Three people injured in Russian attack on central Ukraine, governor says
The resulting fire had been contained, Raikovych said on the Telegram messaging app, adding that 76 private houses and one nine-storey residential building had also been damaged in the attack.
The incident left 1,400 residents without power, he said in a later post.
Reuters could not independently verify the report. There was no immediate comment from Russia.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
14 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on Trump's tariffs: both a political and an economic threat
Donald Trump's 1 August tariffs deadline did what it was always intended to do. It kept the markets and the nations guessing amid last-minute uncertainty. It attempted to reassert the global heft of the United States economy to take on and master all comers. And it placed President Trump at the centre of the media story, where he always insists on being. In the event, there were some last-minute agreements struck this week, few of them fair or rational in trade terms, most of them motivated by the desire to generate some commercial order. Some conflicts are still in the balance. There were 11th-hour court challenges too, disputing the president's very right to play the trade war game in this way. Even now, no one, probably including Mr Trump himself, knows whether this is his administration's last word on US tariffs. Almost certainly not. That's because Mr Trump's love of tariffs is always more about the assertion of political clout rather than economic power. Mr Trump's antipathy towards the European Union drives one example. The pact agreed by Ursula von der Leyen in Scotland last weekend underlines that the EU's aspirations as a global economic superpower exceed its actual clout. The EU could not prevent Mr Trump making European goods 15% more expensive if they sell on US markets. Nor could it stop Mr Trump getting EU tariffs on US goods withdrawn. Equally eloquent about the global balance of economic power is that Mr Trump has not been able to force China to bend the knee in the manner of the EU. China has responded aggressively to Trump's tariff threats, retaliating with tariffs of its own and blocking the sale of commodities, including rare-earth minerals, that the US most covets. Unsurprisingly, this standoff has not produced one of Mr Trump's so-called deals. Friday's deadline has been reset for later in the month. It would be no surprise if it was eventually pushed back further. Mr Trump is not imposing tariffs on the rest of the world in order to promote global trade or even to boost the US economy. He is doing it, in part, because Congress has delegated this power to him, allowing the president to impose or waive tariffs at will. He uses this power for many purposes. These include raising government income without congressional oversight and also, because tariffs are regressive, shifting the tax burden away from the very rich, like Mr Trump himself, on to the middle and working class. But economics also comes way down the field in the list of reasons why Mr Trump is wielding the tariff weapon internationally. US talks with Brazil – with which the US runs a trade surplus, not a deficit – have been hijacked by Mr Trump's grievance over the prosecution of its former president Jair Bolsonaro for trying to overturn his 2022 election defeat. Talks with India are deadlocked because Mr Trump wants to penalise Delhi for buying energy and weapons from Russia. Those with Canada have been hit by Mr Trump's objections to Ottawa's plan to recognise Palestine. The ultimate test of the policy, however, will indeed be economic. For now, financial markets appear to have decided that Mr Trump's tariffs are manageable. If tariffs now raise the cost of goods on US high streets, slowing growth and feeding inflation, as they may, the wider market response could change quickly. In that event, the mood among American voters might even shift too.
The Guardian
16 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Corbyn's new party and the menace of populism
The upcoming launch of a new party by Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana (Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana agree to launch leftwing party, 24 July) will inevitably prompt questions about whether this will divide the progressive vote or offer a genuine alternative to Labour's centrist drift, especially as the Green party continues to grow as a principled voice for environmental and social justice. Although these projects are potential rivals, they need not be. If the disturbing rise of rightwing populism is to be successfully confronted, the left must overcome fragmentation and find ways to coexist and collaborate. The Corbyn-Sultana initiative and the Greens share much common ground: a rejection of austerity, commitment to democratic reform and a belief in economic and ecological justice. Their differences in emphasis, tone and priorities are real but not irreconcilable. There has to be scope for a non-aggression pact at the next general election, with each party standing aside in constituencies where the other has a better chance of success. Joint campaigning on core issues – such as proportional representation, protest rights, wealth taxes and a green new deal – could amplify their impact, and framing climate action as central to economic justice, not separate from it, could provide a unifying narrative for both. This is not about merging or blurring identities. It is about strategic and political maturity. If the left cannot cooperate when so much is at stake, it will surrender the field to those who thrive on division and fear. Unity does not require uniformity; it requires courage and purpose. The worse case, of a public war of words and clashing candidacies between the Greens and Corbynites, would demoralise voters and hand the initiative to the populist CosgroveChapel Lawn, Shropshire Your report quotes Labour party sources who are dismissive of the threat from Jeremy Corbyn and then bluntly states that Corbyn 'lost the 2017 and 2019 elections as party leader'. It would have provided a fairer context if you had pointed out that in 2017, the Corbyn-led Labour party achieved 2.5m more votes (and a 6% higher vote share) than Keir Starmer did in 2024. Even in 2019, 500,000 more people voted for Corbyn's party than Starmer's. Dr Chris MorrisKidderminster, Worcestershire In the winter election of 2019 I spent hours leafleting for Jeremy Corbyn's Labour party. The sensation of cold and wet letterboxes still lingers on my fingertips when I think of what he said in an Observer article just after the election – that Labour had lost the election but won the argument. This is all Mr Corbyn is interested in doing – winning the argument – and indeed I think he will find that is all he ever will ArmstrongChester Thank you to Jeremy Corbyn for still caring enough and having the humanity to rally the 99% to join together and put 40 years of neoliberal theft and exploitation behind us. I support all his domestic policies, but the realpolitik of foreign policy bothers me. How would he deal with Vladimir Putin and Benjamin Netanyahu?Pamela HopeKingston upon Thames, London Oh, Jeremy Corbyn, why splinter the left further by creating a new party when the Greens already actively stand and work for all you want to fight for?Sushila DhallOxford Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
BreakingNews.ie
16 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Man (32) caught with child sex abuse images sent to prison after suspended sentence is overturned
A man who received a fully suspended term for sending 2,500 sexually explicit messages to a 15-year-old boy and having thousands of child abuse images has been jailed for three years after the Court of Appeal found his original sentence was too lenient. James Varian (32), with an address at Lois na Greine, South Douglas Road, Cork, was found to have 7,781 child sex abuse images on his mobile phone, with the majority of the files related to prepubescent children under the age of 12. Advertisement Varian pleaded guilty to using information and communication technology to facilitate the sexual exploitation of a child contrary to section 8 (1) of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act 2017. He also pleaded guilty to the possession of child pornography contrary to section 6 (1) of the Child Trafficking and Pornography Act 1998, as amended by section 14 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act 2017. The judge also took into consideration an offence of attempting to pervert the course of justice contrary to common law. On November 19th 2024, Varian was sentenced by Judge Dermot Sheehan in Cork Circuit Criminal Court. Advertisement He received four years fully suspended for the charge of facilitating the sexual exploitation of a child, and two years fully suspended for the possession of child pornography. The Director of Public Prosecutions had appealed the sentence on the grounds that it was too lenient. At the original sentencing hearing, Detective Sergeant Brendan Corry said that on January 4, 2022, gardai were called to an address and spoke to a father who said that images and other media files of a sexual nature were found on a home computer a 15-year-old boy had been using. Det Sgt Corry said that gardai found messages of a sexually explicit nature were being sent to the boy, mostly through the messaging site Telegram. Advertisement He said that on January 5th the respondent phoned gardai to say that he was the subject of a garda enquiry and on January 6 a warrant was obtained to search his home. He said that the communication discovered by gardaí was 'alarmingly excessive, with in excess of two thousand five hundred messages exchanged over a period of nine days spanning between December 26, 2021 and January 4, 2022." At the time of offending, Varian was 28 years old, while the boy was 15. Det Sgt Corry said that on January 4th upon discovering that gardai were investigating, Varian also directed the boy to 'purge chats, delete everything'. Advertisement He said that Varian was arrested on May 30th 2022, was detained and interviewed on two occasions, where he made no admissions at interview. He said that the seized phone was found to contain 7,781 images classed as child pornography, with 6,431 of these images deemed as 'child animation'. Counsel for the DPP, Emmet Boyle BL, told the Court of Appeal that the sentencing judge erred in failing to attach appropriate weight to aggravating factors in the case. He said these factors included the amount of messages sent to the child, the disparity of age between the defendant and the victim, his urging the boy to delete the messages and his risk of reoffending which was outlined by the probation services. Advertisement Mr Boyle also said that the sentencing judge put undue weight on the mitigating factors in the case, like Varian's lack of previous convictions and his early guilty plea. Defence counsel for Varian, Jane Hyland SC, said that the decision to fully suspend his sentence was justified and the judge was exercising within his discretion in the sentencing. She said that her client lost his job as a result of the incident, that he suffers from mental health problems and that he also suffered reputationally from the incident. Returning judgement, Mr Justice John Edwards said that the sentencing judge's reasons for fully suspending the sentences were 'relatively sparse', giving only Varian's age and the fact that he was a first time offender. He said that the judge acted in error to fully suspend the sentences and that the decision was not proportionate to the gravity of the offending. He said that the sentencing was 'outside the norm and unduly lenient'. He also said that although the court noted Varian's assertions of his remorse, his letter of apology presented to the judge failed to mention his young victim at all. Mr Justice Edwards said that the court decided to quash the original sentences and proceeded to resentencing. Ireland Man (46) jailed for taking photographs of his teen... Read More He said that there was no issue with the original headline sentences imposed at six years for sending explicit messages and four years for the possession of child pornography. He said that the court also accepted the discount of two years for both counts given in mitigation by the sentencing judge. The Court of Appeal sentenced Varian to four years in custody with the final 12 months suspended for a period of 12 months for the count of sending explicit messages. They also sentenced him to two years in custody for the count of possession of child pornography, to run concurrently with the first.
