Mtl Go!" in support of Montreal's professional soccer club. She called the issue a "grey zone" in a June 2024 email to colleagues. "We've been using the word 'go' for years without a problem," she wrote. "Are we going to change everything because of one complaint?" But by later that month, the agency had decided to scrap the word, which involved manually updating the display on each of more than 1,000 buses over a period of months. The agency has said no further change will be made before the buses undergo regular maintenance in the fall. The language office has received at least two other complaints about the word "go" in the last five years, according to a response to a separate access-to-information request. In 2023, someone complained about the slogan "Go Habs Go" appearing on an outdoor billboard. That complaint was dismissed because the expression is a trademark. A similar complaint in 2021 targeted the hashtag .GoHabsGo that appears in oversized letters outside the Bell Centre in Montreal, the home arena of the Canadiens. The person who filed the complaint suggested that to comply with Quebec's language rules, the expression "Allez les Habitants allez" should appear alongside the English slogan, in larger letters. "And yes, I'm serious, if the law applies, then apply it!:)" the person wrote. According to the language watchdog, that complaint was resolved following an intervention, though it provided no details. A spokesperson for the hockey team declined to comment.

Quebec pension giant participates in the ‘economy of genocide,' UN report says
Quebec pension giant participates in the ‘economy of genocide,' UN report says

CTV News

time42 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Quebec pension giant participates in the ‘economy of genocide,' UN report says

Quebec's largest public pension fund manager, The Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec (CDPQ), has been accused of participating in the 'economy of genocide' in Gaza, according to a United Nations (UN) report. The CDPQ has invested $9.6 billion in companies that are allegedly profiting from the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, according to the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, Francesca Albanese, in her report entitled 'From the economy of occupation to the economy of genocide,' released on Thursday. Albanese accuses dozens of companies of profiting financially from the conflict by supplying military equipment. The CDPQ could not be immediately reached for comment. This report by The Canadian Press was first published in French on July 3, 2025.

Murphy's Logic: More RCMP isn't the solution for better policing
Murphy's Logic: More RCMP isn't the solution for better policing

CTV News

timean hour ago

  • CTV News

Murphy's Logic: More RCMP isn't the solution for better policing

Actions speak louder than words. They're usually a lot slower in coming and often disappointing. So it is that more than five years after the Nova Scotia mass murders, and more than two years after the final report of the commission that looked into those deadly events, the Nova Scotia government has finally responded to repeated complaints about policing in the province – particularly in rural areas. Dramatic shortcomings in RCMP staffing levels, command structure, poor response times and communication have long formed the basis of those complaints. They predate the mass murder by decades but were all clearly on display during those desperate hours in April 2020 and in the days, weeks and months since. Even many of the critics of the inquiry commission were surprised if not impressed when its final report was critical of the RCMP response, reiterating calls for significant reform. It's fair to say that the RCMP was fingered as a large part of the problem in policing. Which is why it is so surprising that as part of its solution, the N.S. government is now proposing an even larger role for the RCMP. The Attorney General says municipal police forces that are unable come up to new uniform standards set by the province will need to switch to the RCMP. That begs the question, why is the government confident that the RCMP, which has long failed to meet the public's expectations in rural policing, the right agency to usher in new and expanded standards? A consultant's report recommended that Nova Scotia look at creating a single provincial police force and even suggested a stand-alone force not involving the RCMP whatsoever. Short of that, perhaps such a provincial force could serve all of those areas now served by the RCMP and others found to be lacking high-quality municipal forces. That's likely more easily said than done… or paid for. But it would go a long way toward restoring public confidence in rural policing which is now sadly synonymous with the RCMP, the brand and its shortcomings.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store