logo
What Republicans Have Said About the Epstein Controversy

What Republicans Have Said About the Epstein Controversy

The Trump Administration's handling of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's case is opening divides among Republican lawmakers, officials, and right-wing media figures as the President confronts a wave of backlash from his MAGA supporters.
A memo released by the Department of Justice and FBI that denies the existence of an Epstein 'client list' and states that he died by suicide, aiming to put to bed conspiracies surrounding the disgraced financier harbored by those on the right, has sparked widespread outcry from President Donald Trump's MAGA base.
'I don't understand what the interest or what the fascination is,' Trump told reporters at Joint Base Andrews on Tuesday, speaking of public interest in Epstein. 'The credible information's been given.'
Amid the blowback, Trump allies from House Speaker Mike Johnson to right-wing activist Laura Loomer have broken with the Administration over its handling of the issue, while some other conservatives have voiced support—or sought to avoid the controversy.
Prominent voices on the right clash with the Trump Administration
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, an outspoken MAGA voice in Congress, told CNN that the Trump Administration's mishandling of files related to Epstein's case, which Trump pledged to release during his 2024 campaign, is 'just a red line that it crosses for many people.'
'This is something that's been talked about by many people serving in the Administration, myself and many others on the right and the left of there needing to be transparency of the rich and powerful elites,' she added. Conspiracy theories about Epstein's case were previously promoted by multiple high-ranking members of the Administration, including Vice President J.D. Vance and FBI Director Kash Patel. Over the weekend, however, Patel said in a post on X that 'the conspiracy theories just aren't true, never have been.'
Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana told NBC News that he understands the public intrigue surrounding Epstein, 'who he trafficked those women to and why they weren't prosecuted.'
'I think the Justice Department is going to have to go back to the drawing board in answering those questions,' he said.
Rep. Tim Burchett of Tennessee told The Hill he 'would just like the files to be turned over.'
Rep. Lauren Boebert of Colorado, another outspoken MAGA lawmaker, on Tuesday called for the appointment of a special counsel in the matter, floating former Rep. Matt Gaetz for the role. 'We deserve the truth about the Epstein Files,' she wrote in a post on X. 'I'm ready for a Special Counsel to handle this.'
Right-wing media commentators have also contributed to the blowback. 'The fact that the U.S. government, the one that I voted for, refused to take my question seriously and instead said, 'Case closed, shut up conspiracy theorist,' was too much for me,' right-wing commentator and former Fox News host Tucker Carlson said in a speech at Turning Point USA Student Action Summit on Friday.
Far-right activist and Trump ally Laura Loomer warned that the 'lack of transparency' would cost Republicans House and Senate seats in a post on X. In an interview with Politico, Loomer called for a special counsel to 'independently investigate the handling of the Epstein files.'
Attorney General Pam Bondi has faced particular ire. Bondi in February stated that Epstein's alleged 'client list' was 'sitting on my desk right now to review.' The same month, the Justice Department released a cache of files related to Epstein's case that were heavily redacted and mostly consisted of information that had previously been made public despite Bondi's promises that the documents would include flight logs and the names of people involved, leaving many underwhelmed.
Following the release of the memo last week, Bondi said that she had been referring to the case file on Epstein in the February interview as opposed to a 'client list.'
Trump defended Bondi, writing in a Truth Social post earlier this week that the Attorney General 'is doing a FANTASTIC JOB!' But others on the right have voiced a much more critical sentiment.
After initially saying he trusted the Administration to make the 'right decision,' House Speaker Mike Johnson urged Bondi to 'come forward and explain' what happened with the Epstein 'client list' in an interview with youtuber Benny Johnson. 'I'm for transparency,' the House lawmaker said. 'It's a very delicate subject but we should put everything out there and let the people decide it.' Still, he opposed Democratic efforts to release files related to Epstein.
"I'm sure it's a relief for Pam Bondi to hear the president is still in her corner. Unfortunately, huge swaths of the party are not,' conservative commentator Megyn Kelly wrote on X. 'She repeatedly misled on Epstein. Then didn't have the courage to explain herself. Suddenly, she's camera shy & no Qs allowed. Good luck!"
Carlson blamed Bondi for the backlash facing the Trump Administration in an NBC News interview published earlier this week.
Saying he now thinks the Justice Department doesn't have 'much relevant information about Jeffrey Epstein's sex crimes,' Carlson told the outlet, 'Rather than just admit that, Pam Bondi made a bunch of ludicrous claims on cable news shows that she couldn't back up, and this current outrage is the result.'
Inside the department, FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino, who previously promoted conspiracy theories about a government coverup related to Epstein's case, has reportedly had a falling out with Bondi over the issue and threatened to quit.
Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, who has clashed with Trump on issues from Iran to the President's 'Big Beautiful Bill,' on Tuesday announced he was launching an effort to force a vote on the release of files related to Epstein's case alongside Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California with a procedural tool known as a discharge petition.
'We all deserve to know what's in the Epstein files, who's implicated, and how deep this corruption goes,' Massie said in a statement, adding, 'If your Representative won't sign the discharge petition, ask why.'
Some GOP members of Congress voice support—or dodge the issue
Still, some Republican lawmakers, including Chuck Grassley of Iowa, have made public statements in support of Administration officials or are backing off from making any strong comments about the issue at all. Grassley said that based on what he knows he does believe Bondi provided enough information about Epstein, though he told The Hill that he 'always urge[s] the greatest of transparency.'
Sen. Jim Jordan of Ohio, a strong Trump ally, told NBC News he trusted the President and his team. Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Sen. John Cornyn echoed the sentiment by deferring to Trump on the matter.
Rep. Darrell Issa of California spoke more strongly in support of Trump, saying that much of what his base believes about the case simply isn't true.
'I trust the people who reported it to us and who looked at them,' Issa said.
As a number of Republican lawmakers have looked to avoid the controversy, Democratic lawmakers have sought to take advantage of it by forcing their GOP colleagues to show their cards.
Rep. Khanna introduced an amendment to a cryptocurrency bill that would have required Bondi to release the Epstein files. 'This is a question of whose side are you on?' Khanna said on the House floor on Monday.
Most of the Republicans on the House Rules Committee—Reps. Virginia Foxx, Michelle Fischbach, Erin Houchin, Nicholas Langworthy, Austin Scott, Morgan Griffith, and Brian Jack—voted to block the amendment. Rep. Ralph Norman of South Carolina was the sole Republican on the panel to vote to advance it for the consideration of the full House. Rep. Chip Roy did not vote.
Langworthy defended his vote by saying that Democrats politicized the amendment. 'He voted no because it was a pointless political gimmick, not a path to justice,' a spokesperson from Langworthy's office told ABC News 10.
'I think most of us believe what's appropriate will be released when it is time for the president to release it,' said Foxx, who chairs the committee.
A similar move by Democratic Sen. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland last week won more Republican support, however. Van Hollen introduced an amendment to a funding bill before the Senate Appropriations Committee that would force the Justice Department to retain Epstein files, and provide a report to Congress on the history of the case. The committee approved it unanimously with bipartisan support.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Third Biden aide refuses to answer Oversight questions: Comer
Third Biden aide refuses to answer Oversight questions: Comer

The Hill

time22 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Third Biden aide refuses to answer Oversight questions: Comer

A third aide who served former President Biden while he was in the White House has refused to testify before a congressional panel, House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform chair James Comer (R-Ky.) said on Friday. Comer in a post on X said it was 'unbelievable' that Annie Tomasini, who served as deputy director of Oval Office Operations, and others refused to answer 'basic questions about … Biden's fitness to serve.' 'It's apparent they would rather hide key information to protect themselves and Joe Biden than be truthful with the American people about this historic scandal,' Comer said. 'There needs to be transparency and accountability, and we will continue to pursue the truth and examine options to get the answers we need,' he added. Comer said Tomasini invoked the Fifth Amendment when asked if she was instructed to lie about Biden's health or the handling of classified documents found in his garage. She was also asked if the former president or anyone in the White House instructed her to conceal or destroy classified material found at Biden's home or office, and if she ever conspired with anyone in the White House to hide information regarding the Biden family's business dealings, the Republican lawmaker added. Earlier this week, Anthony Bernal, informally known as former first lady Jill Biden's 'work husband,' refused to testify before the Oversight panel as did Kevin O'Connor, Biden's former doctor, earlier this month. The White House and Comer allege that Biden staffers helped cover up the former president's cognitive decline at the end of his term in office. Both Biden and Bernal have rejected the accusations. 'Most recently, the Committee seeks Mr. Bernal's testimony based on a purported controversy regarding use of the autopen at the conclusion of President Biden's term. President Biden has already confirmed that he personally made all decisions concerning his grants of clemency,' Bernal said in a statement sent to The Hill. 'While the Committee only recently began its autopen investigation, the Chairman has already declared that this matter is ' the biggest scandal in Oval Office history,'' he added. The former president shared similar sentiments during an interview published Sunday by The New York Times. 'Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency. I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false,' he told the news outlet.

Vance claims ‘bulls—‘ on WSJ report alleging Trump birthday note to Epstein
Vance claims ‘bulls—‘ on WSJ report alleging Trump birthday note to Epstein

The Hill

time22 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Vance claims ‘bulls—‘ on WSJ report alleging Trump birthday note to Epstein

Vice President Vance slammed what he called a 'complete and utter bulls—' article from The Wall Street Journal on Wednesday about a 'bawdy' birthday note President Trump allegedly wrote to former acquaintance Jeffrey Epstein in 2003. 'Forgive my language but this story is complete and utter bulls—,' Vance wrote on the X social media platform Thursday night. 'Does anyone honestly believe this sounds like Donald Trump?' The president has vowed to sue the Rupert Murdoch-owned Journal over the article, which describes a birthday letter that Trump supposedly wrote to be included in a leather-bound book marking the disgraced financier's 50th birthday in 2003. Epstein, who had hobnobbed in elite circles in New York City and Palm Beach, Fla., and was a known associate of Trump in the 1990s and early 2000s, died by suicide in a federal prison in 2019 while awaiting federal charges for allegedly sex trafficking minors. Vance, who was briefly an Ohio senator and journalist while serving in the Marine Corps, has in the past denounced some of Trump's coarse language and questioned the government's official narrative around the Epstein case. Vance claimed Thursday that the Journal never 'showed [the Epstein birthday letter] to us before publishing' the article. 'Doesn't it violate some rule of journalistic ethics to publish a letter like this without showing it to the victim of this hit piece?' Vance wrote on X. 'Will the people who have bought into every hoax against President Trump show an ounce of skepticism before buying into this bizarre story?' The Journal reported that the Epstein birthday message, which appears to bear Trump's signature, was typed inside the outline of an apparently nude, hand-drawn woman. 'A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret,' the final line of a typed poem on the page read, per the Journal's reporting. Trump has repeatedly denied close connections with the convicted sex offender, and both had said they had a falling out in the early 2000s. Furor over the Epstein case reached a fever pitch this week, though, when Trump told followers to stop paying attention to Epstein's case and accused his supporters of being duped by left-wing narratives. 'If there was a 'smoking gun' on Epstein, why didn't the Dems, who controlled the 'files' for four years, and had [former Attorney General Merrick] Garland and [ex-prosecutor Maureen] Comey in charge, use it,' Trump wrote on Truth Social on Thursday. 'BECAUSE THEY HAD NOTHING!!!'

Most think GOP tax bill will help wealthy, harm the poor: Survey
Most think GOP tax bill will help wealthy, harm the poor: Survey

The Hill

time22 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Most think GOP tax bill will help wealthy, harm the poor: Survey

Most Americans think that President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' which he signed into law earlier this month, will help those who are wealthy and harm those who are poor, according to a new survey that was released Friday morning. The new Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research found that 64 percent of U.S. adults said the Republican-led tax and spending bill, which Trump signed into law on July 4, will do 'more to help' wealthy people. On the flip side, 7 percent said it would do more to hurt them, while 27 percent said it would not make a difference. Just over a quarter, 26 percent, said the bill would benefit middle-class people. Just over half, 51 percent, said it would hurt them, while 22 percent said it would not make a difference, according to the survey. Similarly, 24 percent of respondents argued the legislation would do more to help 'people like you,' while 51 percent argued it would do more to hurt them, according to the poll. Some 23 percent stated the bill would not make a difference. Just 1-in-5 said the tax and spending law would do more to help low-income people. The majority, 61 percent, said the legislation would do more to hurt those people, while 17 percent argued it would not make a difference, the survey showed. Democratic Party voters are more likely to say the legislation would assist the wealthy and hurt the middle-class and the poor, compared to Republicans. GOP voters are more likely to state the 'big, beautiful bill' will aid rather than harm the middle-class, according to the poll. When it comes to the impact on low-income Americans, the sides are divided. Around four-in-10 Republicans think the bill would do more to help low-income people, while just three percent of Democrats said the same. Some 17 percent of independents argued the legislation would do more to help those who are low-income. Trump's massive spending bill would bring new tax breaks for older adults and overtime workers. The legislation includes funding to help hire border patrol agents and officers. The package also reduces green energy tax credits and cuts Medicaid and food assistance programs. A CNN poll released Wednesday found that 61 percent of Americans oppose the GOP's massive package. Only 11 percent said they 'strongly support' the bill, along with 27 percent who said they 'somewhat support' it. A Harvard CAPS/Harris poll, which was published on Monday, found that Americans were split, with 44 percent saying they supported the 'big, beautiful bill.' Another 44 percent said they did not support it. Some 12 percent were unsure. The poll was conducted from July 10-14 among 1,437 adults. It had a margin of error of plus or minus 3.6 percentage points.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store