
Food Banks Are Running Out of Food Exactly When More Americans Will Need Them
This year, the federal government has canceled food deliveries and cut hundreds of millions of dollars in annual aid to food banks. For Aragón, the head of programming for Roadrunner Food Bank, New Mexico's largest charitable food operation, that has meant losing more than seven million pounds of food she had been counting on.
President Trump's megabill, passed earlier this month, includes cuts to food stamps, now known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP.
Food banks across the country were already straining under rising demand. Now, they worry many more Americans will go hungry. Some food banks and pantries are pushing for more state, local and private funding. Others are considering cutting back services and the amount of food they can distribute.
'It's getting to the point where we can't fill every single need in terms of food,' Aragón said. 'I don't know how much more creative we can be to make things stretch.'
Food banks have seen requests for assistance from households—including those with children—jump sharply over the past few years, driven by the end of pandemic aid programs and the impact of inflation on grocery prices.
According to a recent survey from Feeding America, a national network of food banks, over half of 162 food banks reported demand rising this past April compared with April 2024.
Sarah Aragón is the head of programming for the Roadrunner Food Bank in New Mexico.
Earlier this year, the Agriculture Department canceled millions of pounds of shipments to food banks that were part of its emergency food-assistance program for low-income people.
A spokesperson for the department said it had only terminated an additional fund set up by the Biden administration that resulted in inflated spending on the program. Deliveries for the main emergency food effort continue uninterrupted, the department said.
A separate pandemic-era program, slated to disburse roughly $500 million this year to food banks to buy produce, dairy items and meats from local farmers, was also cut by the Agriculture Department. The department said it had released hundreds of millions of dollars to food banks that had been previously promised as part of the program.
Yet food banks say they are already feeling the impacts of federal cuts.
'This is the most challenging situation I've seen in 17 years here,' said Paule Pachter, president and chief executive of Long Island Cares, a food bank that serves New York's Long Island. 'We've been through Superstorm Sandy, Covid, but this is a self-imposed crisis.'
Pachter's organization faces mounting demand, opening two additional pantries over the past few years to add to its four others. In 2019, it recorded just over 59,000 visits from people needing food. In 2024, that number was more than 193,000.
A waiting line last month at a Roadrunner Food Bank distribution in Albuquerque, N.M.
The Roadrunner Food Bank is pushing state lawmakers to allocate more funding to offset cuts.
Earlier this year, a delivery of a quarter million pounds of food from the emergency food program was canceled, Pachter said.
Pachter and other food bank leaders say the SNAP reductions included in the new budget bill will strain resources by pushing more people whose benefits have either been cut or reduced toward pantries to get food.
Republicans say changes to the SNAP program will ensure people receiving the benefits are working, as required.
The budget bill expands work requirements for SNAP, raising the upper age limit for able-bodied adults from 54 to 64, meaning those people will typically have to work for 80 hours a month to qualify for food benefits. Caregivers of children ages 14 and older previously didn't have to work to get SNAP assistance. The new legislation removes that exemption in most cases.
These changes are set to go into effect immediately, while other changes that shift some of the cost of paying for SNAP from the federal government to the states will be implemented in the coming years.
A congressional analysis of an earlier House version of the bill found that roughly 3.2 million people would lose SNAP benefits in an average month over the next decade.
Some food banks have seen a rise in people accessing their services who also get SNAP assistance. A pandemic-era program that provided households with the maximum amount of food benefits ended in 2023.
According to data from the Central Pennsylvania Food Bank, the number of people who use its pantries and were also enrolled in SNAP jumped by 64% between the end of 2022 and the end of 2024.
Zach Zook, chief strategy officer for the Pennsylvania organization, said the rise showed that even before the cuts, SNAP benefits often weren't enough. Families enrolled in the program use food banks to fill the gap.
Madaline Yazell, 75, at left, says Roadrunner in Albuquerque enables her to supplement the groceries she buys with her Social Security money.
Since April, the Central Pennsylvania Food Bank has also had 23 loads of emergency food-assistance program goods canceled. The food bank receives $173,000 a month from the Agriculture Department's local food program to buy local pork, chicken and dairy items, among other products from farmers. The last payment will be in July, before its funds from the program run out, Zook said.
The food bank has seen demand soar over the past several years. The number of times it served children nearly doubled between fiscal years 2019 and 2024.
Some front-line pantries, the groups that actually distribute the food provided by food banks, are considering reductions in services to conserve resources.
The Love Thy Neighbor community pantry in King George County, Va., recently drafted a contingency plan to prepare for the cuts. Among the options being considered: limiting the number of times people can visit pantries from weekly to biweekly, and reducing the 50 to 55 pounds of food each household receives per visit.
'There are different dials that we can spin to try and keep serving people in a reduced way,' said Ryan Ragsdale, treasurer and secretary of the pantry.
In New Mexico, roughly one in five residents are enrolled in SNAP—among the highest participation rates in the country. Roadrunner is ramping up food drives and pushing state lawmakers to allocate more funding to offset cuts.
Brian Hall, a burly former Army infantryman, is a regular at one of Roadrunner's weekly distribution sites. Hall, 60 years old, said a back injury has left him unable to work at all since 2018. He had been interested in working as a counselor for other veterans, but a recent series of strokes derailed that plan.
Brian Hall, a veteran in Albuquerque, says he never thought he would seek help from a food-bank program.
Hall said he gets $1,400 in disability payments from his back injury and $140 a month in SNAP benefits. He still relies on Roadrunner each week to help get enough to eat, calling it a lifeline.
'I moved to Albuquerque to help my parents because they're older and I wanted to give them a hand. But now I'm the one getting the help,' he said. 'Never in a million years, did I think I'd be in this situation.'
Aragón said that this year, Roadrunner's distributions run out of food more often than they have in the past.
'When we have to tell people that we have no more left, the look on their faces when they walk away is like 'What am I going to do now?'' she said. 'I don't have an answer.'
Write to Dan Frosch at dan.frosch@wsj.com
Food Banks Are Running Out of Food Exactly When More Americans Will Need Them
Food Banks Are Running Out of Food Exactly When More Americans Will Need Them
Food Banks Are Running Out of Food Exactly When More Americans Will Need Them
Food Banks Are Running Out of Food Exactly When More Americans Will Need Them
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
35 minutes ago
- Hans India
Direct flights linking Pyongyang, Moscow to begin service this month: Report
Seoul: North Korea and Russia are set to launch a direct flight route between their capitals, Pyongyang and Moscow, later this month, a Russian news agency has reported. Nordwind Airlines, a Russian budget passenger carrier, will begin direct flights linking the two cities on July 27, Yonhap news agency reported quoting Tass, citing Russia's transport ministry. It will mark the first time that the North Korean and Russian capitals are linked by direct air service, the news agency said. The new air route follows Russian aviation authorities' recent approval of Nordwind's request last month to operate direct flights between Pyongyang and Moscow twice a week. Tass said the flight time is about eight hours. Currently, North Korea and Russia have direct flights only between Pyongyang and Vladivostok. As the two countries emerged as key partners for bilateral exchanges and cooperation following the signing of a mutual defence treaty in June last year, they have stepped up collaboration in various fields, including transportation. Last month, the countries resumed direct rail service between Pyongyang and Moscow, as well as between Pyongyang and Khabarovsk, following COVID-19 suspensions. In April, they also began constructing a road bridge linking them across the Tumen River. While visiting North Korea's eastern coastal city of Wonsan last week, Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said that Russia plans to restore maritime transport routes between the countries.


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
JD Vance to run for president in 2028? New Bluesky post about ‘future' sparks frenzy
Vice President JD Vance is setting off political shockwaves after a cryptic social media post hinted at his ambitions beyond the White House's No. 2 job. Possibly into the top spot itself? J.D. Vance's cryptic social media post hints at presidential ambitions for 2028, garnering significant attention. Photographer: Aaron Schwartz/CNP/Bloomberg(Bloomberg) On Monday, Vance took to Bluesky with a message that instantly lit up the internet: 'I've got an exciting announcement about my political future! #Trump2028,' alongside a photo of him donning a bright red 'Trump 2028' cap. With this, a frenzy of speculation is churning that the Ohio Republican is positioning himself to run for president once Donald Trump completes his second and final term. ALSO READ| JD Vance-Disneyland controversy: VP's Tiana's Bayou Adventure ride sparks row - Here's why While President Donald Trump still has over three years left in office, attention is already turning to who might take up the MAGA mantle next. And early signs suggest GOP primary voters are lining up behind Vance. Notably, a new Emerson College Polling survey shows the vice president as the most popular potential 2028 Republican presidential candidate by a wide margin. Will Vance's path to the presidency be a smooth one? One political expert told Newsweek, '...his fate is tied to the success of Trump's second term, and if that fails to deliver, JD's star will wane.' Interestingly, Vance's central role in ushering a controversial GOP megabill through the Senate has also drawn fierce backlash from Democrats, who are working quickly to tie his name to its most contentious elements cuts to social programs and benefits. After 27 hours of intense debate, Vance cast the decisive vote that sent the legislation closer to President Trump's desk. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez called Vance's vote an 'absolute and utter betrayal of working families,' while California Governor Gavin Newsom said Americans should 'bookmark' this moment, calling Vance 'the ultimate reason why 17 million Americans will lose their healthcare.' ALSO READ| JD Vance claps back at Disneyland criticism with one-line reply: 'Had a great…' Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg joined the chorus, posting: 'VP Vance has cast the deciding vote in the Senate to cut Medicaid, take away food assistance, blow up the deficit, and add tax breaks for the wealthiest... This bill is unpopular because it is wrong. Congress votes this week, but it's our voices — and our votes — that will have the final say.'
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
US inflation likely worsened last month as Trump's tariffs start to bite
Inflation likely accelerated in June as sweeping tariffs on nearly all imports may have pushed up prices for electronics, appliances, and other goods, economists forecast. Consumer prices probably rose 2.6 per cent last month from a year ago, up from an annual increase of 2.4 per cent in May, according to data provider FactSet. The Labour Department will issue its inflation report at 8:30 a.m. eastern. On a monthly basis, prices likely rose 0.3 per cent from May to June, the largest increase since January, economists project. Worsening inflation could pose a political challenge for President Donald Trump, who promised during last year's presidential campaign to immediately lower costs. The sharp inflation spike of 2022-2023 was the worst in four decades and soured most Americans on former president Joe Biden's handling of the economy. Faster price increases would also likely underscore the Federal Reserve's reluctance to cut its short-term interest rate, as Trump is loudly demanding. Excluding the volatile food and energy categories, inflation is forecast to have risen 3 per cent in June from a year earlier, up from a 2.8 per cent rise in May. On a monthly basis, it is also expected to have picked up 0.3 per cent from May to June, according to FactSet. Economists closely watch core prices because they typically provide a better sense of where inflation is headed. Trump has imposed sweeping duties of 10 per cent on all imports, plus 50 per cent levies on steel and aluminum, 30 per cent on goods from China, and 25 per cent on imported cars. Just last week the president threatened to hit the European Union with a new 30 per cent tariff starting Aug 1. So far, the tariffs haven't noticeably pushed up inflation, which has been mild for the past four months. Core inflation has fallen from 3.3 per cent in January to 2.8 per cent in May, though that is still above the Fed's 2 per cent target. If inflation in June is much weaker than economists forecast, Trump will likely renew his demands that Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell immediately reduce borrowing costs. Powell and other Fed officials have emphasized that they want to see how the economy evolves as the tariffs take effect before cutting their key short-term rate. The Fed chair has said that the duties could both push up prices and slow the economy, a tricky combination for the central bank since higher costs would typically lead the Fed to hike rates while a weaker economy often spurs it to reduce them. Trump on Monday said that Powell has been terrible and doesn't know what the hell he's doing. The president added that the economy was doing well despite Powell's refusal to reduce rates, but it would be nice if there were rate cuts because people would be able to buy housing a lot easier. Last week, White House officials also attacked Powell for cost overruns on the years-long renovation of two Fed buildings, which are now slated to cost $2.5 billion, roughly one-third more than originally budgeted. While Trump legally can't fire Powell just because he disagrees with his interest rate decisions, the Supreme Court has signaled, he may be able to do so for cause, such as misconduct or mismanagement. While inflation was mild in May, there were already signs in last month's report that tariffs were starting to have some impact. The cost of furniture, appliances, toys, and tools rose, though those increases were offset by falling prices for airfares, hotels, and muted rises in rental costs. Some companies have said they have or plan to raise prices as a result of the tariffs, including Walmart, the world's largest retailer. Automaker Mitsubishi said last month that it was lifting prices by an average of 2.1 per cent in response to the duties, and Nike has said it would implement surgical price hikes to offset tariff costs. But many companies have been able to postpone or avoid price increases, after building up their stockpiles of goods this spring to get ahead of the duties. Other companies may have refrained from lifting prices while they wait to see whether the U.S. is able to reach trade deals with other countries that lower the duties.