Could an asteroid strike Earth? NASA is tracking asteroid that is closing in on our planet
In what seems to be the backstory of a doomsday science fiction flick, NASA is tracking an asteroid that has a non-zero chance of striking Earth.
Here's what we know about Asteroid 2024 YR4, and when it could possibly hit our planet.
The asteroid, according to NASA, is roughly 130 to 300 feet wide, and has a very small chance of impacting Earth on Wednesday, December 22, 2032.
NASA notes that an impact from Asteroid 2024 YR4 could be damaging, and that it poses threats to domestic and international security.
"It is large enough to cause localized damage in the unlikely event that it should impact Earth," read NASA's Asteroid 2024 YR4 website. "And while 2024 YR4 has a very small chance of Earth impact in 2032, it has surpassed the 1% impact probability threshold to warrant formal notification of the object to other U.S. government agencies involved in planetary defense as well as to the Space Mission Planning Advisory Group."
While NASA didn't specify how damaging a theoretical Asteroid 2024 YR4 strike could be, global published reports are painting a harrowing picture of what an impact could look like.
Although it won't come close to causing the total destruction of all life on Earth, one report estimates Asteroid 2024 YR4 could have an impact radius of 4.54 miles, instantly killing humans, animals and vegetation caught in the radius and miles beyond.
Others labeled Asteroid 2024 YR4 as the most dangerous asteroid in the last 20 years.
You probably don't need to worry about setting up any underground shelters to avoid Asteroid 2024 YR4 fallout, however.
Space.com scientists believe the chances of Asteroid 2024 YR4 actually striking our planet will decrease greatly in the coming years.
Damon C. Williams is a Philadelphia-based journalist reporting on trending topics across the Mid-Atlantic Region.
This article originally appeared on Erie Times-News: NASA is tracking an asteroid; could it strike our planet?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
NASA's summer of discontent may be coming to an end
NASA has had a difficult early summer, between a proposed budget that would eviscerate the space agency's science programs and President Trump's sudden withdrawal of billionaire private space traveler Jared Isaacman from the nomination to be administrator of NASA. Even so, there are signs that NASA's fortunes may be looking up. The space agency has a new administrator — sort of. As Ars Technica reports, Trump has appointed Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy as interim NASA administrator, pending the nomination and confirmation of a permanent space agency head. Duffy is said to have a 'colorful background' since he was a cast member in a reality show called 'Real World Boston.' But his four terms as a member of Congress constitute more relevant experience. The careers of Jim Bridenstine (R-Okla.), another former House member, and Bill Nelson (D-Fla.), a former senator, demonstrate that political experience can be an advantage when dealing with Congress, which funds and sets the direction of NASA. Duffy may be spread a little thin, having to run the Department of Transportation as well as NASA. It is also unclear what kind of power he will have to affect policy. Duffy could confine himself to trying to enact the White House's agenda, which involves draconian cuts to NASA's science programs and focuses on human space exploration of the moon and Mars under the Artemis program. On the other hand, someone who has ties to Congress and who can get Trump on the phone could make a good start in forming a space policy that is acceptable to both the White House and Congress. Duffy as a bridge between two branches of government could be useful because Congress is in open revolt against the executive branch's space agenda. Senate appropriators are rejecting the cuts to NASA's science programs and are developing a bill that more or less funds them. The bill also reflects ideas advanced in the Big, Beautiful Bill in that it funds the Space Launch System and the Orion spacecraft past Artemis III and the Lunar Gateway. The House appropriators are marking up a similar spending bill. Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), the chair of the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science and Related Agencies that funds NASA, made the reason pretty clear as to why the appropriators are sticking to the original Artemis plan for now. 'For NASA, the bill reflects an ambitious approach to space exploration, prioritizing the agency's flagship program Artemis, and rejecting premature terminations of systems like SLS and Orion before commercial replacements are ready,' he said. When and how those commercial replacements would be ready is not clear. Much will depend on how private sector launch systems and spacecraft evolve. The SpaceX Starship is one of those launch systems that might become the center of a commercial Earth to moon transportation system. Unfortunately, recent tests of the Starship have resulted in spectacular failures. The Blue Origin Blue Moon is another vehicle that could become part of a commercial lunar transportation system. A smaller, cargo version of Blue Moon is slated to launch on a New Glenn rocket perhaps as early as 2025. The larger crewed version is likely years away from flying. Progress on the Starship, Blue Moon and possibly other spacecraft will doubtless inform Congress' attitude about going commercial to the moon in the future. One possible fly in the ointment is Duffy's somewhat fraught relationship with Elon Musk. While Musk's Department of Government Efficiency did initiate hardware and software enhancements to the air traffic control system, Duffy clashed with Musk over an alleged attempt to fire air traffic controllers in the midst of a series of aircraft disasters. The acrimony between the two men may be a feature rather than a bug so far as President Trump is concerned. Trump withdrew the nomination of Jared Isaacman as NASA administrator partly over alleged personal ties with his fellow billionaire. Questions remain. Can Duffy help to turn NASA, reeling from proposed budget cuts and a leadership vacuum, around? Can he make peace with Musk and continue the NASA-SpaceX partnership that has so profited both organizations? Can Trump find a permanent NASA head in a timely fashion? Can the Senate confirm that nominee quickly? Can the White House and the Congress agree on a budget and a policy that makes sense for America's space ambitions? The answers to these questions should be forthcoming with all due speed. Mark R. Whittington, who writes frequently about space policy, has published a political study of space exploration entitled ' Why is It So Hard to Go Back to the Moon? ' as well as ' The Moon, Mars and Beyond ' and, most recently, ' Why is America Going Back to the Moon? ' He blogs at Curmudgeons Corner.
Gizmodo
2 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Titan's Methane Lakes Could Form Bubble-Like Structures Essential to Life, Scientists Say
On December 25, 2004, the Huygens probe separated from the Cassini spacecraft and landed on Titan's sandy surface. The probe survived for 72 hours on Saturn's largest moon, revealing a world that is chemically complex and more Earth-like than expected. For years, scientists have been intrigued by Titan as an alien world that might have the right conditions to host life, albeit in a very different form than on Earth. New research by NASA reveals that molecular precursors to life could form in Titan's methane lakes, allowing us a chance to learn how life originates and evolves in the universe. In a recently published paper in the International Journal of Astrobiology, a team of NASA researchers illustrates how vesicles, small, membrane-bound bubble-like compartments or sacs, could form naturally in the lakes of Titan. Vesicles are thought to play a vital role in the formation of life, an important step in making the precursors of living cells. The paper examines how the conditions for life could evolve in a vastly different environment than Earth, shedding light on our search for extraterrestrial life in the universe. Titan is the only other world, apart from Earth, that's known to have liquid on its surface. But unlike Earth's bodies of water, Titan's lakes and seas are not recommended for swimming, as they contain liquid hydrocarbons like ethane and methane. Water is crucial to life as we know it—but what if Titan's lakes have what it takes to harbor molecules required for life to evolve? The paper outlines a process by which stable vesicles might form on Titan based on the data that's been gathered so far about the moon's atmosphere and chemistry. On Earth, molecules known as amphiphiles have a split personality, with a hydrophobic (water-fearing) end and a hydrophilic (water-loving) end. When in water, the molecules naturally organize into ball-like spheres, resembling soap bubbles, whereby the hydrophilic part faces outward to interact with the water while its hydrophobic counterpart shies away on the inside of the sphere. This allows the molecules to form complex structures and may have led to primitive cell membranes in early Earth. On Titan, these vesicles could form thanks to the moon's complex meteorological cycle, according to the paper. The methane in Titan's atmosphere forms clouds, which rain on the surface to create river channels that fill up the moon's lakes and seas. The liquid on the surface then evaporates to form clouds once again. The researchers behind the new study suggest that spray droplets from the rain and the surface of the sea could be coated in layers of amphiphiles. When the droplets land on the surface of a pond, the two layers of amphiphiles meet to form a double-layered vesicle. Over time, the vesicles would be dispersed throughout the pond and would compete in an evolutionary process that could lead to the formation of primitive protocells. 'The existence of any vesicles on Titan would demonstrate an increase in order and complexity, which are conditions necessary for the origin of life,' Conor Nixon, a researcher at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center and co-author of the new study, said in a statement. 'We're excited about these new ideas because they can open up new directions in Titan research and may change how we search for life on Titan in the future.' NASA is preparing to launch Dragonfly, the agency's first Titan mission, in July 2028. The rotorcraft lander will explore the surface of Saturn's moon and gather data about its atmosphere and geology. Dragonfly will help scientists better understand the bizarre world where life could form under vastly different conditions.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump Wants to Shut Down Several Perfectly Good Spacecraft Orbiting Mars for No Reason
The scientific community was appalled by the news that president Donald Trump's administration was looking to deal a devastating blow to NASA's science budget. In its 2026 budget request, released last month, the White House announced it was looking to more cut funding for NASA's science directorate by more than half, leading to overwhelming criticism from the scientific community, as well as from both Republican and Democrat lawmakers. The "skinny" budget calls to end operations of several spacecraft currently orbiting Mars, the Washington Post reports — including Mars Odyssey, a probe that has been orbiting the Red Planet for a record 24 years, and the MAVEN (Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN) mission, which has been studying the planet's atmosphere for over a decade. It would also strip all funding for the European Space Agency's Mars Express mission, which was launched in 2003, as laid out by Science earlier this year. Despite their old age, all three missions are still collecting valuable data about the planet and relaying important communications from NASA's rovers currently roaming its rugged surface. Experts have warned that simply giving up on them would be an enormous waste. Even planned trips to the Martian surface could be erased in their entirety, including NASA's flagship — but immensely costly — Mars Sample Return mission, which has already led to heated discussions surrounding its hefty budget during the Biden administration. Alongside almost all major NASA science missions, abruptly ending the agency's operations in Mars' orbit could deal a devastating blow to the United States' space program overall, an enormous self-inflicted wound that could give adversaries, including China and Russia, room to catch up and dominate in space. "This is a tragic mistake for the new administration," Southwest Research Institute scientist and former NASA science chief Alan Stern told Science earlier this year. But not all is lost. As widely expected, the proposed budget has faced an enormous amount of resistance in Congress, with members from both sides of the aisle calling for a far less brutal budget. Most recently, the Senate's appropriations committee revealed a counteroffer that would keep NASA's existing $24.9 billion budget largely intact for 2026. Even NASA's staffers have taken to protesting outside of NASA's headquarters late last month, waving signs that read "Save NASA." It's not hard to see the Trump administration's prioritizing of human spaceflight, setting aside a whopping $1 billion in new investments for Mars-focused programs. But by gutting most major science missions, the White House could throw a major wrench in those plans as well, potentially blacking out communications by needlessly killing off spacecraft already in the planet's orbit. Besides, now that Trump has called it quits with his frenemy Elon Musk, who controls SpaceX and its Mars-bound Starship rocket, the administration could face a major uphill battle in sending the first humans to the Red Planet. More on NASA: Democrats and Republicans Unite in Last-Ditch Effort to Save NASA Solve the daily Crossword
