Order blocking YouTube channel '4PM' withdrawn, SC informed
"They have withdrawn the blocking order," senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the petitioner, informed a bench of Justices B R Gavai and Augustine George Masih.
The apex court was hearing a plea filed by Sanjay Sharma, who is the editor of digital news platform 4PM, seeking quashing of an order blocking the channel.
The plea claimed the blocking was effected by the intermediary pursuant to an undisclosed direction allegedly issued by the Centre citing vague grounds of "national security" and "public order".
Sibal requested the bench that the plea be tagged with separate pending petitions which have challenged Rule 16 of the Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Blocking for Access of Information by Public) Rules, 2009.
He said Sharma's petition also sought quashing of Rule 16 of the 2009 Rules.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Domicile rule of T'gana for med seats flawed: SC
New Delhi: Supreme Court on Wednesday faulted the Telangana govt's domicile policy, which mandates a student to have pursued Classes 9 to 12 in the state to be eligible for admissions to state quota medical seats through NEET and said it was far removed from the ground reality, reports Dhananjay Mahapatra. "These days, many students, to avail of better coaching facilities for competing in medical and engineering entrance examinations, pursue their Class 11 and 12 at places like Kota. Should they be barred from getting admitted on the ground that they are not domiciles of Telangana?" a bench of CJI B R Gavai and Justices K Vinod Chandran and Joymalya Bagchi asked. "You must have a humane approach." We do not want such students to be harassed. All students whose parents are domiciled in Telangana would be eligible for state quota seats irrespective of the place from where they passed Class 11 and 12," the CJI said, with a warning, "Either you (the govt) resolve the issue, or we will set it right." Appearing for students facing the domicile bar despite their parents being born in Telangana and continuously residing in the state, advocate Raghenth Basant told the bench that it has created a piquant situation. "Children of a person from Kerala, who is posted in Telangana for the last four years, on completing Class 9-12 in Telangana would be eligible for admissions to medical seats under state quota. But students who study outside, despite their parents being natural residents of Telangana, would not be eligible to avail these state quota medical seats," he said. He urged the court to modify the domicile criteria by allowing children of every resident of Telangana, irrespective of where they completed their schooling, to get admitted to medical colleges under state quota seats. The SC posted the matter for further hearing on July 29, by when the Telangana govt will have to come with an answer to the court's query.


News18
42 minutes ago
- News18
Chicharito faces backlash in Mexico for very sexist remarks on gender roles
Agency: Mexico City, Jul 24 (AP) Soccer star Javier 'Chicharito" Hernandez is facing a backlash from Mexico President Claudia Sheinbaum and others for remarks posted on his social media accounts about gender roles. 'Chicharito is a very good soccer player," Sheinbaum said at a news conference Wednesday. 'But when it comes to his opinion on women … he still has a lot to learn." She described the former Mexico international's ideas as 'very sexist." The former Manchester United and Real Madrid striker, who plays for Chivas, is injured and missed the first two matches of Mexico's Apertura tournament. Over the weekend, he posted several reels and videos, mainly on Instagram. 'Don't be afraid to be women, to allow yourselves to be led by a man," the 37-year-old Hernandez said. 'Women, you are failing, you are eradicating masculinity, making society hypersensitive." Hernandez, the all-time leading scorer for the Mexican national team with 52 goals, returned to Mexico last year on a two-year deal with Chivas, the team where he began his professional career in 2006. 'You women need to learn to accept and honor masculinity," he said in another one of his posts. In another, he said to the camera: 'You want a man to provide, but for you, cleaning is patriarchal oppression… interesting." Sheinbaum, a 63-year-old scientist, was elected last year as the first female president in the country's 200-year history. 'I'm a mother, I'm a grandmother, I'm also a housewife," the president added Wednesday. 'But I'm also the Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces. Women can be whatever we want." Hernandez is a divorced father of two who has a habit of kneeling in the middle of the pitch to pray before the start of matches. He began creating content for a YouTube channel where he portrayed his life as a player with West Ham and his marriage. Hernandez had a low profile on social media before hiring life coach Diego Dreyfus, to whom many attribute much of 'Chicharito's" new persona. Criticism followed his recent statements, with some urging him to limit himself to soccer, given that his performance since returning to the Mexican league last year has not been as expected. Hernandez, who also played for Bayer Leverkusen, West Ham and Sevilla, has scored just two goals in 25 matches in his first two tournaments back in Mexico. A few hours after the president's remarks, Hernandez was fined by the by the Gender and Diversity Commission of the Mexican Soccer Federation and by Chivas. 'A few days ago, on the social platform Javier Chicharito Hernández made statements that promote sexist stereotypes that are considered media violence and go against gender equality in the sport," a statement from the federation said. The federation did not disclose the amount of the fine but said that a more severe penalty awaits if he does it again. Chivas didn't mention Hernandez by name in announcing its fine, only saying that the team is against 'behavior that reinforces stereotypes that limit the freedom, respect, and full development of all people, both inside and outside of sports." This is the first time that the federation has sanctioned a player for misogynistic comments. Earlier this year businessman Ricardo Salinas Pliego, the owner of the Mazatlán and Puebla clubs, made harsh statements about female journalists and was left unpunished. Chicharito has been banned from the national team since 2019 after he, alongside other players, organized a non-authorized party in New York after a game against the United States. (AP) ATK ATK view comments First Published: July 24, 2025, 10:30 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


News18
43 minutes ago
- News18
'Udaipur Files Is Deeply Communal': Arshad Madani Moves Supreme Court Against Clearance To The Film
In his petition, Madani argues that Udaipur Files promotes a dangerous narrative by portraying Indian Muslims as sympathisers or agents of Pakistani terrorists. Islamic scholar Maulana Arshad Madani has filed strong objections before the Supreme Court against the clearance granted to the controversial film Udaipur Files by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting's screening committee. Madani, president of Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind, contends that the film's content is not only factually misleading but also deeply communal in nature. In his petition, Madani argues that Udaipur Files promotes a dangerous narrative by portraying Indian Muslims as sympathisers or agents of Pakistani terrorists. 'These narratives do not merely concern India-Pakistan tensions but actively portray Indian Muslims as inherently disloyal, sympathetic to, or working at the behest of terror groups," he stated in court filings. Such depictions, he argues, are both mala fide and aimed at stoking communal tensions across the country. He has also raised serious concerns over the manner in which the film received approval. Madani alleges that the Ministry's screening committee order lacked proper reasoning and failed to adequately respond to his detailed objections. 'The committee's report simply records some submissions and suggests six inconsequential changes, without analysing the broader communal implications," he claimed. Furthermore, Madani has alleged a 'conflict of interest" in the composition of the screening committee. Since the CBFC (Central Board of Film Certification) had already granted certification to the film — a decision under challenge — Madani argues that delegating the matter to a committee largely comprising CBFC members undermines the credibility of the review process. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.