Trump, Hegseth, Rubio: a triple threat to global stability
South Korea ,
At the recent
Shangri-La Dialogue in
Singapore , Hegseth stunned Asia's defence and diplomatic elite by demanding that Indo-Pacific countries raise defence spending to 5 per cent of gross domestic product to 'counter China'. The proposal was not just tone-deaf; it was combustible. No country in the region, save for outliers, comes close to that threshold.
Japan
Australia – and certainly Southeast Asia, where military spending averages just 1.5 per cent of GDP – are in no position to meet such a demand.
What Hegseth delivered was not a strategy, but an ultimatum. And in doing so, he risked catalysing the very action-reaction cycle Washington once sought to avoid: a region arming in anticipation, while Beijing accelerates its military posture in the
South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait.
Asean , already reeling from intensifying great power rivalries, finds itself caught in the crossfire of an American foreign policy that confuses coercion with clarity, and escalation with influence. Former US president Richard Nixon and then-secretary of state Henry Kissinger wielded ambiguity to signal strategic intent. By contrast, Hegseth, Rubio and US President Donald Trump offer only confusion and contradiction – wielded like a cudgel, fracturing the very alliances they claim to reinforce.
In this environment, diplomacy is no longer the art of restraining power. It has become the art of surviving it.
A cabinet without guardrails
The Hegseth doctrine – if it can be called one – illustrates a deeper unravelling within Trump's second administration: the near-total removal of institutional counterweights. The National Security Council is diminished. The State Department's career corps, once the backbone of US diplomacy, has been hollowed out. What remains is a cabinet of loyalists, not strategists.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
41 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
Trump prepares tariff notice as US trade partners scramble for deals
Major US trading partners scrambled over the weekend to finalise trade deals or lobby for extra time as President Donald Trump said he is notifying about a dozen countries on Monday of the new tariff level on their shipments to the US. Advertisement 'I signed some letters and they'll go out on Monday – probably 12,' Trump told reporters over the Fourth of July weekend, adding that the missives involve 'different amounts of money, different amounts of tariffs and somewhat different statements.' Asked to identify the countries, he said, 'I have to announce it on Monday.' Trump's latest remarks suggest talks remain fluid and deals elusive, three days before the July 9 deadline announced by the US administration. The letters initially were supposed to go out on July 4 with a tariff imposition date of August 1, based on Trump's earlier comments. But US officials were busily negotiating through the holiday weekend, including with Japan, South Korea, the European Union, India and Vietnam. South Korean President Lee Jae-myung delivers a speech on the second supplementary budget proposal for 2025 at the National Assembly in Seoul, South Korea, on June 26. Photo: Reuters One of Trump's signature moves in deal making is a unilateral threat when negotiations reach critical stages, so it's unclear whether the letters he describes are real or merely meant to strike fear into trading partners still reluctant to offer last-minute concessions.
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Inside China and Tanzania's ‘very special relationship' – found nowhere else in Africa
Observers say that of those countries, Tanzania stands out as an exceptionally strong and enduring military partner for Beijing, with more than 90 per cent of its military arms from China. According to a study released last month by the Africa Centre for Strategic Studies, Tanzania has 'a very special relationship' with the People's Liberation Army (PLA), 'one you will not find in any other African country'. Tanzania's military inventory, order of battle, battle doctrine and service doctrine are heavily inspired by the PLA, according to the study. 'This enduring influence stems from the PLA's involvement in setting up and building the Tanzania People's Defence Force from 1964 to the present day, which fully explains their unique bond,' said Paul Nantulya, a China-Africa specialist from the National Defence University's Africa Centre for Strategic Studies in Washington and the author of the study. Tanzania is among African nations – including Mozambique, Namibia and Zimbabwe – where liberation movement parties have monopolised power since independence, and these nations have the closest ties with China on the continent.
South China Morning Post
3 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
How Singapore can help China build bridges in an age of fracture
. The recent visit of Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong to China reaffirmed the strategic depth of the China–Singapore relationship. His meetings with Chinese leaders underscored a readiness to work together to uphold the principles of free trade and multilateralism But beyond symbolism, this visit raised critical questions. What role will Singapore now play on the global and regional stage? What new possibilities does this moment unlock? As geopolitical rivalry hardens and the risks of global fragmentation grow, Singapore's strategic position as mediator, convenor and facilitator is becoming more important. Rather than simply hosting dialogues or taking part in frameworks, Singapore must step forward and shape them. It can draw on its unique positioning: rooted in Southeast Asia yet globally engaged, trusted by both East and West and respected for its competence, discretion and policy independence Consider the opportunities presented by Wong's visit, including expanding training programmes between the Singapore and Chinese governments and helping export the joint business management, shared investment and industrial zoning model of the Suzhou Industrial Park . Singapore is already adept at blending governance expertise with China's industrial scale. These initiatives must not remain technocratic exercises. They should serve as platforms to elevate standards in transparency, sustainability and local empowerment across countries along the Belt and Road Initiative. Singapore can help redefine connectivity, not as a contest of influence but as a laboratory for inclusive development.
